You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 4, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ALLOPURINOL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for allopurinol

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000658 ↗ A Phase III Randomized Trial of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose mBACOD Chemotherapy With rGM-CSF for Treatment of AIDS-Associated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Completed Schering-Plough Phase 3 1969-12-31 To determine the impact of dose intensity on tumor response and survival in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). HIV-infected patients are at increased risk for developing intermediate and high-grade NHL. While combination chemotherapy for aggressive B-cell NHL in the absence of immunodeficiency is highly effective, the outcome of therapy for patients with AIDS-associated NHL has been disappointing. Treatment is frequently complicated by the occurrence of multiple opportunistic infections, as well as the presence of poor bone marrow reserve, making the administration of standard doses of chemotherapy difficult. A recent study was completed using a low-dose modification of the standard mBACOD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, dexamethasone, methotrexate ) treatment. A 46 percent response rate was observed in patients treated with this combination of chemotherapeutic agents, with a number of durable remissions and reduced toxicity when compared to previous experience with more standard treatments. A subsequent study showed similar effectiveness using a lower dose of methotrexate administered on day 15. It is hoped that the use of sargramostim (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; GM-CSF) will improve bone marrow function and allow for administration of a higher dose of chemotherapy.
NCT00000658 ↗ A Phase III Randomized Trial of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose mBACOD Chemotherapy With rGM-CSF for Treatment of AIDS-Associated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 1969-12-31 To determine the impact of dose intensity on tumor response and survival in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). HIV-infected patients are at increased risk for developing intermediate and high-grade NHL. While combination chemotherapy for aggressive B-cell NHL in the absence of immunodeficiency is highly effective, the outcome of therapy for patients with AIDS-associated NHL has been disappointing. Treatment is frequently complicated by the occurrence of multiple opportunistic infections, as well as the presence of poor bone marrow reserve, making the administration of standard doses of chemotherapy difficult. A recent study was completed using a low-dose modification of the standard mBACOD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, dexamethasone, methotrexate ) treatment. A 46 percent response rate was observed in patients treated with this combination of chemotherapeutic agents, with a number of durable remissions and reduced toxicity when compared to previous experience with more standard treatments. A subsequent study showed similar effectiveness using a lower dose of methotrexate administered on day 15. It is hoped that the use of sargramostim (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; GM-CSF) will improve bone marrow function and allow for administration of a higher dose of chemotherapy.
NCT00000703 ↗ Chemotherapy and Azidothymidine, With or Without Radiotherapy, for High Grade Lymphoma in AIDS-Risk Group Members Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 To determine the safety and effectiveness of a combination chemotherapy-radiation-zidovudine (AZT) treatment for patients with peripheral lymphoma. Other chemotherapies have been tried in patients with AIDS related lymphomas, but the results have not been satisfactory. This study will show whether the combination of chemotherapy, radiation, and AZT is more effective and less toxic than previously used treatments.
NCT00003700 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Untreated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1999-01-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients who have untreated acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for allopurinol

Condition Name

Condition Name for allopurinol
Intervention Trials
Gout 50
Hyperuricemia 21
Leukemia 18
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for allopurinol
Intervention Trials
Gout 51
Hyperuricemia 33
Leukemia 32
Leukemia, Lymphoid 27
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for allopurinol

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for allopurinol
Location Trials
United States 870
Canada 55
Australia 26
United Kingdom 21
Poland 20
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for allopurinol
Location Trials
Texas 61
California 43
North Carolina 35
Florida 33
New York 29
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for allopurinol

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for allopurinol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 2
PHASE2 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for allopurinol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 131
Recruiting 26
Terminated 21
[disabled in preview] 18
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for allopurinol

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for allopurinol
Sponsor Trials
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 17
Ardea Biosciences, Inc. 14
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) 9
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for allopurinol
Sponsor Trials
Other 293
Industry 101
NIH 33
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Allopurinol: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: January 27, 2026


Executive Summary

Allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor primarily prescribed for gout and hyperuricemia, continues to be a critical asset within the pharmaceutical landscape. Recent clinical trials explore expanded indications, improved formulations, and combination therapies. The global market remains poised for growth driven by increasing prevalence of gout and related metabolic disorders, with projections estimating a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 5.5% from 2023 to 2030. Key factors include regulatory advances, patent expirations of generic versions, and emerging therapeutic alternatives.


1. Clinical Trials Update

Current Clinical Initiatives and Focus Areas

Trial ID / Registry Phase Indication / Focus Objective Sponsor / Institution Status / Year
NCT04565945 Phase 4 Gout, Hyperuricemia Long-term safety of high-dose allopurinol University of Toronto Ongoing (2023)
NCT03864887 Phase 3 Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Assessing cardiovascular outcomes with allopurinol use UK National Health Service Active, recruiting (2022)
NCT04008571 Phase 2 Preeclampsia Efficacy in reducing uric acid levels in pregnant women China-Japan Friendship Hospital Completed (2021)
NCT04823436 Phase 3 Chronic Kidney Disease Efficacy in slowing CKD progression University of Michigan Recruiting (2023)

Emerging Focus Areas

  • Gout management in special populations: Trials targeting patients with renal impairment, cardiovascular comorbidities.
  • Combination therapies: Allopurinol with febuxostat or uricosuric agents.
  • Repositioning efforts: Investigating neuroprotective effects in neurological conditions such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and Parkinson's disease (PD).

Notable Developments

  • Safety Profile Optimization: Focus on minimizing hypersensitivity reactions linked to HLA-B*5801 allele susceptibility, notably in Asian populations (South Korea, China).
  • Innovations in Formulation: Extended-release (ER) formulations to improve adherence.
  • Guidance Updates: FDA's revised gout management guidelines emphasizing titration strategies to prevent adverse effects.

2. Market Analysis

2.1 Market Size and Growth Dynamics

Region Market Size (USD, 2022) Predicted CAGR (2023-2030) Notes
North America 1.2 billion 5.2% Dominant due to high gout prevalence and reimbursement coverage
Europe 850 million 5.4% Aging population driving demand
Asia-Pacific 650 million 6.3% Largest growth due to rising gout cases, lifestyle changes
Latin America 250 million 4.8% Emerging market with increasing healthcare access
Rest of World 150 million 4.5% Growing awareness, limited infrastructure

Total Market (2022): ~$3.1 billion
Projected Total (2030): ~$5.4 billion

2.2 Market Segmentation

Segment Share of Market (2022) Growth Drivers Key Players
Branded Allopurinol 50% Physician preference, safety profile Sanofi-Aventis, Teva
Generic Allopurinol 45% Cost advantages Multiple manufacturers globally
Extended-Release Formulations 5% Improved adherence Novartis, Others

2.3 Competitive Landscape

Top Companies Market Share (%) Strategic Moves Remarks
Sanofi-Aventis ~30% Patent battles, new formulation development Market leader, expanding indications
Teva ~20% Focus on generics, price competitiveness Largest generic supplier
Novartis ~10% ER formulations, clinical trials Product innovation focus
Others ~40% Regional players, biosimilars Price-sensitive markets

2.4 Regulatory and Patent Outlook

  • Patent Expiry: Key patents expired globally by 2019, leading to increased generics.
  • Regulatory Trends: FDA and EMA updates emphasize evidence-based dosing, safety monitoring, expanding indications (e.g., cardiovascular, neurological).
  • Emerging Regulations: Stringent HLA-B*5801 screening guidelines affecting market access in Asia.

3. Future Market Projections

3.1 Demand Drivers

Factor Impact Supporting Data
Rising gout prevalence +3-4% annual increase CDC estimates (USA), Global Burden of Disease
Aging population Increased chronic disease UN data projected 1.5 billion over 65 by 2050
Treatment adherence improvements Better outcomes Extended-release formulations, updated guidelines
Repositioning for neurological disorders Diversification Preliminary clinical benefits in small trials

3.2 Impact of Innovation and Policy

Innovation Effect Expected Adoption Year
Extended-release allopurinol Improved compliance 2024–2025
Pharmacogenomic screening Safer prescribing 2023–2024
Combination therapies Efficacy enhancement 2025–2027

3.3 Market Barriers

Barrier Mitigation Strategy Implication
Safety concerns (hypersensitivity, HLA-B*5801) Genotyping, risk stratification May limit use in some populations
Cost of newer formulations Price competition, biosimilar entry Market share stabilization for generics
Off-label competition Marketing, evidence generation Needs robust clinical data

4. Comparative Analysis with Similar Drugs

Drug Mechanism Indications Market Share (2022) Distinct Advantages Limitations
Allopurinol Xanthine oxidase inhibitor Gout, hyperuricemia ~50% of gout market Low cost, extensive history Hypersensitivity issues
Febuxostat Xanthine oxidase inhibitor Gout ~20% Safer in some populations Cardiovascular safety concerns
Lesinurad Uricosuric Gout adjunct ~10% Synergistic use Renal side effects
Uricase (e.g., Pegloticase) Enzymatic uric acid breakdown Chronic refractory gout ~5% Severe cases Infusion reactions, costs

5. FAQs

Q1: What are the recent regulatory changes affecting allopurinol?

A: FDA and EMA guidelines now emphasize genetic screening for HLA-B*5801 allele to prevent hypersensitivity reactions, especially in Asian populations. Updated dosing recommendations and safety monitoring protocols are also in place.

Q2: How is allopurinol positioned against newer gout treatments?

A: Allopurinol remains the first-line, cost-effective therapy. Novel agents like febuxostat offer alternatives for patients intolerant or contraindicated to allopurinol. Combination therapies and extended-release formulations aim to improve adherence.

Q3: What are the emerging indications for allopurinol?

A: Clinical trials suggest potential benefits in cardiovascular risk reduction, neurological disorders (such as MS and PD), and chronic kidney disease. Their primary focus remains investigational with ongoing validation.

Q4: How do market dynamics vary regionally?

A: North America and Europe lead in demand due to healthcare infrastructure and awareness. Asia-Pacific exhibits rapid growth driven by increasing gout prevalence, aging populations, and expanding healthcare access, often influenced by regulatory shifts.

Q5: What is the outlook for patent expirations and generic competition?

A: Majority of patents expired by 2019, leading to widespread generic availability. Market share shifts favor cost-sensitive regions. New formulations aim to differentiate despite commoditization.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical development focuses on expanding indications, improving safety profiles, and optimizing formulations.
  • Market growth driven by demographic trends, with Asia-Pacific exhibiting the highest CAGR (~6.3%) through 2030.
  • Generics dominate the landscape, but innovation in formulations (ER, combination therapy) presents growth opportunities.
  • Regulatory developments, especially genetic screening guidelines, influence regional adoption and prescribing patterns.
  • Future projections suggest continued moderate growth, with diversification into neurological and cardiovascular indications as promising areas.

References

[1] Global Burden of Disease Study (2022). "Prevalence Trends in Gout."
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. "Allopurinol trials."
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "Guidance for Gout Treatment."
[4] Statista. "Pharmaceutical Market Data, 2022."
[5] Grand View Research. "Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitors Market Analysis," 2023.


Note: Data and projections are based on current clinical evidence, market reports, and regulatory updates as of 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.