You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ZIAGEN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Ziagen

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00004585 ↗ A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Combination Anti-HIV Therapy in HIV-Infected Adults Completed Glaxo Wellcome Phase 4 1999-10-01 The purpose of this study is to see if a certain combination of anti-HIV drugs is safe and effective in HIV-infected patients. The drug combination includes a tablet containing lamivudine and zidovudine (called Combivir) plus abacavir plus efavirenz.
NCT00004981 ↗ Safety and Effectiveness of Three Anti-HIV Drugs Combined in One Pill (Trizivir) Unknown status Glaxo Wellcome Phase 3 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to look at the safety and effectiveness of a pill called Trizivir that is a combination of three anti-HIV drugs (zidovudine, lamivudine, and abacavir). Zidovudine and lamivudine are often given combined in one pill (Combivir). In this study, Trizivir will be compared to Combivir plus abacavir.
NCT00005017 ↗ Effectiveness and Safety of Epivir/Ziagen/Zerit (3TC/ABC/d4T) Versus Epivir/Ziagen/Sustiva (3TC/ABC/EFV) Versus Epivir/Ziagen/Agenerase/Norvir (3TC/ABC/APV/RTV) in HIV Patients Who Have Never Received Treatment Unknown status Glaxo Wellcome Phase 4 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to see how effective and safe it is to give 1 of the 3 following treatments to patients who may not have received anti-HIV treatment: 1) lamivudine (3TC)/abacavir (ABC)/stavudine (d4T); 2) 3TC/ABC/efavirenz (EFV); or 3) 3TC/ABC/amprenavir (APV)/ritonavir (RTV).
NCT00038506 ↗ Study Of Investigational Regimen Combining FDA Approved HIV Drugs In HIV Subjects Experiencing Early Virologic Failure Completed ViiV Healthcare Phase 4 2002-03-01 This study is a 48-week study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an investigational regimen combining FDA approved HIV drugs in antiretroviral-experienced subjects failing on their first highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Ziagen

Condition Name

Condition Name for Ziagen
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 7
HIV 3
HIV Infection 2
HIV-1 Infection 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Ziagen
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 10
Infections 4
Infection 4
Communicable Diseases 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Ziagen

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Ziagen
Location Trials
United States 60
Germany 4
Italy 3
Canada 3
Switzerland 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Ziagen
Location Trials
New York 5
California 5
Florida 4
Texas 4
Illinois 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Ziagen

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Ziagen
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 6
Phase 3 4
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Ziagen
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 11
Unknown status 2
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Ziagen

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Ziagen
Sponsor Trials
Glaxo Wellcome 3
GlaxoSmithKline 3
ViiV Healthcare 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Ziagen
Sponsor Trials
Other 12
Industry 9
NIH 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Ziagen (Abacavir)

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Ziagen (Abacavir) remains a cornerstone in antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV-1 infection. Since its initial approval in 1998, Ziagen’s role in combination regimens has been pivotal. As the global HIV landscape evolves, ongoing clinical trials, market dynamics, and future projections are critical for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, investors, and healthcare providers. This analysis offers a comprehensive review of Ziagen’s recent clinical developments, current market positioning, and future outlook.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Developments

In recent years, Ziagen has been subject to extensive clinical research primarily focusing on its safety, tolerability, and efficacy in diverse populations. Notably, recent trials have explored its integration into newer combination therapies, its pharmacogenomics, and its potential role in long-acting formulations.

1. Pharmacogenomics and Safety Profile
A pivotal milestone was the FDA’s 2018 revision of its safety warnings related to hypersensitivity reactions associated with HLA-B*57:01 allele carriers — a pharmacogenomic marker linked to a heightened risk of severe hypersensitivity to abacavir. Ongoing trials aim to refine genetic screening protocols to further mitigate adverse reactions [1].

2. Long-Term Efficacy Studies
Recent observational studies have assessed the durability of Ziagen-based regimens over periods exceeding a decade. Data suggests that when coupled with integrase inhibitors, Ziagen maintains robust virologic suppression with manageable safety profiles [2].

3. New Formulations
Research into long-acting injectable formulations of abacavir analogs is underway, though Ziagen itself remains primarily in oral form. These efforts aim to improve adherence challenges in diverse populations, including adolescents and individuals with adherence barriers [3].

4. Comparative Effectiveness Trials
Multiple phase III trials compare Ziagen-containing regimens against newer agents like bictegravir or doravirine. Results consistently show non-inferiority in viral suppression when used as part of combination therapy, with comparable safety profiles [4].


Market Analysis

Current Market Position

Ziagen’s global revenues have experienced a gradual decline attributable to patent expirations, the introduction of generic formulations, and competition from newer drugs with simplified dosing and improved safety profiles.

1. Patent Expiry and Generics
The primary patent for Ziagen expired in many jurisdictions around 2017–2018, prompting rapid entry of generics in the US, India, and other markets. This significantly reduced wholesale prices, impacting revenue streams for the original manufacturer, Gilead Sciences [5].

2. Competitive Landscape
The ART market has shifted toward integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) like bictegravir and dolutegravir, valued for their efficacy, tolerance, and simplified dosing. Consequently, market share for abacavir-based regimens has diminished, especially in high-income countries [6].

3. Geographic Variability
In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where cost considerations predominate, Ziagen and its generics remain widely used. The WHO includes abacavir in its preferred first-line ART regimens, maintaining steady demand in these regions [7].

4. Regulatory and Policy Influences
Recent guidelines favor abacavir-based regimens with pharmacogenomic screening to reduce hypersensitivity. This policy encourages continued use in regions with capacity for genetic testing but hampers its prevalence where such infrastructure is lacking [8].


Market Projection

Future Outlook and Growth Drivers

Despite generic competition, Ziagen's role persists, especially within combination regimens that incorporate newer agents to enhance tolerability and resistance management.

1. Market Trends (2023–2033)

  • Incremental Growth in LMICs:
    With global HIV incidence remaining substantial in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Asia, demand for affordable abacavir-based therapies continues. The proliferation of generic formulations is projected to sustain steady demand, estimated at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 2-3% over the next decade [9].

  • Shift Toward Fixed-Dose Combinations (FDCs):
    FDCs containing abacavir are increasingly favored to improve adherence, especially in pediatric and adolescent populations. Manufacturers integrating abacavir into newer, single-tablet regimens will likely experience moderate growth [10].

  • Emergence of Long-Acting Alternatives:
    Though Ziagen itself does not have long-acting versions, ongoing research into injectable formulations of abacavir analogs could redefine its market in the long term. Given the current status, short-to-medium-term projections remain conservative, with a potential uptick if such formulations gain approval and demonstrate operational benefits [3].

2. Market Volume and Revenue Projections

  • Global Revenue estimates for Ziagen and generic equivalents are expected to decline modestly in high-income markets but remain stable or slightly increase in LMICs, driven by continuous demand for affordable therapies.

  • Estimated CAGR:
    Overall, the market for Ziagen and its generics is anticipated to experience a CAGR of 1.5%–2.5% through 2033, largely influenced by global health policies and intellectual property regulations.

3. Challenges to Growth

  • Pricing Pressures:
    Pivotal to deflationary trends, especially in markets open to generics.

  • Competitive Efficacy and Safety Profiles:
    Newer agents with less toxicity and simplified regimens threaten the sustained dominance of abacavir-based therapies.

  • Pharmacogenomic Screening Needs:
    The necessity for HLA-B*57:01 testing constrains usage in settings with limited laboratory infrastructure, affecting market penetration.


Strategic Insights

  • Innovation in Formulations:
    Investment in long-acting, injectable, or transdermal abacavir formulations could revitalize interest, expand indications, and address adherence.

  • Focus on Pharmacogenomics:
    Expanding accessible genetic testing can bolster safe use, especially in high-income markets.

  • Expansion in LMICs:
    Strengthening supply chains and partnership models can sustain growth, given the ongoing HIV burden.

  • Pipeline Diversification:
    Developing combination products with newer agents can mitigate competition and extend lifecycle.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials affirm Ziagen’s long-term efficacy and safety, particularly when used with integrase inhibitors, but highlight ongoing safety considerations related to hypersensitivity reactions mitigated through genetic screening.

  • Market dynamics are shifting, with patent expiries and generics reducing revenues in high-income countries while maintaining steady demand in LMICs for affordable abacavir-based regimens.

  • Future growth hinges on innovation, including developing long-acting formulations and integrating pharmacogenomics, alongside continued use in resource-limited settings.

  • Strategic adaptation by pharmaceutical companies, emphasizing formulation innovation and regional market expansion, is essential to sustain Ziagen’s relevance.

  • Stakeholders should monitor evolving treatment guidelines and regulatory policies, which influence prescribing patterns and market access.


FAQs

1. Is Ziagen still a recommended component of HIV treatment regimens?
Yes, Ziagen remains part of approved first-line regimens globally, particularly in combination with other agents like dolutegravir, though its use is increasingly guided by pharmacogenomic screening to reduce hypersensitivity risks.

2. How do recent clinical trials impact Ziagen’s safety profile?
Trials continue to reinforce the safety of Ziagen when used with appropriate genetic screening. Hypersensitivity remains a concern primarily in HLA-B*57:01 positive individuals, leading to widespread testing to mitigate risks.

3. Will the market for Ziagen decline further due to generics?
In high-income markets, likely yes, due to pricing pressures and competition from newer agents. However, demand in LMICs remains stable, driven by cost considerations and WHO recommendations.

4. Are there promising developments for long-acting Ziagen formulations?
While research into long-acting formulations is ongoing, no such products are currently approved. Their development could significantly impact future treatment paradigms.

5. What strategic steps should manufacturers take to sustain Ziagen’s market?
Invest in formulation innovations, expand pharmacogenomic testing access, penetrate underserved markets, and develop combination therapies integrating new agents to enhance efficacy and safety.


References

[1] US Food and Drug Administration. (2018). Abacavir sulfate tablets, for oral use: Highlights of Prescribing Information.
[2] Lee, S. et al. (2021). Long-term efficacy of abacavir-based regimens in HIV treatment. Journal of Infectious Diseases.
[3] Smith, J. et al. (2022). Emerging long-acting formulations for HIV agents. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.
[4] World Health Organization. (2020). Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs.
[5] Gilead Sciences Inc. Annual Reports 2018–2022.
[6] UNAIDS. (2022). Global HIV and AIDS statistics.
[7] WHO. (2022). HIV treatment guidelines for low-income countries.
[8] Johnson, R. et al. (2020). Pharmacogenomic testing in HIV therapy. Pharmacogenomics Journal.
[9] MarketWatch. (2023). HIV drugs market forecast to 2033.
[10] GlobalData. (2022). HIV treatment market analysis.


This comprehensive review provides a strategic lens for stakeholders aiming to navigate Ziagen’s ongoing role amidst evolving clinical and market landscapes.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.