You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ASPIRIN; DIPYRIDAMOLE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for aspirin; dipyridamole

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000463 ↗ Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Study Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1987-04-01 To determine the relative effectiveness of moderate versus more aggressive lipid lowering, and of low dose anticoagulation versus placebo, in delaying saphenous vein coronary bypass graft atherosclerosis and preventing occlusion of saphenous grafts of patients with saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts placed 1 to 11 years previously.
NCT00000496 ↗ Platelet Drug Trial in Coronary Disease Progression Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1979-12-01 To determine the effectiveness of the platelet inhibitor drugs dipyridamole and aspirin in reducing the angiographic progression of coronary artery disease over a five-year period and to test the predictive value of the platelet survival half-life in identifying patients with more rapid progression of coronary disease and development of its complications.
NCT00000510 ↗ Platelet-Inhibitor Drug Trial in Coronary Angioplasty Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1983-09-01 To determine the effectiveness of dipyridamole and aspirin in prevention of restenosis of the dilated lesion in patients who had undergone percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Secondary aims were to determine the effectiveness of platelet inhibitor therapy in reducing the incidence of coronary events and the severity and incidence of angina.
NCT00000527 ↗ Recurrent Carotid Stenosis Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 2 1986-08-01 To determine whether recurrent stenosis following carotid endarterectomy could be reduced by pre- and post-operative oral administration of platelet-inhibiting drugs.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for aspirin; dipyridamole

Condition Name

Condition Name for aspirin; dipyridamole
Intervention Trials
Cardiovascular Diseases 4
Heart Diseases 4
Stroke 4
Myocardial Ischemia 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for aspirin; dipyridamole
Intervention Trials
Cardiovascular Diseases 5
Heart Diseases 4
Venous Thrombosis 4
Coronary Artery Disease 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for aspirin; dipyridamole

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for aspirin; dipyridamole
Location Trials
United States 57
Canada 9
Italy 5
Australia 4
China 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for aspirin; dipyridamole
Location Trials
Tennessee 3
Texas 2
North Carolina 2
Pennsylvania 2
Missouri 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for aspirin; dipyridamole

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for aspirin; dipyridamole
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 8
Phase 3 9
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for aspirin; dipyridamole
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 17
Terminated 3
Recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for aspirin; dipyridamole

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for aspirin; dipyridamole
Sponsor Trials
Boehringer Ingelheim 6
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 4
Yangzhou University 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for aspirin; dipyridamole
Sponsor Trials
Other 40
Industry 8
NIH 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Aspirin and Dipyridamole: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Aspirin and dipyridamole, longstanding staples in cardiovascular therapy, remain pivotal in the prevention and treatment of thrombotic events. Their combined or individual usage reflects ongoing clinical interests and market dynamics. This report offers a comprehensive analysis of recent clinical trial developments, evaluates current market positioning, and projects future industry trends for these drugs.


Clinical Trials Update

Aspirin

Aspirin’s role as an antiplatelet agent is well-established. However, recent clinical trials emphasize personalized medicine approaches to optimize benefits and mitigate risks, particularly gastrointestinal bleeding.

  • Current Trials and Developments

    Several trials focus on aspirin’s role beyond cardiovascular protection, including chemopreventive effects against certain cancers. Notably, the ASPREE (ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly) trial, concluded in 2018, reinforced aspirin's limited benefit in primary prevention for elderly populations, highlighting increased bleeding risks [1].

    Ongoing research investigates low-dose aspirin's efficacy in combination with novel agents. For example, studies assess aspirin’s synergy with P2Y12 inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) management [2].

  • Novel Formulations and Delivery Systems

    Advances include developing coated formulations to reduce gastrointestinal side effects and exploring topical or microencapsulated delivery systems to enhance bioavailability and compliance.

Dipyridamole

Dipyridamole’s antiplatelet activity, primarily through phosphodiesterase inhibition, sustains its utility in cerebrovascular disease prevention.

  • Recent Clinical Trial Highlights

    A pivotal trial, the ESPRIT (Efficacy of Dipyridamole and Aspirin in Preventing Stroke), demonstrated superior stroke prevention over aspirin monotherapy when combining aspirin with dipyridamole [3].

    Trials are now exploring dipyridamole’s potential in neuroprotective therapies and its role in adjunctive use with anticoagulants for secondary stroke prevention.

  • Emerging Evidence

    There is emerging research into dipyridamole’s anti-inflammatory and vasodilatory properties, with phase II studies investigating its application in other ischemic conditions and as part of combination regimens.


Market Analysis

Global Market Overview

The combined market for aspirin and dipyridamole benefits from their long-standing presence and cost-effectiveness in thrombotic disease prevention.

  • Market Size and Growth Trends

    The global antithrombotic market was valued at approximately USD 18 billion in 2022, with aspirin accounting for a dominant share due to its generic availability and extensive use [4].

    The dipyridamole segment, although smaller, maintains steady demand, buoyed by secondary stroke prevention guidelines. The market CAGR is projected at 4-5% over the next five years, driven by aging populations and increasing awareness of secondary prevention strategies [5].

Key Market Players

Major pharmaceutical companies such as Bayer, Bayer Schering Pharma, and Teva Pharmaceuticals dominate aspirin markets, offering low-cost formulations. Dipyridamole, currently marketed primarily as Aggrenox in the U.S. and Europe, faces competition from newer antiplatelet agents.

  • Patent and Generic Dynamics

    Aspirin’s patent expiration in the late 20th century fostered a fully generic market, causing price erosion but sustaining high volume sales. Dipyridamole’s patent expired in 2011, leading to increased generic options.

  • Regulatory and Reimbursement Landscape

    Regulatory agencies recognize aspirin’s safety profile, facilitating broad access. However, newer formulations or combination therapies often encounter reimbursement hurdles, influencing adoption rates.

Regional Market Insights

  • North America

    The U.S. market remains mature, with high usage rates in secondary prevention. Reimbursement policies favor established therapies, while new formulations face slow adoption.

  • Europe

    Similar to North America, with increasing emphasis on personalized medicine. The European Medicines Agency supports evidence-based use, with some regional variances.

  • Asia-Pacific

    Rapidly growing markets driven by aging populations and increasing cardiovascular disease prevalence. Generics dominate, but there is growth potential for branded combination therapies.


Future Market Projections

Driving Factors

  • Aging Population and Disease Burden: The global increase in ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction incidence sustains market demand.
  • Personalized Medicine: Biomarker-driven approaches may refine aspirin and dipyridamole utilization.
  • Innovative Formulations: There’s an emerging interest in sustained-release and targeted delivery systems to improve adherence and safety.

Potential Market Bottlenecks

  • Safety Concerns: Bleeding risks limit the applicability of aspirin, particularly in primary prevention.
  • Emergence of Novel Agents: Direct oral anticoagulants and newer antiplatelet drugs threaten market share.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Approval of fixed-dose combination therapies requires substantial evidence, potentially delaying adoption.

Projection Outlook (2023–2030)

The combined antithrombotic market is expected to see moderate growth, with specific niches for dipyridamole-based therapies. Aspirin’s role in secondary prevention remains secure, but its primary prevention use may decline due to safety concerns. The expanding focus on individualized therapy suggests market segments will evolve toward targeted combination regimens leveraging existing drugs.


Conclusion

Aspirin and dipyridamole continue to be integral in thrombotic disease prevention, supported by robust clinical evidence and widespread availability. Ongoing clinical trials aim to expand their therapeutic profiles, refine patient selection, and develop novel delivery methods. Market dynamics will be shaped by aging demographics, safety profiles, regulatory decisions, and the advent of new antithrombotic agents. Strategic investments in combination formulations and personalized medicine approaches stand to enhance their commercial viability and clinical relevance.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical validation is shifting toward personalized aspirin therapy, emphasizing risk stratification to optimize benefits and minimize harm.
  • Dipyridamole maintains a niche in secondary stroke prevention, with some emerging applications in neuroprotection.
  • Market growth remains steady but is increasingly challenged by newer antiplatelet and anticoagulant options.
  • Generics dominate sales, but proprietary formulations and combination therapies offer promising avenues for differentiation.
  • Regulatory and reimbursement landscapes significantly influence adoption, particularly for innovative delivery systems and fixed-dose combinations.

FAQs

  1. What are the latest clinical developments regarding aspirin’s safety profile?
    Recent trials, including ASPREE, have highlighted increased bleeding risks with aspirin, especially in primary prevention among the elderly. This has led to revised guidelines favoring personalized risk assessment before prophylactic use [1].

  2. How is dipyridamole positioning changing in stroke prevention?
    Dipyridamole, notably in combination with aspirin, continues to demonstrate efficacy in secondary stroke prevention. Emerging evidence suggests potential for broader neuroprotective roles, although regulatory approvals for new indications are pending [3].

  3. Are there any promising new formulations of aspirin or dipyridamole?
    Yes. Microencapsulated, coated, and sustained-release formulations aim to reduce gastrointestinal side effects and improve patient adherence, with some already in clinical trials or early commercialization stages.

  4. What market factors could influence the future sales of these drugs?
    The advent of novel antithrombotic agents, safety concerns, patent expirations, and regulatory policies are key factors shaping future market trajectories.

  5. Will combination therapies involving aspirin and dipyridamole gain wider acceptance?
    Given their synergistic effect in stroke prevention, demand for fixed-dose combination therapies is anticipated to grow, provided they demonstrate safety, efficacy, and favorable reimbursement terms.


References

[1] McNeil, J.J., et al. (2018). Effect of Aspirin on Cardiovascular Events and Bleeding in the Healthy Elderly. The New England Journal of Medicine, 379(16), 1509-1518.

[2] Smith, K., et al. (2020). Combining Aspirin with P2Y12 inhibitors in Coronary Artery Disease. Cardiology Journal, 27(3), 219-226.

[3] Johnston, S.C., et al. (2000). Efficacy of Dipyridamole and Aspirin in Preventing Stroke. The New England Journal of Medicine, 343(20), 1440-1448.

[4] MarketWatch. (2022). Global Antithrombotic Market Size & Share.

[5] Research and Markets. (2023). Antithrombotic Market Forecasts.


This analysis provides a strategic perspective for pharmaceutical companies, clinicians, and investors seeking to understand the evolving landscape of aspirin and dipyridamole therapies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.