Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR AMINOSALICYLIC ACID


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for aminosalicylic acid

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000796 ↗ A Prospective Study of Multidrug Resistance and a Pilot Study of the Safety of and Clinical and Microbiologic Response to Levofloxacin in Combination With Other Antimycobacterial Drugs for Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis (MDR Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 To determine the demographic, behavioral, clinical, and geographic risk factors associated with the occurrence of multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (MDRTB). To evaluate the clinical and microbiological responses and overall survival of MDRTB patients who are treated with levofloxacin-containing multiple-drug regimens chosen from a hierarchical list. Per 9/28/94 amendment, to assess whether persistent or recurrent positive sputum cultures of patients who show failure or relapse are due to the same strain or reinfection with a new strain. Among TB patients, there has been an increase in progressive disease due to the emergence of antimycobacterial drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Failure to identify patients at high risk for MDRTB increases the hazard for both treatment failure and development of resistance to additional therapeutic agents. Efforts to improve survival in patients with MDRTB will depend on improved methods of assessing the risk of acquisition of MDRTB and identifying drug susceptibility patterns in a timely fashion.
NCT00004288 ↗ Phase II Pilot Study of Olsalazine for Ankylosing Spondylitis Completed University of Rochester Phase 2 1996-05-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the safety and efficacy of olsalazine, a dimer of 5-aminosalicylic acid, in men with ankylosing spondylitis unresponsive to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and physiotherapy.
NCT00004288 ↗ Phase II Pilot Study of Olsalazine for Ankylosing Spondylitis Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Phase 2 1996-05-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the safety and efficacy of olsalazine, a dimer of 5-aminosalicylic acid, in men with ankylosing spondylitis unresponsive to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and physiotherapy.
NCT00004423 ↗ Controlled Trial of 4-Aminosalicylic Acid in Patients With Small Bowel Crohn's Disease Completed University of Vermont N/A 1995-12-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the efficacy and safety of 4-aminosalicylic acid in patients with active Crohn's disease of the small bowel.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for aminosalicylic acid

Condition Name

Condition Name for aminosalicylic acid
Intervention Trials
Ulcerative Colitis 9
Crohn's Disease 6
Colitis, Ulcerative 5
HIV Infections 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for aminosalicylic acid
Intervention Trials
Ulcer 15
Colitis, Ulcerative 15
Colitis 13
Crohn Disease 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for aminosalicylic acid

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for aminosalicylic acid
Location Trials
United States 91
Spain 10
Israel 6
Canada 5
Japan 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for aminosalicylic acid
Location Trials
California 6
New York 6
Texas 5
North Carolina 5
Illinois 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for aminosalicylic acid

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for aminosalicylic acid
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 6
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for aminosalicylic acid
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 15
Terminated 6
Not yet recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for aminosalicylic acid

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for aminosalicylic acid
Sponsor Trials
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 4
Bausch Health Americas, Inc. 3
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for aminosalicylic acid
Sponsor Trials
Other 23
Industry 15
NIH 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 22, 2026

Aminosalicylic Acid clinical trials update and market projection: pipeline, key geographies, pricing outlook, and patent-exit risks

Aminosalicylic acid (5-aminosalicylic acid; 5-ASA) is an established anti-inflammatory for inflammatory bowel disease, used primarily in ulcerative colitis and other colitides. The market is structurally mature: most global revenue comes from long-lived branded and authorized generics; near-term growth is driven less by late-stage innovation and more by switching, formulary placement, pediatric use, and regional uptake of once-daily and targeted-release regimens. Clinical-trials activity is dominated by formulation, adherence, and safety studies rather than new MoA.

What clinical trials are ongoing for aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease?

Featured-snippet answer: Publicly visible clinical activity for 5-ASA is concentrated in ulcerative colitis, with many studies focused on remission maintenance, comparative efficacy of dosage forms, safety in special populations, and drug-product performance rather than new pharmacology.

Trial types seen most often

  • Remission induction or maintenance in ulcerative colitis, including endpoints like clinical activity index, endoscopic remission, and histologic remission.
  • Dose-ranging and “real-world” effectiveness studies tied to adherence and persistence.
  • Pediatric and elderly pharmacokinetic and safety studies.
  • Comparative bioavailability and formulation bridging for generic entrants.
  • Pharmacovigilance and tolerability in long-term use.

What to watch in trial updates

  • “Target product” comparators (brand vs generic or between formulations) because outcomes often hinge on dosing frequency and delivery-system performance.
  • Safety endpoints that affect payer acceptance, especially renal monitoring patterns and GI tolerability.
  • Endoscopic endpoints and durability data, because payers increasingly weight objective remission.

Which companies and sponsors run aminosalicylic acid clinical research?

Featured-snippet answer: Sponsors typically include regional generic manufacturers, brand holders of 5-ASA products, academic IBD centers, and CRO-led multicenter networks. For a mature drug class, trial sponsorship is often linked to product lifecycle management (new dosage forms, line extensions, or regulatory submissions) rather than novel therapeutic platforms.

Sponsor pattern by study objective

  • Brand or life-cycle-extension programs: adherence or modified-release products, fixed-dose combinations, and patient subgroups.
  • Generic product development: BE studies and clinical bridging in ulcerative colitis populations where required by local regulators.
  • Academic centers: investigator-initiated remission and safety studies, often evaluating dosing strategies or monitoring protocols.

When do aminosalicylic acid trials read out, and what timelines matter for market impact?

Featured-snippet answer: For a mature molecule, market impact generally follows readouts that support (1) label expansions in specific patient groups and (2) approvals of new or reformulated products that improve dosing convenience.

Timing categories used for projection

  • Near-term (0-18 months): bioequivalence and formulation support trials; readouts mainly affect competitive intensity, not total category size.
  • Mid-term (18-36 months): remission maintenance and safety datasets that can influence guideline uptake and payer preferences.
  • Longer-term (36+ months): fewer new MoA entrants; the main “swing factor” is regulatory or IP-driven entry of high-volume competitors.

How big is the global market for aminosalicylic acid, and what segments drive revenue?

Featured-snippet answer: The 5-ASA/aminosalicylic acid category is large and mature in ulcerative colitis. Revenue concentrates in oral and rectal formulations (suppositories, enemas, and foam where available) and is increasingly shaped by convenience (once-daily regimens), tolerability, and formulary positioning.

Segmentation that typically drives pricing and volume

  • Delivery system
    • Oral tablets/capsules for mild to moderate ulcerative colitis and maintenance therapy.
    • Rectal formulations for distal disease with targeted local exposure.
  • Release profile and dosing frequency
    • Modified-release or MMX-like regimens (where used under specific brand technologies) can command premium vs immediate release.
  • Line of therapy
    • Induction vs maintenance: maintenance tends to drive chronic spend.
  • Patient type
    • Pediatric and elderly: may support different dosing preferences and monitoring protocols.

Competitive landscape

  • Brand legacy products plus extensive authorized generics.
  • Multiple regional entrants through standard approval pathways, often with aggressive pricing after regulatory approvals.
  • Pricing pressure correlates with generic density and tender design.

What is the aminosalicylic acid market projection for the next 3–5 years?

Featured-snippet answer: Category-level growth should track modest IBD prevalence and treatment penetration, but unit price and gross margin are pressured by generic substitution. Net revenue growth is therefore expected to be limited, with outperformance likely in specific formulations that improve adherence and win formulary share.

Projection drivers

  • Higher persistence with once-daily or simplified regimens.
  • Guideline adherence and payer controls that favor cost-effective maintenance.
  • Pediatric dosing inclusion and safety profile strengthening.
  • Tender cycles and reimbursement policy shifts.

Projection risks

  • Continued generic substitution in core oral products.
  • Regulatory scrutiny of product performance and excipient-related tolerability.
  • Competitive launches that compress prices across major geographies.

How does aminosalicylic acid compare with mesalamine (5-ASA salts) in market and clinical positioning?

Featured-snippet answer: “Aminosalicylic acid” is part of the 5-ASA family; in practice, commercial competition is often between different 5-ASA salts and branded technologies, including mesalamine. Market outcomes depend on dosing regimen, bioavailability, and local label and guideline preferences for specific formulations.

Why the salt/formulation matters

  • Dosing equivalence is not always a straight 1:1 substitution clinically.
  • Delivery system impacts mucosal exposure and tolerability.
  • Prescribing habits can lock in to specific brands or formulations.

What patents protect aminosalicylic acid, and what does the patent estate look like?

Featured-snippet answer: The patent estate for the underlying 5-ASA molecule itself is largely historical. The enforceable IP in most markets typically resides in:

  1. specific formulation technologies,
  2. delivery systems,
  3. manufacturing processes, and
  4. method-of-use claims tied to specific dosing regimens or patient subsets.

Practical IP reality for a mature 5-ASA category

  • Many core-molecule patents have long since expired globally.
  • Current legal leverage (where any) is concentrated in specific brand-formulation families, not the base active ingredient.
  • Entry barriers for “true generics” are usually low unless a specific formulation has active exclusivities or late-life patents.

When does aminosalicylic acid lose exclusivity, and what exclusivity types matter most?

Featured-snippet answer: For 5-ASA, meaningful exclusivity is usually formulation- and product-specific (and tied to specific drug-product approvals), not molecule-wide. The main implications for entry risk are:

  • whether a given product has remaining patent coverage on formulation or use, and
  • whether regulatory exclusivities apply to the specific NDA/ANDA.

Exclusivity categories to map in practice

  • Patent expiry for formulation and delivery technology.
  • Regulatory exclusivities (where applicable) tied to a specific approval.
  • Pediatric exclusivity and data exclusivity, which can extend a given product’s market protection.

What patent litigation affects aminosalicylic acid generics and biosimilar-like entry risks?

Featured-snippet answer: Litigation is less common for base 5-ASA molecule claims and more common for specific brand-formulation patents and generic challenges. “Biosimilar” risk is not applicable, but “generic entry risk” is driven by Paragraph IV-style disputes for specific ANDA products that reference protected brands.

What to track in legal outcomes

  • Court rulings that narrow or invalidate formulation or method claims.
  • Settlement agreements that delay or design around key formulation claims.
  • Scope of injunctions and design-around approvals.

What is the Orange Book status of aminosalicylic acid products?

Featured-snippet answer: Orange Book listings exist for specific aminosalicylic acid or 5-ASA NDA/ANDA products, but molecule-wide coverage is not the norm. Orange Book status must be checked per brand and per formulation because active listings typically track formulation technology and protected drug product claims.

How market entry risk ties back to Orange Book

  • A generic’s approval path depends on which listed patents are asserted and whether they expire or are cleared.
  • Market timing for competition follows patent and exclusivity dates at the product level, not the active ingredient level.

Which formulations of aminosalicylic acid have the highest market traction?

Featured-snippet answer: Modified-release oral and rectal products with dosing convenience and localized delivery typically hold stronger formulary positions than immediate-release alternatives.

Formulation patterns associated with better adoption

  • Once-daily or simplified dosing schedules.
  • Rectal delivery systems for distal disease that improve adherence and clinician confidence.
  • Products with robust safety documentation in long-term maintenance.

What generic entry risks exist for aminosalicylic acid products?

Featured-snippet answer: The main risks are tied to product-specific patents and settlements rather than the base molecule. Where protection remains for delivery technology, generic entrants can face launch delays, injunctions, or “authorized generic” carve-outs.

Entry risk checklist (product-specific)

  • Remaining active Orange Book patents that cover formulation or use.
  • Any pending ANDA Paragraph IV litigation.
  • Settlement terms affecting launch date and carve-out scope.
  • Evidence of design-around acceptance by regulators.

How do manufacturing and IP barriers affect aminosalicylic acid launches?

Featured-snippet answer: Manufacturing barriers are usually more important for reformulations or modified-release technologies than for plain immediate-release 5-ASA. IP barriers cluster around controlled-release mechanisms, coating/process steps, and specific manufacturing controls required to replicate in vivo performance.

Where friction tends to occur

  • Scale-up and consistency for modified-release systems.
  • Proprietary release-control methods.
  • Bioequivalence acceptance where performance is sensitive to particle size, dissolution profile, or coating uniformity.

Regulatory pathway: what FDA approval pathway applies to new aminosalicylic acid generics and reformulations?

Featured-snippet answer: In the US, most generic versions of marketed 5-ASA products proceed via ANDA. Reformulations or new dosage forms may require additional clinical or bridging, depending on the extent of change and the reference product’s protection.

Key regulatory questions for launch timing

  • Which reference listed drug (RLD) is used.
  • Whether the product is coded for patents that trigger litigation risk.
  • Whether the application must address formulation changes with clinical bridging or only BE data.

Key takeaways

  • Clinical trials for aminosalicylic acid are largely product and regimen focused, with heavy emphasis on ulcerative colitis outcomes, safety, adherence, and delivery performance rather than new MoA.
  • Market growth is modest and mostly competitive, shaped by generic substitution and formulary decisions; outperformance is concentrated in formulations that improve convenience and objective remission.
  • Patent and exclusivity are product-specific, with the most relevant protection typically residing in formulation, delivery, and method-of-use patents rather than on the underlying 5-ASA active ingredient.
  • Generic entry risk is driven by Orange Book patent status and settlements tied to specific branded formulations, not a molecule-wide IP moat.
  • Projection depends on regional tendering and payer pricing behavior, with likely margin compression as generic density increases.

FAQs

  1. How do once-daily and modified-release aminosalicylic acid products change dosing adherence and persistence?
  2. What endpoints in ulcerative colitis trials best predict payer acceptance for 5-ASA maintenance therapy?
  3. Which factors determine whether a reformulated aminosalicylic acid product needs clinical bridging beyond bioequivalence?
  4. How do Paragraph IV disputes for specific 5-ASA brand formulations typically affect generic launch calendars?
  5. What safety monitoring and tolerability signals most influence long-term 5-ASA prescribing?

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. FDA (database).
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for “aminosalicylic acid” and “5-aminosalicylic acid” (database).
  3. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov (database documentation and record disclosures).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.