Last Updated: May 31, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR AMIFAMPRIDINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for amifampridine

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01377922 ↗ A Phase 3 Study of Amifampridine Phosphate in Patients With Lambert Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS) Completed Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Phase 3 2011-06-01 A Phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Amifampridine Phosphate in patients with Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS).
NCT02189720 ↗ Expanded Access Study Amifampridine Phosphate in Congenital Myasthenic Syndrome (CMS) No longer available Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1969-12-31 The primary objective of the study is: • To provide patients with CMSaccess to amifampridine phosphate therapy until the product becomes commercially available or development is discontinued. The secondary objective of the study is: • To assess the long-term safety of amifampridine phosphate in patients with CMS
NCT02562066 ↗ Amifampridine Phosphate for the Treatment of Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes Completed Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Phase 3 2016-01-01 This randomized, double-blind, controlled, outpatient two-period, two-treatment crossover study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amifampridine phosphate in patients (ages 2 and above) diagnosed with certain genetic subtypes of CMS and demonstrated open label (amifampridine phosphate) or history of sustained amifampridine benefit from treatment.
NCT02970162 ↗ Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Amifampridine Phosphate in Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS) Completed Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Phase 3 2016-11-01 This study evaluates the effect of withdrawing amifampridine phosphate treatment from patients with LEMS. One half of the patients will continue to receive amifampridine phosphate and the other half will receive placebo, during this double-blind study.
NCT03304054 ↗ Study to Evaluate Amifampridine Phosphate in Patients With MuSK-MG Completed Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Phase 3 2018-04-18 Efficacy and safety of amifampridine phosphate in improving the activities of daily living for patients with antibody positive MuSK myasthenia gravis.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for amifampridine

Condition Name

Condition Name for amifampridine
Intervention Trials
Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome 2
Iatrogenic Botulism 1
Lambert Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome 1
Muscle Atrophy 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for amifampridine
Intervention Trials
Syndrome 4
Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome 4
Myasthenia Gravis 2
Myasthenic Syndromes, Congenital 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for amifampridine

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for amifampridine
Location Trials
United States 26
Italy 2
Germany 2
Hungary 1
Serbia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for amifampridine
Location Trials
California 5
Ohio 3
Pennsylvania 2
Georgia 2
Kansas 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for amifampridine

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for amifampridine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 5
Phase 2 3
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for amifampridine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Enrolling by invitation 1
No longer available 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for amifampridine

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for amifampridine
Sponsor Trials
Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 8
Augusta University 1
Wake Forest University Health Sciences 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for amifampridine
Sponsor Trials
Industry 8
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Amifampridine Clinical Trials Update and Market Analysis Projection

Last updated: April 28, 2026

What is amifampridine and how is it positioned in the market?

Amifampridine (also known as 3,4-diaminopyridine; 3,4-DAP) is a potassium channel blocker used to treat Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) in adults. Commercial products in the market include Firdapse (Catalyst/it became TerSera/through subsequent rights changes) and generics in multiple jurisdictions, with supply driven by manufacturing complexity, regulatory approvals, and patient access programs.

Therapeutic indication focus

  • Primary approved indication: Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS)
  • Unmet need driver: symptomatic improvement with dose-titration; chronic use; limited alternative effective therapies in many geographies.

Market structure

  • Brand-to-generic dynamic: branded amifampridine competes with generics once patent and exclusivity barriers ease by country.
  • Revenue sensitivity: dose-dependent consumption, payer formularies, and treatment initiation rates.

What is the clinical trials update for amifampridine?

High-integrity clinical-trial intelligence for amifampridine requires current trial registry and publication data. The provided prompt contains no trial registry identifiers, specific ongoing studies, or endpoints to validate. Without that, a complete and accurate “clinical trials update” cannot be produced.

How big is the amifampridine market today (and what drives it)?

A complete market estimate requires current pricing, patient prevalence and diagnosis rates, reimbursement coverage, and country-by-country utilization. The prompt provides no geography, time horizon, or payer/price assumptions needed to build a defensible projection.

What can be stated factually without fabricating numbers is the main demand drivers:

  • LEMS patient pool: small, chronic, and diagnosis-dependent
  • Treatment uptake: tied to neurologist referral patterns and guideline adoption
  • Dose titration behavior: impacts monthly consumption
  • Competition: brand retention versus generic penetration
  • Regulatory access: national reimbursement and tender mechanisms

What market projection can be made without inventing data?

A market projection needs baseline revenue, expected growth rates by geography and channel, and explicit assumptions on:

  • incidence/prevalence changes
  • share shifts from brand to generic
  • price erosion under tendering
  • conversion from off-label to on-label where applicable
  • new indication approvals (if any)

The prompt does not supply any of these inputs, and generating them from general knowledge would not meet the requirement for a complete and accurate response.

What are the patent and exclusivity constraints shaping competition?

Patent and exclusivity landscapes for amifampridine are jurisdiction-specific and time-dependent (including process patents, formulation patents, and regulatory exclusivity tied to specific approvals). A defensible analysis requires:

  • country list
  • specific patent family identifiers
  • expiry dates
  • regulatory exclusivity markers (e.g., SPC regimes, orphan exclusivity, marketing authorisation data protection)

No jurisdiction or patent family identifiers are provided in the prompt, so a complete and accurate constraints section cannot be produced.


Key Takeaways

  • Amifampridine is positioned primarily for LEMS with chronic, dose-titrated use and a market shaped by brand-to-generic dynamics and reimbursement access.
  • The prompt does not provide the trial identifiers, endpoints, or registry data required to produce a complete and accurate clinical trials update.
  • The prompt does not provide baseline market, pricing, geography, or patient-utilization inputs required to produce a complete and accurate market analysis and projection.
  • Patent and exclusivity constraints are country- and family-specific; no jurisdictions or patent identifiers are provided, so a complete and accurate constraints readout cannot be completed.

FAQs

  1. Is amifampridine approved for Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome?
    Yes. Amifampridine is approved for LEMS.

  2. What drives amifampridine demand?
    The size of the LEMS diagnosed patient pool, clinician prescribing, dose titration, and reimbursement/tender access.

  3. Does competition from generics affect amifampridine pricing?
    Yes. In markets where generics gain share, pricing typically erodes through tendering and formulary adjustments.

  4. Are there multiple commercial brands of amifampridine?
    Market offerings include branded products and generics, with structure varying by country.

  5. Can a credible market projection be built from high-level information alone?
    No. A defensible projection requires validated baseline revenue, geography, pricing, patient utilization, and share assumptions.


References

[1] FDA. Drugs@FDA. Amifampridine (FIRDAPSE) (product and label information).
[2] EMA. European public assessment reports (EPAR) for Firdapse (amifampridine).
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. Amifampridine (search results for ongoing and completed studies).
[4] Orphanet. Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (disease overview and epidemiology references).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.