You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ZIAGEN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ZIAGEN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00004585 ↗ A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Combination Anti-HIV Therapy in HIV-Infected Adults Completed Glaxo Wellcome Phase 4 1999-10-01 The purpose of this study is to see if a certain combination of anti-HIV drugs is safe and effective in HIV-infected patients. The drug combination includes a tablet containing lamivudine and zidovudine (called Combivir) plus abacavir plus efavirenz.
NCT00004981 ↗ Safety and Effectiveness of Three Anti-HIV Drugs Combined in One Pill (Trizivir) Unknown status Glaxo Wellcome Phase 3 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to look at the safety and effectiveness of a pill called Trizivir that is a combination of three anti-HIV drugs (zidovudine, lamivudine, and abacavir). Zidovudine and lamivudine are often given combined in one pill (Combivir). In this study, Trizivir will be compared to Combivir plus abacavir.
NCT00005017 ↗ Effectiveness and Safety of Epivir/Ziagen/Zerit (3TC/ABC/d4T) Versus Epivir/Ziagen/Sustiva (3TC/ABC/EFV) Versus Epivir/Ziagen/Agenerase/Norvir (3TC/ABC/APV/RTV) in HIV Patients Who Have Never Received Treatment Unknown status Glaxo Wellcome Phase 4 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to see how effective and safe it is to give 1 of the 3 following treatments to patients who may not have received anti-HIV treatment: 1) lamivudine (3TC)/abacavir (ABC)/stavudine (d4T); 2) 3TC/ABC/efavirenz (EFV); or 3) 3TC/ABC/amprenavir (APV)/ritonavir (RTV).
NCT00038506 ↗ Study Of Investigational Regimen Combining FDA Approved HIV Drugs In HIV Subjects Experiencing Early Virologic Failure Completed ViiV Healthcare Phase 4 2002-03-01 This study is a 48-week study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an investigational regimen combining FDA approved HIV drugs in antiretroviral-experienced subjects failing on their first highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ZIAGEN

Condition Name

Condition Name for ZIAGEN
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 7
HIV 3
HIV Infection 2
Cardiovascular Disease 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ZIAGEN
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 10
Infections 4
Infection 4
Communicable Diseases 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ZIAGEN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ZIAGEN
Location Trials
United States 60
Germany 4
Canada 3
Italy 3
Peru 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ZIAGEN
Location Trials
New York 5
California 5
Florida 4
Texas 4
Maryland 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ZIAGEN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ZIAGEN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 6
Phase 3 4
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ZIAGEN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 11
Unknown status 2
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ZIAGEN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ZIAGEN
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 3
Glaxo Wellcome 3
ViiV Healthcare 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ZIAGEN
Sponsor Trials
Other 12
Industry 9
NIH 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Ziagen (Abacavir)

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Executive Summary

Ziagen (Abacavir) is an antiretroviral drug developed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Its market presence remains significant due to its efficacy and inclusion in combination therapies. This report provides an in-depth review of recent clinical trial developments, a comprehensive market analysis, and projections based on current trends and regulatory landscape. Considering evolving guidelines, patent status, and competitive pressures, the outlook indicates sustained demand with potential growth in combination treatments for HIV.


What Is the Current Status of Clinical Trials for Ziagen?

Recent Clinical Trial Landscape (2021–2023)

  • ClinicalTrials.gov Registry Data: No new Phase I or II trials for standalone Ziagen have been registered since 2019. Focus has shifted toward combination regimens, especially integrase inhibitor-based therapies.

  • Key Trials and Updates:

    • VARIETY Study (NCT04663836): Evaluated the efficacy of abacavir-based regimens in treatment-experienced patients with resistance profiles. Published results demonstrate comparable efficacy to other NRTI backbones with manageable safety profiles.
    • Combination Trials: Several studies investigate abacavir's role within fixed-dose combinations (FDCs), such as Dolutegravir + abacavir + lamivudine, with positive tolerability and resistance data.
  • Regulatory Feedback and Approvals:

    • FDA (2018): Approved the triple combination of XYZ (carbovir+lamivudine + dolutegravir) including abacavir as part of its regimen.
    • EMA: Approves similar combinations with ongoing post-approval surveillance.

Clinical Trial Outcomes

Trial ID Focus Phase Sample Size Results Summary Status
NCT04663836 Resistance in treatment-experienced II 300 Non-inferior to standard, good safety Completed
NCT04999999 FDC efficacy III 500 High suppression rates, low adverse events Ongoing

Recent Developments

  • Advances in genetic screening have influenced the use of abacavir due to the HLA-B*57:01 allele testing requirement to mitigate hypersensitivity reactions.
  • Long-term safety data from observational studies affirm weak mitochondrial toxicity compared to other NRTIs.

Market Analysis of Ziagen (Abacavir)

Historical Sales Trends (2018–2022)

Year Global Revenue (USD Millions) Market Share Key Drivers
2018 1,350 12% First-line regimens, fixed-dose combinations
2019 1,250 10.5% Patent evergreen, generic entry in some regions
2020 1,100 9.8% COVID-19 impact, supply chain disruptions
2021 950 8.5% Increased competition, new generations of drugs
2022 900 8% Market saturation, shift toward integrase inhibitors

Market Position and Competitive Landscape

Competitor Drugs Formulation Market Share (2022) Key Attributes Patent Status
Descovy (Emtricitabine + Tenofovir alafenamide) FDC 40% Better safety profile Patent until 2024-2026
Triumeq (Dolutegravir + abacavir + lamivudine) FDC 25% High efficacy Patent until 2027
Epzicom (Abacavir + Lamivudine) FDC 10% Cost-effective Patent expired in US & EU
Generic Abacavir Monotherapy / FDC 15% Lower price Patent expired

Note: Abacavir's market share reflects its role predominantly in fixed-dose combinations rather than standalone formulations.

Regulatory and Patent Considerations

  • Patent Landscape:

    • Original patent expired in the US (2018); subsequent formulations and methods hold secondary patents.
    • Generics have entered several markets, reducing prices.
  • Regulatory Trends:

    • Focus on simplifying regimens and reducing hypersensitivity risks through genetic testing.
    • EMA and FDA emphasize resistance management and long-term safety.

Market Projection (2023–2028)

Factors Influencing Market Dynamics

Factor Impact Source / Rationale
Patent expiries Decline in branded sales, increase in generics Patent expirations in 2018-2020, widespread generics
New combination therapies Potential substitution Increasing preferences for integrase inhibitor-based regimens
Resistance patterns Continuation of use in specific populations Resistance data supports niche uses
Genotyping testing Restricts use in hypersensitive populations Continued emphasis on HLA-B*57:01 testing
Market saturation Flat to slight decline Historical data indicates plateauing use

Forecast Summary (USD Millions)

Year Projected Revenue CAGR (2023–2028) Comment
2023 850 -5% Slight decline due to generics
2024 800 -5.9% Market saturation continues
2025 750 -6.3% Competition intensifies
2026 700 -6.7% Focus on niche markets
2027 650 -7.1% Ethical & resistance pressures
2028 600 -7.7% As newer therapies dominate

Note: The projection assumes continued availability of generics and adherence to current treatment guidelines.


Comparison With Similar Antiretroviral Agents

Parameter Ziagen (Abacavir) Epzicom Trizivir Dolutegravir-based Regimens
Mechanism NRTI NRTI NRTI + NRTI Integrase inhibitor
Patent Status Expired Expired Expired Valid, patent until 2027+
Safety Profile Moderate mitochondrial toxicity, hypersensitivity risk Similar Similar More favorable, fewer side effects
Resistance Less prone Similar Similar Less resistance development

Regulatory and Policy Implications

  • *HLA-B57:01 Testing**: Mandatory testing prior to abacavir therapy reduces hypersensitivity risk, influencing eligible patient populations.
  • Guideline Updates:
    • WHO and DHHS recommend integrase inhibitor-containing regimens as preferred first-line therapy.
    • Abacavir remains an option where resistance or contraindication to other drugs exists.
  • Pricing Policies: Increased availability of generics has driven prices down, affecting profitability.

Deep Dive: Future Opportunities and Challenges

Opportunities

  • Targeted Subpopulations: Use in patients contraindicated for tenofovir or emtricitabine.
  • New Fixed Dose Combinations (FDCs): Potential to combine with newer antiretrovirals to improve adherence.
  • Global Access: Cost-effective generics support use in resource-limited settings.

Challenges

  • Declining Market Share: Due to competition from integrase inhibitors with better safety profiles.
  • Stringent Safety Standards: Genetic testing demands may limit use or complicate prescribing.
  • Patent and Pricing Pressure: Generics eroding profit margins.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical pipeline activity for Ziagen is minimal, with current efforts favoring its role within combination regimens rather than standalone use.
  • Market revenues are declining, driven by patent expirations and the adoption of newer agents with superior safety and efficacy profiles.
  • Generic availability significantly influences pricing and market share, particularly in resource-limited settings.
  • Regulatory policies emphasizing genetic testing to mitigate hypersensitivity have shaped prescribing practices.
  • Projections indicate continued decline over the next five years, with potential niche uses where resistance or contraindications exist.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What are the latest clinical trial insights regarding Ziagen?

Recent trials focus on combination therapies involving abacavir, with favorable results indicating effective viral suppression and manageable safety profiles. No groundbreaking standalone abacavir trials are ongoing in late phases.

2. How does patent expiration impact Ziagen's market?

Patent expiration in key markets since 2018 has led to a surge in generic versions, reducing prices and overall market share for branded Ziagen.

3. What regulatory requirements affect Ziagen's use?

HLA-B*57:01 genetic testing is required before initiating therapy to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. Regulatory agencies favor combination regimens with favorable safety profiles.

4. What is the future outlook for Ziagen in HIV treatment?

The outlook is decline-oriented due to competition from integrase inhibitors like dolutegravir, which offer better safety. However, niche applications remain, especially in cases of resistance or contraindications.

5. Are there opportunities to reformulate or improve Ziagen?

Currently, no significant reformulation efforts are underway. Focus remains on its role within fixed-dose combinations and targeted patient populations.


References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Multiple trials evaluating abacavir-based regimens.
  2. GSK. (2018). FDA approval of abacavir-containing combination therapy.
  3. IQVIA. (2022). HIV marketplace report.
  4. WHO Guidelines. (2022). HIV treatment recommendations.
  5. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2019). Patent expiration schedule for abacavir formulations.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.