You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ZALCITABINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ZALCITABINE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000625 ↗ A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II/III Trial of Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy With Nucleoside Analogs in HIV-Infected Persons With CD4 Cells of 200-500/mm3 Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 2 1969-12-31 To determine the efficacy and safety of zidovudine ( AZT ) versus didanosine ( ddI ), AZT plus ddI, and AZT plus zalcitabine ( ddC ) in preventing disease progression in HIV-infected patients with CD4 counts of 200-500 cells/mm3.
NCT00000625 ↗ A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II/III Trial of Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy With Nucleoside Analogs in HIV-Infected Persons With CD4 Cells of 200-500/mm3 Completed Glaxo Wellcome Phase 2 1969-12-31 To determine the efficacy and safety of zidovudine ( AZT ) versus didanosine ( ddI ), AZT plus ddI, and AZT plus zalcitabine ( ddC ) in preventing disease progression in HIV-infected patients with CD4 counts of 200-500 cells/mm3.
NCT00000625 ↗ A Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II/III Trial of Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy With Nucleoside Analogs in HIV-Infected Persons With CD4 Cells of 200-500/mm3 Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 To determine the efficacy and safety of zidovudine ( AZT ) versus didanosine ( ddI ), AZT plus ddI, and AZT plus zalcitabine ( ddC ) in preventing disease progression in HIV-infected patients with CD4 counts of 200-500 cells/mm3.
NCT00000651 ↗ A Randomized, Double Blind, Comparative Study of Dideoxycytidine (ddC) Alone or ddC/AZT Combination Versus Zidovudine (ZDV) Alone in Patients With HIV Infection Who Have Received Prior ZDV Therapy Completed Glaxo Wellcome Phase 3 1969-12-31 To evaluate the safety of zalcitabine (dideoxycytidine; ddC) alone and in combination with zidovudine (AZT) versus AZT alone when administered to asymptomatic patients with a CD4 count = or < 200 cells/mm3 and symptomatic patients with a CD4 count = or < 300 cells/mm3. To compare the effectiveness of ddC alone and in combination with AZT versus AZT alone. ddC has been shown to demonstrate an antiviral effect. AZT has been shown to significantly decrease mortality and reduce the frequency of opportunistic infections in patients with AIDS or advanced ARC. After 1 year of AZT therapy, the effectiveness tends to diminish and patients progress with more opportunistic infections and higher mortality rates. Because of the demonstrated antiviral activity, absence of hematologic toxicity, and lack of cross tolerance in laboratory studies of ddC, a study to investigate the long-term effectiveness of ddC in patients with HIV infection who have received AZT therapy is warranted.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ZALCITABINE

Condition Name

Condition Name for ZALCITABINE
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 48
Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal 1
Peripheral Nervous System Disease 1
Sarcoma, Kaposi 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ZALCITABINE
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 49
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 18
Infections 14
Infection 12
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ZALCITABINE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ZALCITABINE
Location Trials
United States 403
Puerto Rico 14
Canada 10
Tanzania 2
Australia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ZALCITABINE
Location Trials
California 33
New York 27
Illinois 25
Florida 25
Massachusetts 21
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ZALCITABINE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ZALCITABINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 9
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ZALCITABINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 48
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ZALCITABINE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ZALCITABINE
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 26
Hoffmann-La Roche 19
Glaxo Wellcome 9
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ZALCITABINE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 45
NIH 30
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Zalcitabine

Last updated: October 29, 2025


Introduction

Zalcitabine (2',3'-dideoxycytidine, ddC) is an antiretroviral nucleoside analogue initially developed for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. It was one of the early drugs approved during the late 1980s and early 1990s but gradually phased out due to safety issues and the emergence of more effective therapies. As an older drug with limited current use, understanding its clinical trial history, market position, and future prospects offers insights into niche applications and the evolution of HIV therapeutics.


Clinical Trials Update for Zalcitabine

Historical Clinical Development

Zalcitabine gained FDA approval in 1991 as part of combination antiretroviral therapy. The initial development focused on monotherapy and combination regimens with other nucleoside analogues such as zidovudine. Clinical trials demonstrated modest reductions in viral load but were often marred by toxicity issues, particularly peripheral neuropathy and pancreatitis, limiting widespread use.

Recent and Ongoing Trials

In recent years, there have been no significant clinical trials specifically targeting zalcitabine, reflecting its diminished role in modern HIV treatment. Major trials concluded in the early 2000s, with subsequent research shifting to newer agents like tenofovir, emtricitabine, and integrase inhibitors, which demonstrate superior efficacy and safety profiles.

However, researchers have explored the potential repurposing of older nucleoside analogues, including zalcitabine, for resistant HIV strains or as part of combination strategies with novel agents. A few small-scale studies, primarily retrospective or in vitro, have investigated these prospects, but no large-scale, pivotal clinical trials are currently underway.

Regulatory Status and Discontinuation

Due to limited efficacy and adverse effects, most regulatory agencies have withdrawn zalcitabine from the market or ceased its approval for commercial use. The CDC and WHO no longer recommend zalcitabine for HIV treatment, favoring agents with more tolerable profiles. Its status as an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) is largely historical, with no ongoing development or clinical trial activity.


Market Analysis

Historical Market Position

During the early 1990s, zalcitabine represented a vital component of HIV combination therapy. At that time, the HIV market was nascent, with limited options. Zalcitabine was positioned alongside zidovudine (AZT), offering an alternative for patients intolerant to AZT monotherapy.

The drug's market share rapidly declined after the advent of better-tolerated drugs, such as lamivudine, tenofovir, and emtricitabine, which provided improved efficacy and reduced adverse events. The emergence of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in the late 1990s further marginalized zalcitabine.

Current Market Environment

Today, zalcitabine is essentially obsolete in the global HIV market. Its sales have ceased in most markets, as it is not included in current treatment guidelines. The main reasons include:

  • Safety concerns: Peripheral neuropathy and pancreatitis risks.
  • Limited efficacy: Less potent compared to newer nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs).
  • Market availability: Pharmaceutical companies have phased out manufacturing, leading to scarcity and regulatory discontinuation.

Potential Future Market Relevance

While direct utilization is unlikely, niche opportunities exist in specific contexts:

  • Research applications: As a chemical probe in nucleoside analogue studies.
  • Developing countries: Scarcity of affordable drugs might prompt some use, but this is largely theoretical given the availability of generics of superior agents.
  • Resistant HIV strains: Fragmented research into late-stage drug resistance may consider older analogues for combinatorial regimens, though no current clinical trial data supports this.

Overall, the global market projection for zalcitabine remains negligible, with a decline to near-zero transactional value within the next few years.


Market Projection

Given the current landscape:

  • Market size (2023 and beyond): Approaching zero, with negligible sales figures mainly attributable to legacy sourcing or archival use.
  • Future trend: Completely phased out, replaced by more effective, safer agents.
  • Commercial prospects: Virtually nonexistent unless re-engineered or repurposed in niche research contexts.

The future market trajectory aligns with the broader trend of HIV therapeutics evolving toward personalized, tolerable, and highly effective drug combinations. Thus, any resurgence of zalcitabine would require significant reformulation or novel delivery mechanisms, which presently appear unlikely.


Conclusion and Insights

Zalcitabine's journey from an FDA-approved HIV therapy to obsolescence illustrates the rapid evolution of antiretroviral treatment. Despite its early significance, clinical trials have halted, and market presence has waned as newer agents outperform it in efficacy and safety.

The existing data suggest that zalcitabine will likely remain confined to historical and research niches, with no substantial clinical development or commercial opportunities anticipated shortly. Its legacy underscores the importance of continual drug innovation to meet evolving clinical demands.


Key Takeaways

  • Historically, zalcitabine was among the first antiretrovirals, but safety issues curtailed its widespread use.
  • Current clinical trials for zalcitabine are nonexistent; the drug’s development has been discontinued globally.
  • The commercial market for zalcitabine is effectively obsolete, with negligible or zero projected sales.
  • Future prospects hinge on innovative research applications rather than therapeutic deployment.
  • The evolution of HIV treatment emphasizes safety, efficacy, and tolerability, rendering older drugs like zalcitabine obsolete.

FAQs

1. Why was zalcitabine discontinued for HIV treatment?
Due to its limited efficacy and significant toxicity, notably peripheral neuropathy and pancreatitis, along with the advent of more effective, better-tolerated antiretroviral agents, authorities phased out zalcitabine.

2. Are there any ongoing clinical trials involving zalcitabine?
No, current clinical trials involving zalcitabine are nonexistent. Its development was halted decades ago, with research shifting to newer drugs.

3. Can zalcitabine be used today for HIV?
No. It is not recommended or approved for contemporary HIV treatment, given the availability of superior alternatives.

4. Is there any interest in repurposing zalcitabine?
Limited research exists exploring potential repurposing, often as a chemical probe or in resistant strains, but these are experimental and lack clinical validation.

5. What lessons can the pharmaceutical industry learn from zalcitabine's trajectory?
The importance of prioritizing safety and efficacy in drug development is paramount. Early drugs must undergo rigorous testing, and continuous innovation is essential to meet clinical needs, as demonstrated by zalcitabine’s obsolescence.


References

  1. FDA Drug Database. Zalcitabine approval history and safety profile.
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). HIV treatment guidelines and drug updates.
  3. UNAIDS. Overview of antiretroviral drug evolution.
  4. ClinicalTrials.gov. Historical data on clinical trials involving zalcitabine.
  5. Pharmaceutical industry reports. Market analysis of antiretroviral drugs.

Note: This analysis consolidates publicly available data and industry insights up to 2023, reflecting the current status of zalcitabine in clinical and commercial contexts.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.