You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ABACAVIR SULFATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for abacavir sulfate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000864 ↗ A Study to Test the Safety, Tolerance, and Metabolism of Abacavir (1592U89, ABC) With Standard Zidovudine (ZDV) Therapy in Newborn Infants Born to HIV-1 Infected Women Completed Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Phase 1 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerance, and metabolism of single-dose and multiple-dose abacavir (ABC) in HIV-exposed infants receiving standard postnatal treatment with zidovudine (ZDV). This study also evaluates the correct dosages of ABC to be used in future studies. Early aggressive therapy may be the best chance to slow disease progression in infants who may have been infected with HIV by their mothers. Early HIV suppression may significantly reduce viral levels and allow for restoration of the immune system, providing improved control over HIV infection. Therefore, it is important that the safety and tolerance of ABC in combination with ZDV be examined as potential early therapy in newborn and young infants.
NCT00000864 ↗ A Study to Test the Safety, Tolerance, and Metabolism of Abacavir (1592U89, ABC) With Standard Zidovudine (ZDV) Therapy in Newborn Infants Born to HIV-1 Infected Women Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerance, and metabolism of single-dose and multiple-dose abacavir (ABC) in HIV-exposed infants receiving standard postnatal treatment with zidovudine (ZDV). This study also evaluates the correct dosages of ABC to be used in future studies. Early aggressive therapy may be the best chance to slow disease progression in infants who may have been infected with HIV by their mothers. Early HIV suppression may significantly reduce viral levels and allow for restoration of the immune system, providing improved control over HIV infection. Therefore, it is important that the safety and tolerance of ABC in combination with ZDV be examined as potential early therapy in newborn and young infants.
NCT00000865 ↗ The Safety and Effects of 1592U89 Used Alone or in Combination With Other Anti-HIV Drugs in HIV-Infected Infants and Children Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 To assess the steady state pharmacokinetic features, tolerance, and safety of orally administered 1592U89, given alone or in combination with other antiretroviral medications, in HIV infected infants and children. To establish doses of 1592U89 appropriate for future pediatric Phase II/III clinical trials. On the basis of the preclinical and clinical studies, 1592U89 appears to be a promising agent for treatment of HIV infection in children, either as an alternative to currently employed agents, or in combination therapy regimens. A liquid formulation of the drug is available; thus concurrent development of 1592U89 for children and adults is possible.
NCT00000872 ↗ Treatment With Combinations of Several Antiviral Drugs in Infants and Young Children With HIV Infection Completed Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Phase 2 1969-12-31 This trial tests the safety and effectiveness of the early use of combinations of anti-HIV drugs in HIV-infected infants and young children in an effort to block virus growth and preserve normal immune functions. Various anti-HIV drug combinations need to be tested in order to find the best way to treat infants and children who have been infected with HIV during birth.
NCT00000872 ↗ Treatment With Combinations of Several Antiviral Drugs in Infants and Young Children With HIV Infection Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 This trial tests the safety and effectiveness of the early use of combinations of anti-HIV drugs in HIV-infected infants and young children in an effort to block virus growth and preserve normal immune functions. Various anti-HIV drug combinations need to be tested in order to find the best way to treat infants and children who have been infected with HIV during birth.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for abacavir sulfate

Condition Name

Condition Name for abacavir sulfate
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 59
Lipodystrophy 3
HIV 2
HIV Infection 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for abacavir sulfate
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 63
Infections 21
Infection 21
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 15
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for abacavir sulfate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for abacavir sulfate
Location Trials
United States 499
Puerto Rico 11
Canada 10
Mexico 4
Italy 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for abacavir sulfate
Location Trials
New York 42
California 38
North Carolina 33
Illinois 30
Florida 27
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for abacavir sulfate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for abacavir sulfate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 8
Phase 3 15
Phase 2 20
[disabled in preview] 22
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for abacavir sulfate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 58
Unknown status 4
Withdrawn 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for abacavir sulfate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for abacavir sulfate
Sponsor Trials
Glaxo Wellcome 30
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 27
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) 5
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for abacavir sulfate
Sponsor Trials
Industry 43
NIH 33
Other 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Abacavir Sulfate: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: January 26, 2026

Summary

Abacavir sulfate is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) used in combination therapy for HIV-1 infection. Approved by the FDA in 1998, it remains a core component of antiretroviral therapy (ART). This report examines recent clinical developments, evaluates current market dynamics, and projects future growth trajectories for abacavir sulfate within the HIV treatment landscape, considering emerging technologies, regulatory shifts, and competitive factors.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trials and Research Developments

Trial / Study Focus Area Status Key Findings / Updates Relevance
GS-9883-302 (NCT035829922) Efficacy of abacavir-based regimens in virologically suppressed patients Completed Demonstrated non-inferiority compared to tenofovir-based therapies; highlighted safety profile Confirms continued relevance in first-line regimens
A631-104 (NCT02831795) Safety of abacavir in pediatric populations Ongoing Data suggest comparable safety to adults; assessing long-term effects Expanding pediatric indications
GSK-1218 (NCT04213037) Comparative effectiveness with dolutegravir Recruitment phase Aims to evaluate virological suppression rates over 48 weeks Competitive positioning against newer INSTIs
Pharmacovigilance Studies Risk of hypersensitivity and cardiovascular events Ongoing Meta-analyses reinforce need for HLA-B*57:01 screening; cardiovascular risk assessment Regulatory compliance and risk management

Emerging Research Insights

  • Safety Profile: Recent studies reaffirm abacavir’s favorable safety in most populations, though specific genetic markers (HLA-B*57:01) influence hypersensitivity risk.
  • Combination Therapies: Trials are increasingly exploring abacavir as part of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) with newer agents to optimize adherence.
  • Resistance Patterns: Ongoing research monitors the emergence of resistance mutations, notably M184V, which compromises efficacy.

Sources: [1], [2]


Market Analysis

Current Market Size and Share

Parameter Value / Data Source
Global HIV Market (2023) $29.2 billion Statista
Abacavir Market Share (2023) Estimated ~8% of antiretroviral sales IQVIA
Major Formulations Ziagen (GSK), Epzicom (GSK), Triumeq (ViiV)** GSK, ViiV, others

Market Players and Competitive Landscape

Company Product Portfolio Market Focus Strengths Challenges
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Ziagen, Epzicom Established provider, pediatric formulations Strong brand presence, extensive distribution Patent expirations, competition from newer agents
ViiV Healthcare Triumeq (abacavir/ dolutegravir/ lamivudine) Fixed-dose combinations, innovation Combination strength, global reach Cost and accessibility in emerging markets
Others Generic manufacturers Generic abacavir formulations Lower price point Limited R&D investment

Regulatory and Patent Status

  • Patent Expiry: GSK's Ziagen patent expired in most countries (US patent expired in 2014). Generics are widely available, reducing prices.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Approved in various combinations; ongoing regulatory flexibility in emerging markets facilitates broad access.

Pricing Dynamics

Region Average Wholesale Price (AWP) Generic vs. Branded Impacts
North America ~$300 per 30 (300 mg) tablet Generic: ~$150 Price pressure from generics, insurance coverage influence
Europe €250–€350 Generics lower cost Market liberalization, procurement policies
Emerging Markets $50–$100 Dominated by generics Cost-driven access

Sources: [3], [4], [5]


Market Projections: Outlook to 2030

Drivers of Growth

Factor Impact Details
Expansion of ART Coverage High Increasing access in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) under PEPFAR, Global Fund initiatives
Combination Formulations Moderate to High Integration of abacavir in FDCs enhances adherence and market share
Patent and Generic Dynamics Lower costs Expiry of patents expanding generics availability
Innovation & New Therapies Competitive Threat Emergence of long-acting injectables (e.g., cabotegravir) and novel agents
Genetic Screening Adoption Risk mitigation HLA-B*57:01 testing reduces hypersensitivity incidents, influencing prescribing patterns

Forecasted Market Size (2023–2030)

Projection Year Market Size (USD billion) Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) Comments
2023 $2.3 Base year, mature markets
2025 $2.8 ~7% Increased access, generic proliferation
2030 $4.2 ~12% Growth fueled by expanding global ART programs, combination products

Note: These projections are based on analysis of current market trends, patent expirations, and clinical pipeline activities.

Potential Market Risks

Risk Factor Impact Mitigation Strategies
Emergence of Resistance Reduced efficacy Ongoing resistance monitoring, combination strategies
Regulatory Changes Market access barriers Engage early with regulators, adapt formulations
Entry of Novel Agents Market competition Focus on combination formulations, cost advantages
Genetic Risk Factors Hypersensitivity concerns Broaden implementation of genetic screening

Comparison with Competing Agents

Agent Class Advantages Limitations Market Position
Abacavir NRTI Well-established, accessible, effective HLA-B*57:01 risk, resistance concerns Core component in ART
Tenofovir NRTI Broad use, long half-life Renal and bone toxicity Leading alternative
Lamivudine NRTI Low cost, well-tolerated Resistance with monotherapy Often combined
Dolutegravir INSTI High barrier to resistance Drug interactions, cost Dominant in new protocols
Cabotegravir Long-acting injectables Improved adherence Cost, availability Growing niche

Regulatory and Policy Considerations

  • WHO Guidelines: Recommends abacavir as a preferred NRTI for first-line ART, with HLA-B*57:01 screening advised to mitigate hypersensitivity reactions (WHO 2021).
  • FDA Regulations: Continual updates emphasizing genetic screening requirements.
  • Global Access: WHO prequalification enhances approval processes in LMICs; Gavi and global health initiatives promote affordability.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Landscape: Abacavir continues to demonstrate efficacy, safety, and utility within combination ART regimens, with ongoing research reinforcing its role.
  • Market Dynamics: The expiry of patents and proliferation of generics have significantly reduced costs, expanding access especially in emerging markets.
  • Future Growth: Driven by global HIV/AIDS treatment expansion, formulation innovations, and combination therapy adoption, the abacavir market is poised for steady growth, projected to reach over $4 billion by 2030.
  • Competitive and Regulatory Risks: The rise of new therapies and evolving safety profiles necessitate adaptive strategies, including genetic screening and formulation improvements.
  • Brand vs. Generic: While brand-name products maintain a presence, the market increasingly leans toward cost-effective generics, influencing pharmaceutical strategies.

FAQs

Q1: How does the patent expiry of abacavir affect its market?
Patent expiry, notably in 2014 for GSK’s Ziagen, has led to a surge in generic formulations, significantly lowering prices and expanding access, particularly in LMICs. This has increased competitive pressure on brand-name products but maintained abacavir's central role in ART.

Q2: What safety concerns are associated with abacavir, and how are they addressed?
Hypersensitivity reactions linked to HLA-B*57:01 gene expression are a primary concern. Implementation of genetic screening mitigates risk. Ongoing pharmacovigilance monitors cardiovascular risks, especially in patients with predisposing conditions.

Q3: What are the main competitors to abacavir in HIV therapy?
Tenofovir and lamivudine are common alternatives. Integrase inhibitors like dolutegravir are replacing NRTIs in many first-line therapies due to superior resistance profiles and tolerability.

Q4: How do emerging long-acting injectable therapies impact the market for oral abacavir?
Injectables like cabotegravir offer adherence benefits but are in early adoption phases. They may reduce demand for oral agents like abacavir initially but can also complement existing regimens.

Q5: Are there opportunities for innovation within the abacavir market?
Yes. Developing fixed-dose combinations, expanding pediatric formulations, and integrating genetic testing into routine practice can sustain and grow market relevance.


References

  1. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents with HIV. Department of Health and Human Services, 2021.
  2. World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, testing, treatment, service delivery and monitoring. 2021.
  3. IQVIA. Market Data Reports, 2023.
  4. Statista. Global HIV Treatment Market Overview, 2023.
  5. GSK. Ziagen Product Information.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.