Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BUPROPION HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for bupropion hydrochloride

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT00405912 ↗ St. John's Wort for Tobacco Cessation Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2005-09-01 After a steady decline for the last 50 years, the prevalence of tobacco use in the United States has reached a plateau of approximately 23%. Currently available treatments among adults are expensive and not efficacious for all tobacco users. New pharmacologic agents need to be developed and tested to achieve the Healthy People 2010 goal of less than a 12% adult tobacco use prevalence. Bupropion, an FDA approved agent for tobacco cessation, acts by inhibiting central synaptosomal reuptake of dopamine and norepinephrine. A widely used herbal antidepressant, St. John's Wort (SJW), shares a similar mechanism of action and is effective for treating mild to moderate depression. SJW is well tolerated, available over the counter, and is significantly less expensive than the established treatments for tobacco dependence. To date, no prospective clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of SJW for the treatment of tobacco use has been published. We propose to evaluate the efficacy of SJW for increasing tobacco abstinence and decreasing nicotine withdrawal symptoms in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm, parallel group, dose-ranging clinical trial. Participants (N=120) will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups and will receive a twelve-week course of SJW 900 mg per day, 1800 mg per day, or a matching placebo. This study is anticipated to provide the data needed to develop a larger randomized controlled clinical trial submitted through the R01 funding mechanism.
OTC NCT00405912 ↗ St. John's Wort for Tobacco Cessation Completed Mayo Clinic Phase 2 2005-09-01 After a steady decline for the last 50 years, the prevalence of tobacco use in the United States has reached a plateau of approximately 23%. Currently available treatments among adults are expensive and not efficacious for all tobacco users. New pharmacologic agents need to be developed and tested to achieve the Healthy People 2010 goal of less than a 12% adult tobacco use prevalence. Bupropion, an FDA approved agent for tobacco cessation, acts by inhibiting central synaptosomal reuptake of dopamine and norepinephrine. A widely used herbal antidepressant, St. John's Wort (SJW), shares a similar mechanism of action and is effective for treating mild to moderate depression. SJW is well tolerated, available over the counter, and is significantly less expensive than the established treatments for tobacco dependence. To date, no prospective clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of SJW for the treatment of tobacco use has been published. We propose to evaluate the efficacy of SJW for increasing tobacco abstinence and decreasing nicotine withdrawal symptoms in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm, parallel group, dose-ranging clinical trial. Participants (N=120) will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups and will receive a twelve-week course of SJW 900 mg per day, 1800 mg per day, or a matching placebo. This study is anticipated to provide the data needed to develop a larger randomized controlled clinical trial submitted through the R01 funding mechanism.
OTC NCT03557294 ↗ Varenicline OTC Trial on Efficacy and Safety Recruiting Los Angeles Clinical Trials Phase 4 2018-05-07 The primary goal of the proposed research is to test whether varenicline (Chantix) is safe and effective as an over-the-counter (OTC) medication.
OTC NCT03557294 ↗ Varenicline OTC Trial on Efficacy and Safety Recruiting National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 4 2018-05-07 The primary goal of the proposed research is to test whether varenicline (Chantix) is safe and effective as an over-the-counter (OTC) medication.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for bupropion hydrochloride

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000268 ↗ Cocaine Abuse and Attention Deficit Disorder - 3 Completed New York State Psychiatric Institute N/A 1995-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate cocaine abuse and Attention Deficit Disorder
NCT00000268 ↗ Cocaine Abuse and Attention Deficit Disorder - 3 Completed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) N/A 1995-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate cocaine abuse and Attention Deficit Disorder
NCT00000276 ↗ Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitors of Cocaine Abuse - 1 Terminated National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 1 1994-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate dopamine reuptake inhibitors for cocaine abuse.
NCT00000276 ↗ Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitors of Cocaine Abuse - 1 Terminated VA Connecticut Healthcare System Phase 1 1994-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate dopamine reuptake inhibitors for cocaine abuse.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for bupropion hydrochloride

Condition Name

Condition Name for bupropion hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Smoking Cessation 45
Obesity 35
Nicotine Dependence 35
Major Depressive Disorder 32
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for bupropion hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Depression 89
Tobacco Use Disorder 78
Depressive Disorder 78
Depressive Disorder, Major 64
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for bupropion hydrochloride

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for bupropion hydrochloride
Location Trials
Canada 57
China 22
Germany 12
Australia 10
United Kingdom 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for bupropion hydrochloride
Location Trials
California 60
New York 60
Texas 55
North Carolina 53
Massachusetts 40
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for bupropion hydrochloride

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for bupropion hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 13
PHASE3 4
PHASE2 1
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for bupropion hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 267
RECRUITING 50
Terminated 24
[disabled in preview] 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for bupropion hydrochloride

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for bupropion hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 70
GlaxoSmithKline 29
Yale University 25
[disabled in preview] 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for bupropion hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Other 422
NIH 141
Industry 139
[disabled in preview] 26
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 27, 2026

Bupropion Hydrochloride Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Forecast (2026-2035)

Executive summary: Bupropion hydrochloride remains a long-established, off-patent antidepressant with ongoing clinical development focused on next-generation formulations, combination regimens, and mechanistic expansions (including smoking-cessation and psychiatric comorbidity). Market growth in mature geographies is driven mainly by formulary access, switching within antidepressant classes, and branded share defense in specific delivery formats rather than by new molecular exclusivity. Competitive intensity is high due to broad generic availability. Near-term value depends more on product positioning (dose forms, titration/side-effect management, adherence) than on new chemical entities.


What clinical trials are currently ongoing for bupropion hydrochloride?

Featured answer: Current development is centered on reformulations (extended/controlled-release variants, alternative-release profiles) and clinical studies in targeted populations or comparative effectiveness. Trial activity is generally incremental versus a pipeline driven by new patents on the base molecule.

What are the main trial categories for bupropion hydrochloride?

  1. Formulation and pharmacokinetic (PK) studies

    • Dose-proportionality, food-effect, and release-profile confirmation for modified-release versions.
    • Bioequivalence studies are common, but those do not usually create meaningful market differentiation unless tied to a differentiated patient-experience claim.
  2. Comparative effectiveness in depression and depressive subtypes

    • Head-to-head trials vs other antidepressant classes.
    • Trials evaluating symptom domains (anhedonia, anxiety co-morbidity) and functional outcomes.
  3. Smoking cessation and nicotine dependence adjunct use

    • Studies on quit rates, relapse prevention, and tolerability in diverse cohorts.
    • Trials may evaluate bupropion in combination with behavioral interventions or other pharmacotherapies.
  4. Psychiatric comorbidity and real-world outcomes

    • Anxiety, ADHD misdiagnosis overlap, bipolar screening strategies, substance use comorbidity.
    • Studies aimed at safety monitoring (seizure risk management, insomnia, agitation) and treatment persistence.

Where to verify the latest trial status quickly

  • ClinicalTrials.gov is the primary registry stream used for U.S. visibility; international registries cover additional enrollment.
  • In practice, ongoing activity for bupropion hydrochloride often skews toward reformulation/observational studies rather than phase-3 pivotal NDA-enabling programs for the base molecule.

When does bupropion hydrochloride lose exclusivity and how does that affect trial strategy?

Featured answer: Base-molecule exclusivity is long expired in most major markets; development strategy emphasizes formulation differentiation and line-extension claims.

Exclusivity reality for a mature antidepressant

  • Bupropion hydrochloride’s commercial landscape is shaped by:
    • Generic substitution after patent expiry.
    • Residual brand leverage tied to specific dosage forms, dosing convenience, and payer preference.
  • Trial investment tends to focus on:
    • Improving tolerability and adherence.
    • Creating differentiated label language via reformulated products or specific use cases.
    • Generating data for lifecycle management rather than securing a new market monopoly.

What is the current market size for bupropion hydrochloride and how is it trending?

Featured answer: The market is large but mature, with growth typically low-to-moderate because most demand is captured by established generics. Brand value tracks payer behavior and differentiated product formats.

Demand drivers

  • Broad indication acceptance: Major depressive disorder treatment and smoking cessation support in approved labeling.
  • Class-switching dynamics: Bupropion competes within the antidepressant universe where prescribers rotate based on side-effect profiles, especially sexual dysfunction avoidance and weight-neutral tendencies versus some alternatives.
  • Formulary access and pricing: Generic competition compresses unit economics; volume remains the main lever.

Constraints

  • Generic price pressure: Multiple ANDA entrants in most markets lower net selling price.
  • Safety perceptions: Seizure risk at high doses, contraindications (eating disorders, abrupt withdrawal from alcohol/benzodiazepines) constrain patient eligibility.
  • Off-label saturation: Extensive off-label familiarity can reduce perceived need for new clinical development unless tied to specific claims.

How does bupropion hydrochloride compare with other antidepressants in market share and growth?

Featured answer: Bupropion competes effectively on tolerability and weight profile, but does not usually win on growth because generics dominate the class.

Competitive positioning vs SSRIs and SNRIs

  • SSRIs: Often preferred first-line due to long prescribing history and broad tolerability, though sexual dysfunction can shift patients to alternatives.
  • SNRIs: Can be chosen where comorbid pain is prominent; side effects can drive switching.
  • Atypical antidepressants (bupropion, mirtazapine): Selected for insomnia profile matching (mirtazapine) and activating/weight considerations (bupropion).

Key practical differentiators

  • Patient experience: activation/insomnia risk management.
  • Dosing schedule: adherence impact depending on release form.
  • Titration strategies: clinician protocols for minimizing adverse events.

What formulations of bupropion hydrochloride generate the most commercial value?

Featured answer: Extended-release and other modified-release dosage forms tend to hold better payer and prescriber alignment than immediate-release in routine outpatient practice.

Commercial relevance by dosage form

  • Extended-release (and related controlled-release formats):
    • Often favored for adherence and side-effect control.
    • Brand leverage can persist if payers steer toward specific manufacturer’s product due to contracting or perceived tolerability.
  • Immediate-release:
    • Lower differentiation, usually more exposed to generic price compression.
  • Fixed-dose combinations:
    • If pursued, can capture value through simplified regimens, but the market for combinations is harder to defend in an off-patent base molecule unless backed by specific label differentiation.

What “line extension” claims typically underpin market defense?

  • Reduced peak-trough fluctuations and improved tolerability language.
  • Simplified titration and patient adherence evidence.
  • Comparative safety monitoring data.

Which companies are active in bupropion hydrochloride clinical development and what does that imply for pipeline risk?

Featured answer: Pipeline activity is often dominated by:

  • Formulation developers and generics supporting release-profile claims.
  • Academic or sponsored studies evaluating comparative outcomes.
  • Companies seeking differentiated generics or 505(b)(2) pathways for label improvements in specific contexts.

How to interpret competitor trial activity

  • High volume of small PK trials often signals lifecycle defense through product differentiation rather than a new clinical indication.
  • Larger pragmatic studies can support payer negotiations and market share retention.

What are the regulatory milestones and FDA status considerations for bupropion hydrochloride?

Featured answer: Regulatory status is stable; major changes come from reformulation approvals, labeling updates for safety/usage, and generic submissions.

FDA pathway dynamics

  • Most generic entry is via ANDA referencing listed RLDs.
  • Reformulated products may use 505(b)(2) when leveraging FDA findings and literature support to obtain narrower label improvements.

Label and safety updates that can affect market access

  • Seizure risk language and contraindication emphasis.
  • Cardiovascular and psychiatric adverse-event monitoring updates.
  • Patient selection criteria (comorbidities that raise risk).

What is the Orange Book status of bupropion hydrochloride and what does it mean for generic entry?

Featured answer: Orange Book protection for bupropion hydrochloride is limited in most markets because the base molecule is off-patent; remaining protections tend to be formulation- or method-specific and have largely expired.

How generic entry risk typically looks in off-patent antidepressants

  • When listed patents expire, ANDA filings can launch quickly.
  • Remaining listable patents (if any) can extend entry for specific dosage forms, but for bupropion the long history of generics reduces the likelihood of near-term exclusivity-driven delays.

(Note: A complete Orange Book table with specific patent numbers, expiration dates, and listed products requires direct Orange Book parsing for the specific dosage forms and strengths.)


What patent estate strength exists for bupropion hydrochloride, and how does that shape litigation exposure?

Featured answer: Litigation risk is lower than for on-patent drugs because the molecule is mature and most patents have expired, with sporadic disputes tied to formulation-specific claims.

Common IP dispute patterns in mature antidepressants

  • Bioequivalence disputes for modified-release products.
  • Method-of-use label extension challenges are less common when the underlying molecule is generic-available.
  • Settlement patterns historically accelerate generic readiness once core protections expire.

What biosimilar risk exists for bupropion hydrochloride?

Featured answer: None. Bupropion hydrochloride is a small molecule; biosimilar frameworks do not apply.


How strong is the clinical rationale for bupropion hydrochloride in next-generation studies?

Featured answer: The clinical rationale for ongoing trials is the ability to reproduce or improve patient outcomes via dosing, delivery profile, and population targeting, not via a new mechanism.

Where new data still matters commercially

  • Patients who experience SSRI/SNRI sexual dysfunction may prefer bupropion.
  • Weight-neutral/activating profile can be advantageous in depression subpopulations.
  • Safety protocols that reduce insomnia or agitation can support persistence.

Market projection for bupropion hydrochloride (2026-2035): base case, bull case, bear case

Featured answer: For off-patent antidepressants, projections generally track population-level depression treatment prevalence and antidepressant switching within formularies. Unit growth tends to be modest; value growth depends on net price and mix.

Base case (most likely)

  • Volume: Low-to-moderate growth driven by persistence, incremental adoption in switching cycles, and steady demand in smoking cessation and depression treatment.
  • Value: Nearly flat to low growth due to ongoing generic price competition.
  • Key variable: Net selling price compression versus contracting strategies for favored dosage forms.

Bull case

  • Higher growth if:
    • Specific modified-release formats gain formulary steering.
    • Label differentiation (safety/titration/target subpopulation claims) increases persistence and reduces discontinuation.
  • Value upside: Mix shift toward branded or preferred generics with better reimbursement.

Bear case

  • Lower growth if:
    • Additional generic entrants intensify price competition.
    • Payer restrictions push volume away from higher-cost formulations.
    • Competitors with stronger safety and tolerability profiles gain switching share.
  • Value downside: Net price falls faster than volume increases.

Projection framework (what drives the numbers)

Driver Expected direction for 2026-2035 Impact on revenue
Generic penetration Up or stable at high level Negative (net price)
Formulary contracting Dynamic Positive if bupropion formats become preferred
Mix by release form Shifts to controlled/extended-release Positive if reimbursement improves
Persistence on therapy Modest improvements with tolerability-focused use Positive
Safety-driven discontinuations Stable with protocols Neutral to negative
Competition from newer antidepressants Stable Negative to neutral depending on switching

What generic entry risks exist for bupropion hydrochloride in specific markets?

Featured answer: Entry risk is mostly realized already; the remaining risk is marginal based on formulation-specific approvals or contract-driven substitution timing.

How to evaluate near-term entry risk

  • Identify the current RLD for each strength and dosage form.
  • Check whether any formulation-specific listed patents or regulatory exclusivities remain.
  • Monitor ANDA approvals and launch announcements by major generic manufacturers for the targeted dosage form.

(A market-by-market risk score requires listing-level patent and approval data for each strength and product label.)


Key Takeaways

  • Bupropion hydrochloride is in a mature, off-patent market where clinical development focuses on formulation refinement, tolerability optimization, and comparative effectiveness rather than new mechanism-driven breakthroughs.
  • Market growth is constrained by generic price pressure; revenue outlook depends on mix and formulary positioning for specific modified-release dosage forms.
  • Trial activity is most valuable when it supports label language, adherence improvements, or patient-selection claims that shift persistence and switching behavior.
  • Competitive intensity remains high; the commercial winners are typically those with preferred contracting, reliable supply, and demonstrable patient-experience improvements.

FAQs

  1. What is the most common reason patients discontinue bupropion hydrochloride and how does that affect market demand?
  2. How do extended-release versus immediate-release bupropion formulations change tolerability and persistence in real-world use?
  3. What trial endpoints are most persuasive for bupropion studies seeking incremental label value (symptom scales, remission rates, adverse-event burden)?
  4. Which competitor antidepressant classes most often drive switching away from bupropion in formularies?
  5. How do generic contracting and rebate structures typically determine who captures share for bupropion hydrochloride strengths?

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drugs@FDA: bupropion hydrochloride (product and label information).
  2. U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov: bupropion hydrochloride search results (ongoing studies, recruiting and active).
  3. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (bupropion hydrochloride listings by dosage form and strength).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.