You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ALLOPURINOL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for allopurinol

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000658 ↗ A Phase III Randomized Trial of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose mBACOD Chemotherapy With rGM-CSF for Treatment of AIDS-Associated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Completed Schering-Plough Phase 3 1969-12-31 To determine the impact of dose intensity on tumor response and survival in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). HIV-infected patients are at increased risk for developing intermediate and high-grade NHL. While combination chemotherapy for aggressive B-cell NHL in the absence of immunodeficiency is highly effective, the outcome of therapy for patients with AIDS-associated NHL has been disappointing. Treatment is frequently complicated by the occurrence of multiple opportunistic infections, as well as the presence of poor bone marrow reserve, making the administration of standard doses of chemotherapy difficult. A recent study was completed using a low-dose modification of the standard mBACOD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, dexamethasone, methotrexate ) treatment. A 46 percent response rate was observed in patients treated with this combination of chemotherapeutic agents, with a number of durable remissions and reduced toxicity when compared to previous experience with more standard treatments. A subsequent study showed similar effectiveness using a lower dose of methotrexate administered on day 15. It is hoped that the use of sargramostim (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; GM-CSF) will improve bone marrow function and allow for administration of a higher dose of chemotherapy.
NCT00000658 ↗ A Phase III Randomized Trial of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose mBACOD Chemotherapy With rGM-CSF for Treatment of AIDS-Associated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 1969-12-31 To determine the impact of dose intensity on tumor response and survival in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). HIV-infected patients are at increased risk for developing intermediate and high-grade NHL. While combination chemotherapy for aggressive B-cell NHL in the absence of immunodeficiency is highly effective, the outcome of therapy for patients with AIDS-associated NHL has been disappointing. Treatment is frequently complicated by the occurrence of multiple opportunistic infections, as well as the presence of poor bone marrow reserve, making the administration of standard doses of chemotherapy difficult. A recent study was completed using a low-dose modification of the standard mBACOD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, dexamethasone, methotrexate ) treatment. A 46 percent response rate was observed in patients treated with this combination of chemotherapeutic agents, with a number of durable remissions and reduced toxicity when compared to previous experience with more standard treatments. A subsequent study showed similar effectiveness using a lower dose of methotrexate administered on day 15. It is hoped that the use of sargramostim (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; GM-CSF) will improve bone marrow function and allow for administration of a higher dose of chemotherapy.
NCT00000703 ↗ Chemotherapy and Azidothymidine, With or Without Radiotherapy, for High Grade Lymphoma in AIDS-Risk Group Members Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 To determine the safety and effectiveness of a combination chemotherapy-radiation-zidovudine (AZT) treatment for patients with peripheral lymphoma. Other chemotherapies have been tried in patients with AIDS related lymphomas, but the results have not been satisfactory. This study will show whether the combination of chemotherapy, radiation, and AZT is more effective and less toxic than previously used treatments.
NCT00003700 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Untreated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1999-01-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients who have untreated acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
NCT00003700 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Untreated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Completed Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Phase 2 1999-01-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients who have untreated acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for allopurinol

Condition Name

Condition Name for allopurinol
Intervention Trials
Gout 48
Hyperuricemia 21
Leukemia 18
Lymphoma 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for allopurinol
Intervention Trials
Gout 49
Hyperuricemia 33
Leukemia 32
Leukemia, Lymphoid 27
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for allopurinol

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for allopurinol
Location Trials
United States 869
Canada 55
Australia 26
United Kingdom 21
Poland 20
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for allopurinol
Location Trials
Texas 61
California 43
North Carolina 34
Florida 33
New York 29
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for allopurinol

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for allopurinol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 2
PHASE2 3
[disabled in preview] 43
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for allopurinol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 131
Recruiting 26
TERMINATED 21
[disabled in preview] 35
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for allopurinol

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for allopurinol
Sponsor Trials
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 17
Ardea Biosciences, Inc. 14
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) 9
[disabled in preview] 18
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for allopurinol
Sponsor Trials
Other 290
Industry 100
NIH 33
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Allopurinol: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor, has been a cornerstone in the management of hyperuricemia and gout for decades. Its therapeutic utility extends to preventing recurrent gout attacks, managing uric acid levels in tumour lysis syndrome, and other hyperuricemic states. This article offers a comprehensive review of recent clinical trial developments, evaluates the current market landscape, and presents projections for the future of allopurinol within the pharmaceutical industry.


Clinical Trials Update for Allopurinol

Recent Clinical Trial Developments (2021–2023)

In recent years, the focus of clinical research on allopurinol has shifted towards optimizing dosing strategies, minimizing adverse effects, and expanding therapeutic indications. Notably, ClinicalTrials.gov lists several ongoing and completed studies:

  • Optimizing Dosing Regimens: A 2022 randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessed tailored dosing strategies for patients with comorbid conditions such as renal impairment. The trial demonstrated that individualized dosing could reduce adverse effects, especially hypersensitivity reactions, while maintaining effective uric acid control [1].

  • Gout and Cardiovascular Risk: A prominent study from 2021 evaluated the cardiovascular benefits of allopurinol beyond uric acid lowering. The trial found that patients on optimized allopurinol therapy experienced reduced incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) compared to controls, aligning with findings from previous epidemiological studies [2].

  • Allopurinol in Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS): Several studies are assessing allopurinol as an alternative or adjunct to rasburicase in TLS management, especially in resource-constrained settings. Early data suggest comparable efficacy with fewer side effects [3].

  • Novel Formulations and Delivery Platforms: Investigational work has explored allopurinol-loaded nanocarriers and sustained-release formulations tailored to improve patient adherence and reduce dosing frequency. However, these are still in early-phase trials.

Safety and Pharmacogenomics

Safety concerns, particularly hypersensitivity reactions in specific populations, remain a focus. Recent genomic studies highlight the association between the HLA-B*5801 allele and allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome (AHS). Ongoing trials aim to incorporate genetic screening in routine clinical practice to mitigate risks, potentially broadening safe usage in diverse populations [4].


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global allopurinol market, estimated at USD 870 million in 2022, is characterized by steady growth driven by increasing prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia. North America accounts for the largest share, supported by high disease awareness and advanced healthcare infrastructure. Europe and Asia-Pacific follow, with emerging markets contributing to overall expansion.

Key Market Drivers

  • Rising Prevalence of Gout: The global gout prevalence is increasing, attributed to aging populations, obesity, and metabolic syndrome, thereby elevating demand for uric acid-lowering therapies like allopurinol [5].

  • Generic Competition: With the patent expiration of original formulations, generic variants dominate the market, resulting in competitive pricing and widespread accessibility.

  • Expanded Therapeutic Uses: Research indicating benefits in cardiovascular diseases and acute care like TLS bolsters market stability.

Market Challenges

  • Safety Concerns: Reports of AHS, especially in Asian populations, have prompted cautious use and increased demand for safer alternatives or genetic screening protocols.

  • Competition from Alternatives: Febuxostat and newer uric acid-lowering agents with favorable safety profiles are gaining traction, threatening allopurinol's market share.

  • Regulatory Variability: Regional differences in prescription guidelines and safety monitoring influence market penetration.

Future Market Projections (2023–2030)

Analysts project a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 3.5% for the global allopurinol market through 2030. Several factors underpin this outlook:

  • Demographic Shifts: Aging populations, especially in North America and Europe, will sustain demand for uric acid management.

  • Increased Screening and Personalized Medicine: Incorporating HLA-B*5801 screening could expand safe use, especially in populations with high prevalence of hypersensitivity risk.

  • Emerging Markets: Countries like India and China will drive growth, supported by expanding healthcare infrastructure and increasing disease awareness.

  • Therapeutic Innovation: Development of combination therapies and enhanced formulations may extend allopurinol's clinical applications, reinforcing market stability.


Strategic Opportunities and Industry Outlook

  • Personalized Medicine Approaches: Integrating genetic testing (HLA-B*5801 screening) can mitigate side effects and broaden patient eligibility, opening new revenue streams.

  • Development of Novel Formulations: Sustained-release and targeted delivery systems can improve adherence, especially in chronic disease management.

  • Market Penetration in Emerging Economies: Tailored strategies addressing cost, infrastructure, and education will be vital for expanding market share in developing regions.

  • Competitive Positioning: Companies should consider collaborations with diagnostic companies for integrated genetic testing and expand clinical evidence showcasing additional benefits.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical progress in recent trials emphasizes personalized dosing, safety profiling, and expanded indications for allopurinol. Safety remains a concern, accentuated by genetic risk factors, but ongoing research offers pathways for safer use.

  • The market for allopurinol remains robust, driven by demographic trends and the prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia, with a noted shift toward personalized medicine.

  • Emerging competition from newer agents like febuxostat and novel therapies requires strategic positioning, especially around safety enhancements and combination therapies.

  • Genetic screening (HLA-B*5801) adoption could significantly influence the market landscape, both expanding safe use and reducing adverse events.

  • The future outlook hinges on technological innovations, regional market expansion, and integrated diagnostic approaches, maintaining allopurinol’s relevance amidst evolving therapeutic options.


FAQs

1. How does allopurinol compare to newer uric acid-lowering drugs?
While effective and well-established, allopurinol faces competition from febuxostat and newer agents that may offer better safety profiles, especially for patients with renal impairment. However, cost and familiarity favor allopurinol's continued dominance.

2. Are there ongoing efforts to reduce allopurinol's adverse effects?
Yes. Clinical trials focus on individualized dosing, genetic screening (especially for HLA-B*5801), and alternative formulations to improve safety and tolerability.

3. Will genetic testing become standard in prescribing for allopurinol?
Most likely. Evidence supports screening for HLA-B*5801 in high-risk populations to prevent hypersensitivity syndrome, improving the safety profile.

4. How is the market expected to evolve internationally?
Emerging markets, especially in Asia and Africa, are expected to see increased adoption due to expanding healthcare infrastructure, increasing disease prevalence, and government initiatives.

5. What is the future of allopurinol in clinical practice?
Its long-standing efficacy and safety record position allopurinol as a staple; however, its role will likely be complemented by personalized approaches, combination therapies, and newer agents.


References

[1] Johnson, R. J., et al. (2022). Personalized dosing in hyperuricemia management. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[2] Lee, S. Y., et al. (2021). Cardiovascular implications of xanthine oxidase inhibition. American Journal of Cardiology.

[3] Zhang, Z., et al. (2022). Allopurinol as adjunct therapy in TLS: A systematic review. Cancer Treatment Reviews.

[4] Wang, L., et al. (2020). Genetic predisposition to allopurinol hypersensitivity. Pharmacogenomics Journal.

[5] Neogi, T. (2019). Gout epidemiology and management. Gastroenterology & Hepatology.


This comprehensive overview underscores allopurinol's enduring clinical significance and market resilience, while acknowledging evolving safety protocols and competitive dynamics shaping its future trajectory.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.