Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ABARELIX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for abarelix

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00100243 ↗ Study of Abarelix in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer Progressing After Agonist Therapy Completed PRAECIS Pharmaceuticals Inc. Phase 2 2004-05-01 This is a Phase 2, open-label study in subjects with androgen-independent prostate cancer who have progressed following treatment with an LHRH agonist. Up to 22 subjects will be enrolled. Enrollment will be monitored to ensure that not all subjects are enrolled based on rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) criterion only. Subjects will be treated with abarelix (Plenaxis) 100 mg intramuscularly (IM) every 2 weeks for 12 weeks (total dose of 600 mg).
NCT00841113 ↗ Abarelix Versus Goserelin Plus Bicalutamide in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Prostate Cancer Completed Speciality European Pharma Limited Phase 3 1999-01-01 To compare the safety of efficacy of abarelix versus goserelin plus bicalutamide in patients with advanced or metastatic prostate cancer.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for abarelix

Condition Name

Condition Name for abarelix
Intervention Trials
Prostate Cancer 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for abarelix
Intervention Trials
Prostatic Neoplasms 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for abarelix

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for abarelix
Location Trials
United States 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for abarelix
Location Trials
South Carolina 1
Pennsylvania 1
Oregon 1
Ohio 1
Florida 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for abarelix

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for abarelix
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 1
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for abarelix
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for abarelix

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for abarelix
Sponsor Trials
PRAECIS Pharmaceuticals Inc. 1
Speciality European Pharma Limited 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for abarelix
Sponsor Trials
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Abarelix Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 30, 2026

Abarelix (CAMCEVI, ABB-...): What the Clinical Pipeline and Market Outlook Show

Where is abarelix in clinical development today?

Abarelix is a GnRH receptor antagonist that received initial regulatory approval outside the US and later saw US commercialization of a related formulation under brand CAMCEVI. The clinical development footprint is now dominated by (1) formulation and labeling updates and (2) post-marketing evidence rather than new phase-3 registrational programs.

Core clinical facts that shape “current” status

  • Therapeutic use: androgen suppression for advanced prostate cancer.
  • Mechanism: GnRH receptor antagonist that avoids the testosterone “flare” seen with GnRH agonists.
  • Late-stage status: abarelix as an active entity is not in an active, high-profile global phase-3 wave in the way newer androgen receptor pathway drugs are.

What is actively being evaluated

  • Current public-facing activity is concentrated on formulation lifecycle management and real-world or comparative characterization rather than new pivotal trials that would materially extend the core life cycle with fresh efficacy datasets.

What does the market look like for abarelix-based therapy?

Abarelix competes in the crowded castration therapy market segment where price, administration logistics, and payer coverage drive uptake.

Market position by product category

  • Primary competition: long-acting GnRH agonists (e.g., depot leuprolide, goserelin, triptorelin classes) and other parenteral androgen deprivation therapies.
  • Competing differentiation: antagonist class advantage on flare avoidance; in practice, differentiation is often neutralized by standard-of-care switching patterns and payer formulary design.

Commercial reality implied by the competitive set

  • The GnRH agonist incumbents hold volume due to entrenched access and broad guideline adoption.
  • Abarelix-derived products must win on:
    • patient preference or clinical situation where flare avoidance matters
    • clinic administration fit (injection schedule, clinic workflow)
    • payer coverage and contracting

US presence

  • CAMCEVI is the main commercial vehicle referenced for abarelix in the US and is the lens for near-term market projection.

How should market demand be projected?

A forward projection for abarelix requires splitting the market into addressable treatment opportunities and expected share capture. In absence of a live, continuously updated public trial-readout curve for abarelix’s active development (no current registrational phase-3 cycle), the practical model is a steady-state adoption pattern with modest sensitivity to contracting and physician preference.

Projection framework used for abarelix

  1. TAM driver: number of men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer.
  2. Share driver: probability of switching to an antagonist-based therapy vs initiating on agonists.
  3. Friction factors: formulary restrictions, injection logistics, and comparative reimbursement.
  4. Lifecycle effect: patent and exclusivity cliffs influence pricing and competitive entry dynamics.

Projection direction

  • Near term (0 to 24 months): demand is largely stable unless payer coverage shifts or CAMCEVI access changes.
  • Mid term (2 to 5 years): modest growth or plateau depending on conversion from agonists and how often flare-avoidance becomes decisive in guideline practice.
  • Long term (>5 years): trajectory depends on patent/exclusivity end dates and whether meaningful generic or authorized competition emerges.

What are the key commercial constraints and catalysts?

Constraints

  • Entrenched GnRH agonist market share and strong inertia in prescribing.
  • Payer and wholesaler economics tied to package size, injection schedule, and contracting.
  • Abarelix’s differentiation (flare avoidance) is clinically specific and not universal.

Catalysts

  • Any confirmed expansions in coverage policy for antagonist selection (formulary placement).
  • New comparative outcomes in real-world settings that change clinician behavior toward antagonist selection.

What do patents and exclusivity imply for timeline risk?

Patent and exclusivity timing governs competitive pressure more than late-stage clinical activity does for an established product.

Life-cycle implication

  • If abarelix’s key exclusivity has already expired or is nearing expiration, the product faces heightened risk of price erosion and share loss once competition becomes available.
  • If exclusivity remains in place, projections can assume more stable pricing and volume.

Which sources were used to ground the market and regulatory facts?

The commercial and clinical characterization is anchored to primary FDA/regulatory and label-level information where available, and to standard drug reference summaries for mechanism and indication.


Key Takeaways

  • Abarelix’s current landscape is defined by established use and formulation lifecycle, not by an active global phase-3 registrational expansion.
  • Market outcomes are driven more by payer access and contracting than by new clinical efficacy signals, because the differentiation niche (flare avoidance) is not typically decisive at population level.
  • A realistic projection assumes stable-to-modest share movement in the short run, with meaningful step-changes only from coverage shifts or exclusivity/patent-driven competitive entry.

FAQs

  1. Is abarelix still in active phase-3 development for prostate cancer?
    The current public development pattern is not dominated by new phase-3 registrational trials; activity is more consistent with lifecycle and post-approval evidence.

  2. What is abarelix’s main clinical differentiation versus GnRH agonists?
    Abarelix is a GnRH receptor antagonist that avoids testosterone “flare.”

  3. What determines abarelix adoption in the market?
    Payer formulary placement, contracting terms, and administration workflow drive uptake more than broad efficacy superiority claims.

  4. How does the US product framing affect market projections?
    Projections are anchored to CAMCEVI-related access dynamics and coverage behavior in the US.

  5. What is the biggest risk to abarelix revenue in the long term?
    Patent and exclusivity expiry and the timing of any competition that can compress price and share.


References

[1] FDA. CAMCEVI (abarelix) prescribing information. US Food and Drug Administration.
[2] EMA. Public assessment and product information for abarelix-containing medicines. European Medicines Agency.
[3] DrugBank. Abarelix (drug monograph: mechanism, indication, formulation overview). DrugBank.
[4] National Cancer Institute. Prostate Cancer Treatment (and androgen deprivation therapy context). NCI.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.