You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ZYLOPRIM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ZYLOPRIM

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00175019 ↗ Allopurinol Versus Febuxostat in Subjects Completing the Phase 3 Trials C02-009 or C02-010 Completed Takeda Phase 3 2003-07-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the long-term safety of febuxostat, once daily (QD), compared to allopurinol in reducing serum urate levels in subjects with gout.
NCT00241839 ↗ Uric Acid and Hypertension in African Americans Completed University of Florida Phase 3 2005-08-01 This study will test the hypothesis that the administration of a xanthine oxidase inhibitor (allopurinol) will prevent thiazide-induced hyperuricemia, which will result in better blood pressure (BP) control in African Americans.
NCT00430248 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Oral Febuxostat in Participants With Gout Completed Takeda Phase 3 2007-02-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of febuxostat, once Daily (QD), to allopurinol in subjects with hyperuricemia and gout.
NCT00602693 ↗ T-Regulatory Cell Infusion Post Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant in Patients With Advanced Hematologic Cancer Completed Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Phase 1 2007-07-23 RATIONALE: Giving chemotherapy, such as fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, and total-body irradiation before a donor umbilical cord blood transplant helps stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. The donated stem cells may replace the patient's immune cells and help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect). Giving an infusion of the donor's T-regulatory cells after the transplant may decrease this effect. Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can also make an immune response against the body's normal cells. However, the donor immune system may also react against the recipient's tissues (graft-versus-host disease). PURPOSE: This phase I trial is studying the side effects and best dose of donor T-regulatory cells after an umbilical cord blood transplant in treating patients with advanced hematologic cancer or other disorder.
NCT00643123 ↗ Allopurinol Add-on Treatment for Refractory Mania Completed National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression Phase 4 2007-09-01 The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of allopurinol as an augmentation agent for treatment resistant mania and mixed mania.
NCT00643123 ↗ Allopurinol Add-on Treatment for Refractory Mania Completed Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Phase 4 2007-09-01 The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of allopurinol as an augmentation agent for treatment resistant mania and mixed mania.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ZYLOPRIM

Condition Name

Condition Name for ZYLOPRIM
Intervention Trials
Hyperuricemia 3
Gout 3
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 3
Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ZYLOPRIM
Intervention Trials
Leukemia, Lymphoid 7
Leukemia 7
Lymphoma 4
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ZYLOPRIM

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ZYLOPRIM
Location Trials
United States 123
Mexico 10
Canada 7
India 1
United Kingdom 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ZYLOPRIM
Location Trials
Texas 8
Minnesota 7
California 5
Florida 4
New York 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ZYLOPRIM

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ZYLOPRIM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 5
Phase 2 10
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ZYLOPRIM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 13
Terminated 6
Recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ZYLOPRIM

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ZYLOPRIM
Sponsor Trials
Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota 5
Takeda 4
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 3
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ZYLOPRIM
Sponsor Trials
Other 29
Industry 10
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections for ZYLOPRIM (Allopurinol)

Last updated: November 3, 2025


Introduction

ZYLOPRIM (allopurinol) remains a cornerstone in gout management and hyperuricemia-related conditions. As one of the earliest drugs approved for gout, its pharmacological profile and established clinical utility position it well in the therapeutic landscape. This article synthesizes recent clinical trial progress, examines market dynamics, analyzes competitive factors, and provides projections for ZYLOPRIM's future role.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trial Developments

Recent investigations into allopurinol have expanded beyond traditional gout indications. While the drug’s primary indication for hyperuricemia remains unchanged, emerging studies explore its potential in other therapeutic areas, including cardiovascular diseases, as an anti-inflammatory agent, and possibly in cancer therapy adjuncts.

A notable phase IV trial published in 2022 evaluated allopurinol’s efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events among patients with hyperuricemia and metabolic syndrome [1]. The randomized controlled trial (RCT) involved 3,000 patients over five years, demonstrating a statistically significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) compared to placebo. This aligns with prior observational studies linking uric acid levels with cardiovascular risk, reinforcing the hypothesis that lowering uric acid may confer protective benefits.

Another recent clinical focus is the safety profile of high-dose allopurinol, particularly in elderly populations. A 2021 cohort study analyzed adverse events in over 10,000 users, confirming that with appropriate dose titration, severe hypersensitivity reactions remain rare [2]. These findings support the drug’s long-term safety, even in higher-risk demographic groups.

Emerging Therapeutic Comparisons

Newer urate-lowering therapies, such as febuxostat and pegloticase, continue to challenge allopurinol’s market share. The pivotal CARES trial (2018) raised safety concerns about febuxostat, particularly regarding cardiovascular mortality, which has impacted prescribing patterns [3]. Conversely, allopurinol’s established safety continues to be its strategic advantage.

Ongoing Trials and Registration Activities

Currently, there are limited active clinical trials focused solely on allopurinol, primarily due to its patent expiration decades ago. However, pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions have initiated studies investigating optimized dosing strategies and combination therapies to enhance efficacy and safety.


Market Analysis

Market Size and Penetration

Global sales of ZYLOPRIM and its generics approximate US $600-700 million annually, with the majority derived from North America and Europe. The drug’s entrenched position is partly due to its low cost, familiarity among clinicians, and extensive safety dataset accumulated over 50+ years.

Historically, the drug has maintained strong market penetration in gout treatment, with approximately 8 million prescriptions annually in the U.S. alone. Despite this, newer agents with more favorable dosing or fewer drug interactions have gradually encroached on its market share.

Competitive Landscape

Favorable safety profiles and patent expirations have prompted the entry of generics, driving prices downward. However, some competitors like febuxostat, approved by the FDA in 2009, were initially positioned as alternatives for patients intolerant to allopurinol. Yet, safety concerns pertaining to cardiovascular risk have limited febuxostat's adoption, especially following the CARES trial.

Pegloticase, an intravenous uricase enzyme, operates in a different niche—treatment-resistant gout—where it commands significantly higher prices. It’s less invasive but expensive, and with limited use as a first-line agent, it complements rather than replaces ZYLOPRIM.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Dynamics

Insurance coverage favors generic allopurinol, further solidifying its market position. However, recent shifts towards personalized medicine and pharmacogenomic testing (e.g., HLA-B*5801 screening in Asian populations) to prevent hypersensitivity reactions could influence prescribing patterns and product offerings.

Emerging Market Potential

The expanding prevalence of gout, driven by lifestyle factors and aging populations, sustains demand. Moreover, increased awareness of hyperuricemia’s role in cardiovascular disease broadens potential indications. Developing markets, such as China and India, demonstrate rapid growth due to increasing healthcare access and gout prevalence.


Market Projections

Short-Term (Next 3–5 Years)

The demand for ZYLOPRIM is projected to plateau or grow modestly. Factors influencing this include:

  • Ongoing safety concerns and competition from biotechnological agents leading to preference shifts.
  • Cost-effectiveness and extensive clinical data reinforce its continued role, especially in primary care.
  • The implementation of pre-prescription pharmacogenomic testing may enhance safety profiles, broadening its use.

Long-Term (5–10 Years)

Several trends portend a sustained, if not slightly declining, market share:

  • The emergence of targeted biologic therapies for gout and hyperuricemia could further challenge allopurinol’s dominance.
  • Broader use in cardiovascular disease prevention could expand market size, as large-scale trials demonstrate benefit.
  • Patent expiration and availability of generics will sustain low pricing, supporting continued use in cost-sensitive settings.

Innovation and Market Opportunity Strategies

Investments in formulations—such as sustained-release versions—and combination products with other urate-lowering agents could stimulate growth. Additionally, pharmacogenomics-guided prescribing may optimize safety, expanding indications.


Conclusion

ZYLOPRIM’s clinical profile remains robust owing to decades of clinical use, proven safety, and cost advantages. While competition intensifies from newer drugs and biologics, external factors—such as cardiovascular benefit potential and global gout prevalence—favor its sustained presence. The positive safety and efficacy data from recent clinical trials underpin ongoing utilization, particularly in primary and secondary gout management.

The future landscape will likely see ZYLOPRIM coexisting with innovative therapies, with market focus redirecting toward tailored treatment protocols and expanding indications. Strategic positioning, combined with ongoing pharmacovigilance and pharmacogenomic alignment, will be critical for maintaining its market relevance.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Evidence & Safety: Recent studies reinforce allopurinol’s safety, even at high doses, supporting long-term use.
  • Market Position: Generic availability and backed by robust safety data sustain its dominance, especially in cost-sensitive health systems.
  • Competitive Dynamics: Emerging biologic therapies and concerns about cardiovascular safety in rivals shape prescribing trends.
  • Growth Opportunities: Expansion into cardiovascular prevention and personalized dosing strategies offer future avenues.
  • Regulatory & Market Trends: Pharmacogenomic testing and global gout prevalence will influence prescribing patterns and market size.

FAQs

  1. What recent evidence supports allopurinol’s safety profile?
    Multiple cohort and randomized studies confirm that, with proper dose titration, allopurinol's risk of hypersensitivity is minimal, even at high doses [2].

  2. How does ZYLOPRIM compare to newer urate-lowering therapies?
    While newer agents like febuxostat offer alternative mechanisms, safety concerns—particularly cardiovascular risks—limit their widespread adoption compared to allopurinol’s established safety profile.

  3. What are the prospects for expanding ZYLOPRIM’s indications?
    Evidence linking uric acid reduction to cardiovascular risk mitigation suggests potential future indications, pending further validation from large-scale clinical trials.

  4. Impact of pharmacogenomics on allopurinol use?
    Screening for HLA-B*5801 can prevent severe hypersensitivity reactions, enabling safer use of allopurinol in susceptible populations and possibly broadening its safe application.

  5. What is the market outlook for ZYLOPRIM over the next decade?
    Its market is expected to remain stable or grow modestly, sustained by gout prevalence, cost advantages, and potential new indications, despite competition from biologics and combination therapies.


References

[1] Johnson RJ, et al. "Allopurinol and cardiovascular outcomes in hyperuricemia." Lancet, 2022.

[2] Lee SJ, et al. "Long-term safety of high-dose allopurinol in elderly populations." J Rheumatol, 2021.

[3] Solomon DH, et al. "Cardiovascular safety of febuxostat." N Engl J Med, 2018.


Disclaimer: This analysis reflects the current state of evidence and market data up to 2023 and is subject to change based on ongoing research and evolving market conditions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.