Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR VERMOX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for VERMOX

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01837862 ↗ A Phase I Study of Mebendazole for the Treatment of Pediatric Gliomas Recruiting Janssen Pharmaceuticals Phase 1/Phase 2 2013-10-22 This is a study to determine the safety and efficacy of the drug, mebendazole, when used in combination with standard chemotherapy drugs for the treatment of pediatric brain tumors. Mebendazole is a drug used to treat infections with intestinal parasites and has a long track record of safety in humans. Recently, it was discovered that mebendazole may be effective in treating cancer as well, in particular brain tumors. Studies using both cell cultures and mouse models demonstrated that mebendazole was effective in decreasing the growth of brain tumor cells. This study focuses on the treatment of a category of brain tumors called gliomas. Low-grade gliomas are tumors arising from the glial cells of the central nervous system and are characterized by slower, less aggressive growth than that of high-grade gliomas. Some low-grade gliomas have a more aggressive biology and an increased likelihood of resistance or recurrence. Low-grade gliomas are often able to be treated by observation alone if they receive a total surgical resection. However, tumors which are only partially resected and continue to grow or cause symptoms, or those which recur following total resection require additional treatment, such as chemotherapy. Due to their more aggressive nature, pilomyxoid astrocytomas, even when totally resected, will often be treated with chemotherapy. The current first-line treatment at our institution for these low-grade gliomas involves a three-drug chemotherapy regimen of vincristine, carboplatin, and temozolomide. However, based on our data from our own historical controls, over 50% of patients with pilomyxoid astrocytomas will continue to have disease progression while on this treatment. We believe that mebendazole in combination with vincristine, carboplatin, and temozolomide may provide an additional therapeutic benefit with increased progression-free and overall survival for low-grade glioma patients, particularly for those with pilomyxoid astrocytomas. High grade gliomas are more aggressive tumors with poor prognoses. The standard therapy is radiation therapy. A variety of adjuvant chemotherapeutic combinations have been used, but with disappointing results. For high-grade gliomas this study will add mebendazole to the established combination of bevacizumab and irinotecan to determine this combinations safety and efficacy
NCT01837862 ↗ A Phase I Study of Mebendazole for the Treatment of Pediatric Gliomas Recruiting Julie Krystal Phase 1/Phase 2 2013-10-22 This is a study to determine the safety and efficacy of the drug, mebendazole, when used in combination with standard chemotherapy drugs for the treatment of pediatric brain tumors. Mebendazole is a drug used to treat infections with intestinal parasites and has a long track record of safety in humans. Recently, it was discovered that mebendazole may be effective in treating cancer as well, in particular brain tumors. Studies using both cell cultures and mouse models demonstrated that mebendazole was effective in decreasing the growth of brain tumor cells. This study focuses on the treatment of a category of brain tumors called gliomas. Low-grade gliomas are tumors arising from the glial cells of the central nervous system and are characterized by slower, less aggressive growth than that of high-grade gliomas. Some low-grade gliomas have a more aggressive biology and an increased likelihood of resistance or recurrence. Low-grade gliomas are often able to be treated by observation alone if they receive a total surgical resection. However, tumors which are only partially resected and continue to grow or cause symptoms, or those which recur following total resection require additional treatment, such as chemotherapy. Due to their more aggressive nature, pilomyxoid astrocytomas, even when totally resected, will often be treated with chemotherapy. The current first-line treatment at our institution for these low-grade gliomas involves a three-drug chemotherapy regimen of vincristine, carboplatin, and temozolomide. However, based on our data from our own historical controls, over 50% of patients with pilomyxoid astrocytomas will continue to have disease progression while on this treatment. We believe that mebendazole in combination with vincristine, carboplatin, and temozolomide may provide an additional therapeutic benefit with increased progression-free and overall survival for low-grade glioma patients, particularly for those with pilomyxoid astrocytomas. High grade gliomas are more aggressive tumors with poor prognoses. The standard therapy is radiation therapy. A variety of adjuvant chemotherapeutic combinations have been used, but with disappointing results. For high-grade gliomas this study will add mebendazole to the established combination of bevacizumab and irinotecan to determine this combinations safety and efficacy
NCT01837862 ↗ A Phase I Study of Mebendazole for the Treatment of Pediatric Gliomas Recruiting Mark Atlas Phase 1/Phase 2 2013-10-22 This is a study to determine the safety and efficacy of the drug, mebendazole, when used in combination with standard chemotherapy drugs for the treatment of pediatric brain tumors. Mebendazole is a drug used to treat infections with intestinal parasites and has a long track record of safety in humans. Recently, it was discovered that mebendazole may be effective in treating cancer as well, in particular brain tumors. Studies using both cell cultures and mouse models demonstrated that mebendazole was effective in decreasing the growth of brain tumor cells. This study focuses on the treatment of a category of brain tumors called gliomas. Low-grade gliomas are tumors arising from the glial cells of the central nervous system and are characterized by slower, less aggressive growth than that of high-grade gliomas. Some low-grade gliomas have a more aggressive biology and an increased likelihood of resistance or recurrence. Low-grade gliomas are often able to be treated by observation alone if they receive a total surgical resection. However, tumors which are only partially resected and continue to grow or cause symptoms, or those which recur following total resection require additional treatment, such as chemotherapy. Due to their more aggressive nature, pilomyxoid astrocytomas, even when totally resected, will often be treated with chemotherapy. The current first-line treatment at our institution for these low-grade gliomas involves a three-drug chemotherapy regimen of vincristine, carboplatin, and temozolomide. However, based on our data from our own historical controls, over 50% of patients with pilomyxoid astrocytomas will continue to have disease progression while on this treatment. We believe that mebendazole in combination with vincristine, carboplatin, and temozolomide may provide an additional therapeutic benefit with increased progression-free and overall survival for low-grade glioma patients, particularly for those with pilomyxoid astrocytomas. High grade gliomas are more aggressive tumors with poor prognoses. The standard therapy is radiation therapy. A variety of adjuvant chemotherapeutic combinations have been used, but with disappointing results. For high-grade gliomas this study will add mebendazole to the established combination of bevacizumab and irinotecan to determine this combinations safety and efficacy
NCT02051738 ↗ A Study to Assess the Effect of Food on the Bioavailability of Mebendazole From a Fast-Disintegrating Chewable Formulation of Mebendazole in Healthy Participants Completed Janssen Research & Development, LLC Phase 1 2014-02-01 The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of food on the bioavailability (how much medication is in your blood) of mebendazole from a single 500 mg oral dose of a fast-disintegrating chewable tablet formulation of mebendazole in healthy adult participants.
NCT02420574 ↗ Assessment of Drug Efficacy of Local Albendazole Completed University Ghent N/A 2014-02-01 Infections with soil-transmitted helminthes (STH) occur throughout the developing world and remain a major public health problem in the poorest communities. Preventive chemotherapy (PC) programs in which single-dose albendazole 400 mg or single-dose mebendazole 500 mg - the drugs of choice for STH - are administered at the population level, is the main strategy for STH control. To ensure quality, these drugs are being widely donated by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) (albendazole (ALB), Zentel) and Johnson & Johnson (mebendazole (MEB), Vermox). In addition to this, there are a wide variety of ALB and MEB tablets available on the local market. Although little is known about the quality of anthelmintics sold for human use, several publications have reported variability in the quality of generic anthelmintics used in veterinary medicine. The main objective of the present study is to compare the efficacy of two ALB brands bought on the local market, including OVIS (Korea, DAEHWA pharmaceutical) and BENDEX (India, Cipla)
NCT02644291 ↗ Phase I Study of Mebendazole Therapy for Recurrent/Progressive Pediatric Brain Tumors Recruiting Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Phase 1 2016-05-01 This is a safety (Phase 1) trial using mebendazole for recurrent pediatric brain cancers that include medulloblastoma and high grade glioma, that are no longing responding to standard therapies. The drug mebendazole is an oral drug in a chewable 500 mg orange flavored tablet. It is already approved to treat parasitic infections. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and side effects for increasing doses of mebendazole, followed by the treatment of an additional 12 patients at the best tolerated dose.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for VERMOX

Condition Name

Condition Name for VERMOX
Intervention Trials
Anaplastic Astrocytoma 2
Optic Nerve Glioma 1
Glioma, Astrocytic 1
Pilocytic Astrocytoma 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for VERMOX
Intervention Trials
Glioma 2
Glioblastoma 2
Astrocytoma 2
Optic Nerve Glioma 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for VERMOX

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for VERMOX
Location Trials
United States 3
Ghana 1
Belgium 1
United Kingdom 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for VERMOX
Location Trials
Maryland 1
Florida 1
New York 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for VERMOX

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for VERMOX
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 2 1
Phase 1/Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for VERMOX
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
Recruiting 2
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for VERMOX

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for VERMOX
Sponsor Trials
RDD Pharma Ltd 1
Janssen Research & Development, LLC 1
University Ghent 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for VERMOX
Sponsor Trials
Other 11
Industry 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

VERMOX (Mebendazole): Clinical Trial Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

Last updated: April 25, 2026

What is VERMOX (mebendazole) and what is its current clinical-trial posture?

VERMOX is a brand of mebendazole, a benzimidazole anti-helminthic. In most markets it is a generic-led, off-patent medicine with limited new clinical-trial programs for new indications compared with novel therapeutics.

Clinical activity signal (high-level):

  • Core profile: long-established antiparasitic use with mature dosing regimens and well-characterized safety.
  • Trial mix likely dominates: label-expansion studies, pediatric dosing refinements, formulation bioequivalence, and country-specific observational work.
  • Regulatory strategy pattern: when mebendazole is developed now, it is usually to support new formulations (bioavailability, pediatric dispersible forms) or adjunct use rather than to secure new active-ingredient patent protection.

Implication for investors/R&D planners: without a proprietary formulation or delivery platform, clinical trial spend tends to be incremental and tied to regulatory/market access rather than to a new clinical-asset pipeline.

What do the market economics look like for mebendazole brands like VERMOX?

Mebendazole sits in a mature segment of global antiparasitic therapy where demand is driven by:

  • endemicity and sanitation gaps for target helminths
  • pediatric treatment standards
  • national deworming programs and procurement cycles
  • fast generic substitution

Market structure:

  • Generic competition is the dominant market force.
  • Brand-level pricing exists mainly in markets with brand procurement, limited generic penetration, or reimbursement structures that maintain formulary presence.

Revenue reality check for a brand:

  • Sustained share depends on distribution strength, procurement relationships, and stable pricing rather than on new clinical value creation.
  • Any “market growth” typically traces population-treated volumes and public-health procurement rather than innovative clinical differentiation.

How does demand typically evolve for mebendazole?

Demand drivers that tend to be durable:

  • Pediatric mass deworming cycles (routine school and community programs)
  • Campaign procurement by governments and NGOs (where formularies can standardize to benzimidazoles)
  • In-market substitution effects: brands compete with generics on price, packaging, and supply continuity

Demand constraints:

  • Formulary switches to albendazole in some programs where local guideline preference shifts
  • Price pressure from generic tenders
  • Inventory and tender timing impacts quarter-to-quarter visibility

What is the competitive landscape for VERMOX?

Competitive set is mostly generic mebendazole products plus, indirectly, other anthelmintics used in overlapping indications.

Direct competitive pressures:

  • multiple generic manufacturers
  • tender-driven purchasing that compresses margins
  • bioequivalence requirements that reduce differentiation

Indirect competitive pressures:

  • albendazole, pyrantel pamoate, and praziquantel depending on the parasite and indication mix
  • guideline-based selection differences by country and therapeutic program

What clinical-trial update matters most for business decisions?

For a legacy antiparasitic like mebendazole/VERMOX, the decision-relevant clinical questions are typically not “does it work” but:

  • Does a new formulation improve patient acceptability (for children, adherence)
  • Does a new formulation preserve exposure (bioavailability/bioequivalence)
  • Do new country registrations extend shelf life, switch reimbursement, or expand pack coverage
  • Do new combinations (where permitted) win tender preference

Without proprietary clinical differentiation, trial outcomes translate into access more than asset value.

Market projection: what trajectory is realistic?

Given the generic-led nature, projections should be framed as:

  • unit volume growth driven by treatment programs and population base
  • revenue growth limited by price compression and tender re-sets
  • margin volatility driven by procurement cycles and competitive pricing

A defensible directional outlook:

  • Top-line stability is more likely than premium growth.
  • Value growth (if any) comes from increased volumes in covered geographies, package/route expansion, and maintained supply contracts.
  • Downside risk is persistent margin compression if tender competition intensifies or formularies migrate to alternative benzimidazoles.

What are the key commercialization levers for VERMOX over the next 3 to 5 years?

  1. Formulation and presentation
    • pediatric-friendly dosing forms that reduce dosing error and improve adherence
  2. Tender and procurement position
    • maintaining preferred supplier status in endemic-country programs
  3. Regulatory coverage
    • extending registrations, renewals, and pack size assortments to protect channel share
  4. Pricing strategy
    • aligning to tender benchmarks while protecting baseline margin
  5. Supply resilience
    • avoiding stockouts that cause permanent formulary erosion

Business outlook summary (actionable positioning)

For a brand like VERMOX operating in a generic-dominant mebendazole market:

  • Clinical-trial upside is mainly regulatory and access-driven.
  • Market upside is primarily volume and procurement continuity.
  • Investment cases rely on manufacturing economics, tender execution, and formulary retention, not on breakthrough clinical differentiation.

Key Takeaways

  • VERMOX is mebendazole, a mature off-patent anti-helminthic where clinical differentiation is typically limited to formulation, dosing, and access.
  • The market is generic-led, with revenue growth constrained by price competition and tender cycles.
  • Near- to mid-term projections are best framed as volume-driven growth with margin volatility, not premium pricing expansion.
  • The most effective levers are pediatric/acceptability-focused formulations, procurement leverage, and regulatory/pack coverage.

FAQs

  1. Is VERMOX still expanding clinically?
    Clinical activity for mebendazole/VERMOX is typically more centered on access-enabling studies (formulation, bioequivalence, pediatric/label refinements) than on major new efficacy paradigms.

  2. What typically drives growth for mebendazole brands?
    Growth usually comes from population-treated volumes and procurement/tender execution, not from brand-premium pricing.

  3. How does generic competition affect projections?
    Generic substitution compresses pricing, so projections trend toward stable or modest revenue growth and margin volatility tied to competitive tenders.

  4. What is the main commercial risk?
    Formulary and tender loss to competing anthelmintics or lower-cost generics, plus supply disruptions that erode trust with procurement agencies.

  5. Where can value still be created for a legacy brand?
    Through strong supply reliability, pediatric-friendly formulations, and maintaining preferred positioning in public-health procurement cycles.


References (APA)

  1. World Health Organization. (n.d.). Model List of Essential Medicines (accessed via WHO website). https://www.who.int/teams/health-product-and-policy-standards/standards-and-specifications/harmful-alcohol-use
  2. European Medicines Agency. (n.d.). Public assessment reports and product information for mebendazole-related products (database accessed via EMA website). https://www.ema.europa.eu/
  3. U.S. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). ClinicalTrials.gov (search results for mebendazole; database accessed via NLM website). https://clinicaltrials.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.