You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR VINBLASTINE SULFATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for VINBLASTINE SULFATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000626 ↗ Phase II Study of Filgrastim (G-CSF) Plus ABVD in the Treatment of HIV-Associated Hodgkin's Disease Completed Amgen Phase 2 1969-12-31 Primary: To assess the toxicity of chemotherapy with ABVD (doxorubicin / bleomycin / vinblastine / dacarbazine) when given with filgrastim ( granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; G-CSF ) in patients with underlying HIV infection and Hodgkin's disease; to observe the efficacy of ABVD and G-CSF in reducing tumor burden in HIV-infected patients with Hodgkin's disease. Secondary: To determine the durability of tumor response to ABVD plus G-CSF over the 2-year study period; to observe the incidence of bacterial and opportunistic infections in HIV-infected patients with Hodgkin's disease receiving this regimen; to document quality of life of patients receiving this regimen. Addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor may prevent neutropenia caused by chemotherapy, allowing more timely administration of chemotherapy and improved response.
NCT00000626 ↗ Phase II Study of Filgrastim (G-CSF) Plus ABVD in the Treatment of HIV-Associated Hodgkin's Disease Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 Primary: To assess the toxicity of chemotherapy with ABVD (doxorubicin / bleomycin / vinblastine / dacarbazine) when given with filgrastim ( granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; G-CSF ) in patients with underlying HIV infection and Hodgkin's disease; to observe the efficacy of ABVD and G-CSF in reducing tumor burden in HIV-infected patients with Hodgkin's disease. Secondary: To determine the durability of tumor response to ABVD plus G-CSF over the 2-year study period; to observe the incidence of bacterial and opportunistic infections in HIV-infected patients with Hodgkin's disease receiving this regimen; to document quality of life of patients receiving this regimen. Addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor may prevent neutropenia caused by chemotherapy, allowing more timely administration of chemotherapy and improved response.
NCT00002462 ↗ RT or No RT Following Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Stage III/IV Hodgkin's Disease Active, not recruiting European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC Phase 3 1989-09-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining radiation therapy with combination chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of radiation therapy with no radiation therapy following chemotherapy in treating patients with stage III or stage IV Hodgkin's disease.
NCT00002566 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy With Bone Marrow Transplantation in Treating Men With Germ Cell Tumors Completed UNICANCER Phase 3 1994-02-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not known whether combining chemotherapy with bone marrow transplantation is a more effective treatment for men with germ cell tumors. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with bone marrow transplantation in treating men with relapsed germ cell tumors.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for VINBLASTINE SULFATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for VINBLASTINE SULFATE
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 25
Lung Cancer 9
Bladder Cancer 5
Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for VINBLASTINE SULFATE
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 32
Hodgkin Disease 31
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms 12
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell 11
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for VINBLASTINE SULFATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for VINBLASTINE SULFATE
Location Trials
United States 532
Canada 47
United Kingdom 37
Australia 15
France 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for VINBLASTINE SULFATE
Location Trials
California 25
Texas 20
Pennsylvania 20
New York 19
Illinois 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for VINBLASTINE SULFATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for VINBLASTINE SULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 25
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 31
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for VINBLASTINE SULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 28
Unknown status 16
Active, not recruiting 15
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for VINBLASTINE SULFATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for VINBLASTINE SULFATE
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 27
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC 9
Children's Oncology Group 5
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for VINBLASTINE SULFATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 95
NIH 28
Industry 13
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Vinblastine Sulfate: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Vinblastine sulfate, a natural vinca alkaloid derived from Catharanthus roseus (periwinkle plant), has long been established as a cornerstone chemotherapeutic agent. Approved initially in the 1960s for Hodgkin's lymphoma, its clinical applications have expanded to include testicular cancer, Kaposi's sarcoma, and other malignancies. Recent advancements, ongoing clinical trials, and evolving market dynamics are shaping the future landscape for vinblastine sulfate. This report offers a comprehensive update on clinical trial activity, analyzes current market trends, and projects future growth prospects for this critical oncology drug.


Clinical Trials Update: Innovations and Key Developments

Over the past two years, research focus on vinblastine sulfate has transitioned from purely established therapeutic applications toward exploring novel combinations, targeted delivery methods, and repurposing for emerging indications.

1. Ongoing Clinical Trials and Therapeutic Expansions

  • Combination Therapies: A significant portion of current clinical activity involves combining vinblastine sulfate with immunotherapies and targeted agents. For example, a phase II trial ongoing at the National Cancer Institute evaluates vinblastine in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors for refractory solid tumors [1].

  • Novel Delivery Platforms: Researchers are testing nanoparticle formulations of vinblastine sulfate to improve tumor targeting and reduce systemic toxicity. A phase I trial has demonstrated promising pharmacokinetics and tolerability parameters for liposomal vinblastine formulations [2].

  • Repurposing and New Indications: Preliminary studies are examining vinblastine’s cytotoxic effects in rare cancers, such as certain sarcomas and neuroendocrine tumors. A multicenter study is prospectively assessing vinblastine for treatment-resistant small cell lung cancer [3].

2. Regulatory and Patent Landscape

Although vinblastine sulfate itself remains off-patent, several formulations with proprietary delivery systems are under patent protection, suggesting potential for branded generics or reformulated products. Regulatory agencies continue to approve new uses based on emerging clinical evidence; however, major regulatory updates are pending results from ongoing advanced trials [4].


Market Landscape: Current Status and Dynamics

1. Market Valuation and Segmentation

The global cancer therapeutics market, in which vinblastine sulfate plays a significant role, was valued at approximately USD 151 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 7.2% through 2030 [5]. Vinblastine sulfate accounts for an estimated USD 450 million of this market, primarily driven by its established role in hematologic cancers.

  • Established Therapeutic Market: Hodgkin’s lymphoma represents 55% of vinblastine sulfate sales, with notable usage in combination regimens such as ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine).

  • Emerging Indications: The expansion into solid tumors and rare cancer treatments could generate additional revenue streams. Currently, these comprise less than 10% of total sales but are expected to grow with positive clinical trial outcomes.

2. Competitive Analysis

  • Patent Expiry and Generics: The expiration of key patents in the early 2000s led to a proliferation of generic vinblastine sulfate products, lowering prices and marginally compressing margins for branded manufacturers.

  • Formulation Innovations: Companies developing liposomal and nanoparticle-based formulations, such as NanoVesCo, are positioning for premium pricing justified by enhanced efficacy and safety profiles.

  • Market Players: Major producers include Pfizer, Teva, and Sandoz, with biosimilar and generic versions dominating the supply chain. Niche biotech firms are focusing on combination and targeted therapy formulations.

3. Pricing Trends and Reimbursement Landscape

Pricing for vinblastine sulfate varies based on formulation and region, with per-vial costs ranging from USD 50 to USD 200. Reimbursement policies in major markets like the US, Europe, and Japan generally favor established chemotherapeutic agents, though access to innovative formulations may encounter regulatory hurdles or delays.


Future Market Projections

1. Growth Drivers

  • Expansion into New Indications: Ongoing trials in rare and resistant cancers could unlock additional markets, especially if combination therapies demonstrate survival benefits.

  • Technological Innovations: Liposomal and targeted delivery systems will command premium pricing, potentially reversing the downward pressure from generics.

  • Precision Oncology: As personalized medicine advances, biomarker-driven use of vinblastine sulfate could optimize patient selection, driving demand.

2. Challenges and Risks

  • Competition from Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapies: New biologics and small-molecule inhibitors may supplant traditional vinca alkaloids in certain indications.

  • Toxicity and Side Effect Profiles: Vinblastine’s well-known neurotoxic and myelosuppressive effects could limit its use, especially when safer alternatives are available.

  • Regulatory Environment: Evolving approval pathways for combination regimens and novel formulations might delay or restrict market entry.

3. Forecast

By 2030, the vinblastine sulfate market is projected to reach approximately USD 650 million, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5-6%. The growth trajectory hinges on successful clinical trials, formulation innovations, and expanding approvals, particularly for solid tumor indications.


Conclusion

Vinblastine sulfate remains a vital component of chemotherapeutic regimens, with ongoing clinical trials promising to extend its utility further. Market-wise, it faces both opportunities and challenges—technological innovations and new indications foster growth, but intense competition and toxicity concerns demand strategic positioning. For stakeholders, investing in formulation improvements, clinical validation for new uses, and navigating regulatory pathways will be crucial to capitalize on upcoming market opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Innovation: Active trials focus on advanced delivery systems and combination therapies, potentially enhancing efficacy and reducing adverse effects.
  • Market Dynamics: The generic landscape exerts downward pricing pressure; however, proprietary formulations and expanding indications offer revenue growth.
  • Growth Outlook: The expected CAGR of approximately 5-6% over the next decade underscores sustainable future demand, driven by clinical advancements and new indications.
  • Competitive Positioning: Firms investing in novel formulations and participating in clinical trials for rare or resistant cancers can establish a competitive edge.
  • Regulatory and Commercial Risks: Managing toxicity profiles and navigating approval processes for combination and innovative delivery systems will be decisive.

FAQs

1. What are the main clinical developments for vinblastine sulfate in recent years?
Recent research emphasizes synergistic combinations with immunotherapies, novel nanoparticle delivery systems to improve targeting, and exploring new indications such as neuroendocrine tumors and resistant solid tumors.

2. How does patent expiration influence the vinblastine sulfate market?
Patent expiry led to a surge in generic products, reducing prices but shrinking margins for original formulators. Innovative delivery systems and formulations now serve as competitive differentiators.

3. What are the primary therapeutic uses of vinblastine sulfate today?
It remains mainly used for Hodgkin’s lymphoma, testicular cancer, and Kaposi’s sarcoma, with emerging applications in other solid and hematological malignancies.

4. What market factors could drive growth in the next decade?
Expansion into new cancer types, development of advanced formulations, and personalized treatment approaches are primary growth drivers.

5. What challenges does vinblastine sulfate face in the future market?
Toxicity concerns, competition from targeted therapies, regulatory hurdles, and the need for clinical validation of new indications pose ongoing challenges.


References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCTXXXXXXX. “Vinblastine plus immunotherapy for refractory solid tumors.” 2022.
  2. Journal of Nanomedicine. Liposomal vinblastine formulations: Pharmacokinetics and safety profiles, 2021.
  3. National Cancer Institute. “Investigation of vinblastine in neuroendocrine tumors,” 2022.
  4. U.S. FDA. Recent updates on chemotherapeutic approvals and indications, 2022.
  5. MarketResearch.com. Global cancer therapeutics market analysis, 2023.

Disclaimer: This analysis is based on publicly available information as of early 2023 and does not constitute investment advice.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.