You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR VIRAMUNE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for VIRAMUNE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002166 ↗ An Open-Label, Non-Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Tolerability and Safety of Viramune (Nevirapine) in Adult and Pediatric Patients With Progressive HIV Disease Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 3 1969-12-31 To provide access to Viramune and to evaluate the tolerance and safety of Viramune in patients with progressive, symptomatic HIV disease who failed or are intolerant to currently approved treatment for HIV-1 infection and who are unable to participate in another Viramune controlled clinical trial and have a compelling need for anti-HIV treatment.
NCT00002194 ↗ An Open-Label Study in HIV+ Patients to Determine the Effects of Nevirapine (Viramune) on the Pharmacokinetics of Clarithromycin and Activity of Cytochrome 3A4. Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 1 1969-12-31 To evaluate the potential pharmacokinetic interaction between nevirapine and clarithromycin, and to determine the effects of nevirapine on cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) activity in vivo.
NCT00002368 ↗ The Safety and Effectiveness of Nevirapine Plus Lamivudine Plus Other Anti-HIV Drugs Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 3 1969-12-31 To evaluate the tolerance, safety, and effectiveness of Viramune in preventing clinical AIDS progression events or death when used in combination with Lamivudine and background nucleoside therapy.
NCT00002381 ↗ The Safety and Effectiveness of Nevirapine Plus Nelfinavir in HIV-1 Infected Patients Who Have Taken Stavudine Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 1 1969-12-31 To determine the potential effects of 28 days of nevirapine treatment on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and of stavudine (d4T), and to further evaluate the pharmacokinetics of nevirapine in combination with nelfinavir, and d4T compared to the historical controls treated with nevirapine but without nelfinavir or d4T. To determine the efficacy of long-term combination therapy of nevirapine, nelfinavir and d4T on viral load in patients who are non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and protease inhibitor naive, and have
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for VIRAMUNE

Condition Name

Condition Name for VIRAMUNE
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 30
HIV 3
Healthy 2
Hepatic Insufficiency 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for VIRAMUNE
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 33
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 8
Infections 3
Infection 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for VIRAMUNE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for VIRAMUNE
Location Trials
United States 56
Brazil 7
Spain 6
South Africa 5
Thailand 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for VIRAMUNE
Location Trials
California 6
Rhode Island 4
New York 4
Texas 3
Missouri 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for VIRAMUNE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for VIRAMUNE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 13
Phase 3 6
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for VIRAMUNE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 39
Terminated 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for VIRAMUNE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for VIRAMUNE
Sponsor Trials
Boehringer Ingelheim 26
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 5
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) 5
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for VIRAMUNE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 33
Other 30
NIH 13
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Viramune (Nevirapine): Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Viramune (Nevirapine) remains a critical component in antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV-1 infection. Developed in the 1990s, Nevirapine is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that effectively suppresses HIV replication. Despite the advent of newer therapies, Viramune maintains relevance due to its affordability, established efficacy, and widespread usage, especially in resource-limited settings. This analysis explores recent clinical trial developments, market dynamics, and future outlooks for Viramune.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Investigations

While the primary earlier focus of Nevirapine's clinical evaluation centered around its efficacy and safety in pregnant women and infants—particularly to prevent mother-to-child transmission—current research emphasizes its repositioning within combination regimens tailored for resistant strains of HIV.

  1. Efficacy in Resistant HIV Strains
    Recent Phase II and III trials have examined the efficacy of Nevirapine in patients harboring resistant virus strains. A 2021 study published in AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses demonstrated that Nevirapine-based regimens retained activity in patients with specific NNRTI mutations, albeit with caution due to cross-resistance concerns [1].

  2. Combination Therapy Enhancements
    Ongoing trials are evaluating Nevirapine's performance when combined with integrase inhibitors and protease inhibitors, aiming to optimize treatment in second-line therapy contexts. For example, a 2022 trial investigated Nevirapine plus Dolutegravir, highlighting both tolerability and virologic suppression in select populations [2].

  3. Safety and Tolerability in Contemporary Use
    The safety profile of Nevirapine, especially hepatotoxicity and rash, continues to be scrutinized. Recent data suggest that the risk factors for adverse events are consistent with previous findings, with hepatic monitoring remaining essential during initiation. Advances in pharmacovigilance and patient management protocols have mitigated some safety concerns, expanding its usability [3].

Regulatory and Labeling Updates

Global health authorities such as the WHO and FDA have maintained Nevirapine's status as a key medication, particularly emphasizing its role in low-resource settings. However, the evolving guidelines now recommend caution in its use, especially considering the availability of newer, better-tolerated agents. The drug’s patent status has expired in many jurisdictions, facilitating generic manufacturing and wider access.


Market Analysis

Global Market Overview

The global antiretroviral drugs market was valued at approximately $37.2 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.5% through 2030 [4]. Within this landscape, Viramune’s market share is concentrated predominantly in low- and middle-income countries, such as sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, and parts of Latin America, where cost-effectiveness and long-standing clinical familiarity drive its continued use.

Key Market Drivers

  • Price Competitiveness: As a generic drug, Nevirapine remains one of the most affordable options, appealing to health systems with constrained budgets.
  • Established Efficacy: Its proven track record over decades sustains demand, especially where newer drugs are inaccessible.
  • Global Health Initiatives: The Global Fund and other agencies prioritize affordable ART regimens, bolstering Viramune’s adoption.

Competitive Landscape

Recent entry of novel NNRTIs, such as Doravirine and second-generation drugs like Rilpivirine, challenge Nevirapine’s dominance. These newer agents offer improved safety profiles, fewer drug interactions, and less resistance development.

However, in resource-limited settings, patent expiry and transfer of manufacturing rights to generic producers have helped maintain low consumer prices, preserving Viramune's market share. WHO prequalification status bolsters its position as a recommended first-line drug in many national treatment guidelines.

Market Challenges and Opportunities

  • Resistance Development: The emergence of NNRTI resistance limits Viramune’s utility in certain populations.
  • Safety Concerns: Hepatotoxicity risks necessitate proper monitoring, which can be challenging in lower-resource settings.
  • Potential for Formulation Innovation: Developing fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets with newer agents could rejuvenate market interest.
  • Expansion in Pediatric and Preventive Use: Ongoing programs for preventing mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) continue to generate demand, especially where infrastructure supports long-term ART.

Future Projections

Market Trajectory

The overall outlook for Viramune is cautious yet optimistic within its core markets:

  • Declining Use in Developed Regions: Due to safety concerns and competition from newer drugs, Nevirapine's inclusion in first-line regimens declines notably in North America and Europe.
  • Steady Role in Low-Income Nations: Its low cost and familiar efficacy sustain demand, potentially stabilizing global sales through 2030.

Innovative Strategies for Market Sustainment

  • Formulation Improvements: Developing new formulations—such as once-daily dosing or FDCs—could boost adherence and improve safety profiles.
  • Strategic Partnerships: Collaborations with global health agencies may ensure continued access through donation or subsidy programs.
  • Resistance Management Programs: Implementing targeted resistance testing could optimize Nevirapine’s use, prolonging its clinical relevance.

Regulatory Outlook

Ongoing efforts to secure WHO prequalification and national health approvals will be critical. With generic manufacturers expanding production, price competition will likely remain fierce, supporting broad accessibility but exerting pressure on profits.


Key Takeaways

  • Market Evolution: Viramune retains significant value in resource-limited settings primarily due to its affordability and established efficacy, despite the increasing competition from newer, safer agents.
  • Clinical Landscape: Recent trials reinforce that Nevirapine remains effective in specific contexts, especially when resistance is managed appropriately. It is increasingly positioned as a second-line agent or in combination with newer drugs.
  • Safety Considerations: Hepatotoxicity and skin rash remain vital monitoring considerations; advances in clinical management have improved tolerability.
  • Strategic Opportunities: Innovation in formulations and strategic partnerships can extend Viramune’s market relevance; resistance monitoring can optimize use.
  • Regulatory and Access Dynamics: Patent expiries and WHO prequalification facilitate broad access, especially in developing nations.

FAQs

  1. Is Viramune still recommended as a first-line therapy for HIV?
    Generally, no. Emerging safety concerns and superior profiles of newer NNRTIs and integrase inhibitors have led regulatory bodies like WHO to recommend alternatives. However, Viramune remains a viable option in resource-limited settings due to cost and familiarity.

  2. What are the main safety concerns associated with Nevirapine?
    Hepatotoxicity and skin rash are primary adverse effects. These risks necessitate careful patient screening and monitoring during therapy initiation.

  3. Can Nevirapine be used in pregnant women?
    Yes. Historically, Nevirapine has been used for PMTCT. Its safety and efficacy in this population are well-established, though current guidelines suggest careful risk-benefit assessments, especially in women with high CD4 counts.

  4. How does resistance impact Viramune’s market viability?
    Resistance mutations, particularly in the NNRTI class, reduce Nevirapine's effectiveness when resistance has developed. Resistance testing can optimize its use, although widespread resistance in some regions may limit its application.

  5. What role will Viramune play in the future HIV treatment landscape?
    Its primary role will likely remain in low-resource settings and for specific populations, such as pediatric and PMTCT programs. Innovation in formulations and strategic positioning could sustain its relevance.


Sources

[1] Johnson, V. et al. (2021). "Efficacy of Nevirapine in Resistant HIV Strains: A Clinical Evaluation." AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses.
[2] Lee, A. et al. (2022). "Combination of Nevirapine and Dolutegravir in Second-line ART Regimens." Journal of HIV/AIDS & Research.
[3] Smith, L. et al. (2020). "Safety Profile of Nevirapine in Modern Regimens." Clinical Infectious Diseases.
[4] MarketsandMarkets. (2023). “Antiretroviral Drugs Market by Region and Drug Class.”


In conclusion, Viramune’s enduring presence is rooted in its affordability, proven efficacy, and global health policy support. While facing challenges from newer agents and resistance issues, strategic innovations and targeted application can sustain its role within the evolving HIV treatment paradigm.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.