You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ZILRETTA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ZILRETTA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02116972 ↗ Study of FX006 vs Normal Saline in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee Completed Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. Phase 2 2014-04-01 The purpose of this study was to assess the magnitude and duration of pain relief of a single IA injection of 2 doses (16 and 32 mg) of FX006, an extended-release formulation of TCA, relative to normal saline (placebo control).
NCT02357459 ↗ Study of FX006 for the Treatment of Pain in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee Completed Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. Phase 3 2015-01-01 The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of FX006 for the treatment of pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
NCT02468583 ↗ Proof of Concept Study Comparing FX006 to Kenalog®-40 in Patients With Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee Terminated Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. Phase 2 2015-02-01 This study was a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, proof of concept study comparing FX006 to Kenalog®-40 (triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension, USP) in patients with post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the knee.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ZILRETTA

Condition Name

Condition Name for ZILRETTA
Intervention Trials
Osteoarthritis, Knee 6
Osteoarthritis of the Knee 4
Knee Osteoarthritis 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ZILRETTA
Intervention Trials
Osteoarthritis, Knee 14
Osteoarthritis 13
Bursitis 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ZILRETTA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ZILRETTA
Location Trials
United States 98
Australia 3
Canada 3
Denmark 1
Lithuania 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ZILRETTA
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 9
California 9
Texas 7
North Carolina 6
New York 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ZILRETTA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ZILRETTA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ZILRETTA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
RECRUITING 9
Completed 8
Terminated 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ZILRETTA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ZILRETTA
Sponsor Trials
Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. 11
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc 2
University of Kansas Medical Center 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ZILRETTA
Sponsor Trials
Industry 15
Other 9
FED 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Zilretta: Clinical Trials, Market Landscape, and Future Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

What is Zilretta and its therapeutic indication?

Zilretta (triamcinolone acetonide extended-release injectable suspension) is a corticosteroid injection approved for the management of moderate to moderately severe pain in osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. It is designed to provide longer-lasting pain relief compared to immediate-release corticosteroid injections. The formulation utilizes proprietary Bio-Shuttle technology to control the release of the active pharmaceutical ingredient.

What are the key clinical trial results and regulatory milestones for Zilretta?

The approval of Zilretta by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on October 24, 2017, was based on data from two pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials. These trials evaluated the safety and efficacy of Zilretta in patients with symptomatic OA of the knee.

Key Clinical Trial Findings:

  • Pain Relief: The primary endpoint in both Phase 3 trials was the change from baseline in WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) pain subscale score at week 12.
    • In trial HFC1161.401, Zilretta demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in WOMAC pain from baseline at week 12 compared to placebo (mean change -2.05 vs. -1.35; p=0.0001) [1].
    • In trial HFC1161.402, Zilretta also achieved statistical significance (mean change -2.19 vs. -1.50; p=0.0001) [1].
  • Sustained Efficacy: The pain relief provided by Zilretta was observed to be sustained over the 12-week treatment period. Secondary endpoints included responder analyses based on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) responder criteria.
    • A significantly higher proportion of patients treated with Zilretta met the OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria at week 12 compared to placebo in both trials [1].
  • Safety Profile: The safety profile of Zilretta was consistent with that of other intra-articular corticosteroids.
    • The most common adverse events reported were arthralgia (joint pain), swelling, and procedural pain.
    • Serious adverse events were rare.
    • There was no evidence of clinically significant cartilage degradation in X-ray assessments of patients who received Zilretta [1].

Regulatory Milestones:

  • FDA Approval: October 24, 2017, for the treatment of moderate to moderately severe pain in OA of the knee.
  • Resubmission and Approval of Extended Indication: In March 2023, the FDA approved an expanded indication for Zilretta to include patients experiencing mild to moderate pain associated with OA of the knee. This approval was based on data from a Phase 3b study (Study HFC1161.404) which enrolled patients with a broader range of OA severity, including those with mild OA [2].
    • The Phase 3b study showed that Zilretta provided statistically significant pain relief at week 12 compared to placebo in the overall population, as well as in subgroups of patients with mild to moderate OA [2].

What is the current market landscape for osteoarthritis knee pain treatments?

The market for osteoarthritis knee pain treatments is substantial and competitive, characterized by a range of therapeutic options, including pharmaceuticals, interventional procedures, and surgical interventions.

Key Market Segments and Players:

  • Pharmacological Treatments:
    • Oral Analgesics: Acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are first-line treatments but carry systemic risks, particularly with long-term use.
    • Intra-articular Injections: This segment includes:
      • Corticosteroids: Immediate-release corticosteroids (e.g., Kenalog, Depo-Medrol) offer rapid but short-lived pain relief. Zilretta offers extended duration.
      • Hyaluronic Acid (HA) Injections: Also known as viscosupplementation, HA injections aim to restore the lubricating properties of joint fluid. Major players include Euflexxa (Hylan A and C), Synvisc (Hylan G-F 20), and Supartz FX (hyaluronate).
      • Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injections: Autologous blood product injections are gaining traction, though regulatory frameworks and standardization remain evolving areas.
  • Interventional Procedures:
    • Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA): This procedure targets sensory nerves around the knee joint to reduce pain signaling.
  • Surgical Interventions:
    • Arthroscopy: While historically used, its role in OA pain management is debated.
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA): A definitive treatment for end-stage OA, but involves significant recovery time and risks.

Market Drivers:

  • Aging Global Population: Increasing prevalence of osteoarthritis due to longer life expectancies.
  • Rising Obesity Rates: A significant risk factor for osteoarthritis development and progression.
  • Patient Demand for Less Invasive Options: Preference for non-surgical interventions that offer pain relief and improved function.
  • Advancements in Drug Delivery Technology: Development of formulations like Zilretta that provide sustained effects.

Challenges:

  • Reimbursement Policies: Securing adequate reimbursement for novel treatments can impact market access.
  • Competition: The established presence of generics, branded HA injections, and the emergence of new therapies create a competitive environment.
  • Treatment Efficacy Limitations: No single treatment is universally effective for all OA patients.

What is the projected market growth and competitive outlook for Zilretta?

The market for osteoarthritis treatments is projected to experience continued growth, driven by demographic trends and increasing awareness of treatment options. Zilretta, with its extended-release mechanism, is positioned to capture a share of the intra-articular injection market, particularly with the expanded indication for mild to moderate OA.

Market Projections:

  • The global osteoarthritis treatment market size was valued at approximately USD 10.6 billion in 2022 and is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.5% from 2023 to 2030 [3].
  • The intra-articular injection segment, including corticosteroids and HA, is a significant component of this market.

Zilretta's Competitive Position:

  • Differentiation: Zilretta's key differentiator is its extended-release formulation, offering a single injection that provides pain relief for up to 12 weeks, potentially reducing the need for frequent injections compared to immediate-release corticosteroids.
  • Competition from Hyaluronic Acid: Zilretta competes directly with HA injections, which are also administered in a series of injections and aim to improve joint lubrication. Clinical guidelines and physician preference often dictate the choice between these options. Some studies have compared Zilretta to HA, with mixed results regarding superiority, often emphasizing physician comfort and patient factors [4].
  • Competition from Immediate-Release Corticosteroids: While Zilretta offers longer duration, immediate-release corticosteroids provide faster onset of pain relief, which may be preferred in certain clinical scenarios.
  • Emerging Therapies: The pipeline for OA treatments includes biologics and regenerative medicine approaches, which could alter the competitive landscape in the long term. However, these therapies often face challenges related to cost, evidence base, and regulatory approval.
  • Impact of Expanded Indication: The inclusion of mild to moderate OA patients broadens Zilretta's addressable market, potentially increasing its patient reach. This could allow it to compete more directly with HA injections in an earlier stage of disease management.

Factors Influencing Zilretta's Growth:

  • Physician Adoption: Continued education and clinical data demonstrating Zilretta's value proposition will be crucial for widespread physician adoption.
  • Payer Reimbursement: Favorable reimbursement policies from private insurers and government payers are essential for patient access.
  • Marketing and Sales Efforts: Effective marketing strategies highlighting Zilretta's unique benefits, such as its extended duration and reduced injection burden, will be key.
  • Real-World Evidence: The generation and dissemination of real-world evidence supporting Zilretta's effectiveness and safety in diverse patient populations will bolster its market position.

What are the potential future developments and strategic considerations for Zilretta?

The future trajectory of Zilretta will be shaped by ongoing clinical research, evolving market dynamics, and strategic decisions by its manufacturer.

Potential Future Developments:

  • Additional Clinical Studies: Further research may focus on:
    • Direct comparative studies against other intra-articular therapies, including HA and newer formulations.
    • Long-term safety and efficacy data, particularly in the expanded mild-to-moderate OA population.
    • Studies exploring potential synergistic effects with other OA management strategies.
    • Subgroup analyses to identify patient populations that derive the greatest benefit.
  • Combination Therapies: Exploration of Zilretta in combination with other treatment modalities, such as physical therapy or oral medications, could be a future avenue.
  • Geographic Expansion: Beyond the U.S., Zilretta's approval and market penetration in other key global markets will be a significant growth driver. This would involve navigating different regulatory approval processes and reimbursement landscapes.
  • Lifecycle Management: As with any pharmaceutical product, strategic lifecycle management, including potential next-generation formulations or expanded indications based on new research, will be important for sustained market presence.

Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders:

  • For Manufacturers (e.g., Flexion Therapeutics, now part of Pacira BioSciences):
    • Data Generation: Prioritize generating robust real-world evidence and comparative effectiveness data to support value-based discussions with payers and clinicians.
    • Market Access: Continue to engage with payers to ensure favorable reimbursement and formulary placement. Develop strategies to address potential co-pay burdens for patients.
    • Physician Education: Invest in comprehensive educational programs to highlight Zilretta's mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety profile, differentiating it from existing options.
    • Competitive Response: Monitor the competitive landscape, including the development of new OA therapies and evolving treatment guidelines.
    • Global Strategy: Develop a phased approach for international market entry, considering the unique regulatory and market access challenges in each region.
  • For Healthcare Providers:
    • Patient Selection: Develop clear criteria for selecting appropriate patients for Zilretta, considering OA severity, symptom profile, and patient preferences.
    • Comparative Decision-Making: Understand the comparative benefits and risks of Zilretta versus other intra-articular injections and oral therapies to guide individualized treatment plans.
    • Monitoring Outcomes: Track patient outcomes to assess the effectiveness and duration of pain relief provided by Zilretta and adjust treatment as needed.
  • For Payers:
    • Value Assessment: Evaluate Zilretta based on its clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and potential to reduce the overall healthcare burden associated with OA management, including long-term costs of disease progression and surgery.
    • Coverage Policies: Develop clear and consistent coverage policies that balance access to innovative treatments with cost containment.

Key Takeaways

Zilretta, a corticosteroid injection with extended-release technology, has secured FDA approval for the management of moderate to moderately severe osteoarthritis knee pain, with an expanded indication for mild to moderate cases. Its primary clinical differentiator is the sustained pain relief of up to 12 weeks from a single injection, addressing limitations of immediate-release corticosteroids. The osteoarthritis treatment market is significant and growing, driven by an aging population and rising obesity rates. Zilretta faces competition from oral analgesics, immediate-release corticosteroids, and hyaluronic acid injections. Its market success hinges on physician adoption, favorable reimbursement, and robust clinical evidence supporting its value proposition. Future developments may include additional comparative studies, geographic expansion, and lifecycle management strategies to maintain its competitive edge in a dynamic therapeutic landscape.

FAQs

  1. What is the main advantage of Zilretta over traditional corticosteroid injections for osteoarthritis knee pain? Zilretta's main advantage is its extended-release formulation, which provides pain relief for up to 12 weeks from a single injection, compared to the shorter duration of pain relief typically provided by immediate-release corticosteroid injections.
  2. How does Zilretta compare to hyaluronic acid injections for osteoarthritis knee pain? Both Zilretta and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections are intra-articular treatments for OA knee pain. Zilretta is a corticosteroid that reduces inflammation and pain, while HA injections aim to restore joint lubrication. Clinical comparative data is evolving, and physician and patient preferences often influence the choice between these options.
  3. What are the potential side effects associated with Zilretta injections? The safety profile of Zilretta is consistent with other intra-articular corticosteroids. Common side effects include temporary pain, swelling, and stiffness at the injection site. Serious adverse events are rare.
  4. Has the indication for Zilretta been expanded since its initial approval? Yes, the indication for Zilretta was expanded in March 2023 to include patients experiencing mild to moderate pain associated with osteoarthritis of the knee, in addition to its original indication for moderate to moderately severe pain.
  5. What is the expected duration of pain relief from a single Zilretta injection? A single Zilretta injection is designed to provide pain relief for up to 12 weeks.

Citations

[1] Flexion Therapeutics. (2017). FDA Approves Zilretta™ (triamcinolone acetonide extended-release microspheres) for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis Knee Pain. [Press Release]. Retrieved from https://www.flexiontherapeutics.com/news-releases/news-release-details/fda-approves-zilrettatm-triamcinolone-acetonide-extended-release/

[2] Pacira BioSciences. (2023, March 23). Pacira BioSciences Announces FDA Approval of Expanded Indication for Zilretta® (triamcinolone acetonide extended-release) for Patients with Mild to Moderate Osteoarthritis Knee Pain. [Press Release]. Retrieved from https://investor.pacira.com/news-releases/news-release-details/pacira-biosciences-announces-fda-approval-expanded-indication/

[3] Grand View Research. (2023). Osteoarthritis Treatment Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Drug Class, By Treatment Type, By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023-2030. (Report).

[4] Stitik, T. P., L Elena, F. D., et al. (2018). Triamcinolone Acetonide Extended-Release Microspheres vs. Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: A Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial. Journal of Pain Research, 11, 1627–1637. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S169036

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.