You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ZEPATIER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ZEPATIER

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02743897 ↗ Transplanting Hepatitis C Kidneys Into Negative Kidney Recipients Active, not recruiting Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 1/Phase 2 2016-05-01 This study is being conducted to determine safety and effectiveness of transplanting kidneys from Hepatitis C-positive donors into Hepatitis C-negative patients on the kidney transplant waitlist, who will then be treated with the appropriate direct-acting antiviral (DAA) after the single kidney transplantation.
NCT02743897 ↗ Transplanting Hepatitis C Kidneys Into Negative Kidney Recipients Active, not recruiting University of Pennsylvania Phase 1/Phase 2 2016-05-01 This study is being conducted to determine safety and effectiveness of transplanting kidneys from Hepatitis C-positive donors into Hepatitis C-negative patients on the kidney transplant waitlist, who will then be treated with the appropriate direct-acting antiviral (DAA) after the single kidney transplantation.
NCT02781649 ↗ Exploring Renal Transplants Using Hepatitis C Infected Donors for HCV-negative Recipients Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 4 2016-07-20 In this study, individuals without hepatitis C infection who are on the kidney transplant waitlist will receive a kidney from a deceased donor with hepatitis C infection and will be treated for hepatitis C at the same time. Treatment will include Grazoprevir (GZR) 100 mg/Elbasvir (EBR) 50 mg administered on-call to the operating room for the renal transplant procedure and continued for 12 weeks post-renal transplant.
NCT02781649 ↗ Exploring Renal Transplants Using Hepatitis C Infected Donors for HCV-negative Recipients Completed Johns Hopkins University Phase 4 2016-07-20 In this study, individuals without hepatitis C infection who are on the kidney transplant waitlist will receive a kidney from a deceased donor with hepatitis C infection and will be treated for hepatitis C at the same time. Treatment will include Grazoprevir (GZR) 100 mg/Elbasvir (EBR) 50 mg administered on-call to the operating room for the renal transplant procedure and continued for 12 weeks post-renal transplant.
NCT02786537 ↗ Study of Oral Treatments for Hepatitis C Completed AbbVie Phase 4 2016-06-01 Phase 1 of this study compared the effectiveness of 3 approved DAA (direct-acting antiviral) HCV treatment regimens to learn whether they worked equally well under real-world conditions. Phase 2 of this study began early 2017 with removal of 1 DAA regimen, limiting randomization to just 2 FDA approved DAA regimens. Patients receiving HCV therapy in community and academic clinics were offered the opportunity to consent to be randomly assigned to one of three (phase 1) or one of two (phase 2) regimens and observed for outcomes. Once randomized, all medical care, laboratory testing, and any disease or side effect management were assumed by usual care conditions, and patient-reported outcomes were collected outside clinic in keeping with pragmatic design principles.
NCT02786537 ↗ Study of Oral Treatments for Hepatitis C Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 4 2016-06-01 Phase 1 of this study compared the effectiveness of 3 approved DAA (direct-acting antiviral) HCV treatment regimens to learn whether they worked equally well under real-world conditions. Phase 2 of this study began early 2017 with removal of 1 DAA regimen, limiting randomization to just 2 FDA approved DAA regimens. Patients receiving HCV therapy in community and academic clinics were offered the opportunity to consent to be randomly assigned to one of three (phase 1) or one of two (phase 2) regimens and observed for outcomes. Once randomized, all medical care, laboratory testing, and any disease or side effect management were assumed by usual care conditions, and patient-reported outcomes were collected outside clinic in keeping with pragmatic design principles.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ZEPATIER

Condition Name

Condition Name for ZEPATIER
Intervention Trials
Hepatitis C 13
Hepatitis C, Chronic 3
Chronic Hepatitis c 2
Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ZEPATIER
Intervention Trials
Hepatitis C 24
Hepatitis 20
Hepatitis A 10
Hepatitis C, Chronic 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ZEPATIER

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ZEPATIER
Location Trials
United States 35
United Kingdom 3
Taiwan 3
France 1
Spain 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ZEPATIER
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 5
Massachusetts 4
Maryland 3
Texas 3
Mississippi 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ZEPATIER

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ZEPATIER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 16
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ZEPATIER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 12
Terminated 4
Active, not recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ZEPATIER

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ZEPATIER
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 16
University of Pennsylvania 4
Massachusetts General Hospital 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ZEPATIER
Sponsor Trials
Other 29
Industry 18
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for ZEPATIER (Elbasvir and Grazoprevir)

Last updated: November 11, 2025

Introduction

ZEPATIER (elbasvir and grazoprevir) is an oral, fixed-dose combination antiviral medication developed by Merck, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2016 for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. With the evolving landscape of HCV therapies, recent clinical data, regulatory decisions, and market dynamics critically influence ZEPATIER’s positioning and future outlook.

This comprehensive analysis synthesizes recent clinical trial updates, delineates market trends, and projects ZEPATIER’s strategic trajectory within the competitive antiviral landscape.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent and Ongoing Clinical Studies

Since its initial approval, ZEPATIER has undergone extensive clinical research to expand indications, optimize efficacy, and evaluate safety profiles. Recent pivotal trials include:

  • C-EDGE COAST Study (NCT02664915):
    A phase 3 trial assessing ZEPATIER in patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4 coinfected with HIV. Results confirmed high SVR12 rates (>95%), affirming ZEPATIER’s efficacy and safety in coinfected populations, aligning with previous data (source: Merck, 2021).

  • EXPEDITION-IV Trial (NCT03179536):
    Focused on patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD), a population historically difficult to treat. The trial demonstrated SVR12 rates of approximately 99%, establishing ZEPATIER as a viable option amidst renal impairment (Merck, 2020).

  • Post-marketing Safety Surveillance:
    Ongoing pharmacovigilance data continue to support a favorable safety profile with rare adverse events such as mild fatigue and headache. No emergent safety concerns have prompted label modifications (FDA, 2022).

Regulatory and Approval Progress

  • Expansion in Europe:
    The European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved ZEPATIER in 2017 for genotypes 1 and 4, with subsequent revisions expanding use in certain CKD populations.

  • Label Modifications:
    Recent updates incorporate data on co-administration with certain antiretrovirals and adjustments for cirrhotic patients, reflecting ongoing clinical insights.

Implications of Clinical Data

  • Broadened Indications:
    The accumulation of evidence supports broader applications, especially for coinfected and renal impairment populations, cementing ZEPATIER’s niche in complex cases.

  • Comparative Effectiveness:
    Though highly effective in genotype 1 and 4, evolving competition from pangenotypic regimens like glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (Mavyret) and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (Epclusa) influences prescribing patterns.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global hepatitis C therapeutics market, valued at approximately USD 19.5 billion in 2021, is characterized by intense competition driven by the advent of pangenotypic regimens and price competition.

ZEPATIER holds a significant share within the niche of genotype 1 and 4 infections, especially in patients with CKD or prior treatment failures.

Key Market Dynamics

  • Competitive Regimens:
    Pangenotypic options like Mavyret and Epclusa offer broad genotype coverage with shorter treatment durations (8-12 weeks), leading to preference shifts among clinicians.

  • Pricing and Reimbursement:
    Cost reductions due to generics and tiered reimbursement policies in various markets have affected ZEPATIER’s market penetration, particularly outside the U.S.

  • Market Penetration Strategies:
    Merck has focused on targeted niches such as CKD and coinfected populations, where ZEPATIER’s efficacy demonstrates clear advantages.

  • Regulatory Barriers and Patent Status:
    Patent protections and exclusivity rights until at least 2027 limit generic competition in key markets, maintaining ZEPATIER’s premium position therein.

Market Performance and Forecasts

  • Historical Performance:
    In the U.S., ZEPATIER accounted for roughly 4% of the total HCV market share in 2021, with sales near USD 300 million, primarily driven by treatment of complex cases (IQVIA, 2022).

  • Future Projections (2023-2028):
    Despite competition, ZEPATIER’s targeted niche focus is likely to sustain stability through 2025. However, overtaken in overall market share by pangenotypic options, its revenue is expected to decline modestly—projected compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of -2% to -3% post-2025, barring new indications or formulation enhancements.

Emerging Opportunities

  • Expansion into Post-Exposure Prophylaxis and Special Populations:
    Ongoing trials may unlock new indications, such as use in post-transplant patients or specific pediatric populations, providing growth avenues.

  • Pharmacoeconomic Value:
    In renal impairment and coinfected patients, ZEPATIER’s efficacy and safety support its market role, especially where alternatives are limited.

Projected Outlook for ZEPATIER

Strategic Outlook

While the general hepatitis C market shifts towards pangenotypic, shorter-duration regimens, ZEPATIER’s role remains resilient in select niches. Its efficacy in complex patient populations, coupled with demonstrated safety, underpins its continued relevance.

Short-Term (2023–2025)

  • Focused efforts on CKD and HIV coinfected patients will preserve niche revenue streams.
  • Incorporation of new data into labeling and clinical guidelines will help maintain clinician confidence.
  • Sales likely to plateau amidst increasing generic competition in broader segments.

Long-Term (2026 and beyond)

  • Patent expiry and potential generic entrants could erode revenue.
  • Merck’s ability to innovate—potentially through fixed-dose improvements or new formulations—will determine lifespan.
  • Market migration towards pangenotypic agents will further diminish ZEPATIER’s share outside of specialized niches.

Conclusion

ZEPATIER remains a clinically validated and strategically valuable agent for specific HCV patient subsets. Ongoing clinical trial data reinforce its role in complex cases, though market forces driven by pangenotypic therapies and cost considerations constrict its growth potential.

To maximize its longevity, Merck should explore formulation innovations, expand indications through novel trials, and reinforce its positioning in niche markets. The drug’s future hinges on balancing clinical evidence with market dynamics.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Data Reinforces Niche Role: ZEPATIER’s efficacy in CKD and coinfected populations is well-supported, securing its clinical niche.
  • Market Share Faces Erosion: Pangenotypic regimens offer broader coverage and shorter treatment durations, challenging ZEPATIER’s market position.
  • Revenue Projections are Modest: Expect a gradual decline post-2025 due to generics and market shifts, unless new indications emerge.
  • Strategic Expansion is Essential: Development of new formulations or expanded indications could bolster long-term viability.
  • Regulatory and Patent Protections are Critical: Maintaining exclusivity until at least 2027 is essential for revenue stability in key markets.

FAQs

1. What are the primary clinical advantages of ZEPATIER compared to other HCV therapies?
ZEPATIER demonstrates high sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in genotypes 1 and 4, with particular efficacy in patients with CKD and HIV coinfection. Its safety profile is favorable, and it has fewer drug-drug interactions in specific populations compared to some pangenotypic options.

2. How does the expiration of patent protection affect ZEPATIER’s market?
Patent expiration, anticipated around 2027, will likely lead to generic entry, significantly reducing prices and market share unless Merck develops new formulations or expands indications to sustain revenue streams.

3. Are there any ongoing clinical trials that could expand ZEPATIER’s use?
Yes, ongoing research explores ZEPATIER’s efficacy in pediatric populations, post-transplant settings, and as part of combination regimens for complex cases, which could extend its clinical utility.

4. How does ZEPATIER compare cost-wise with pangenotypic therapies?
While ZEPATIER has historically been priced competitively due to its targeted niche focus, pangenotypic therapies are often priced similarly or lower, especially with generic availability, affecting its market competitiveness.

5. What strategies can Merck adopt to preserve ZEPATIER’s market relevance?
Focusing on niche markets, pursuing new clinical indications, improving formulations, and leveraging pharmacoeconomic benefits can help Merck sustain ZEPATIER’s position amidst evolving therapeutic standards.


References

  1. Merck. (2021). Clinical trial data on ZEPATIER in HIV coinfected patients.
  2. Merck. (2020). Results from EXPEDITION-IV in patients with CKD.
  3. FDA. (2022). Post-marketing safety surveillance report.
  4. IQVIA. (2022). Hepatitis C therapeutics market review, 2021.
  5. European Medicines Agency. (2017). ZEPATIER approval documentation.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.