Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ZUBSOLV


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ZUBSOLV

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01848054 ↗ Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of BNX Sublingual Tablets for the Induction of Treatment of Opioid Dependence Completed Worldwide Clinical Trials Phase 3 2013-06-01 The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of induction treatment with buprenorphine/naloxone (BNX) sublingual tablet s compared with induction treatment with buprenorphine only. The hypothesis is that starting directly on OX219 works equally well (e.g. not significantly worse) as starting on buprenorphine only and switching to OX219 on Day 3.
NCT01848054 ↗ Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of BNX Sublingual Tablets for the Induction of Treatment of Opioid Dependence Completed Orexo AB Phase 3 2013-06-01 The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of induction treatment with buprenorphine/naloxone (BNX) sublingual tablet s compared with induction treatment with buprenorphine only. The hypothesis is that starting directly on OX219 works equally well (e.g. not significantly worse) as starting on buprenorphine only and switching to OX219 on Day 3.
NCT01903005 ↗ Multi-Center, Open-Label, 24-Week Study of OX219 Safety and Efficacy for Maintenance Treatment of Opioid Dependence Completed Worldwide Clinical Trials Phase 4 2013-07-01 The purpose of this study was to assess safety, efficacy, and treatment retention following extended treatment with OX219, a higher-bioavailability buprenorphine/naloxone (BNX) sublingual tablet formulation in opioid-dependent patients who completed 1 of 2 primary efficacy and safety studies of OX219.
NCT01903005 ↗ Multi-Center, Open-Label, 24-Week Study of OX219 Safety and Efficacy for Maintenance Treatment of Opioid Dependence Completed Orexo AB Phase 4 2013-07-01 The purpose of this study was to assess safety, efficacy, and treatment retention following extended treatment with OX219, a higher-bioavailability buprenorphine/naloxone (BNX) sublingual tablet formulation in opioid-dependent patients who completed 1 of 2 primary efficacy and safety studies of OX219.
NCT01908842 ↗ Efficacy of BNX Sublingual Tablets Versus BNX Sublingual Film for Treatment of Opioid-Dependent Adults Completed Worldwide Clinical Trials Phase 3 2013-08-01 The purpose of this study was to assess retention in treatment after induction with buprenorphine/naloxone (BNX) sublingual tablets compared with generic buprenorphine and after stabilization with BNX sublingual tablets compared with BNX film. Secondary objectives included assessment of treatment effects on opioid withdrawal symptoms, opioid cravings, and safety.
NCT01908842 ↗ Efficacy of BNX Sublingual Tablets Versus BNX Sublingual Film for Treatment of Opioid-Dependent Adults Completed Orexo AB Phase 3 2013-08-01 The purpose of this study was to assess retention in treatment after induction with buprenorphine/naloxone (BNX) sublingual tablets compared with generic buprenorphine and after stabilization with BNX sublingual tablets compared with BNX film. Secondary objectives included assessment of treatment effects on opioid withdrawal symptoms, opioid cravings, and safety.
NCT02038790 ↗ Usability of Zubsolv Sublingual Tablets 5.7/1.4 to Suboxone Sublingual Film 8/2 In Buprenorphine/Naloxone Treated Opioid Dependent Population Completed Indivior Inc. Phase 4 2013-11-01 The primary objective of this study is to compare overall patient preference for either Suboxone® sublingual film 8/2 or Zubsolv® sublingual tablets 5.7/1.4. Suboxone sublingual film 8/2 contains 8mg buprenorphine and 2mg naloxone. Zubsolv sublingual tablets contain 5.7 mg buprenorphine and 1.4 mg naloxone. Both interventions act as a substitute for opiate drugs like heroin, morphine or oxycodone and help withdrawal from opiate drugs over a period of time.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ZUBSOLV

Condition Name

Condition Name for ZUBSOLV
Intervention Trials
Opioid Dependence, on Agonist Therapy 2
Opioid Use Disorder 2
Opioid-Related Disorders 1
Opioid-Related Disorders, 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ZUBSOLV
Intervention Trials
Opioid-Related Disorders 7
Chronic Pain 1
Anemia, Sickle Cell 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ZUBSOLV

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ZUBSOLV
Location Trials
United States 60
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ZUBSOLV
Location Trials
Maryland 5
New Jersey 4
Utah 4
Pennsylvania 4
Florida 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ZUBSOLV

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ZUBSOLV
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 1
Phase 4 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ZUBSOLV
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
RECRUITING 2
Active, not recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ZUBSOLV

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ZUBSOLV
Sponsor Trials
Worldwide Clinical Trials 3
Orexo AB 3
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 2
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ZUBSOLV
Sponsor Trials
Other 7
Industry 6
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Zubsolv (buprenorphine and naloxone) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

Last updated: April 24, 2026

What is Zubsolv and what is its current clinical development status?

Zubsolv is an oral sublingual combination of buprenorphine and naloxone for maintenance treatment of opioid dependence in patients who have already achieved partial or full opioid agonist effect. The product is marketed by Horizon Therapeutics (U.S. and select markets), following the asset integration from Orexo and related licensing history.

As of the most recent public record used for this update set, Zubsolv’s clinical program is not characterized by active late-stage (Phase 3/registrational) trials in the public domain in the way that new molecular entities are. The observable activity in public trial registries and publications is dominated by:

  • Post-approval evidence generation (comparative exposure, formulation/label support, and real-world or switch studies).
  • Operational or mechanistic studies that do not change the core label in a way comparable to a new Phase 3 readout.

A “clinical trials update” for a mature, labeled product therefore tends to track head-to-head formulation equivalence, treatment switching, and adherence/tolerability endpoints rather than new indication pivots. The core label still anchors the product’s commercial profile.

What clinical endpoints and design themes dominate the Zubsolv literature?

Across the post-approval evidence base, studies commonly evaluate:

  • Bioavailability and exposure equivalence between sublingual formats and dosing regimens (buprenorphine exposure; naloxone exposure is typically used to support abuse-deterrent intent).
  • Time to onset and sublingual absorption performance, using pharmacokinetic endpoints rather than new efficacy curves.
  • Induction-to-maintenance transfer (patients transitioning from other buprenorphine/naloxone formulations).
  • Tolerability and adherence proxies (e.g., discontinuation rates, patient-reported acceptability metrics).
  • Treatment continuation patterns in pragmatic settings, where endpoints are framed as real-world persistence.

What is the current market structure for Zubsolv?

U.S. market positioning

Zubsolv is one of the principal branded sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone options in the U.S. market, operating in a class where competition includes multiple branded and authorized generic buprenorphine/naloxone combinations and dosage forms. The commercial dynamic is shaped by:

  • Formulation competitiveness (patient preference and dosing convenience).
  • Managed care contracting and formulary placement in addiction medicine and integrated health systems.
  • Generic pressure and channel mix for buprenorphine/naloxone products.
  • Buprenorphine-class demand elasticity driven by opioid use disorder incidence, policy, and prescriber adoption of office-based opioid agonist therapy.

Competitive set snapshot (category)

Zubsolv competes in the U.S. sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone category against branded products and generics. The competitive set typically includes:

  • Bunavail (buprenorphine/naloxone buccal film)
  • Suboxone (buprenorphine/naloxone sublingual film/tablet ecosystem)
  • Generics and authorized generics of buprenorphine/naloxone sublingual tablets/films, depending on market and payer policies

Zubsolv’s differentiation is primarily formulation and patient acceptability, which can drive payer adoption even when a category generic exists.

How big is the addressable market and what are the demand drivers?

The addressable market is the U.S. opioid use disorder treatment population receiving medication-assisted treatment (MAT), specifically office-based buprenorphine-based therapy under common regulatory and clinical frameworks.

Key demand drivers:

  • Continued opioid use disorder burden and MAT scaling.
  • Prescriber capacity growth (including waivered providers and integration into health systems).
  • Policy and payer coverage patterns that influence access.
  • Switch behavior among patients stable on one formulation when reimbursement changes.

The U.S. MAT buprenorphine segment has remained commercially resilient relative to many specialty franchises because the therapy sits at the center of treatment guidelines and payer coverage frameworks.

What is the commercial outlook for Zubsolv through patent and payer cycles?

Zubsolv’s commercial projection is typically governed by three forces:

  1. Class-level demand growth
  2. Share retention versus substitution (between brands and generics)
  3. Formulary and contracting durability (managed care channel constraints)

In branded buprenorphine/naloxone products, the biggest near- and mid-term risk is not a clinical failure event but rather share erosion from generics plus payer-driven substitution.

Clinical trial pipeline status: what does the public evidence imply for near-term label expansion?

Publicly visible late-stage development has been limited for Zubsolv relative to newer assets. That implies:

  • Near-term label expansion probability is low in the absence of a new pivotal trial program.
  • The most investable near-term questions are formulation competitiveness, payer access, and patient retention rather than new efficacy claims.

Market analysis: pricing, reimbursement, and substitution dynamics

For a mature branded OUD product, unit economics hinge on payer behavior:

  • Commercial and Medicaid formulary tiering changes can quickly shift market share.
  • PBM contracting can create rapid price and volume impacts.
  • Switch programs may be required or incentivized, changing patient persistence curves.

Zubsolv’s market resilience historically tracks payer preference for patient experience factors, but sustained share usually depends on ongoing contracting.

Zubsolv projections: base, bear, bull scenarios

Projections here are framed as relative market trajectory for Zubsolv in the U.S. buprenorphine/naloxone sublingual category, not as a forecast of the entire OUD MAT population.

Scenario logic

  • Bull: Maintains payer access with limited substitution; class demand growth improves net volume; brand share stabilizes.
  • Base: Gradual share erosion from generics offsets class demand growth.
  • Bear: Accelerated payer substitution and reduced formulary position; faster share decline than expected.

Projection framework (2026 to 2030)

The timeline below is expressed as share and revenue direction, consistent with mature branded products where new clinical reads are not the primary driver.

Year Market condition Zubsolv volume trend Zubsolv price/revenue trend Revenue direction
2026 Stable MAT demand; ongoing generic substitution Flat to modest decline (base: mild erosion) Net price pressure modest Base: slight decline to flat
2027 Contract cycle and formulary churn Moderate decline (base) PBM-driven pressure persists Base: decline
2028 Increasing substitution pressure Continued erosion Mix shift against brand Base: mid-single-digit erosion
2029 Brand share stress Further decline or plateau (bull/bear spread) Minimal improvement Base: gradual decline
2030 Late-cycle contracting Plateau in bull, continued erosion in bear No structural pricing upside Base: low single-digit decline trend

Scenario endpoints (qualitative)

  • Bull endpoint: share holds more closely to current levels; revenue stabilizes through 2030 with periodic payer adjustments.
  • Base endpoint: slow erosion through 2030 with limited upside.
  • Bear endpoint: faster substitution and reduced access accelerate decline.

Clinical and regulatory milestones that matter commercially

For Zubsolv, the commercially relevant “milestones” are less about new phases and more about:

  • Label stability (no disruptive label restriction)
  • Comparative formulation acceptance by payers and prescribers
  • Switch tolerance and persistence outcomes in pragmatic settings
  • PBM formularies and clinical pathway inclusion

Investment and R&D implications

If your thesis is “clinical”: what to monitor

  • Evidence supporting patient satisfaction and adherence versus alternative buprenorphine products
  • Formulation-specific data that reduces barriers to switching
  • Real-world persistence analyses in payer-restricted cohorts

If your thesis is “commercial”: what to monitor

  • PBM contracting events and formulary tier movements
  • Medicaid policy and state formulary patterns
  • Channel-specific substitution speed from branded to generic

Key Takeaways

  • Zubsolv is a mature, labeled buprenorphine/naloxone product where public clinical activity is dominated by post-approval evidence generation rather than registrational breakthroughs.
  • The market outlook is primarily determined by payer contracting durability and substitution risk against branded and generic buprenorphine/naloxone options.
  • Projections through 2030 point to continued brand pressure in a base case, with upside tied to formulary stabilization and downside driven by accelerated substitution.

FAQs

1) Is Zubsolv in active Phase 3 development for a new indication?
No clear public signals of active late-stage registrational development for new indications drive the current update set.

2) What endpoints matter most in post-approval Zubsolv studies?
Pharmacokinetic exposure, sublingual absorption performance, and clinical transfer/switch tolerability and persistence.

3) What is the biggest market risk for Zubsolv?
Payer-driven substitution that erodes branded share when generics are preferred on formularies.

4) What is the biggest upside lever for Zubsolv?
Contracting durability that supports stable access and minimizes switching away from the brand.

5) How should investors model Zubsolv forecasts?
Model scenarios around share erosion versus stability, with class-level demand as a secondary stabilizer rather than a primary upside engine.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Zubsolv (buprenorphine and naloxone) prescribing information.
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. Zubsolv (buprenorphine and naloxone) study records.
[3] Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Buprenorphine treatment and opioid treatment program resources.
[4] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Opioid use disorder and medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) guidance and monitoring resources.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.