Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CALCIUM GLUCONATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for calcium gluconate

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Formulation NCT04039828 ↗ Zinc Sulfate Acceptability Completed International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh N/A 2019-09-09 Introduction: Zinc (Zn) is an essential mineral widely distributed within the human body with metalloproteins, Zinc-binding proteins, etc. It is necessary for signal transduction and also cell growth and proliferation via respective metallo- and zinc-dependent enzymes. Zinc supplementation can significantly reduce diarrheal severity and duration as well as prevents future incidences and reduces use of other medications in diarrhoea. For this reason WHO, UNICEF, USAID and experts worldwide jointly recommended zinc supplementation (10 mg for infants less than 6 months old and 20 mg in 6 - 59 months old) combined with reduced osmolarity ORS for clinical management of acute diarrhoea. But due to strong metallic taste zinc products are less palatable to children even after using masking flavours as recommended by WHO. Several companies have formulated the product since WHO recommendations came but still transient side effects like vomiting and regurgitation remain evident. Despite careful counselling to the caregivers expected adherence rate to 10 days regimen of zinc supplement is yet to be reached. With the aim to increase zinc supplement coverage during acute diarrheal illness, it is necessary to conduct a study to introduce new formulation Zinc tablet which is more palatable, more dispersible and more acceptable. Intervention: Zinc sulfate [Zinc Dispersible Tablet, 20 mg; (Elemental Zinc 20 mg as Zinc Sulfate Monohydrate / Tablet)] Methods: Prospective, open label, interventional study Hypothesis: Improved formulation of Zinc Sulfate will have good acceptability. Study population: Stratum 1: 3 months -
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for calcium gluconate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00004361 ↗ Study of the Relationship Between Calcium Levels and Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) in Adults With Repaired or Palliated Conotruncal Cardiac Defects Completed Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago 1995-07-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Identify latent hypoparathyroidism in normocalcemic adult survivors with repaired conotruncal cardiac defects, by evaluating parathyroid gland secretory function after induced hypocalcemia. II. Determine the relationship of parathyroid hormone secretion to microdeletions in the same region of chromosome 22q11 as found in patients with DiGeorge anomaly.
NCT00004361 ↗ Study of the Relationship Between Calcium Levels and Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) in Adults With Repaired or Palliated Conotruncal Cardiac Defects Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) 1995-07-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Identify latent hypoparathyroidism in normocalcemic adult survivors with repaired conotruncal cardiac defects, by evaluating parathyroid gland secretory function after induced hypocalcemia. II. Determine the relationship of parathyroid hormone secretion to microdeletions in the same region of chromosome 22q11 as found in patients with DiGeorge anomaly.
NCT00058188 ↗ Zolendronate for the Prevention of Bone Loss in Men w/ Prostate CA on Long-Term Androgen Deprivation Terminated Novartis Phase 3 2003-03-01 RATIONALE: Zoledronate may prevent bone loss associated with long term androgen deprivation therapy. It is not yet known whether zoledronate combined with calcium is more effective than calcium alone in preventing bone loss. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of zoledronate combined with calcium with that of calcium alone in preventing bone loss in patients with stage III or stage IV prostate cancer who have received long-term androgen deprivation therapy.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for calcium gluconate

Condition Name

Condition Name for calcium gluconate
Intervention Trials
Hypocalcemia 5
Osteoporosis 4
Trauma 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for calcium gluconate
Intervention Trials
Hypocalcemia 5
Osteoporosis 4
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for calcium gluconate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for calcium gluconate
Location Trials
United States 86
Canada 12
Egypt 6
Mexico 2
Poland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for calcium gluconate
Location Trials
Minnesota 5
Illinois 4
Washington 3
Pennsylvania 3
New York 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for calcium gluconate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for calcium gluconate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 2
PHASE2 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for calcium gluconate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 22
Recruiting 7
Not yet recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for calcium gluconate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for calcium gluconate
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 6
North Central Cancer Treatment Group 2
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for calcium gluconate
Sponsor Trials
Other 50
NIH 7
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 27, 2026

Calcium Gluconate Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Exclusivity/Regulatory Projection

Executive summary

Calcium gluconate is an established generic drug used to treat or prevent hypocalcemia and to support management of calcium-related conditions (including adjunct use in selected poisonings). Market activity is dominated by generic supply rather than new chemical entity development. Current clinical-trial visibility is limited and fragmented across country registries, dosing regimens, and emergency-care protocols. Near-term “pipeline risk” is low in the sense that approval pathways and labeling changes are incremental, but “commercial upside” is constrained by mature manufacturing scale, multiple suppliers, and pressure from payers and formularies. Exclusivity is typically defined by formulation or dosing-device patents rather than active-ingredient patents, and regulatory trajectories generally follow generic/abbreviated or literature-based submissions unless a company secures a protected formulation, delivery system, or specific indication.

No clinically meaningful, company-specific, time-stamped trial dataset for calcium gluconate could be produced from the information available here.


Are there active clinical trials for calcium gluconate?

Featured snippet answer: Public clinical-trial activity for calcium gluconate exists intermittently, but it is typically small, protocol-driven, or supportive of acute-care practice rather than advancing a new product with a clear regulatory endpoint.

What trial types show up most often

  • Emergency medicine and toxicology protocols assessing calcium administration in specific contexts (practice variation focus).
  • Comparative studies of IV calcium salts (calcium gluconate vs. calcium chloride), dosing strategy, and monitoring frequency.
  • Pharmacokinetic and administration studies for different concentrations, infusion rates, and line-safety handling.

What determines trial impact for market projection

  • Whether the trial supports a specific labelable claim (indication, population, dosing, or monitoring).
  • Whether it targets a differentiating product (ready-to-use formulation, premixed IV, concentration standardization, auto-injector, or delivery device).
  • Whether endpoints align with FDA labeling standards for dosing and safety in acute care.

Which indications and dosing regimens drive calcium gluconate demand?

Featured snippet answer: Demand is primarily driven by IV correction of hypocalcemia, chronic/acute hypocalcemia prevention and management, and adjunct use in emergency settings where calcium repletion is clinically relevant.

Indication clusters that support volume

  • Hypocalcemia treatment (acute correction in hospitals).
  • Prevention and management of calcium deficiency in at-risk patients (setting dependent).
  • Adjunct emergency use in selected poisoning or electrolyte-derangement contexts, guided by local protocols.

Administration and setting segmentation

  • Hospital-based IV use is the dominant commercial channel.
  • Outpatient oral calcium gluconate use is smaller than products positioned for chronic osteoporosis or mineral supplementation, where other calcium salts may be preferred based on tablet burden, price, and absorption marketing.

What is the current market structure for calcium gluconate (suppliers, pricing pressure, tender dynamics)?

Featured snippet answer: The market is generic-heavy with broad supplier coverage, creating procurement-driven pricing and tender competition, especially for hospital IV products.

Supply and competition characteristics

  • Multiple generic manufacturers compete on concentration, pack size, and usability (ready-to-administer vs bulk).
  • Hospital pharmacy procurement favors:
    • predictable supply,
    • consistent concentrations,
    • low cost per dose,
    • compatible packaging for IV workflows.

Commercial levers that can create differentiation

  • Ready-to-use premixed products reducing administration errors.
  • Stable formulations with longer shelf life.
  • Supply reliability for emergency stocking.

How does calcium gluconate compare with calcium chloride and other calcium salts for clinical adoption?

Featured snippet answer: Calcium chloride often has higher elemental calcium per volume, while calcium gluconate is frequently selected for peripheral IV use and protocol preference in many settings, which affects hospital formulary patterns.

Practical drivers of product selection

  • Venous access: peripheral vs central line protocols.
  • Monitoring: calcium levels, ECG changes, and infusion tolerability.
  • Pharmacy handling: concentration, compatibility with other infusions, and error-reduction packaging.

Commercial implication

Even if clinical guidance favors one agent in a niche scenario, hospital substitution practices and tender pricing determine which product dominates unit volumes.


When does calcium gluconate lose exclusivity?

Featured snippet answer: Active-ingredient exclusivity for calcium gluconate is generally not a meaningful gating factor because the compound is long off original innovator protection in most jurisdictions. Practical exclusivity is usually tied to formulation, packaging, or specific labeled indications.

What to monitor instead of “API patent expiry”

  • Orange Book listings for specific NDCs (if any listed patents remain for a particular manufacturer’s formulation).
  • Device or container-closure system patents tied to a specific marketed NDC.
  • Labeling exclusivity tied to a new indication, if any filing achieved it.

No Orange Book/NDA/NDC-specific exclusivity schedule can be produced from the information available here.


What patents protect calcium gluconate formulations, delivery systems, or indications?

Featured snippet answer: Patent protection for calcium gluconate products, when present, is typically concentrated in formulation details (concentration, excipients, stability), manufacturing methods, or packaging and administration improvements rather than core chemistry.

Common patent categories that matter commercially

  • Injectable concentration and stability claims (shelf life, reconstitution behavior).
  • Buffering and pH control for IV compatibility.
  • Manufacturing process improvements that reduce impurities or improve consistency.
  • Container-closure and ready-to-use configuration.

Litigation risk profile

  • Generic entry barriers for an established small-molecule are usually limited unless a specific formulation is protected.
  • If multiple NDCs exist with different excipients or concentrations, patent-by-NDC matters.

A concrete patent estate map cannot be produced from the information available here.


What is the Orange Book status of calcium gluconate?

Featured snippet answer: Orange Book status depends on the specific listed product/NDC, and most calcium gluconate uses are served by generics that are not Orange Book-exclusivity driven for the active ingredient itself.

How Orange Book status would affect market projections

  • If an Orange Book-listed formulation patent remains, it can delay generic competition for that NDC.
  • If no Orange Book-listed patents remain for a particular NDC, generic supply is typically available without Paragraph IV leverage.

No NDC-level Orange Book listing data can be produced from the information available here.


How many Paragraph IV challenges exist for calcium gluconate generics?

Featured snippet answer: Paragraph IV filings are generally sporadic for old, widely used generic drugs unless a formulation-specific patent is listed and still in force for a particular NDC.

What would indicate near-term competitive entry

  • A cluster of ANDA filings tied to the same listed patent.
  • Court dockets around that patent and NDC.
  • Settlement agreements restricting launch timing.

No Paragraph IV challenge dataset can be produced from the information available here.


What patent litigation affects calcium gluconate generic entry?

Featured snippet answer: Litigation is usually formulation-specific and limited to particular patents listed for specific NDCs, not broad compound-level disputes.

Dockets and outcomes that matter for revenue exposure

  • Preliminary injunction decisions and design-around rulings.
  • Timing of settlement and stipulated dismissal terms.
  • Court construction affecting whether a generic’s formulation infringes.

No litigation status can be produced from the information available here.


What generic entry risks exist for a calcium gluconate brand or special formulation?

Featured snippet answer: Entry risk is usually high unless the product’s differentiation is protected by a remaining formulation/packaging patent or a labelable use that supports exclusivity.

Scenario framework for launch economics

  • High entry risk:
    • no Orange Book blocking patents,
    • multiple existing approved generics,
    • tender-driven commodity procurement.
  • Lower entry risk:
    • remaining formulation or packaging patents for a single NDC,
    • limited substitute SKUs due to compatibility or concentration constraints,
    • hospital formulary locked to that supplier due to supply or handling.

A company- or NDC-specific risk assessment cannot be produced from the information available here.


What do regulatory milestones look like for calcium gluconate (FDA pathways)?

Featured snippet answer: New approvals are typically ANDAs to genericize existing products or supplements to update labeling, concentration, or packaging, rather than NDA-driven new clinical programs.

Typical pathways and implications

  • ANDA: creates competitive supply and pricing pressure.
  • 505(b)(2): could be used if a modified formulation has a meaningful difference, but this is less common for legacy drugs.
  • Labeling supplements: incremental, less likely to reset exclusivity.

No FDA pathway-specific timeline can be produced from the information available here.


Clinical trial endpoints and FDA labeling: what would change the labeling for calcium gluconate?

Featured snippet answer: A labeling change is most likely if trials demonstrate reproducible dosing, safety, and monitoring parameters that fit acute-care labeling conventions.

Label-relevant endpoints

  • Serum calcium correction time and rebound rates.
  • Safety: infusion reaction rates, extravasation events, hypercalcemia incidence.
  • Operational: compatibility, error reduction, and administration time metrics for premixed products.

Commercial effect

  • Even small label expansions can shift procurement and formulary inclusion for specific hospital lines.

No trial-by-trial endpoint dataset can be produced from the information available here.


Market projection for calcium gluconate through the next 3 to 5 years

Featured snippet answer: Near-term growth is expected to track hospital utilization and seasonal demand in acute care rather than new-indication-driven expansion, with pricing held down by generic competition.

Projection drivers

  • Demand stability:
    • hypocalcemia incidence tied to baseline population health and inpatient care volumes.
  • Supply and procurement:
    • tender cycles and multisource purchasing keep margins compressed.
  • Differentiation:
    • any shift toward ready-to-administer or safer packaging can lift unit share for specific SKUs but does not change the overall generic commodity structure.

Upside and downside bounds (directional)

  • Upside:
    • expanded hospital preference for premixed or ready-to-use products,
    • supply disruptions favoring resilient suppliers.
  • Downside:
    • continued price compression from additional generic entries,
    • procurement consolidation into lowest-cost suppliers.

A quantified revenue projection (CAGR, market size, share) cannot be produced from the information available here.


Key Takeaways

  • Calcium gluconate is a mature, generic-dominated drug where clinical development is usually incremental and practice-driven.
  • Clinical-trial impact depends on whether studies support labelable dosing/monitoring claims or a differentiating formulation delivery system.
  • Market outlook is driven by hospital procurement and tender pricing, with growth tied to utilization rather than new exclusivity.
  • Exclusivity and entry risk are typically NDC-specific and formulation-specific, not compound-level.
  • Quantitative clinical-trial and market projections require product- and jurisdiction-specific datasets; those datasets are not available in the information provided here.

FAQs

  1. Are there any calcium gluconate patents still in force in the US for injectable formulations?
  2. Does calcium gluconate have FDA orphan drug or exclusivity designations for any indication?
  3. How do hospital guidelines choose calcium gluconate vs calcium chloride for IV replacement?
  4. What are the main risks in calcium gluconate manufacturing that affect supply continuity (quality, impurities, stability)?
  5. Which regulatory supplements most commonly change calcium gluconate labeling or packaging?

References

  1. (No sources were provided or cited.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.