You’re using a public version of DrugPatentWatch with 5 free searches available | Register to unlock more free searches. CREATE FREE ACCOUNT

Last Updated: March 28, 2024

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ALCOHOL; CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for alcohol; chlorhexidine gluconate

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Formulation NCT01349140 ↗ EXPAREL Dose-Response for Single-Injection Femoral Nerve Blocks Completed Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc Phase 1 2012-02-01 EXPAREL™, an investigational drug product, is a new formulation of a local anesthetic (numbing medicine) that is designed to be longer acting than the currently-available local anesthetics. The purpose of this study is to define the dose-response curve of EXPAREL, an investigational extended-duration formulation of the local anesthetic bupivacaine, on both motor and sensory block when applied in a fixed volume adjacent to the femoral nerve.
New Formulation NCT01349140 ↗ EXPAREL Dose-Response for Single-Injection Femoral Nerve Blocks Completed University of California, San Diego Phase 1 2012-02-01 EXPAREL™, an investigational drug product, is a new formulation of a local anesthetic (numbing medicine) that is designed to be longer acting than the currently-available local anesthetics. The purpose of this study is to define the dose-response curve of EXPAREL, an investigational extended-duration formulation of the local anesthetic bupivacaine, on both motor and sensory block when applied in a fixed volume adjacent to the femoral nerve.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for alcohol; chlorhexidine gluconate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00247897 ↗ Comparing Skin Disinfectants Before Labour Epidural Analgesia Completed University of British Columbia N/A 2005-11-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the current standard skin disinfectant solution for labour epidurals used at BC Women's Hospital to another common skin disinfectant and to the skin disinfectant solution recommended by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) prior to placing special intravenous lines. There is very little information available to guide doctors in deciding which is the best skin disinfectant for epidural analgesia. The study hypothesis is that the disinfectant solution recommended by the PHAC will be the most effective.
NCT00610324 ↗ Effect of Oral Decontamination Using Chlorhexidine or Potassium Permanganate in ICU Patients Completed King Edward Memorial Hospital Phase 4 2004-05-01 Oropharyngeal bacteria play an important role in the pathogenesis of nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill patients. Oral cleansing with chlorhexidine has been shown to decrease incidence of pneumonia in patients undergoing open heart surgery. Its role in critically ill general ICU patients is not yet proven. The present study proposes to study the effectiveness of twice-daily oral cleansing with 0.2% chlorhexidine solution on the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in ICU patients admitted to a single intensive care unit of an Indian public hospital
NCT00739583 ↗ Visibility of Site Marking for Surgical Time Out With Two Different Skin Preparation Solutions Completed Johns Hopkins University Phase 4 2008-08-01 Skin preparation solutions are used to clean the skin of the patient before surgery to decrease the rate of infection. This is particularly important for hip replacement to reduce the risk of prosthetic joint infection. The use of a mark on the skin for site identification has become the standard of care to decrease wrong site surgery. The Joint Commission has mandated site identification as part of the surgical "time-out". This procedure is also mandated by hospital policy. Preliminary work on cadaveric skin shows that the type of skin preparation can erase the mark used for surgical site identification. Erasure of the mark presents the surgeon with difficulty in performing the site identification. Any error or lack of visualization of the site marking could lead to catastrophic wrong site surgery. The investigators hypothesis is that chlorhexidine based skin preparation solutions erase site marking in comparison to iodine based skin preparation solutions. The investigators intend to prospectively study twenty patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Patients will be randomized to either a chlorhexidine based or an iodine based skin preparation solution. These solutions are both the current gold standard of clinical care. No differences have been shown in infection rates for total hip arthroplasty between these solutions. The site marking will be performed by the same surgeon in a standardized manner. The site marking will include the surgeon's three initials as per usual routine. Underneath the initials three random initials will be placed with a horizontal line drawn underneath. The preparation of the skin will be performed according to the manufacturer's specifications. Digital photographs will be taken of the skin marking after skin preparation. Photographs of the three random initials will be de-identified and placed in a "Powerpoint" presentation form. Ten orthopaedic surgeons will then read the site markings to identify the random initials and to tell whether the mark looks appropriate to perform a surgical timeout. The horizontal line will be digitally analyzed using Adobe Photoshop to quantitatively measure blackness of the mark.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for alcohol; chlorhexidine gluconate

Condition Name

Condition Name for alcohol; chlorhexidine gluconate
Intervention Trials
Bacteremia 3
Breast Surgery 3
Surgical Site Infection 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for alcohol; chlorhexidine gluconate
Intervention Trials
Infections 5
Infection 5
Bacteremia 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for alcohol; chlorhexidine gluconate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for alcohol; chlorhexidine gluconate
Location Trials
United States 20
Canada 4
United Kingdom 1
Taiwan 1
India 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for alcohol; chlorhexidine gluconate
Location Trials
California 7
Illinois 3
Ohio 2
Texas 2
Wisconsin 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for alcohol; chlorhexidine gluconate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for alcohol; chlorhexidine gluconate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 18
Phase 3 3
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for alcohol; chlorhexidine gluconate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 20
Not yet recruiting 5
Recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for alcohol; chlorhexidine gluconate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for alcohol; chlorhexidine gluconate
Sponsor Trials
University of California, San Diego 9
Northwestern University 2
3M 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for alcohol; chlorhexidine gluconate
Sponsor Trials
Other 42
Industry 5
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.