Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CABERGOLINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for cabergoline

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00033111 ↗ A Study of Cabergoline for the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence - 1 Completed University of California, Los Angeles Phase 2 2001-06-01 The purpose of this study is to assess cabergoline for the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence
NCT00033111 ↗ A Study of Cabergoline for the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence - 1 Completed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 2 2001-06-01 The purpose of this study is to assess cabergoline for the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence
NCT00129181 ↗ Study of the Effects of Dopaminergic Medications on Dopamine Transporter Density in Subjects With Parkinson's Disease Completed GE Healthcare N/A 2005-01-01 This study investigates whether there is a change in 123iodine-2ß- carbomethoxy-3ß-(4-iodophenyl) tropane ([123I]ß-CIT) uptake after short-term treatment with levodopa compared to either dopamine agonist or placebo.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for cabergoline

Condition Name

Condition Name for cabergoline
Intervention Trials
Acromegaly 7
Lactation Suppressed 6
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for cabergoline
Intervention Trials
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome 12
Pituitary Neoplasms 7
Prolactinoma 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for cabergoline

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for cabergoline
Location Trials
United States 35
Italy 15
Egypt 14
Brazil 14
Spain 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for cabergoline
Location Trials
California 5
Massachusetts 3
Illinois 3
Texas 3
New York 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for cabergoline

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for cabergoline
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 2
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for cabergoline
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 37
Recruiting 13
Unknown status 11
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for cabergoline

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for cabergoline
Sponsor Trials
Pfizer 6
Novartis Pharmaceuticals 4
Benha University 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for cabergoline
Sponsor Trials
Other 83
Industry 22
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Cabergoline clinical trials update, market analysis and long-term market projection

Last updated: July 28, 2026

Cabergoline is an ergot-derived dopamine D2 receptor agonist used for hyperprolactinemia and Parkinson’s disease, and it has an established product lineage with extensive generic availability. No single “current” development program can be identified from the information provided, so a complete clinical-trials update for an R&D pipeline and a defensible forward market forecast by product life cycle cannot be produced.

What are the latest cabergoline clinical trial results and trial status updates?

Cabergoline’s current clinical footprint is dominated by mature, marketed therapy lines and by investigator-initiated studies rather than sponsor-led, late-stage novelty that would support a consolidated “latest update” and timeline.

Where do cabergoline studies cluster (indications and endpoints)?

  • Hyperprolactinemia due to pituitary adenomas (prolactin reduction endpoints, tumor shrinkage imaging endpoints).
  • Parkinson’s disease (dopaminergic symptom scales; dosing-titration comparisons).
  • Hormone suppression and endocrinology contexts where dopamine agonists are used.

What is the typical development profile for cabergoline in 2020s-era trials?

Across the class, post-approval work typically falls into:

  • Bioequivalence and formulation comparability studies for generic lifecycle management.
  • Smaller cohort efficacy/safety studies that refine dosing schedules.
  • Real-world observational cohorts rather than new pivotal programs.

How big is the cabergoline market and who drives demand globally?

A quantified market size, by geography and segment, cannot be generated without market and sales inputs. Cabergoline demand is driven by:

  • Chronic use in prolactin disorders.
  • Continued use in patients stabilized on established dosing regimens.
  • Generic penetration that shifts value from brand to volume and reimbursed generics.

What is the commercial model given extensive generic competition?

Cabergoline is priced as a mature, largely generic commodity in many markets. Commercial value depends on:

  • Reimbursement dynamics for dopamine agonists in endocrine care.
  • Availability and procurement of generics.
  • Tender-driven switching in hospital formularies (where applicable).

When will cabergoline lose exclusivity and what is the competitive impact?

Cabergoline is off-patent in most jurisdictions. Competitive impact is typically driven by:

  • Generic market entry waves.
  • Formulation-specific differentiation (if any) rather than molecule-level exclusivity.

What patent or exclusivity events matter for forecasting?

Only molecule-protecting or formulation-protecting rights would move the forecasting needle. A complete, jurisdictioned event map cannot be produced from the information provided.

What generic entry risks exist for cabergoline?

Generic entry risk for cabergoline is already realized in most markets. The primary remaining risks are practical, not regulatory exclusivity:

  • Manufacturing quality and supply continuity.
  • Regulatory approvals for specific dosage forms and strengths.
  • Market-share capture by low-cost entrants versus regional supply constraints.

What is the FDA regulatory status of cabergoline and how many products are listed?

A defensible Orange Book count and status requires Orange Book lookup data tied to the specific listed NDA/ANDA products, which is not available in the provided prompt. Without that, the number of listed approvals and listing status cannot be stated.

How does cabergoline compare with other dopamine agonists for market and clinical differentiation?

Cabergoline competes for prescribing with other dopamine agonists used in hyperprolactinemia and Parkinson’s disease, including bromocriptine and quinagolide (where available), and Parkinson’s agents in separate classes.

What differentiates cabergoline clinically in prescribing behavior?

  • Dosing convenience is often a key driver versus more frequent dopamine agonists.
  • Tolerability profiles influence patient persistence.
  • Long-term prolactin control affects long-duration adherence.

What formulations and dosage forms shape cabergoline use and demand?

Cabergoline’s market behavior is tied to tablet strengths and patient-titration workflows. Formulation-level differentiation is usually limited once generics dominate, but it can affect:

  • Switching decisions due to perceived tolerability.
  • Dispensing and adherence due to dosing frequency and pill burden.

How strong is the patent estate for cabergoline by jurisdiction?

A jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction patent strength assessment cannot be produced without a patent inventory and legal event data. A molecule that is widely generic requires a structured estate map to determine:

  • Remaining claims by method-of-use, formulation, or polymorph.
  • Geographic coverage and enforcement posture.

What cabergoline patent litigation affects generic launch timing?

Litigation timing requires case dockets and settlement/entry triggers. Without litigation case data, no launch-impact statements can be made.

What is the market projection for cabergoline through 2030 or 2035?

A quantitative projection requires baseline sales, growth drivers, and assumed generic pricing erosion curves. None of these are provided in the prompt, so a defensible forecast cannot be produced.

What projection framework would be used (if data were available)?

A proper forecast would combine:

  • Indication incidence and treatment rates (hyperprolactinemia, Parkinson’s).
  • Generic penetration and average selling price (ASP) erosion.
  • Patient persistence and dose intensity (units per treated patient).
  • Regulatory events (new entries, discontinuations, supply constraints).
  • Country-level reimbursement trends.

Key Takeaways

  • Cabergoline is a mature, widely generic dopamine agonist with clinical usage dominated by established indications.
  • The prompt does not contain sufficient, citable input to produce: (1) a true “latest clinical trials update,” (2) an Orange Book/patent event map, or (3) a quantified market projection through 2030/2035.
  • Any defensible forward-looking analysis requires sponsor-level trial identification, regulatory listing counts, and market baseline data.

FAQs

  1. Is cabergoline still prescribed for hyperprolactinemia, and how does efficacy compare to other dopamine agonists?
  2. What dosing schedules are typical for cabergoline in hyperprolactinemia versus Parkinson’s disease?
  3. Do cabergoline generics differ in tolerability or persistence compared with branded products?
  4. What regulatory pathways do cabergoline ANDAs typically use (and what does that mean for launch timing)?
  5. Are there any ongoing late-stage cabergoline trials testing new formulations, delivery systems, or new indications?

References (APA)

  1. (No sources were provided in the prompt.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.