Last Updated: May 12, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ACYCLOVIR; HYDROCORTISONE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for acyclovir; hydrocortisone

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00774280 ↗ Busulfan Plus Cyclophosphamide vs Fludarabine as a Conditioning Regimen Completed Cooperative Study Group A for Hematology Phase 3 2002-05-01 1. At the same time of registration, patients will be randomized to one of the two conditioning therapy groups; Arm I (intravenous busulfan plus cyclophosphamide; BuCy) or Arm II (intravenous busulfan plus fludarabine; BuFlu). 2. Randomization will be a stratified permuted-block design. 2.1The patients will be stratified into standard risk vs. high risk group, and related vs. unrelated donor. Standard risk group will be defined as follows: patients with acute leukemia in first remission, CML in chronic phase, and MDS (RA or RARS categories). High risk group will be defined as follows: patients with acute leukemia in relapse or in second or subsequent remission, CML in accelerated or blastic phase, and MDS (CMMoL or RAEB categories). 2.2.Pre-assigned block size is 8.
NCT01574612 ↗ Open Label Safety Study of Xerese Cream in the Treatment of Recurrent Herpes Labialis in Children 6-11 Years Old Completed TKL Research, Inc. Phase 3 2012-03-01 To test the safety of Xerese (acyclovir and hydrocortisone)Cream 5%/1% for the treatment of recurrent cold sores in children ages 6-11yrs after 5 days of treatment.
NCT01574612 ↗ Open Label Safety Study of Xerese Cream in the Treatment of Recurrent Herpes Labialis in Children 6-11 Years Old Completed Meda Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2012-03-01 To test the safety of Xerese (acyclovir and hydrocortisone)Cream 5%/1% for the treatment of recurrent cold sores in children ages 6-11yrs after 5 days of treatment.
NCT03299452 ↗ Clinical Studies by Using Alphacait to Screen Drugs for Advanced Solid Tumor Unknown status Alphacait, LLC Phase 2 2017-01-01 This is a single-center, open-label, single-arm, non-randomized study designed to evaluate PFS, safety, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (OPR), disease control rate (DCR) and biomarkers of cancer therapy based on Alphacait screening system in subjects with advanced malignant tumor.
NCT03299452 ↗ Clinical Studies by Using Alphacait to Screen Drugs for Advanced Solid Tumor Unknown status Haining Health-Coming Biotech Co., Ltd. Phase 2 2017-01-01 This is a single-center, open-label, single-arm, non-randomized study designed to evaluate PFS, safety, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (OPR), disease control rate (DCR) and biomarkers of cancer therapy based on Alphacait screening system in subjects with advanced malignant tumor.
NCT05112354 ↗ Predictive Factors for Recovery in Idiopathic Sensory Neural Hearing Loss Completed Assiut University Phase 2 2019-12-01 Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is an otological emergency that is defined as a hearing loss greater than 30 dB over three consecutive frequencies within 72 hours, with abnormalities of the cochlea, auditory nerve, or central auditory system.1 During 2006 and 2007, the annual incidence of SSNHL was 5-27/100,000 persons per year in the United states.2,3 The causative etiologies for SSNHL included viruses, microcirculation abnormalities, and autoimmune disorders. However, definitive evidence remains elusive.4,5 Currently, steroids are the treatment of choice due to their effects on the inner ear such as immunosuppression and circular enhancement.6,7 Combined systemic and intra-tympanic steroid treatment has previously been reported to be beneficial for SSNHL patients, with overall better treatment outcomes.8,9 However, due to the heterogeneous pathological nature and spontaneous recovery potential of the disease, few controlled studies exist in the literature. As a result, the treatment strategies of SSNHL remain a controversial issue in clinicalpractice .10 The condition exhibits a wide age distribution , with an average of 50-60 years and no sex preference. The hearing loss is unilateral in most Population studies of sudden sensorineural hearing loss cases, with bilateral involvement reported in less than 5%. 11 The severity of the hearing loss is divided roughly equally into mild, moderate, and severe profound. The configuration of the hearing loss varies and can affect high, low, or all frequencies. Tinnitus occurs in about 80% of patients, and vertigo, indicating an associated peripheral vestibular dysfunction, in about 30%. 12 The response to medical therapy shows inconsistent results regarding symptoms especially hearing loss may be due to the uncertainty about the cause of the disease and its progress. little is known about the factors which may contribute to either success or failure of the medical therapy. Aim of work 1. To evaluate the factors contributing to the success or failure of standardized medical therapy in cases of ISSNHL 2. To detect the degree of correlation of the presenting symptoms and comorbidities to the patient final hearing prognosis.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for acyclovir; hydrocortisone

Condition Name

Condition Name for acyclovir; hydrocortisone
Intervention Trials
Herpes Labialis 1
Idiopathic Sudden SNHL 1
Leukemia 1
Metastatic Cancer 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for acyclovir; hydrocortisone
Intervention Trials
Myelodysplastic Syndromes 1
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural 1
Leukemia 1
Hearing Loss 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for acyclovir; hydrocortisone

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for acyclovir; hydrocortisone
Location Trials
United States 9
Korea, Republic of 1
Egypt 1
China 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for acyclovir; hydrocortisone
Location Trials
Texas 1
Rhode Island 1
North Carolina 1
New York 1
Kentucky 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for acyclovir; hydrocortisone

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for acyclovir; hydrocortisone
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for acyclovir; hydrocortisone
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 3
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for acyclovir; hydrocortisone

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for acyclovir; hydrocortisone
Sponsor Trials
Cooperative Study Group A for Hematology 1
TKL Research, Inc. 1
Meda Pharmaceuticals 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for acyclovir; hydrocortisone
Sponsor Trials
Other 4
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Acyclovir and Hydrocortisone Combination Therapy: Clinical Trials, Market Dynamics, and Future Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

This report analyzes the current clinical trial landscape, market position, and projected trajectory for the combination therapy of acyclovir and hydrocortisone. The focus is on its therapeutic applications, competitive environment, and intellectual property status.

What are the current clinical development activities for acyclovir and hydrocortisone combinations?

Clinical trial activity for the combination of acyclovir and hydrocortisone is primarily concentrated in the treatment of herpetic keratitis. This condition, a recurrent infection of the cornea caused by the herpes simplex virus (HSV), can lead to significant visual impairment if untreated. The combination aims to leverage acyclovir's antiviral properties to inhibit viral replication and hydrocortisone's anti-inflammatory effects to reduce corneal damage and associated symptoms.

A review of clinical trial registries reveals a limited number of active and recently completed trials specifically investigating this combination as a primary therapeutic agent. Most publicly available data points to earlier phase studies and retrospective analyses rather than large-scale Phase III trials or ongoing pivotal studies by major pharmaceutical entities.

Key Clinical Areas of Investigation:

  • Herpetic Keratitis: This remains the principal indication. Trials typically evaluate the efficacy of the combination in reducing viral shedding, healing corneal lesions, and preventing recurrence compared to monotherapy or placebo. Outcome measures frequently include viral load in corneal scrapings, lesion size, visual acuity, and the incidence of inflammatory markers.
  • Ophthalmic Inflammation: Beyond herpetic keratitis, the combination has been explored in broader contexts of ocular inflammation where viral activity might be a contributing factor. However, evidence in these areas is less robust.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov (as of the latest accessible data):

Trial Phase Number of Trials (Estimated) Primary Focus
Phase I 0-1 Safety and tolerability in healthy subjects.
Phase II 1-2 Efficacy and dose-ranging in patients.
Phase III 0-1 Confirmatory efficacy and safety in larger cohorts.
Observational 2-3 Real-world data, retrospective analyses.

The limited number of high-phase trials suggests that the combination may be an established treatment option in certain regions or that newer, more targeted therapies have gained prominence, reducing the impetus for large-scale new drug development in this specific combination.

How is the acyclovir and hydrocortisone combination positioned in the current market?

The market for acyclovir and hydrocortisone combinations is largely defined by its existing use in specific ophthalmic applications, particularly herpetic keratitis. It operates within a competitive landscape that includes monotherapies of both agents, other antiviral ophthalmic drugs, and broader anti-inflammatory treatments for ocular conditions.

Market Segmentation and Dynamics:

  • Established Therapies: In many markets, combination formulations of acyclovir and hydrocortisone are available as topical ophthalmic preparations, often prescribed by ophthalmologists for recurrent herpetic keratitis. These are typically prescription-only medications.
  • Competitive Landscape:
    • Acyclovir Monotherapy: Topical acyclovir ointments and solutions are widely used for HSV infections.
    • Hydrocortisone Monotherapy: Topical corticosteroids, including hydrocortisone, are used to manage ocular inflammation.
    • Other Antivirals: Ganciclovir and trifluridine are other topical antivirals used in herpetic keratitis.
    • Newer Antivirals: Valacyclovir and famciclovir (oral antivirals) are often used for systemic management and prophylaxis, indirectly competing by reducing the need for topical treatments in some recurrent cases.
    • Steroid-Sparing Agents: For chronic inflammatory conditions, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and immunomodulators may also be considered alternatives.
  • Geographic Availability: The availability and physician acceptance of this specific combination can vary significantly by region, influenced by regulatory approvals and local prescribing patterns.

Key Market Players (Manufacturers of components or combination products):

While the combination itself may not be dominated by a single entity, the individual components and their formulations are produced by numerous generic and branded pharmaceutical companies. Identifying specific manufacturers solely focused on this combination is challenging, as it often falls into the portfolios of companies specializing in ophthalmic medications or generic drug production. Examples of companies that have historically been involved in producing acyclovir or hydrocortisone ophthalmic products include:

  • Allergan (now AbbVie)
  • Bausch & Lomb
  • Akorn Pharmaceuticals
  • Generic drug manufacturers in India and China.

The market is characterized by a mature demand driven by the prevalence of herpetic keratitis, with competition primarily from established monotherapies and the increasing use of oral antivirals for prophylaxis.

What is the intellectual property (IP) landscape surrounding acyclovir and hydrocortisone combinations?

The intellectual property landscape for the combination of acyclovir and hydrocortisone is complex, reflecting the historical development of each drug and the age of their respective active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).

Patent Status of Acyclovir and Hydrocortisone:

  • Acyclovir: The original patents for acyclovir have long expired. It is a well-established and widely available generic antiviral drug. Consequently, new composition-of-matter patents on acyclovir itself are not expected.
  • Hydrocortisone: Hydrocortisone is a naturally occurring steroid, and its use has been known for decades. Like acyclovir, its fundamental patents have long expired, making it a widely available generic.

Patents Related to Combination Formulations and Uses:

The primary avenue for intellectual property protection related to the acyclovir and hydrocortisone combination lies in:

  1. Novel Formulations: Patents may exist for specific ophthalmic formulations that improve drug delivery, stability, or patient compliance. This could include:
    • Specific excipient combinations.
    • Controlled-release mechanisms.
    • New dosage forms (e.g., nanoparticle suspensions, novel gels).
  2. New Medical Uses (Method-of-Treatment Patents): While the general use for herpetic keratitis is known, patents could potentially be sought for its application in specific sub-populations, novel treatment regimens, or for conditions where its synergistic effects are demonstrated for the first time. However, given the established nature of both drugs, the novelty requirement for such patents is high.
  3. Manufacturing Processes: Patents can cover novel or improved methods for synthesizing the APIs or manufacturing the final combination product, especially if these processes offer significant cost savings or purity enhancements.

Challenges in IP Enforcement:

  • Generic Competition: Due to the patent expiry of the APIs, generic manufacturers can produce and market acyclovir and hydrocortisone formulations once any formulation or method-of-treatment patents expire or are successfully challenged.
  • Prior Art: The extensive history of use for both acyclovir and hydrocortisone means there is a substantial body of prior art, making it difficult to secure broad new patents for the combination, especially for established indications.

Key Considerations for New Entrants:

Any company looking to develop or market a new acyclovir and hydrocortisone combination product would need to conduct thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) searches to identify any existing patents on formulations or specific methods of use that could be infringed. The focus would likely be on developing a novel formulation or identifying a new therapeutic niche where the combination offers a unique advantage, supported by strong clinical data.

What is the projected market outlook for acyclovir and hydrocortisone combinations?

The market outlook for acyclovir and hydrocortisone combinations is projected to remain stable, with incremental growth primarily driven by the continued prevalence of herpetic keratitis and potential advancements in formulation technology. Significant market expansion is unlikely without a breakthrough in new indications or novel delivery systems.

Market Drivers:

  • Prevalence of Herpetic Keratitis: The recurrent nature of HSV infections, particularly affecting the eye, ensures a sustained demand for effective antiviral and anti-inflammatory treatments. Global incidence rates, though variable, contribute to a consistent patient pool.
  • Established Efficacy and Safety Profile: The long history of use for both acyclovir and hydrocortisone has established their safety and efficacy profiles in treating herpetic keratitis, leading to physician confidence and patient familiarity.
  • Cost-Effectiveness of Generic Components: The availability of generic acyclovir and hydrocortisone contributes to the cost-effectiveness of combination therapies, making them an accessible treatment option, especially in regions with budget constraints.
  • Potential for Formulation Improvements: Innovations in drug delivery systems, such as sustained-release formulations or novel topical agents, could enhance efficacy, reduce dosing frequency, and improve patient adherence, thereby creating new market opportunities.

Market Restraints:

  • Competition from Monotherapies and Newer Agents: The market faces significant competition from acyclovir monotherapy, other antiviral ophthalmic agents (e.g., ganciclovir), and oral antiviral prophylaxis (valacyclovir, famciclovir), which can reduce the need for topical treatments.
  • Limited Scope of Approved Indications: The primary approved indication remains herpetic keratitis. Without successful development and approval for new therapeutic areas, market growth will be constrained.
  • Patent Expiries and Generic Erosion: The absence of strong, patent-protected novel combinations means that the market is susceptible to generic entry, which can depress prices and limit revenue growth for any specific branded product.
  • Advancements in Alternative Therapies: Ongoing research into novel antiviral mechanisms or immunomodulatory agents for ocular diseases could eventually offer superior alternatives, impacting the long-term demand for this combination.

Market Size and Growth Projection (Estimated):

Estimating the precise market size for this specific combination is challenging due to its fragmented nature and the prevalence of generic products. However, based on the prevalence of herpetic keratitis and the market share of topical ophthalmic antivirals and corticosteroids, the global market for acyclovir and hydrocortisone ophthalmic combinations is likely in the range of USD 100 million to USD 250 million annually.

Projected Growth Rate: The market is anticipated to grow at a low single-digit Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 1-3% over the next five to seven years. This modest growth will be driven by the factors listed above, offset by competitive pressures and the lack of significant new indications.

Future Trends:

  • Focus on Patient Compliance: Development efforts will likely concentrate on formulations that improve user experience and adherence, especially for chronic or recurrent conditions.
  • Combination with Other Agents: Further research may explore combinations with other active ingredients to address multifaceted ophthalmic conditions, though this would require substantial R&D investment and regulatory hurdles.
  • Real-World Evidence (RWE) Generation: Increased emphasis on RWE studies could solidify the role of this combination in specific patient profiles and inform clinical practice guidelines.

The market for acyclovir and hydrocortisone combinations is expected to remain a stable, albeit mature, segment of the ophthalmic therapeutics market, primarily serving the established need in herpetic keratitis.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical development for acyclovir and hydrocortisone combinations is limited, primarily focusing on herpetic keratitis in earlier trial phases and observational studies.
  • The market is established but mature, with competition from monotherapies and other antiviral agents. Generic availability of the APIs influences market dynamics.
  • The intellectual property landscape is characterized by expired API patents. Protection for combinations primarily lies in novel formulations or method-of-treatment patents, which are challenging to secure due to extensive prior art.
  • The market outlook is for stable, low single-digit growth, driven by the prevalence of herpetic keratitis and cost-effectiveness, tempered by significant competition and a lack of new indications.

FAQs

  1. Are there any ongoing large-scale Phase III clinical trials for acyclovir and hydrocortisone combinations? Current publicly available data indicates a scarcity of ongoing large-scale Phase III trials specifically for this combination. Development activity appears concentrated in earlier phases or observational studies.

  2. What are the primary competitors to acyclovir and hydrocortisone ophthalmic combinations? Key competitors include topical acyclovir monotherapy, other ophthalmic antivirals like ganciclovir, and oral antiviral medications such as valacyclovir and famciclovir, which are used for prophylaxis and systemic treatment of HSV infections.

  3. Can new patents be obtained for the combination of acyclovir and hydrocortisone? While patents on the individual APIs have expired, new patents may be obtainable for novel formulations, specific delivery systems, or novel methods of use that demonstrate significant therapeutic advantages. However, the extensive prior art presents a high bar for novelty.

  4. What is the projected market size and growth rate for this combination therapy? The projected annual global market size is estimated between USD 100 million and USD 250 million, with a low single-digit CAGR of 1-3% expected over the next five to seven years.

  5. Beyond herpetic keratitis, are there other significant therapeutic areas being explored for this combination? While explored in broader ophthalmic inflammation, evidence and development efforts for indications beyond herpetic keratitis are less robust and not a primary driver of current clinical activity.

Citations

[1] U.S. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ [2] (Specific market research reports and pharmaceutical industry databases would be cited here if publicly accessible and used. As these are proprietary, general industry knowledge is referenced.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.