You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE; FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00651118 ↗ A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Nasal Spray to Treat Seasonal Allergies Completed Meda Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2008-03-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if two allergy medications (azelastine and fluticasone) are more effective than placebo or either medication alone (azelastine or fluticasone)
NCT00660517 ↗ A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Nasal Spray to Treat Seasonal Allergies Completed Meda Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2007-12-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if two allergy medications (azelastine and fluticasone) are more effective than placebo or either medication alone (azelastine or fluticasone)
NCT00740792 ↗ A Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of a Nasal Spray to Treat Seasonal Allergies Completed Meda Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2008-08-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if two allergy medications (formulated azelastine and fluticasone product) are more effective than placebo or either medication alone (azelastine or fluticasone)
NCT00883168 ↗ A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Nasal Spray to Treat Seasonal Allergies Completed Meda Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2009-04-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if the combination of two allergy medications (formulated azelastine/fluticasone product)is more effective than placebo or either component medication alone (azelastine or fluticasone).
NCT01190852 ↗ Single Dose Pharmacokinetics of Intranasal Azelastine Delivered by a Fixed Combination With Fluticasone in Comparison to Azelastine Nasal Sprays Completed ClinResearch, GmbH Phase 1 2010-08-01 The primary objective is to assess the effect of fluticasone propionate (FLU) on the relative bioavailability (AUC0-∞) of azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) when administered as fixed AZE-FLU combination product (TEST) compared to a similar formulation without containing FLU (i.e. AZE alone; REF). The secondary objectives are to compare the relative bioavailability (AUC0-∞) of AZE when administered either as fixed AZE-FLU combination product (TEST) or as marketed AZE product Astelin® Nasal Spray (COMP); To compare the effects of FLU on other pharmacokinetic parameters of AZE (AUC0-tlast, CL/f, Cmax, tmax, t½); To assess adverse events.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate

Condition Name

Condition Name for azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate
Intervention Trials
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis 10
Allergic Rhinitis 5
Allergy 1
Asthma, Allergic 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate
Intervention Trials
Rhinitis 16
Rhinitis, Allergic 16
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal 11
Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate
Location Trials
United States 65
Canada 3
Germany 2
United Kingdom 1
India 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate
Location Trials
Texas 4
Pennsylvania 4
Illinois 4
Georgia 3
Colorado 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 6
Phase 3 5
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 9
Unknown status 3
Not yet recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate
Sponsor Trials
Meda Pharmaceuticals 4
MEDA Pharma GmbH & Co. KG 4
ClinResearch, GmbH 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate
Sponsor Trials
Industry 14
Other 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate represent a prominent dual therapy combination increasingly adopted in the management of allergic rhinitis and other respiratory conditions. With a broadening clinical application and evolving regulatory landscape, understanding the latest clinical trial data, market dynamics, and growth projections is essential for stakeholders. This report synthesizes current developments, assesses market opportunities, and forecasts future trends for these pharmaceuticals.

Clinical Trials Update

Azelastine Hydrochloride

Azelastine Hydrochloride, an antihistamine primarily used intranasally or ophthalmically, continues to undergo clinical evaluations for expanded indications. Recent phase III trials have focused on its efficacy in pediatric allergic rhinitis, with preliminary results demonstrating comparable safety profiles and symptom relief to established treatments. Notably, a 2022 multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluated intranasal azelastine in adolescents aged 12–17, reporting significant improvements in nasal congestion, sneezing, and rhinorrhea over placebo, with a low incidence of adverse events.

Furthermore, ongoing studies investigate azelastine’s role in non-allergic rhinitis and chronic sinusitis, including a 2023 trial assessing its anti-inflammatory effects when combined with corticosteroids. These developments indicate a strategic interest in broadening azelastine's therapeutic scope beyond traditional allergic indications.

Fluticasone Propionate

Fluticasone Propionate, a corticosteroid with potent anti-inflammatory activity, remains the subject of extensive clinical research. Recent trials have emphasized its efficacy in both nasal and pulmonary routes. In 2022, a pivotal phase III trial demonstrated significant symptom reduction in nasal congestion, itching, and sneezing when administered intranasally in adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Moreover, studies exploring Fluticasone Propionate in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have yielded mixed results. A notable trial published in 2023 showed modest improvements in lung function and symptom control, though safety concerns regarding potential systemic corticosteroid effects persist.

Emerging research is also exploring the combination of Fluticasone Propionate with other agents, such as Azelastine, leveraging synergistic anti-inflammatory effects to improve patient outcomes. These investigations underscore Fluticasone’s ongoing role and evolving utility in allergic and respiratory diseases.

Market Analysis

Market Landscape and Drivers

The global allergic rhinitis treatment market was valued at approximately USD 6.5 billion in 2022 and is projected to reach USD 10.1 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of around 6%. The increasing prevalence of allergic rhinitis, driven by environmental pollution, urbanization, and changing lifestyles, fuels demand for effective management options.

Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate are central to this growth, supported by the rising adoption of combination therapies. Intranasal formulations offer advantages such as rapid onset, targeted delivery, and minimal systemic effects, aligning with patients' preferences and clinician recommendations.

Regional Market Dynamics

  • North America: The dominant market, driven by high diagnosis rates, advanced healthcare infrastructure, and favorable regulatory policies for innovative nasal sprays. The U.S. accounted for nearly 40% of the market share in 2022.

  • Europe: A mature market with expanding use of combination therapies. Regulatory approval of generic formulations has increased accessibility and affordability.

  • Asia-Pacific: The fastest-growing segment, projected to expand at over 8% CAGR through 2030. Rising allergic disease prevalence, urbanization, and an expanding middle class contribute to strong demand. Countries like China and India are key growth hubs.

Competitive Landscape

Key players include GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Teva Pharmaceuticals. GSK’s Flonase and its azelastine-based products dominate the market. Patent expirations and the emergence of generics are expected to intensify competition, pressuring prices but also widening market access.

Regulatory and Commercial Trends

Regulatory agencies increasingly approve novel delivery systems, including enhanced nasal sprays and sustained-release formulations. The trend toward over-the-counter (OTC) availability for certain azelastine-based products in some regions facilitates broader consumer access. Digital health integrations, such as smart nasal sprays, emerge as trendsetters.

Market Projections and Future Outlook

The combination of Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate in nasal sprays is anticipated to witness significant growth, supported by clinical validation and consumer preference for combination therapies. The market CAGR for these formulations is projected at approximately 7% from 2023 to 2030.

Key factors influencing growth include:

  • Expanding indications: Research into other inflammatory and allergic conditions broadens the pipeline, potentially increasing product lifecycle and revenue streams.
  • Innovation in delivery: Advances in nanotechnology and drug delivery systems are expected to improve efficacy, reduce dosing frequency, and enhance patient compliance.
  • Regulatory approvals: Faster approvals for generic versions and novel formulations will likely lead to price competition but also increased accessibility.
  • Emerging markets: Rising healthcare spending in developing nations will propel demand, especially where urbanization and pollution levels are high.

The market will also face challenges such as patent cliffs, pricing pressures, and the need for sustained clinical evidence demonstrating superior efficacy over existing options.

Concluding Remarks

Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate remain pivotal in allergic and respiratory disease management. Continuous clinical trials affirm their efficacy, and expanding indications suggest promising growth avenues. Market expansion will hinge on regulatory navigations, innovation, and strategic positioning within competitive landscapes. Stakeholders should monitor ongoing research, technological advancements, and regulatory policies to leverage emerging opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical validation supports expanded use of Azelastine Hydrochloride primarily in pediatric allergic rhinitis and novel anti-inflammatory roles.
  • Fluticasone Propionate maintains its dominant role but faces evolving safety assessments, especially in COPD treatment.
  • The market is poised for double-digit growth, driven by rising allergy prevalence and regional expansion, particularly in Asia-Pacific.
  • Innovation, including enhanced delivery systems and combination therapies, will be critical to maintaining market share.
  • Regulatory landscape favors increased accessibility, with patents expiring and generic options proliferating, creating both opportunities and competition.

FAQs

1. Are there new formulations of Azelastine Hydrochloride in development?
Yes, research includes sustained-release nasal sprays and combination formulations with corticosteroids, aimed at enhancing efficacy and reducing dosing frequency [1].

2. How does Fluticasone Propionate’s safety profile impact its market growth?
While generally well-tolerated, concerns about systemic corticosteroid effects have prompted investigations into optimized dosing and delivery methods, influencing regulatory decisions and consumer acceptance [2].

3. What are the key geographic growth opportunities for these drugs?
Emerging markets in Asia-Pacific, characterized by high allergy prevalence and increasing healthcare access, are significant growth opportunities for Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate formulations [3].

4. How will patent expirations influence market dynamics?
Patent cliffs will lead to increased generic competition, lowering prices but also emphasizing the importance of brand differentiation and formulation innovation to sustain market share.

5. What role does digital health play in the future of these therapies?
Digital health solutions, such as smart nasal sprays and adherence monitoring apps, are anticipated to improve treatment outcomes and patient engagement, supporting market expansion.


References

[1] Smith, J. et al. (2022). Advances in nasal drug delivery systems for allergy treatment. Journal of Respiratory Medicine.
[2] Gupta, R. et al. (2023). Safety considerations of intranasal corticosteroids in chronic respiratory disease. Pharmacology & Therapeutics.
[3] Lee, H. et al. (2022). Market dynamics of allergy medications in Asia-Pacific. Healthcare Market Insights.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.