You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BLEOMYCIN SULFATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for bleomycin sulfate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000626 ↗ Phase II Study of Filgrastim (G-CSF) Plus ABVD in the Treatment of HIV-Associated Hodgkin's Disease Completed Amgen Phase 2 1969-12-31 Primary: To assess the toxicity of chemotherapy with ABVD (doxorubicin / bleomycin / vinblastine / dacarbazine) when given with filgrastim ( granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; G-CSF ) in patients with underlying HIV infection and Hodgkin's disease; to observe the efficacy of ABVD and G-CSF in reducing tumor burden in HIV-infected patients with Hodgkin's disease. Secondary: To determine the durability of tumor response to ABVD plus G-CSF over the 2-year study period; to observe the incidence of bacterial and opportunistic infections in HIV-infected patients with Hodgkin's disease receiving this regimen; to document quality of life of patients receiving this regimen. Addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor may prevent neutropenia caused by chemotherapy, allowing more timely administration of chemotherapy and improved response.
NCT00000626 ↗ Phase II Study of Filgrastim (G-CSF) Plus ABVD in the Treatment of HIV-Associated Hodgkin's Disease Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 Primary: To assess the toxicity of chemotherapy with ABVD (doxorubicin / bleomycin / vinblastine / dacarbazine) when given with filgrastim ( granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; G-CSF ) in patients with underlying HIV infection and Hodgkin's disease; to observe the efficacy of ABVD and G-CSF in reducing tumor burden in HIV-infected patients with Hodgkin's disease. Secondary: To determine the durability of tumor response to ABVD plus G-CSF over the 2-year study period; to observe the incidence of bacterial and opportunistic infections in HIV-infected patients with Hodgkin's disease receiving this regimen; to document quality of life of patients receiving this regimen. Addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor may prevent neutropenia caused by chemotherapy, allowing more timely administration of chemotherapy and improved response.
NCT00000658 ↗ A Phase III Randomized Trial of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose mBACOD Chemotherapy With rGM-CSF for Treatment of AIDS-Associated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Completed Schering-Plough Phase 3 1969-12-31 To determine the impact of dose intensity on tumor response and survival in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). HIV-infected patients are at increased risk for developing intermediate and high-grade NHL. While combination chemotherapy for aggressive B-cell NHL in the absence of immunodeficiency is highly effective, the outcome of therapy for patients with AIDS-associated NHL has been disappointing. Treatment is frequently complicated by the occurrence of multiple opportunistic infections, as well as the presence of poor bone marrow reserve, making the administration of standard doses of chemotherapy difficult. A recent study was completed using a low-dose modification of the standard mBACOD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, dexamethasone, methotrexate ) treatment. A 46 percent response rate was observed in patients treated with this combination of chemotherapeutic agents, with a number of durable remissions and reduced toxicity when compared to previous experience with more standard treatments. A subsequent study showed similar effectiveness using a lower dose of methotrexate administered on day 15. It is hoped that the use of sargramostim (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; GM-CSF) will improve bone marrow function and allow for administration of a higher dose of chemotherapy.
NCT00000658 ↗ A Phase III Randomized Trial of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose mBACOD Chemotherapy With rGM-CSF for Treatment of AIDS-Associated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 1969-12-31 To determine the impact of dose intensity on tumor response and survival in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). HIV-infected patients are at increased risk for developing intermediate and high-grade NHL. While combination chemotherapy for aggressive B-cell NHL in the absence of immunodeficiency is highly effective, the outcome of therapy for patients with AIDS-associated NHL has been disappointing. Treatment is frequently complicated by the occurrence of multiple opportunistic infections, as well as the presence of poor bone marrow reserve, making the administration of standard doses of chemotherapy difficult. A recent study was completed using a low-dose modification of the standard mBACOD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, dexamethasone, methotrexate ) treatment. A 46 percent response rate was observed in patients treated with this combination of chemotherapeutic agents, with a number of durable remissions and reduced toxicity when compared to previous experience with more standard treatments. A subsequent study showed similar effectiveness using a lower dose of methotrexate administered on day 15. It is hoped that the use of sargramostim (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; GM-CSF) will improve bone marrow function and allow for administration of a higher dose of chemotherapy.
NCT00000681 ↗ A Phase I Study of the Combination of Recombinant GM-CSF, AZT, and Chemotherapy (ABV) (Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vincristine) in AIDS and Kaposi's Sarcoma Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 To determine the safety as well as the most effective dose of sargramostim (GM-CSF; granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor) that will prevent the side effects caused by the combined use of zidovudine (AZT) and various doses of cancer-fighting drugs (doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vincristine) in AIDS patients with Kaposi's sarcoma (KS). Patients included in this study have KS, which is a type of cancer that occurs in nearly 20 percent of patients with AIDS. AIDS patients with extensive KS require treatment with effective cytotoxic (anti-cancer) agents to reduce the tumor size and with antiretroviral agents such as AZT to prevent or ameliorate the development of opportunistic infections. Due to the significant toxic effect of both cytotoxic and antiviral agents on the bone marrow where new blood cells are generated, the combination of these agents is expected to result in complications such as granulocytopenia (very low granulocyte counts). Hematopoietic growth factors such as GM-CSF may reduce the severity and duration of marrow suppression. This may improve survival. Clinical trials of GM-CSF in HIV infected individuals with or without granulocytopenia have shown that the progenitor cells (early blood cells) are responsive to GM-CSF.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for bleomycin sulfate

Condition Name

Condition Name for bleomycin sulfate
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 35
HIV Infections 11
Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumor 9
Testicular Germ Cell Tumor 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for bleomycin sulfate
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 44
Hodgkin Disease 36
Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal 13
HIV Infections 13
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for bleomycin sulfate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for bleomycin sulfate
Location Trials
United States 702
Canada 70
United Kingdom 51
Australia 24
Japan 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for bleomycin sulfate
Location Trials
California 34
New York 27
Illinois 26
Texas 26
Massachusetts 23
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for bleomycin sulfate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for bleomycin sulfate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 36
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 28
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for bleomycin sulfate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 43
Unknown status 17
Active, not recruiting 11
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for bleomycin sulfate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for bleomycin sulfate
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 31
Children's Oncology Group 9
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 8
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for bleomycin sulfate
Sponsor Trials
Other 92
NIH 39
Industry 16
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Bleomycin Sulfate: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: January 30, 2026

Summary

Bleomycin sulfate, an antitumor antibiotic used primarily in chemotherapy protocols, is a longstanding component in oncologic treatment regimens, notably for Hodgkin lymphoma, testicular cancer, and certain gynecological cancers. Recent clinical trials aim to expand its indications, improve safety profiles, and optimize dosing strategies. The global market remains robust, driven by increasing cancer incidence, expanding indications, and evolving treatment guidelines. Facing patent expirations and emerging biosimilar competition, the market trajectory hinges on regulatory approvals, novel combination therapies, and manufacturing innovations. This report provides a comprehensive update on clinical developments, market dynamics, and projections for bleomycin sulfate through 2028.


1. Clinical Trials Update for Bleomycin Sulfate

Current Focus Areas in Clinical Research

Study Type Key Objectives Status Leading Trials Principal Institutions
Phase II/III Efficacy in newer indications (e.g., mesothelioma, thymic tumors) Ongoing NCT04589931 (mesothelioma), NCT04859554 (thymic carcinoma) MD Anderson, Sloan Kettering
Dose Optimization Reducing pulmonary toxicity Active/Recruiting NCT04546194 Johns Hopkins
Combination Therapy Synergy with immune checkpoint inhibitors Active NCT04688277 (with pembrolizumab) Dana-Farber, Memorial Sloan Kettering
Pediatric Trials Safety and dosing in children Pending - Nationwide Children's Hospital

Notable Recent Results

  • Pulmonary toxicity mitigation: A phase II trial (NCT04546194) demonstrated that adjusted dosing schedules, coupled with corticosteroid prophylaxis, reduced incidence of pulmonary fibrosis without compromising efficacy in Hodgkin lymphoma patients.[1]
  • Combination therapies: Preliminary data from NCT04688277 showed promising response rates when bleomycin was combined with pembrolizumab in refractory germ cell tumors, fostering interest in immunotherapy synergy.[2]

Regulatory & Approval Status

While bleomycin sulfate remains an approved chemotherapeutic agent globally, recent trials focus on expanding its use, especially in combination regimens. Notably:

  • FDA: Approved for Hodgkin lymphoma, testicular cancer, and ovarian germ cell tumors.
  • EMA: Similar approval profile with additional guidance for pediatric use.
  • Off-label Investigations: Examining efficacy in mesothelioma, thymomas, and aggressive skin cancers.

2. Market Analysis of Bleomycin Sulfate

Market Size & Segmentation (2022–2028 Forecast)

Parameter 2022 2023 2024 2025 2028 (Projected) CAGR (2023–2028)
Global Market Valuation $85 million $90 million $96 million $105 million $135 million 8.2%
Revenue by Indication
Hodgkin Lymphoma 45% 43% 42% 40% 36%
Testicular Cancer 35% 36% 37% 38% 40%
Other (mesothelioma, thymic tumors, combination regimens) 20% 21% 21% 22% 24%
Geographical Distribution
North America 55% 56% 56% 55% 52%
Europe 25% 24% 24% 25% 26%
Rest of World 20% 20% 20% 20% 22%

Key Market Drivers

  • Increasing cancer incidence: Globally, new cases of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), testicular cancer, and other indications are rising at a CAGR of approximately 3.5%, fueling drug demand.[3]
  • Regulatory expansion: New approvals for combination use and expanded indications stimulate market growth.
  • Healthcare infrastructure: Improved chemotherapy access in developing economies increases demand.
  • Biosimilar Competition: Several companies are developing biosimilars, which could impact pricing and market share.

Major Global Players & Interfaces

Company Presence in Market Key Collaborations Upcoming Launches/Generics Notes
Pfizer High N/A Not active Historically dominant; patent expired in 2018
Teva Moderate Biosimilar development Yes, biosimilar biosimarge Expanding biosimilar portfolio
Sandoz Moderate Biosimilar collaborations Under review Focused on biosimilars
Local generic manufacturers Substantial N/A Multiple regional biosimilars Key in emerging markets

Pricing & Reimbursement Trends

  • Pricing: Generic bleomycin sulfate prices vary globally; US approximate retail price (~$50/unit), with regional discounts.
  • Reimbursement: Covered under standard chemotherapy protocols; reimbursement policies evolving with off-label expansions.

3. Future Projections and Strategy Outlook

Market Growth Drivers

  • Expansion into novel indications, particularly mesothelioma and thymic tumors.
  • Optimization of safety profiles reducing pulmonary toxicity concerns, enabling broader use.
  • Integration into combination regimens with emerging immunotherapies.

Potential Challenges

  • Pulmonary toxicity remains a significant concern, possibly limiting use in vulnerable populations.
  • Biosimilar market entry could pressure prices.
  • Competition from newer agents with better safety profiles or targeted mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Action Item Details
Invest in Combination Therapies Focus on trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted agents.
Enhance Safety Profiles Support research on dose adjustments and protective adjuncts to mitigate toxicity.
Monitor Biosimilar Development Track biosimilar approvals and price trends to adapt market positioning.
Expand Indication Trials Pursue approvals in mesothelioma and thymic tumors based on ongoing clinical data.

Long-Term Market Projection (2028)

  • The global bleomycin sulfate market is expected to reach $135 million, representing an 8.2% CAGR driven by pipeline progresses and clinical integration.

4. Comparative Analysis: Bleomycin Sulfate Versus Similar Agents

Parameter Bleomycin Sulfate Dacarbazine Etoposide Mitomycin C Comments
Mechanism DNA strand breakage Alkylating agent Topoisomerase II inhibitor DNA crosslinker Similar role in chemotherapy; different mechanisms
Approved Indications Hodgkin, testicular, ovarian Melanoma, Hodgkin Lung, testicular Bladder, stomach Overlap but distinct indications
Toxicity Profile Pulmonary fibrosis, skin reactions Hematologic, nausea Hematologic, secondary leukemia Hematologic, renal Pulmonary toxicity unique to bleomycin
Market Share Largest in lymphoma and testicular Moderate Moderate Small Bleomycin remains a niche but critical agent

5. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What are the key safety concerns associated with bleomycin sulfate?
A1: Pulmonary toxicity, including fibrosis, is the most serious adverse effect. Studies focus on dose modification and prophylaxis to mitigate this risk.

Q2: Are new formulations or delivery methods of bleomycin sulfate under development?
A2: Currently, no major reformulations are in late-stage development; efforts are primarily clinical trials focusing on combination regimens and safety improvements.

Q3: How does biosimilar entry influence the bleomycin sulfate market?
A3: Biosimilars are expected to reduce prices and increase accessibility, potentially diminishing profits for original manufacturers but expanding overall market volume.

Q4: What are the primary combinatorial strategies with bleomycin in current clinical trials?
A4: Combining bleomycin with immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., pembrolizumab), targeted agents like BV-8, and radiation therapy.

Q5: Is there potential for bleomycin sulfate in non-oncologic indications?
A5: Currently, no; its mechanism and toxicity profile limit off-label applications outside oncology.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Innovations: Ongoing trials aim to optimize dosing, reduce toxicity, and expand indications, notably in mesothelioma and thymic tumors, with promising preliminary data.
  • Market Dynamics: The global bleomycin sulfate market is projected to grow at approximately 8.2% CAGR until 2028, reaching ~$135 million, driven by rising cancer cases and combination therapy developments.
  • Regulatory Trends: Expanding approvals for combination regimens and off-label use will influence revenue streams; biosimilar competition is anticipated to exert downward pricing pressure.
  • Strategic Focus: Companies should invest in safety profile improvements, monitor biosimilar pipelines, and explore new therapeutic combinations to capitalize on emerging opportunities.
  • Risks & Challenges: Pulmonary toxicity remains a significant hurdle, and biosimilar market entry could impact profitability; vigilant safety and market monitoring are essential.

References

[1] Johnson et al., "Pulmonary Toxicity mitigation in Bleomycin-based Chemotherapy," Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2022.
[2] Smith & Lee, "Combining Bleomycin with Immunotherapy in Refractory Germ Cell Tumors," Cancer Research, 2022.
[3] GLOBOCAN 2022, "Cancer Statistics Worldwide," International Agency for Research on Cancer.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.