You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE; EPINEPHRINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for bupivacaine hydrochloride; epinephrine

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00298571 ↗ Cesarean Delivery and Post-operative Pain Management With Local Anesthesia Completed University of South Florida Phase 2/Phase 3 2006-02-01 The use of .5% Bupivacaine with epinephrine at the time of skin closure in cesarean deliveries will decrease post-op pain.
NCT00458003 ↗ Phenylephrine in Spinal Anesthesia in Preeclamptic Patients Completed Northwestern University N/A 2006-07-01 Hypotension remains a common clinical problem after induction of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Maternal hypotension has been associated with considerable morbidity (maternal nausea and vomiting and fetal/neonatal acidemia). Traditionally, ephedrine has been the vasopressor of choice because of concerns about phenylephrine's potential adverse effect on uterine blood flow. This practice was based on animal studies which showed that ephedrine maintained cardiac output and uterine blood flow, while direct acting vasoconstrictors, e.g., phenylephrine, decreased uteroplacental perfusion. However, several recent studies have demonstrated that phenylephrine has similar efficacy to ephedrine for preventing and treating hypotension and may be associated with a lower incidence of fetal acidosis. All of these studies have been performed in healthy patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Preeclampsia complicates 5-6% of all pregnancies and is a significant contributor to maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Many preeclamptic patients require cesarean delivery of the infant. These patients often have uteroplacental insufficiency. Given the potential for significant hypotension after spinal anesthesia and its effect on an already compromised fetus, prevention of (relative) hypotension in preeclamptic patients is important. Spinal anesthesia in preeclamptic patients has been shown to have no adverse neonatal outcomes as compared to epidural anesthesia when hypotension is treated adequately. Due to problems related to management of the difficult airway and coagulopathy, both of which are more common in preeclamptic women, spinal anesthesia may be the preferred regional anesthesia technique. Recent studies have demonstrated that preeclamptic patients may experience less hypotension after spinal anesthesia than their healthy counterparts. To our knowledge, phenylephrine for the treatment of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension has not been studied in women with preeclampsia. The aim of our study is to compare intravenous infusion regimens of phenylephrine versus ephedrine for the treatment of spinal anesthesia induced hypotension in preeclamptic patients undergoing cesarean delivery. The primary outcome variable is umbilical artery pH.
NCT00519584 ↗ Interscalene Nerve Blocks With Ropivacaine Alone, With Dexamethasone, Plus Systemic Dexamethasone Terminated The Cleveland Clinic N/A 2007-07-01 This study will test the hypothesis that ropivacaine in combination with either systemic or local steroid provides comparably longer-lasting analgesia tha ropivacaine alone.
NCT00531349 ↗ Regional Anesthesia and Endometrial Cancer Recurrence Withdrawn The Cleveland Clinic Phase 3 2007-11-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether recurrence of local and metastatic cancer after open hysterectomy for stage 1 or 2 endometrial cancer is reduced when patients receive epidural anesthesia/analgesia combined with propofol sedation rather than sevoflurane anesthesia and opioid analgesia.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for bupivacaine hydrochloride; epinephrine

Condition Name

Condition Name for bupivacaine hydrochloride; epinephrine
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 22
Postoperative Pain 22
Pain 16
Analgesia 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for bupivacaine hydrochloride; epinephrine
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 56
Acute Pain 12
Osteoarthritis 10
Osteoarthritis, Knee 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for bupivacaine hydrochloride; epinephrine

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for bupivacaine hydrochloride; epinephrine
Location Trials
United States 98
Canada 22
Egypt 15
Brazil 6
Chile 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for bupivacaine hydrochloride; epinephrine
Location Trials
New York 11
Massachusetts 9
California 9
Texas 8
North Carolina 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for bupivacaine hydrochloride; epinephrine

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for bupivacaine hydrochloride; epinephrine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 7
PHASE3 3
PHASE2 3
[disabled in preview] 68
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for bupivacaine hydrochloride; epinephrine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 76
Recruiting 38
Not yet recruiting 24
[disabled in preview] 15
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for bupivacaine hydrochloride; epinephrine

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for bupivacaine hydrochloride; epinephrine
Sponsor Trials
Federal University of São Paulo 6
University of California, San Diego 6
Wake Forest University Health Sciences 5
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for bupivacaine hydrochloride; epinephrine
Sponsor Trials
Other 213
Industry 10
U.S. Fed 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Future Outlook for Bupivacaine Hydrochloride with Epinephrine

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Bupivacaine Hydrochloride combined with Epinephrine represents a pivotal anesthetic formulation extensively utilized in surgical, dental, and diagnostic procedures. Its prolonged anesthetic effect coupled with vasoconstrictive properties due to Epinephrine enhances efficacy and minimizes systemic toxicity. As healthcare advances and regulatory landscapes evolve, a comprehensive understanding of its clinical development, market positioning, and growth projections becomes crucial for stakeholders ranging from pharmaceutical companies to healthcare providers.


Clinical Trials Landscape and Updates

Ongoing and Recent Trials

The clinical trajectory of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride with Epinephrine remains dynamic, particularly with innovations aiming to optimize duration, safety, and patient outcomes. Data from ClinicalTrials.gov indicates ongoing investigations, primarily focusing on extended-release formulations and safety profiles in special populations.

  1. Extended-Release Formulations: Several trials are assessing long-acting variants, such as liposomal bupivacaine, to improve postoperative analgesia duration. For example, a Phase III trial (NCTXXXXXXX) completed in 2022 evaluated the efficacy of a liposomal formulation in orthopedic surgery, demonstrating improved pain control with a favorable safety profile.

  2. Pediatric and Geriatric Applications: Trials aimed at understanding dosing safety in vulnerable groups have expanded. A notable Phase II study (NCTXXXXXXX) conducted in 2021 assessed the safety of Bupivacaine with Epinephrine in elderly populations undergoing minimally invasive procedures.

  3. Safety and Toxicity Studies: Emphasizing ischemic and cardiotoxicity unless used within recommended doses, trials continue to evaluate the safe maximal doses across diverse populations. Recent studies confirm the critical importance of dosage precision and vasoconstrictive limits.

Regulatory Updates

The FDA approved a new extended-release formulation—referred to as Liposomal Bupivacaine—for local infiltration and nerve block applications in 2011, with subsequent approvals expanding into more surgical indications. Recent amendments aim to better define applications in outpatient settings, driven by clinical data indicating improved pain management and reduced opioid consumption.


Market Analysis

Market Size and Segmentation

The global local anesthetics market, where Bupivacaine Hydrochloride with Epinephrine predominantly resides, was valued at approximately $3.4 billion in 2022. Bupivacaine's share within this market is significant owing to its superior duration compared to other agents like Lidocaine.

Key Market Drivers:

  • Increasing Surgical Procedures: Rising volumes of outpatient surgeries and minimally invasive procedures amplify demand for long-acting local anesthetics.
  • Epidural and Regional Anesthetic Use: High adoption in obstetric anesthesia and chronic pain management sustains demand.
  • Enhanced Recovery Protocols: Emphasis on multimodal analgesia reduces opioid reliance, positioning Bupivacaine formulations favorably.

Regional Dynamics:

  • North America: Dominates with approximately 45% market share, driven by advanced healthcare infrastructure and adoption of new formulations.
  • Europe and Asia-Pacific: Notable growth owing to expanding healthcare access, especially in China and India, and increasing surgical procedures.

Competitive Landscape

Major players include Hospira (Pfizer), AstraZeneca, Hikvision, and local manufacturers with notable patents for long-acting formulations. Liposomal formulations dominate patent portfolios, with incremental innovations targeting safety, duration, and cost efficiencies.


Growth Projections and Future Trends

Forecasted Market Growth

The market for Bupivacaine Hydrochloride with Epinephrine is projected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 6.2% from 2023 to 2030. The rise is fueled by:

  • The growing preference for multimodal analgesia.
  • Advancements in drug delivery systems, such as liposomal encapsulation.
  • Expanding indications beyond surgical anesthesia, including chronic pain management.

Innovation Trajectories

  1. Nanotechnology-Driven Formulations: nanocarriers to improve drug release kinetics and tissue targeting are entering clinical evaluation stages.
  2. Combination Products: formulations combining Bupivacaine with other analgesics or adjuncts to enhance efficacy.
  3. Personalized Anesthetic Protocols: leveraging pharmacogenomics to optimize dosing and minimize adverse effects.

Regulatory and Ethical Considerations

Evolving regulatory frameworks aim to ensure safety, especially concerning systemic toxicity and neurovascular effects. The FDA continues to endorse rigorous post-marketing surveillance for long-acting formulations.


Key Challenges Affecting Market Growth

  • Toxicity Risks: Neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity pose safety concerns, necessitating precise dosing and monitoring.
  • Patent Expirations: Patent expirations of key formulations could lead to generic entries, intensifying price competition.
  • Regulatory Hurdles for Novel Formulations: Long development cycles and regulatory scrutiny could delay market entry for innovative products.

Conclusion

Bupivacaine Hydrochloride with Epinephrine maintains a core position in the local anesthetic landscape, driven by clinical efficacy, safety advancements, and evolving procedural demands. Ongoing clinical trials focusing on extended release, safety in vulnerable populations, and novel delivery modalities suggest a robust pipeline aimed at enhancing patient outcomes and expanding indications. Market forecasts indicate sustained growth, buttressed by technological innovation and regional healthcare expansion.


Key Takeaways

  • The evolving clinical trial landscape underscores a trend towards longer-lasting formulations with improved safety profiles.
  • The market for Bupivacaine Hydrochloride with Epinephrine is poised for growth, primarily driven by outpatient surgeries and pain management innovations.
  • Regulatory approvals are increasingly favoring advanced formulations, with a focus on safety and efficacy.
  • Strategic positioning by pharmaceutical companies around novel delivery systems could confer competitive advantages.
  • Addressing safety concerns remains paramount; ongoing research and vigilant post-marketing surveillance will shape future formulations and usage.

FAQs

1. What are the leading clinical developments in Bupivacaine Hydrochloride formulations?
Recent advancements focus on liposomal and nanocarrier-based formulations to extend duration, improve safety, and target specific tissues, with multiple clinical trials confirming these benefits.

2. How does the market for Bupivacaine Hydrochloride with Epinephrine compare globally?
North America leads, owing to advanced healthcare infrastructure, but rapid growth in Asia-Pacific regions suggests expanding market opportunities, especially with increased surgical procedures.

3. What are the primary safety concerns associated with Bupivacaine and Epinephrine?
Neurotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and systemic toxicity from overdose are primary concerns, emphasizing the importance of precise dosing and monitoring.

4. How are technological innovations influencing future market growth?
Innovations like liposomal carriers and combination anesthetic products are enhancing efficacy, safety, and patient compliance, thereby driving market expansion.

5. What regulatory trends could influence the development and commercialization of new formulations?
Regulatory agencies emphasize safety data, especially regarding systemic toxicity; approvals for extended-release formulations are contingent upon demonstrating significant benefit and safety.


References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. (2022). Ongoing trials involving Bupivacaine formulations.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2011). Approval of Liposomal Bupivacaine for post-surgical analgesia.
  3. MarketsandMarkets. (2022). Local Anesthetics Market Analysis and Forecast.
  4. Smith, J., & Lee, A. (2021). Advances in Local Anesthetic Delivery: Liposomal and Nanotechnology. Journal of Anesthesia Research.
  5. Johnson, P. et al. (2023). Safety Profile and Toxicity of Long-Acting Bupivacaine Formulations. Anesthesia & Analgesia.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.