Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR VELBAN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for VELBAN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002855 ↗ Chemotherapy Plus Hormone Therapy Versus Androgen Suppression in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Unresectable Prostate Cancer Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1996-08-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining hormone therapy with chemotherapy and androgen suppression may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for prostate cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of chemotherapy plus hormone therapy versus androgen suppression alone as initial therapy in patients with prostate cancer that is metastatic or that cannot be removed surgically.
NCT00002855 ↗ Chemotherapy Plus Hormone Therapy Versus Androgen Suppression in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Unresectable Prostate Cancer Completed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 3 1996-08-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining hormone therapy with chemotherapy and androgen suppression may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for prostate cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of chemotherapy plus hormone therapy versus androgen suppression alone as initial therapy in patients with prostate cancer that is metastatic or that cannot be removed surgically.
NCT00002882 ↗ Interferon Alfa With or Without Combination Chemotherapy Plus Interleukin-2 in Treating Patients With Melanoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1995-11-01 RATIONALE: Interferon alfa may interfere with the growth of cancer cells. Interleukin-2 may stimulate a person's white blood cells to kill melanoma cells. It is not yet known whether interferon alfa plus combination chemotherapy and interleukin-2 is more effective than interferon alfa alone in treating patients with melanoma. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of interferon alfa with or without combination chemotherapy plus interleukin-2 in treating patients with melanoma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for VELBAN

Condition Name

Condition Name for VELBAN
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 5
Prostate Cancer 3
Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for VELBAN
Intervention Trials
Hodgkin Disease 14
Lymphoma 10
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for VELBAN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for VELBAN
Location Trials
United States 326
Canada 14
Australia 2
Puerto Rico 1
France 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for VELBAN
Location Trials
Texas 20
Illinois 13
California 13
Ohio 10
Iowa 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for VELBAN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for VELBAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 10
Phase 2 22
Phase 1/Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for VELBAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 17
Recruiting 6
Active, not recruiting 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for VELBAN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for VELBAN
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 22
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 10
Genentech, Inc. 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for VELBAN
Sponsor Trials
Other 38
NIH 22
Industry 12
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

VELBAN Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 28, 2026

Velban (vinblastine) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

What is Velban and what is its clinical state?

Velban is the branded form of vinblastine (an established vinca alkaloid). It is a mature, off-patent oncology medicine in most jurisdictions, with clinical use grounded in decades of regimen-based evidence rather than ongoing registrational trials for a proprietary formulation.

Clinical trial activity pattern (practical reality):

  • Vinblastine is typically studied in combination regimens within broader oncology protocols rather than as a standalone development asset.
  • Current trial activity, when present, tends to be phase I/II exploratory (dose-finding, regimen optimization, special populations) or diagnostic/biomarker adjunct work.
  • The sponsor and protocol structure is usually tied to cancer type and standard-of-care chemotherapy backbone, not to a new drug entity.

What this means for “clinical trials update”:

  • Velban’s trajectory is dominated by label maintenance, supportive evidence in guidelines, and real-world regimen use, not a modern late-stage pipeline.
  • Any “update” is best expressed as a use-and-research footprint rather than an expected next NDA/BLA event.

What is the current market structure for Velban (vinblastine)?

Velban competes primarily in a genericized, supply-constrained but widely substituted market.

Market structure drivers

  • Patent status: vinblastine is long established; most markets run on generics and licensed products rather than brand exclusivity.
  • Substitution: vinblastine is a low substitution risk drug therapeutically because the active ingredient is well defined.
  • Procurement: oncology formularies and hospital purchasing dominate demand allocation.
  • Supply and pricing: oncology injectables show periodic procurement volatility depending on manufacturing continuity and regulatory inspection outcomes.

Commercial reality

  • A brand like Velban typically behaves like:
    • a legacy revenue stream where brand retention depends on contracting, distribution relationships, and formulary inertia; and
    • a business case increasingly tied to market access and supply stability, not differentiation.

Which oncology indications anchor vinblastine demand?

Vinblastine demand is primarily tied to its established roles, historically including:

  • Hodgkin lymphoma (as part of chemotherapy regimens)
  • Testicular cancer (in multi-agent combinations)
  • Kaposi sarcoma (vinblastine has been used in combination regimens in historical protocols)
  • Other solid tumors where vinca alkaloid use persists in specific settings

In practice, vinblastine is less dominant than newer targeted agents, immunotherapies, and taxane-based backbones, but it remains clinically embedded where protocols still rely on vinca alkaloid components.


Clinical Trials Update: what matters for decisions now

Are there active registrational trials for Velban?

A modern registrational read-through for Velban as a brand product is not the dominant pattern for vinblastine. The development landscape generally does not map to a conventional “Phase 3 pivotal trial leading to a next label expansion” for the drug itself.

Actionable decision framing

  • Treat Velban as a mature molecule: market and volume are mainly driven by guideline inclusion, regimen selection, and procurement.
  • Track trial activity as evidence-of-use and regimen evolution rather than as a near-term catalyst for exclusivity.

What do new vinblastine studies typically target?

When new interventional studies appear, they most often focus on:

  • Combination regimen optimization (dose scheduling, cytotoxic backbone choice)
  • Special populations (pediatrics, frailty, comorbidity considerations)
  • Supportive care and safety management (hematologic toxicity mitigation, administration protocols)
  • Pharmacology in context (handling, administration parameters, compatibility with regimen components)

Market Analysis: how Velban is likely priced and purchased

How does procurement behavior affect Velban revenue?

Hospital and group purchasing organization (GPO) dynamics matter more than marketing.

Procurement mechanics

  • Brand retention tends to persist when:
    • a health system has long-standing contracting for Velban;
    • substitution is constrained by pharmacy practice, ordering workflow, or supply continuity; or
    • the brand product holds a favorable pack size or distribution channel.

Price pressure

  • Generic competition creates persistent price compression.
  • The brand premium is usually tied to non-price factors: availability, reliability, and reduced ordering friction.

Where does demand concentrate geographically?

Demand tracks:

  • higher oncology treatment volumes
  • hospital-led purchasing
  • formularies that keep vinca alkaloid-containing regimens

Market Projection: revenue and volume outlook

What is the forward outlook for Velban as a branded asset?

For a legacy injectable oncology product like Velban, forward projections generally track:

  • total vinblastine usage trends by regimen inclusion,
  • generic penetration intensity,
  • and supply steadiness.

A branded projection should be framed as declining share with flat-to-declining brand net price, with total molecule demand supported by continued standard regimen use.

Projection framework (typical for mature injectables)

  1. Total molecule demand: stable to modestly declining as regimen preferences shift.
  2. Brand share: tends to decline as generics keep widening access.
  3. Net price: trends downward due to competitive tendering and contracting.
  4. Revenue: declines faster than total molecule demand because brand share and net price compress together.

Base-case scenario (structured)

  • Volume: modest decline to stability depending on regimen persistence and supply.
  • Net sales: decline driven by net price and share loss.
  • Risk: supply disruptions and regulatory actions at manufacturing sites can create short-term volatility.

(A full numeric forecast requires up-to-date trial counts and current commercial market sizing by jurisdiction; those inputs are not present in the provided prompt.)


Competitive Landscape and Business Implications

What competes with Velban in procurement?

  • Generic vinblastine products as direct substitutes.
  • Alternative regimen backbones in lymphoma and testicular cancer that reduce reliance on vinca alkaloids in some protocols.
  • In some disease contexts, newer therapies displace older cytotoxics over time.

What does this imply for R&D investment decisions?

  • For investors and R&D planners: Velban is a low-probability exclusivity generator.
  • Value creation is more likely through:
    • formulation/admin improvements that are commercially meaningful but still face generic substitution economics; or
    • lifecycle strategies that do not rely on patent exclusivity (market access, supply assurance, contracts).

Key Takeaways

  • Velban is vinblastine, a mature oncology injectable with clinical use dominated by established combination regimens rather than a modern pipeline for brand-level label expansion.
  • The market is genericized, with brand performance driven primarily by contracting, formularies, and supply reliability rather than differentiation.
  • Forward performance should be modeled as brand share and net price compression with molecule demand supported by continued regimen inclusion.
  • “Clinical trials updates” for vinblastine usually represent regimen optimization and evidence-of-use patterns, not near-term registrational catalysts.

FAQs

  1. Is Velban still under patent protection?
    Vinblastine is a long-established molecule; branded exclusivity is generally not the market-determining factor in most jurisdictions.

  2. What phases are most common for new vinblastine studies?
    When present, vinblastine research most often takes the form of phase I/II regimen and safety work rather than brand registrational programs.

  3. What drives Velban demand in hospitals?
    Protocol inclusion in oncology chemotherapy regimens plus purchasing and formulary contracting.

  4. Does Velban have strong differentiation versus generics?
    Differentiation is usually limited because substitution targets the same active ingredient (vinblastine).

  5. What is the main commercial risk for Velban?
    Price and share erosion from generics, plus operational risk from manufacturing and supply continuity.


References

[1] FDA. (n.d.). Velban (vinblastine sulfate) prescribing information. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
[2] EMA. (n.d.). European public assessment reports and product information for vinblastine-containing medicinal products. European Medicines Agency.
[3] National Cancer Institute. (n.d.). Vinblastine information and PDQ regimen context. National Cancer Institute.
[4] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Search results for vinblastine interventional studies. U.S. National Library of Medicine.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.