Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR VELBAN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for VELBAN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002855 ↗ Chemotherapy Plus Hormone Therapy Versus Androgen Suppression in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Unresectable Prostate Cancer Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1996-08-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining hormone therapy with chemotherapy and androgen suppression may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for prostate cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of chemotherapy plus hormone therapy versus androgen suppression alone as initial therapy in patients with prostate cancer that is metastatic or that cannot be removed surgically.
NCT00002855 ↗ Chemotherapy Plus Hormone Therapy Versus Androgen Suppression in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Unresectable Prostate Cancer Completed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 3 1996-08-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining hormone therapy with chemotherapy and androgen suppression may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for prostate cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of chemotherapy plus hormone therapy versus androgen suppression alone as initial therapy in patients with prostate cancer that is metastatic or that cannot be removed surgically.
NCT00002882 ↗ Interferon Alfa With or Without Combination Chemotherapy Plus Interleukin-2 in Treating Patients With Melanoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1995-11-01 RATIONALE: Interferon alfa may interfere with the growth of cancer cells. Interleukin-2 may stimulate a person's white blood cells to kill melanoma cells. It is not yet known whether interferon alfa plus combination chemotherapy and interleukin-2 is more effective than interferon alfa alone in treating patients with melanoma. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of interferon alfa with or without combination chemotherapy plus interleukin-2 in treating patients with melanoma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for VELBAN

Condition Name

Condition Name for VELBAN
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 5
Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma 3
Prostate Cancer 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for VELBAN
Intervention Trials
Hodgkin Disease 14
Lymphoma 10
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for VELBAN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for VELBAN
Location Trials
United States 326
Canada 14
Australia 2
South Africa 1
Puerto Rico 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for VELBAN
Location Trials
Texas 20
California 13
Illinois 13
Ohio 10
Iowa 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for VELBAN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for VELBAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 10
Phase 2 22
Phase 1/Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for VELBAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 17
Recruiting 6
Active, not recruiting 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for VELBAN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for VELBAN
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 22
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 10
Seattle Genetics, Inc. 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for VELBAN
Sponsor Trials
Other 38
NIH 22
Industry 12
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Velban (vinblastine) clinical trials update, market analysis and launch/projection outlook

Last updated: July 28, 2026

Velban is the brand name for vinblastine sulfate, a vinca alkaloid chemotherapeutic used primarily in oncology regimens. Public-facing “Velban” clinical trial activity is limited because vinblastine is an established, widely used generic-active ingredient, with most contemporary development focused on new formulations, combinations, or supporting trials rather than brand-new single-agent phase programs. Near-term market outcomes are therefore driven less by fresh pivotal readouts and more by generic penetration, supply continuity, payer/coverage dynamics, and patent/market exclusivity around any product-specific line extensions.

What is Velban (vinblastine sulfate) and how is it used clinically?

Velban (vinblastine sulfate) is administered intravenously and is used in combination chemotherapy for multiple malignancies. Clinical practice patterns vary by tumor type and region, but vinblastine remains a core historical agent for regimens including Hodgkin lymphoma and testicular cancer, among others where vinca alkaloids are used.

What formulations and routes are relevant for Velban market demand?

  • Route: IV (standard for vinblastine sulfate)
  • Delivery: conventional reconstitution and infusion workflows
  • Hospital-administered product: demand correlates with inpatient/outpatient infusion volumes and oncology regimen mix

How do current clinical guidelines typically position vinblastine-containing regimens?

Vinblastine use is regimen- and line-of-therapy dependent. In modern practice, it competes indirectly with newer agents and combination standards, but it still remains in use where regimens or protocols include vinca alkaloids, and in settings where cost and availability matter.

What clinical trials are active for Velban or vinblastine in 2024-2026?

No single consolidated “Velban-specific” phase program dominates public signals; vinblastine’s clinical activity is mostly incremental, often involving combinations, dosing optimization, or comparative/real-world studies rather than new approvals.

What trial categories typically show up for established vinblastine brands?

  • Combination therapy trials (vinblastine with other cytotoxics or targeted agents)
  • Dosing/schedule optimization studies
  • Retrospective or prospective observational studies and regimen comparisons
  • Safety-focused studies related to handling, infusion protocols, or supportive care patterns

What is the practical impact of “active trials” on Velban brand economics?

Because vinblastine is largely generic and widely available, new trials typically influence clinician preference and protocol inclusion more than they create a brand-protectable market. In practice, trial readouts that change regimen standards can affect total vinblastine demand, but they usually do not create meaningful “Velban exclusivity” value unless tied to a protectable formulation or a specific indication holding.

When does Velban lose exclusivity, and what drives availability post-exclusivity?

For established small-molecule oncology agents like vinblastine, brand exclusivity is usually long expired. Current market conditions generally depend on:

  • Generic supply and manufacturing continuity
  • Product-specific labeling or quality issues
  • Any remaining patent estate around a branded presentation, manufacturing method, or specific use

What typically drives market entry for vinblastine products?

  • ANDA pathways for generic vinblastine sulfate
  • Switching between manufacturers by wholesalers, group purchasing organizations, and institutions
  • Substitution policies at the hospital pharmacy level

How does exclusivity affect actual procurement?

Once multiple suppliers exist, procurement shifts from exclusivity protection to:

  • Price erosion
  • Supply reliability
  • Packaging and concentration format compatibility with institutional protocols
  • Shortages and reallocation events

What patents protect Velban vinblastine sulfate, and how strong is the patent estate?

Vinblastine is a historical molecule with broad foundational chemistry known for decades. For “Velban” as a product, value is normally tied to any remaining product-specific intellectual property rather than the underlying molecule itself.

How to interpret vinblastine patent estates for business planning

  • Expect the core API protections to be expired
  • Screen for any remaining patents on:
    • Specific formulations or dosage strengths
    • Manufacturing processes
    • Method-of-use for narrow patient populations or specific regimen combinations

How do patents translate into market barriers?

For generic erosion, the binding constraints are usually not molecule-level patents. They are:

  • Product-specific IP, if any
  • Practical manufacturing qualification and stability validation
  • Litigation outcomes, if any active challenges exist (often limited at this stage)

What is the Orange Book status of Velban (vinblastine)?

“Orange Book status” for an older oncology active usually shows:

  • Historic brand listings with expired or near-expired protection
  • Active generic listings for vinblastine sulfate
  • Sparse remaining unexpired patent coverage unless the brand has a specific product update

What does an Orange Book listing pattern imply for near-term generic entry risk?

  • If multiple ANDA holders exist with “same drug” active ingredient, incremental Orange Book listings generally do not create meaningful additional delay risk.
  • If there is an unexpired patent tied to a specific strength or product, it can delay that particular presentation.

What generic entry risks exist for Velban, including Paragraph IV challenges?

For vinblastine, Paragraph IV challenges are typically less common now than during earlier brand life cycles because the molecule has long since passed through initial exclusivity and foundational patent eras.

What drives post-launch generic competition intensity?

  • Number of qualified ANDA suppliers
  • Evidence of manufacturing capacity
  • Contracted pricing and tendering
  • Shortage dynamics that can temporarily increase brand or scarce supplier pricing power

Which companies sell vinblastine sulfate competitively, and how does pricing usually behave?

Competitive sets generally include:

  • Generic manufacturers with ANDA approvals for vinblastine sulfate
  • Rare instances of sole-source supply from a constrained manufacturer, which can temporarily reduce competition

What market factors most influence vinblastine pricing?

  • Input supply and manufacturing yield
  • Regulatory batch releases and compliance status
  • Tender-based procurement and hospital formulary decisions
  • Regional distribution and wholesaler inventory

How does Velban compare with other vinca alkaloids (vincristine, vinorelbine) in demand and lifecycle?

Vinblastine demand is often more episodic than vincristine because vincristine is embedded in a wider range of frontline regimens. Vinblastine use also depends on specific histologies and protocol preference.

Business implication for market projection

  • Vinblastine volume follows protocol usage and oncology incidence patterns.
  • Growth is usually limited and driven by:
    • Changes in regimen recommendations
    • Pediatric oncology and lymphoma protocol updates (where applicable)
    • Supply stabilization and avoidance of stock-outs

What is the current market size for vinblastine/Velban, and what growth should be assumed?

Velban’s “brand market” is usually small relative to the total vinblastine molecule market once generics dominate. Market projection should therefore model:

  • Total vinblastine demand (therapeutic need)
  • Minus generic price erosion (unit price decline)
  • Plus/minus procurement shifts during shortage windows

How to set a defensible projection framework

A workable approach for business use is:

  1. Estimate oncology regimen-driven vinblastine utilization (hospital infusion/chemo orders)
  2. Apply historical pricing curves for generic oncology injectables
  3. Adjust for supply-driven volatility (manufacturing interruptions, regulatory delays)
  4. Include patient mix changes (lymphoma and testicular cancer incidence and treatment patterns)

What is the likely near-term (12-36 month) scenario for Velban revenue?

Given the age of the product and typical generic penetration for vinblastine sulfate, the base case usually shows:

  • Flat to modestly declining brand revenue in most markets
  • Lower brand share as generic substitution increases
  • Revenue volatility mainly due to supply constraints and contract repricing

What would change the scenario materially?

  • A new formulation or product-specific IP that restores a degree of exclusivity for a presentation
  • A shortage or compliance event that temporarily constrains generic supply
  • A regimen shift that increases protocol inclusion for vinblastine

What manufacturing and supply chain risks affect Velban availability and sales?

Oncology injectables have recurrent supply-chain sensitivities:

  • API sourcing and purification capacity
  • Sterile manufacturing yield and batch release cycles
  • Logistics constraints and allocation during shortages

How do supply events typically map to market share?

  • Shortage windows can temporarily lift sales for the remaining suppliers.
  • When supply normalizes, competitive pricing resets quickly, and brand share typically declines again.

What regulatory updates affect vinblastine products, including label and safety changes?

For established cytotoxics, regulatory updates usually involve:

  • Safety labeling revisions
  • Administration guidance clarifications
  • Packaging or stability-related changes

How do label changes affect market demand?

  • Clinical uptake changes only if safety or administration guidance affects clinician comfort, dosing, or monitoring burden.
  • Otherwise, demand remains driven by protocol inclusion.

Key Takeaways

  • Velban (vinblastine sulfate) is an established IV oncology drug with limited “brand-style” clinical trial momentum compared with first-in-class assets.
  • Near-term market direction is governed by generic penetration, hospital procurement behavior, and supply continuity rather than new Velban-specific pivotal trials.
  • Exclusivity and patent impact are typically minimal at this stage unless tied to product-specific formulations, strengths, or manufacturing/process IP that can block a narrow presentation.
  • Revenue projection should model stable or modestly declining brand economics with volatility driven by supply and contract repricing.

FAQs

  1. Are there any ongoing phase trials testing vinblastine in new combination regimens for lymphoma?
  2. How does vinblastine sulfate pricing typically change when multiple ANDA suppliers enter?
  3. What happens to hospital utilization of vinblastine during generic shortages or supply allocations?
  4. Do formulation or concentration differences create separate regulatory competition for vinblastine products?
  5. Which cancers historically drive most vinblastine use and how does incidence affect demand?

References

(No sources were provided in the prompt; no citations are included.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.