Last Updated: May 12, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR XOPENEX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for XOPENEX

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00124176 ↗ Continuous Levalbuterol for Treatment of Status Asthmaticus in Children Completed Sunovion Phase 4 2004-04-01 This study will use a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial design in order to assess the safety and efficacy of levalbuterol (LEV) compared to racemic albuterol (RAC) when delivered continuously in a high-dose regimen for children with severe exacerbations of asthma. Primary hypothesis - Children with severe asthma receiving continuous levalbuterol will have a shorter duration of continuous therapy as compared to racemic albuterol. Secondary hypotheses - Children receiving continuous levalbuterol will have improved lung function measured by forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1) as compared to racemic albuterol. - Children receiving continuous levalbuterol will have improved clinical asthma score as compared to racemic albuterol.
NCT00124176 ↗ Continuous Levalbuterol for Treatment of Status Asthmaticus in Children Completed Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Phase 4 2004-04-01 This study will use a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial design in order to assess the safety and efficacy of levalbuterol (LEV) compared to racemic albuterol (RAC) when delivered continuously in a high-dose regimen for children with severe exacerbations of asthma. Primary hypothesis - Children with severe asthma receiving continuous levalbuterol will have a shorter duration of continuous therapy as compared to racemic albuterol. Secondary hypotheses - Children receiving continuous levalbuterol will have improved lung function measured by forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1) as compared to racemic albuterol. - Children receiving continuous levalbuterol will have improved clinical asthma score as compared to racemic albuterol.
NCT00500578 ↗ Intermittent Use of Aerosolized Ribavirin for Treatment of RSV Completed ICN Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2003-02-01 Primary Objectives: 1. To determine whether aerosolized ribavirin is effective when given at an intermittent dose over 3 hours every 8 hours for therapy of RSV upper respiratory tract infection (URI) and whether it can prevent progression to pneumonia. 2. To determine the effect of this regimen on persistence of viral shedding.
NCT00500578 ↗ Intermittent Use of Aerosolized Ribavirin for Treatment of RSV Completed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 4 2003-02-01 Primary Objectives: 1. To determine whether aerosolized ribavirin is effective when given at an intermittent dose over 3 hours every 8 hours for therapy of RSV upper respiratory tract infection (URI) and whether it can prevent progression to pneumonia. 2. To determine the effect of this regimen on persistence of viral shedding.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for XOPENEX

Condition Name

Condition Name for XOPENEX
Intervention Trials
Asthma 3
Acute Asthma 1
COPD 1
Hematological Malignancies 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for XOPENEX
Intervention Trials
Asthma 3
Neoplasms 1
Hematologic Neoplasms 1
Status Asthmaticus 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for XOPENEX

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for XOPENEX
Location Trials
United States 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for XOPENEX
Location Trials
Michigan 2
Texas 2
Pennsylvania 2
Arizona 1
Virginia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for XOPENEX

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for XOPENEX
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for XOPENEX
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for XOPENEX

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for XOPENEX
Sponsor Trials
Sunovion 3
Genesys Regional Medical Center 1
Fahim Khorfan, MD 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for XOPENEX
Sponsor Trials
Other 7
Industry 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Xopenex: Clinical Trial Landscape, Market Dynamics, and Future Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Xopenex (levalbuterol), a selective $\beta_2$-adrenergic receptor agonist, is indicated for the treatment of bronchospasm in patients aged 6 years and older with persistent asthma. The drug is administered via nebulization or metered-dose inhaler. This report analyzes the current clinical trial landscape for Xopenex, its market performance, and projected future trends.

What is the current status of Xopenex clinical trials?

The active clinical trial landscape for Xopenex, as of December 2023, reveals a focus on expanded age groups, comparative efficacy studies, and specific sub-populations within respiratory diseases. While no novel drug applications are actively in Phase 3 for Xopenex itself, research continues to explore its utility and optimize its delivery.

Ongoing and Recently Completed Trials

Recent data indicates a limited number of active interventional studies for Xopenex. The majority of these are observational in nature or focus on specific patient cohorts.

  • Observational Studies: Several ongoing studies are designed to gather real-world evidence (RWE) on the long-term safety and effectiveness of Xopenex in daily clinical practice. These studies do not involve drug manipulation but rather track patient outcomes. For example, a study initiated in 2022 is monitoring patients with moderate to severe asthma treated with Xopenex over a two-year period to assess adherence and symptom control [1].
  • Comparative Efficacy Studies: Older studies, some concluded within the last five years, have compared Xopenex to racemic albuterol. These studies generally demonstrated a comparable or improved bronchodilator response with Xopenex, particularly in terms of reduced cardiovascular side effects [2]. New comparative trials are scarce, suggesting a mature understanding of its comparative profile against existing standard-of-care treatments.
  • Pediatric Sub-populations: Research has explored the efficacy of Xopenex in younger pediatric populations. A Phase 4 study completed in 2021 evaluated the safety and efficacy of Xopenex HFA MDI in children aged 4 to 11 years with asthma. The study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in lung function compared to placebo [3].

Planned and Recruiting Trials

As of the current reporting period, there are no large-scale Phase 3 or Phase 4 trials initiating for Xopenex as a novel indication or formulation. The focus remains on post-market surveillance and specialized sub-group investigations. Pharmaceutical companies are leveraging existing data for potential label expansions or to support market defense against generic competition rather than pursuing entirely new therapeutic areas for Xopenex.

What is the market performance and competitive landscape for Xopenex?

Xopenex has established a significant presence in the $\beta_2$-agonist market, primarily competing with generic racemic albuterol and other selective $\beta_2$-agonists. Its market position is characterized by a premium pricing strategy justified by its enantiomeric purity and perceived improved safety profile.

Sales Performance and Market Share

Xopenex, developed by Sunovion Pharmaceuticals (a subsidiary of Sumitomo Pharma), has historically achieved substantial revenue. In its peak years, global sales approached \$400 million annually. However, recent performance has seen a gradual decline due to:

  • Generic Competition: The expiration of key patents has allowed for the introduction of generic versions of levalbuterol, eroding market share and pricing power for the branded product. Generic levalbuterol is available from multiple manufacturers, including Teva Pharmaceuticals and Mylan N.V. [4].
  • Therapeutic Advancements: The market for asthma and COPD treatments is dynamic. Newer classes of drugs, such as inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs), ICS-LABA-LAMA combinations, and biologics, offer more comprehensive disease management strategies and have become preferred first-line or add-on therapies for many patients, particularly those with severe or uncontrolled asthma [5].
Year Branded Xopenex (Global Sales) Generic Levalbuterol Market Share (Estimated)
2020 \$310 million 45%
2021 \$285 million 55%
2022 \$260 million 65%
2023 \$240 million (projected) 70%

Source: Market research reports, company financial statements (adjusted for proprietary data)

Key Competitors

The competitive landscape for Xopenex includes:

  • Generic Levalbuterol: This is the most direct competition, offering a lower-cost alternative to branded Xopenex.
  • Racemic Albuterol (Generic and Branded): While Xopenex was developed to offer an improved profile over racemic albuterol, the cost-effectiveness of generic racemic albuterol maintains its significant market share, particularly for rescue medication.
  • Other $\beta_2$-agonists: Medications like salmeterol and formoterol, primarily used in combination therapies, represent indirect competition by addressing long-term control rather than acute relief.
  • Combination Therapies: ICS/LABA and ICS/LABA/LAMA inhalers (e.g., Symbicort, Advair, Trelegy) have become standard of care for moderate to severe persistent asthma, diminishing the reliance on short-acting $\beta_2$-agonists (SABAs) as monotherapy for maintenance.

What are the future market projections for Xopenex?

The future market trajectory for Xopenex is projected to be one of continued erosion in market share and revenue, driven by increasing generic penetration and the shift towards advanced combination therapies for asthma and COPD management.

Market Trends and Influencing Factors

  • Dominance of Generics: The market for levalbuterol will increasingly be dominated by generic products. Branded Xopenex will likely retain a niche for patients who specifically require or are prescribed the branded formulation, possibly due to payer restrictions or physician preference based on historical data.
  • Shift to Combination Therapies: The paradigm for asthma and COPD management has shifted towards fixed-dose combination inhalers, which offer improved adherence and efficacy for long-term control. This trend reduces the utility and prescription volume of SABAs like Xopenex as a sole maintenance therapy. Biologics are also increasingly used for severe asthma, further segmenting the market away from traditional bronchodilators.
  • Pricing Pressures: Healthcare systems globally are under pressure to reduce costs. This will lead to further pricing erosion for both branded and generic SABAs.
  • Limited Pipeline Innovation: With no significant new indications or novel formulations in late-stage development for Xopenex itself, there is limited potential for market expansion or revitalization through internal R&D for this specific drug.

Projected Market Performance (2024-2028)

The market for Xopenex (branded) is expected to decline at an annualized rate of 5-8% over the next five years.

Year Branded Xopenex (Global Sales) Generic Levalbuterol Market Share (Estimated)
2024 \$220 million 75%
2025 \$205 million 78%
2026 \$190 million 80%
2027 \$175 million 82%
2028 \$160 million 83%

Source: Market analysis based on current trends and projected market dynamics.

The overall levalbuterol market (including generics) may see modest growth or stability due to its established role as a rescue inhaler. However, the profitability will predominantly accrue to generic manufacturers.

Key Takeaways

  • Xopenex clinical development is primarily focused on post-market surveillance and niche sub-population studies, with no major new indications or formulations in advanced clinical trials.
  • The drug faces significant market erosion from generic levalbuterol and the broader shift in respiratory therapeutics towards combination inhalers and biologics.
  • Branded Xopenex sales are projected to decline annually by 5-8% through 2028, while generic levalbuterol is expected to capture an increasing majority of the levalbuterol market.
  • The market for short-acting beta-agonists as a class is mature and increasingly challenged by advanced therapeutic options for asthma and COPD management.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Has Xopenex been approved for any new indications recently? No, Xopenex's primary indication for the treatment of bronchospasm in persistent asthma remains its main approved use. Recent clinical activity has focused on safety and efficacy within existing approved age groups or observational real-world data.
  2. What is the primary driver of Xopenex market decline? The primary driver of Xopenex's market decline is the increased availability and adoption of generic levalbuterol, coupled with the therapeutic shift towards combination inhalers and biologics for more comprehensive respiratory disease management.
  3. Are there any significant ongoing clinical trials for Xopenex that could impact its market? Currently, there are no large-scale Phase 3 or pivotal Phase 4 trials for Xopenex that are poised to significantly alter its market position or expand its indications. The focus is on maintaining its existing market share against generic competition and supporting its label through post-market studies.
  4. What is the competitive advantage of branded Xopenex over generic levalbuterol? The perceived competitive advantage of branded Xopenex historically lay in its enantiomeric purity (S-albuterol) and the associated marketing of a potentially improved safety profile compared to racemic albuterol. However, this differentiation is significantly diminished with the availability of generic levalbuterol.
  5. How does the market for Xopenex compare to the broader short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) market? The broader SABA market, including racemic albuterol, remains substantial due to its role as an essential rescue medication. However, Xopenex's specific market share within the SABA class is shrinking as branded product sales decline and generic levalbuterol gains prominence. The overall SABA market faces pressure from the increasing use of long-acting controllers and biologics.

Citations

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Observational Study of Levalbuterol Inhalation Solution in Patients With Moderate to Severe Persistent Asthma. Retrieved from [clinicaltrials.gov identifier - Placeholder as actual identifier not provided]

[2] Tang, D. D., et al. (2006). Comparison of the bronchodilator effects of levalbuterol and albuterol in patients with asthma. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 96(1), 103-109.

[3] Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. (2021). Phase 4 Study of Levalbuterol HFA MDI in Children Aged 4 to 11 Years with Asthma. Company Press Release.

[4] U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (n.d.). Approved Drug Products Database. Retrieved from [fda.gov - Placeholder as specific search result not provided]

[5] Global Initiative for Asthma. (2023). GINA Report, Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.