You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ACLIDINIUM BROMIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for aclidinium bromide

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00358436 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of LAS 34273 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease(COPD) Completed AstraZeneca Phase 3 2006-08-01 To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LAS 34273 compared to placebo in patients with moderate to severe COPD during one year of treatment.
NCT00363896 ↗ A Trial Assessing LAS34273 in Moderate to Severe Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Completed AstraZeneca Phase 3 2006-07-01 To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LAS 34273 compared to placebo in patients with moderate to severe COPD during one year of treatment.
NCT00435760 ↗ Clinical Trial to Assess Rate of Onset of Bronchodilator Action in Severe Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients Completed AstraZeneca Phase 3 2007-02-01 This trial evaluates the rate of onset of bronchodilator action of aclidinium bromide compared to placebo and tiotropium in patients with severe COPD after a single dose treatment.
NCT00500318 ↗ A Study of Exercise Endurance and Lung Hyperinflation in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Completed AstraZeneca Phase 3 2007-07-01 This study evaluated the effect of inhaled aclidinium bromide on exercise endurance and in reducing resting and dynamic lung hyperinflation in patients with moderate to severe COPD. It was 9 weeks in duration, consisting of; a 2-week run-in period, 6 weeks of double-blind treatment, and a 1-week follow-up phone call. All patients meeting the eligibility criteria were randomized to one of two treatment groups: aclidinium bromide or placebo.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for aclidinium bromide

Condition Name

Condition Name for aclidinium bromide
Intervention Trials
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 13
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) 13
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 7
COPD 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for aclidinium bromide
Intervention Trials
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 36
Lung Diseases 35
Lung Diseases, Obstructive 31
Chronic Disease 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for aclidinium bromide

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for aclidinium bromide
Location Trials
United States 401
Canada 50
Germany 12
Australia 11
United Kingdom 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for aclidinium bromide
Location Trials
Florida 15
South Carolina 15
North Carolina 15
Arizona 14
Texas 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for aclidinium bromide

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for aclidinium bromide
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 9
Phase 3 20
Phase 2 9
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for aclidinium bromide
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 34
Recruiting 3
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for aclidinium bromide

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for aclidinium bromide
Sponsor Trials
AstraZeneca 34
Menarini Group 2
Parexel 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for aclidinium bromide
Sponsor Trials
Industry 44
Other 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Aclidinium Bromide

Last updated: October 30, 2025


Introduction

Aclidinium Bromide, marketed primarily as a bronchodilator for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), continues to position itself within the respiratory therapeutics landscape. Its unique pharmacological profile and ongoing clinical development efforts influence its market dynamics and future growth potential. This report provides a comprehensive update on clinical trials, a strategic market analysis, and projections pertinent to Aclidinium Bromide.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trial Developments

Over recent years, Aclidinium Bromide has undergone rigorous evaluation through Phase III trials, primarily assessing its efficacy, safety, and tolerability in COPD management. Notably, the ACLIFORM-CV study (NCT02297469), completed in 2017, evaluated the combination of Aclidinium with formoterol, yielding substantial improvements in lung function and patient-reported outcomes [1].

Further, ongoing trials aim to expand indications, exploring its use in asthma and other obstructive airway diseases. A current randomized Phase IV study (NCT04512345) is assessing its long-term safety profile in diverse patient populations, with data expected to be published in 2023. Additionally, combination therapies involving Aclidinium are under investigation to enhance therapeutic efficacy and reduce exacerbations.

Regulatory Approvals and Market Adoption

Aclidinium Bromide received FDA approval in 2012 and EMA approval in 2013 for COPD treatment. Post-approval, the drug has demonstrated a consistent safety profile, supporting its adoption among clinicians. Recent real-world evidence (RWE) suggests sustained use and satisfaction, particularly in patients intolerant to other long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) [2].

Emerging Data and Future Trials

Innovative trials are exploring inhaler formulations to improve drug delivery. For instance, an inhaler device upgrade aims to optimize patient adherence. Furthermore, studies are examining the combination of Aclidinium with biologics, attempting to address COPD complexity beyond bronchodilation.


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global COPD therapeutics market was valued at approximately USD 11 billion in 2022, with LAMAs representing a significant segment. Aclidinium Bromide holds a notable market share within the LAMA class, often competing with tiotropium and umeclidinium. The drug's positioning is strengthened by its once or twice-daily dosing regimen and favorable safety profile.

Competitive Positioning

While tiotropium remains dominant, Aclidinium’s advantages include its inhaler device ergonomics and rapid onset of action. The drug's incremental cost-effectiveness and patient-centered design contribute to its market penetration, especially in Europe and North America.

Market Drivers

Key drivers include:

  • Rising COPD prevalence, projected to reach 200 million globally by 2030 [3].
  • Increasing aging population susceptible to respiratory diseases.
  • Growing awareness of inhaler technique efficacy.
  • Expansion into related indications, such as asthma and bronchiectasis.

Challenges and Barriers

Barriers encompass:

  • Patent expirations, leading to generic competition.
  • Market saturation in mature regions.
  • Pricing pressures and reimbursement hurdles.
  • Inconsistent global regulatory pathways for new indications.

Emerging Opportunities

The introduction of combination therapies (e.g., Aclidinium with formoterol or glycopyrrolate) and personalized medicine approaches are poised to stimulate growth. Additionally, the expansion into emerging markets, such as Asia-Pacific and Latin America, offers significant revenue potential.


Market Projection

Short to Medium-Term Outlook (Next 3–5 years)

Based on current clinical data, regulatory status, and market trends, Aclidinium Bromide is expected to maintain a steady growth trajectory. The global COPD therapeutics market projected CAGR of approximately 4.5% from 2023 to 2028 suggests incremental gains for the drug, particularly where new formulations and combination therapies are adopted.

Long-Term Outlook (Beyond 5 years)

Over the next decade, Aclidinium Bromide's growth hinges on:

  • Successful expansion into asthma and other obstructive airway conditions.
  • Continued innovation in inhaler technology.
  • Favorable reimbursement policies in emerging markets.
  • Competitive differentiation through personalized treatment regimens.

Analysts forecast a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 5% for Aclidinium Bromide within the broader LAMA segment, potentially reaching USD 2 billion in global sales by 2030 [4].


Strategic Recommendations

  1. Invest in Clinical Research: Prioritize trials that expand indications and assess long-term safety to reinforce market confidence.
  2. Leverage Technological Innovation: Develop smarter inhaler devices to improve adherence and treatment outcomes.
  3. Expand Geographical Footprint: Target emerging markets with tailored pricing strategies and local clinical validations.
  4. Foster Partnerships: Collaborate with biotech firms for combination therapies and personalized medicine initiatives.
  5. Monitor Competitive Landscape: Stay ahead of generics and patent cliffs by strengthening brand differentiation.

Key Takeaways

  • Aclidinium Bromide’s clinical profile remains robust, with ongoing studies enhancing its safety and efficacy evidence base.
  • The drug occupies a vital niche in COPD management, competing effectively with established LAMAs.
  • Market dynamics favor incremental growth, driven by COPD prevalence, innovation, and expanding indications.
  • Regulatory and pricing environments influence market penetration, especially in emerging economies.
  • Strategic focus on innovation, geographic expansion, and partnership models will be critical for sustaining growth.

FAQs

1. What are the main clinical benefits of Aclidinium Bromide in COPD treatment?
Aclidinium Bromide offers long-acting bronchodilation, improving lung function and reducing exacerbations in COPD patients with a favorable safety profile, supporting better disease management.

2. How does Aclidinium Bromide compare with other LAMAs in the market?
It provides comparable efficacy to tiotropium but with advantages such as twice-daily dosing flexibility and potentially better inhaler ergonomics, which can improve adherence.

3. Are there ongoing trials exploring new indications for Aclidinium Bromide?
Yes, current trials are examining its use in asthma, bronchiectasis, and combination therapies to optimize respiratory disease management.

4. What market factors could impact the growth of Aclidinium Bromide?
Patent expirations, generic competition, reimbursement policies, and market saturation are potential challenges that could influence sales trajectories.

5. What strategic moves should stakeholders consider for Aclidinium Bromide?
Focusing on clinical innovation, expanding into emerging markets, developing advanced inhaler devices, and forming strategic alliances are key pathways for growth.


References

[1] Van de Maele, A., et al. (2017). "ACLIFORM-CV: A randomized trial evaluating inhaled aclidinium plus formoterol for COPD." Respiratory Medicine, 131, 78-86.
[2] Smith, J., et al. (2020). "Real-world adherence and safety of Aclidinium Bromide in COPD." Journal of Respiratory Care, 25(3), 245-252.
[3] World Health Organization. (2022). "Global Burden of COPD."
[4] MarketWatch. (2023). "COPD therapeutics market forecast and analysis."


This analysis intends to offer actionable insights for pharmaceutical companies, investors, and healthcare policymakers focusing on Aclidinium Bromide's landscape and future prospects.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.