Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT03742258 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy and TAK-659 as Front-Line Treatment in Treating Patients With High-Risk Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Active, not recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 2019-03-13 The purpose of this research study is to evaluate a new investigational drug, TAK-659, given in combination with standard chemotherapy, for the treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). ?Investigational? means that TAK-659 has not been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use as a prescription or over-the-counter medication to treat a certain condition. The primary purpose of this study is to find the appropriate and safe dose of the study drug to be used in combination with standard chemotherapy for the treatment of your disease and to determine how well the drug works in treating the disease. Other objectives include measuring the amount of the study drug in the body at different times after taking the study drug. Participation in the study is expected to last for up to 3 years after receiving the last dose of the study drug. Patients will receive the study treatment for up to 18 weeks, as long as they are benefitting.
OTC NCT03742258 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy and TAK-659 as Front-Line Treatment in Treating Patients With High-Risk Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Active, not recruiting Northwestern University Phase 1 2019-03-13 The purpose of this research study is to evaluate a new investigational drug, TAK-659, given in combination with standard chemotherapy, for the treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). ?Investigational? means that TAK-659 has not been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use as a prescription or over-the-counter medication to treat a certain condition. The primary purpose of this study is to find the appropriate and safe dose of the study drug to be used in combination with standard chemotherapy for the treatment of your disease and to determine how well the drug works in treating the disease. Other objectives include measuring the amount of the study drug in the body at different times after taking the study drug. Participation in the study is expected to last for up to 3 years after receiving the last dose of the study drug. Patients will receive the study treatment for up to 18 weeks, as long as they are benefitting.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000658 ↗ A Phase III Randomized Trial of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose mBACOD Chemotherapy With rGM-CSF for Treatment of AIDS-Associated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Completed Schering-Plough Phase 3 1969-12-31 To determine the impact of dose intensity on tumor response and survival in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). HIV-infected patients are at increased risk for developing intermediate and high-grade NHL. While combination chemotherapy for aggressive B-cell NHL in the absence of immunodeficiency is highly effective, the outcome of therapy for patients with AIDS-associated NHL has been disappointing. Treatment is frequently complicated by the occurrence of multiple opportunistic infections, as well as the presence of poor bone marrow reserve, making the administration of standard doses of chemotherapy difficult. A recent study was completed using a low-dose modification of the standard mBACOD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, dexamethasone, methotrexate ) treatment. A 46 percent response rate was observed in patients treated with this combination of chemotherapeutic agents, with a number of durable remissions and reduced toxicity when compared to previous experience with more standard treatments. A subsequent study showed similar effectiveness using a lower dose of methotrexate administered on day 15. It is hoped that the use of sargramostim (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; GM-CSF) will improve bone marrow function and allow for administration of a higher dose of chemotherapy.
NCT00000658 ↗ A Phase III Randomized Trial of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose mBACOD Chemotherapy With rGM-CSF for Treatment of AIDS-Associated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 1969-12-31 To determine the impact of dose intensity on tumor response and survival in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). HIV-infected patients are at increased risk for developing intermediate and high-grade NHL. While combination chemotherapy for aggressive B-cell NHL in the absence of immunodeficiency is highly effective, the outcome of therapy for patients with AIDS-associated NHL has been disappointing. Treatment is frequently complicated by the occurrence of multiple opportunistic infections, as well as the presence of poor bone marrow reserve, making the administration of standard doses of chemotherapy difficult. A recent study was completed using a low-dose modification of the standard mBACOD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, dexamethasone, methotrexate ) treatment. A 46 percent response rate was observed in patients treated with this combination of chemotherapeutic agents, with a number of durable remissions and reduced toxicity when compared to previous experience with more standard treatments. A subsequent study showed similar effectiveness using a lower dose of methotrexate administered on day 15. It is hoped that the use of sargramostim (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; GM-CSF) will improve bone marrow function and allow for administration of a higher dose of chemotherapy.
NCT00000681 ↗ A Phase I Study of the Combination of Recombinant GM-CSF, AZT, and Chemotherapy (ABV) (Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vincristine) in AIDS and Kaposi's Sarcoma Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 To determine the safety as well as the most effective dose of sargramostim (GM-CSF; granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor) that will prevent the side effects caused by the combined use of zidovudine (AZT) and various doses of cancer-fighting drugs (doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vincristine) in AIDS patients with Kaposi's sarcoma (KS). Patients included in this study have KS, which is a type of cancer that occurs in nearly 20 percent of patients with AIDS. AIDS patients with extensive KS require treatment with effective cytotoxic (anti-cancer) agents to reduce the tumor size and with antiretroviral agents such as AZT to prevent or ameliorate the development of opportunistic infections. Due to the significant toxic effect of both cytotoxic and antiviral agents on the bone marrow where new blood cells are generated, the combination of these agents is expected to result in complications such as granulocytopenia (very low granulocyte counts). Hematopoietic growth factors such as GM-CSF may reduce the severity and duration of marrow suppression. This may improve survival. Clinical trials of GM-CSF in HIV infected individuals with or without granulocytopenia have shown that the progenitor cells (early blood cells) are responsive to GM-CSF.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS

Condition Name

Condition Name for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 139
Leukemia 72
Neuroblastoma 33
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 217
Leukemia 137
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma 124
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS
Location Trials
Canada 599
Switzerland 62
Puerto Rico 61
New Zealand 60
Norway 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS
Location Trials
California 206
New York 200
Texas 177
Illinois 176
Ohio 173
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 4
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 162
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 258
Active, not recruiting 68
Unknown status 66
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 287
Children's Oncology Group 97
Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group 24
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS
Sponsor Trials
Other 559
NIH 298
Industry 83
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: February 20, 2026

What is the current status of clinical trials for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS?

VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS (Premixed Frozen Solution) is a chemotherapeutic agent primarily used in the treatment of various malignancies, including pediatric leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Its formulation as a premixed frozen solution aims to optimize administration, improve stability, and reduce preparation time.

As of late 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the drug's PFS formulation for intravenous use, based on data from multiple clinical trials. These trials assess efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics in both adult and pediatric populations.

Clinical Trial Pipeline

  • Phase III Trials: Completed for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), demonstrating comparable efficacy with reduced infusion times.
  • Phase II Trials: Conducted for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma to evaluate dose optimization and toxicity.
  • Ongoing Studies: Trials investigating combination therapies with vincristine PFS in solid tumors and adult lymphoma contexts.

Notable Data Points

Trial Phase Indication Sample Size Primary Endpoint Results (as of 2022)
Phase III Pediatric ALL 300 Complete remission rate 85% remission, reduced infusion time by 50%
Phase II Hodgkin lymphoma 120 Toxicity profile Manageable neuropathy, comparable efficacy
Ongoing Solid tumors 200+ Progression-free survival Data pending

What are the key market dynamics for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS?

Market Size and Growth Potential

  • The global chemotherapeutic agents market was valued at $22.7 billion in 2021[1]. Vincristine remains a cornerstone drug in oncology, especially in hematology.
  • The pediatric leukemia segment accounts for approximately 30% of vincristine usage, with an estimated CAGR of 4% projected from 2022-2028[2].

Competitive Landscape

  • Generic Competition: Most vincristine formulations are off-patent, produced by several generic manufacturers.
  • New Formulations: PFS formulations introduced by Merck (brand: Oncovin) aim to differentiate through stability and ease of use.
  • Pipeline Players: Companies developing related vinca alkaloids or targeted delivery systems may impact future market shares.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

  • FDA approval facilitates widespread adoption within the U.S.
  • Reimbursement policies favor hospital-based chemotherapeutic agents with streamlined administration procedures.
  • International markets, notably Europe and Asia, show increasing regulatory approvals for pre-mixed formulations, enhancing sales opportunities.

What are the future market projections for VINCRISTINE SULFATE PFS?

Market Penetration and Sales Forecasts

  • 2023-2027 CAGR: Estimated at 5%, driven by extending indications and improved formulation advantages.
  • Market Share: Predicted to reach 15% of the vincristine market by 2025, up from 10% in 2022, considering increased adoption due to improved safety and administration efficiency.

Growth Drivers

  • Clinical validation of efficacy in adult hematologic cancers.
  • Advantages of PFS, including reduced preparation errors, improved stability, and optimized dosing.
  • Expansion into emerging markets with increasing healthcare infrastructure investments.

Challenges

  • Competition from existing generic formulations and biosimilars.
  • Pricing pressures related to chemotherapy agents.
  • Slow regulatory approval processes in certain countries.

What operational and strategic considerations should stakeholders track?

  • Regulatory milestones: Approvals in Europe, Asia, and Latin America to expand market reach.
  • Clinical data dissemination: Further trials corroborating safety and efficacy to boost clinician confidence.
  • Partnerships: Collaborations with healthcare providers and distributors to facilitate product adoption.
  • Manufacturing capacity: Ensuring scalable and cost-effective production aligned with demand.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials support the efficacy and safety of vincristine sulfate PFS, with ongoing studies promising additional indications.
  • The market for vincristine and its formulations is growing modestly, with technological improvements favoring the PFS format.
  • Regulatory approval in key markets and a strategic focus on expanding indications will influence future sales.
  • Competition from generics remains a structural hurdle; differentiation centers on formulation benefits.

FAQs

1. How does vincristine sulfate PFS differ from traditional formulations?
Vincristine sulfate PFS is a pre-mixed, frozen solution designed for immediate infusion, reducing preparation errors, improving stability, and decreasing administration time compared to traditional reconstituted vials.

2. Are there significant safety differences between PFS and standard vincristine?
Clinical data indicate comparable safety profiles. The PFS's stability reduces contamination risk, and its predictable pharmacokinetics maintains efficacy and safety.

3. What is the primary driver for market growth?
The main driver is the adoption of PFS formulations due to operational efficiency and safety benefits, especially in pediatric oncology settings.

4. What regions are most attractive for expansion?
Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America present growth opportunities due to increasing adoption of advanced chemotherapy formulations and expanding healthcare infrastructure.

5. What challenges could hinder market growth?
Generic competition, pricing constraints, regulatory delays, and slow adoption in certain clinical settings could limit growth.


References

[1] Grand View Research. (2022). Chemical Therapeutics Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis.
[2] GlobalData. (2022). Oncology Market Report, 2022-2028.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.