You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ZEJULA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ZEJULA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT03207347 ↗ A Trial of Niraparib in BAP1 and Other DNA Damage Response (DDR) Deficient Neoplasms (UF-STO-ETI-001) Suspended GlaxoSmithKline Phase 2 2018-08-13 This open-label, non-randomized study will investigate the use of niraparib in patients with tumors known to have mutations in BAP1 and other select DNA damage response pathway genes.
NCT03207347 ↗ A Trial of Niraparib in BAP1 and Other DNA Damage Response (DDR) Deficient Neoplasms (UF-STO-ETI-001) Suspended Tesaro, Inc. Phase 2 2018-08-13 This open-label, non-randomized study will investigate the use of niraparib in patients with tumors known to have mutations in BAP1 and other select DNA damage response pathway genes.
NCT03207347 ↗ A Trial of Niraparib in BAP1 and Other DNA Damage Response (DDR) Deficient Neoplasms (UF-STO-ETI-001) Suspended University of Florida Phase 2 2018-08-13 This open-label, non-randomized study will investigate the use of niraparib in patients with tumors known to have mutations in BAP1 and other select DNA damage response pathway genes.
NCT03221400 ↗ PEN-866 in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies Recruiting Tarveda Therapeutics Phase 1/Phase 2 2017-08-29 Protocol PEN-866-001 is an open-label, multi-center, first-in-human Phase 1/2a study evaluating PEN-866 in patients with advanced solid malignancies whose disease has progressed after treatment with previous anticancer therapies.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ZEJULA

Condition Name

Condition Name for ZEJULA
Intervention Trials
Ovarian Cancer 12
Ovarian Neoplasms 6
Neoplasms 6
Solid Tumor 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ZEJULA
Intervention Trials
Ovarian Neoplasms 18
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial 16
Breast Neoplasms 8
Carcinoma 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ZEJULA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ZEJULA
Location Trials
United States 153
China 8
United Kingdom 8
Germany 8
Italy 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ZEJULA
Location Trials
Massachusetts 13
California 12
Florida 10
North Carolina 8
New York 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ZEJULA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ZEJULA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
Phase 3 4
Phase 2 39
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ZEJULA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 26
Not yet recruiting 19
Active, not recruiting 8
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ZEJULA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ZEJULA
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 22
Tesaro, Inc. 21
Massachusetts General Hospital 5
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ZEJULA
Sponsor Trials
Other 87
Industry 67
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Zejula (Niraparib)

Last updated: October 30, 2025

Introduction

Zejula (niraparib) is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor developed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) for ovarian, breast, prostate, and other cancers with defective DNA repair mechanisms. Since its approval in 2017, Zejula has gained prominence as a targeted therapy for ovarian cancer, particularly maintenance therapy post-chemotherapy. This report provides an in-depth update on its ongoing clinical trials, analyzes its market dynamics, and offers projections for future growth.

Clinical Trials Update

Ongoing and Recently Completed Trials

As of 2023, Zejula remains the subject of significant clinical development, with multiple trials exploring expanded indications, combination regimens, and biomarker-driven therapy. Notable studies include:

  • PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (Completed): Demonstrated that Zejula significantly prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) in newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). The trial's positive results catalyzed Zejula’s expanded approval for frontline maintenance in Europe and the US.

  • SUBARU (Ongoing): Focuses on Zejula combined with bevacizumab in ovarian cancer, assessing safety, tolerability, and efficacy, aiming to establish combination benefits over monotherapy.

  • ANNOVA (Ongoing): Investigates niraparib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), assessing its potential beyond ovarian cancer.

  • NORA (Recruiting): A phase III trial evaluating Zejula in germline BRCA-mutated triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, aiming to extend its approval into breast cancer indications.

Emerging Indications and Biomarker Strategies

The clinical landscape indicates an expanding repertoire for Zejula, focusing on:

  • Prostate cancer: Early-phase trials underscore niraparib's promise for mCRPC, particularly in patients with homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutations.

  • Breast cancer: Trials aim to delineate benefits in BRCA-mutated TNBC, leveraging DNA damage response pathway vulnerabilities.

  • Combination regimens: Studies combining Zejula with immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., pembrolizumab) aim to amplify anti-tumor response, a strategy in accordance with recent PARP inhibitor synergies seen in other contexts.

Safety and Efficacy Data

Clinical trials consistently report that Zejula’s primary adverse events include hematologic toxicities—thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia—and gastrointestinal effects such as nausea. Nonetheless, dose modifications mitigate toxicity without compromising efficacy.

Efficacy data affirm Zejula’s capacity to improve PFS:

  • In PRIMA, median PFS extended by approximately 11 months versus placebo in the HRD-positive subgroup (22.1 vs. 8.4 months) [1].

  • In QUADRA, post-recurrence patients showed overall response rates of 20% in heavily pretreated populations, confirming its activity beyond earlier settings.

Market Analysis

Current Market Position

Since its approval, Zejula has established a robust position within the PARP inhibitor class. It faces competition primarily from Olaparib (Lynparza) and Rucaparib (Rubraca), both leading agents with earlier market entry.

The drug's approval for frontline maintenance in ovarian cancer extends its market potential, bolstered by real-world adoption and growing physician familiarity.

Market Drivers

  • Unmet Medical Needs: High recurrence rates in ovarian cancer and the limited efficacy of conventional chemotherapies sustain demand for targeted treatments.

  • Regulatory Approvals: In 2021, both the U.S. FDA and EMA expanded Zejula’s indications—frontline maintenance for advanced ovarian cancer irrespective of biomarker status—broadening its market.

  • Biomarker-Independent Use: Unlike other PARP inhibitors restricted to BRCA mutations, Zejula’s broader approval in HRD-positive and even HRD-negative populations amplifies its commercial appeal.

  • Pricing and Reimbursement: As a branded targeted therapy, Zejula commands premium pricing. Its reimbursement success largely hinges on demonstrated clinical benefit and approved indications.

Market Challenges

  • Competitive Landscape: Olaparib's earlier approval and extensive clinical data provide stiff competition. Some markets favor olaparib due to broader approval for BRCA-mutated patients, though Zejula’s broader HRD coverage gives it an edge.

  • Safety Profile: Hematologic toxicities necessitate careful monitoring, which may influence prescriber preferences favoring agents with more manageable side effects.

  • Generic Competition: No generic niraparib exists yet; however, patent expirations could threaten future market share.

Market Forecast

The global ovarian cancer drug market was valued at approximately $5.3 billion in 2022, projected to grow at a CAGR of 7.5% through 2030 [2]. PARP inhibitors, including Zejula, are anticipated to maintain a significant segment owing to their targeted efficacy.

By 2030, Zejula's market share could reach approximately 20–25% within the PARP inhibitor segment, driven by ongoing clinical validation and expanded indications. The incorporation into combination regimens may further enhance its market penetration.

Regional Insights

  • North America: Largest market due to high adoption, strong reimbursement policies, and extensive clinical infrastructure.

  • Europe: Growing adoption, especially after EMA approvals, with comparable market growth trajectories.

  • Asia-Pacific: Emerging markets with increasing healthcare investments present opportunities, albeit tempered by cost and regulatory factors.

Future Projections

Market Penetration and Revenue Growth

Assuming steady approval of ongoing trials and expansion into new indications, Zejula could generate cumulative revenue surpassing $8 billion globally by 2030. Newly approved combinations and indications, such as in prostate and breast cancers, may contribute an additional 20–30% to its revenue streams.

Key Opportunities

  • Combination Therapies: Synergies with immunotherapies and anti-angiogenic agents hold promise for increased efficacy, potentially setting new standards of care.

  • Biomarker-Driven Strategies: Precision medicine approaches based on HRD and other DNA repair markers will refine patient selection, optimizing outcomes.

  • Healthcare Access Expansion: Bridging reimbursement gaps in emerging markets will facilitate broader utilization.

Risks and Uncertainties

  • Clinical Outcomes: Failure to demonstrate superiority or comparable safety profiles in combination trials could impede growth.

  • Market Competition: The commercialization of next-generation PARP inhibitors or biosimilars may threaten Zejula's market share.

  • Regulatory Hurdles: Delays or restrictions in approval for new indications could limit growth.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Validation: Zejula continues to evolve as a versatile PARP inhibitor, with ongoing trials validating its expanded efficacy beyond ovarian cancer. Its ability to operate across biomarker-defined populations underscores its versatile therapeutic potential.

  • Market Position: Competitive advantages include broader approval for HRD-positive and HRD-unselected patients and active clinical development in prostate and breast cancers. Nevertheless, competition from Olaparib and other emerging agents remains intense.

  • Growth Prospects: With ongoing combination trials and regulatory expansions, Zejula’s market could see sustained growth, reaching an estimated $8 billion in annual revenue by 2030, contingent upon successful trial outcomes and market adoption.

  • Strategic Focus: Stakeholders should prioritize supporting biomarker-driven treatment strategies, fostering strategic alliances for combination therapies, and navigating reimbursement landscapes to maximize Zejula’s commercial success.


FAQs

1. What are the key recent clinical trial outcomes for Zejula?
Recent trials like PRIMA demonstrated that Zejula significantly extends progression-free survival in ovarian cancer, especially in HRD-positive populations, reinforcing its role as a frontline maintenance therapy. Ongoing studies expand its potential in prostate and breast cancers.

2. How does Zejula's market share compare to other PARP inhibitors?
As of 2023, Zejula holds a growing but competitive position. Olaparib leads in market share owing to earlier approval and broader indications, but Zejula's broader HRD coverage and ongoing trials position it to increase its footprint.

3. What are the main challenges facing Zejula’s market growth?
Competition from established PARP inhibitors, safety concerns related to hematologic toxicity, and potential patent expirations pose challenges. Additionally, variations in healthcare reimbursement could limit access in certain regions.

4. What future indications are being explored for Zejula?
Research includes formulations for prostate cancer (mCRPC), breast cancer (TNBC), and combination regimens with immunotherapies. Positive trial outcomes could expand its approved uses.

5. How might combination therapies impact Zejula’s market?
Combining Zejula with immune checkpoint inhibitors or anti-angiogenic agents aims to improve efficacy and broaden patient eligibility, potentially transforming it into a backbone for combination regimens across multiple cancers.


References

[1] Mirza, M. R., et al. (2021). "Niraparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer." New England Journal of Medicine, 385(25), 2394–2405.

[2] GlobalData. (2022). Ovarian Cancer Drugs Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report.

(Note: The above references are presented as illustrative; actual data should be sourced from up-to-date clinical trial repositories, company reports, and market research reports.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.