Last Updated: June 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR VARIBAR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for VARIBAR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01525927 ↗ Study of Chemotherapy Prior to Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in Patients With HPV Associated Cancer of the Oral Cavity Terminated Northwell Health Phase 2 2010-08-01 This study looks at the use of three cycles of chemotherapy given prior to radiation therapy in patients with cancer of the oral cavity and evidence of prior exposure to Human Papilloma Virus (HPV). Patients with cancer of the oral cavity who have evidence of exposure to HPV have a better prognosis than those who do not have such evidence of exposure to HPV. The main hypothesis of this study is that using three cycles of chemotherapy prior to embarking on radiation therapy will allow the use of reduced doses of radiation therapy and, therefore, less radiation induced side-effects. The primary objective is to determine the activity of this pre-radiation chemotherapy strategy along with reduced dose levels of radiation with or without chemotherapy during the radiation phase. The effectiveness of the strategy will be assessed at three months following the completion of the radiation therapy phase and also at two years following completion of the radiation therapy.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for VARIBAR

Condition Name

Condition Name for VARIBAR
Intervention Trials
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for VARIBAR
Intervention Trials
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms 1
Neoplasms 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for VARIBAR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for VARIBAR
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for VARIBAR
Location Trials
New York 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for VARIBAR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for VARIBAR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for VARIBAR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for VARIBAR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for VARIBAR
Sponsor Trials
Northwell Health 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for VARIBAR
Sponsor Trials
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

VARIBAR clinical trials update, market analysis, and launch/exclusivity projection

Last updated: June 24, 2026

VARIBAR (barium sulfate for oral suspension) is an imaging contrast product used to visualize the gastrointestinal tract on X-ray/fluoroscopy. It is not a prescription “new molecular entity” with a typical clinical-trials-to-launch lifecycle. Public clinical-trials activity is limited, and market projections hinge on (1) radiology utilization, (2) supply continuity and generic substitution dynamics, and (3) payer and hospital formulary preferences rather than on late-stage efficacy trials.

What is VARIBAR, who makes it, and how is it used in imaging?

Featured snippet answer: VARIBAR is a barium sulfate oral suspension used as a gastrointestinal contrast agent for X-ray/fluoroscopic imaging.

What indication does VARIBAR cover?

VARIBAR is used as an oral contrast agent for gastrointestinal imaging. Common clinical workflows include:

  • delineating luminal anatomy,
  • assessing suspected pathology that requires contrast enhancement,
  • supporting radiographic exams rather than CT/MRI-specific contrast pathways.

Dosage forms and administration basics

  • Oral suspension containing barium sulfate
  • Administered prior to imaging per radiology protocol and patient preparation instructions.

Is VARIBAR a brand with an active NDA/BLA program?

VARIBAR is a legacy contrast product, so “clinical trial update” is usually more about regulatory maintenance, labeling updates, and supply stability than about new efficacy endpoints.

What clinical trials data exist for VARIBAR, and what is the latest update?

Featured snippet answer: VARIBAR is not associated with a broad, ongoing late-stage clinical development program in public registries; most activity is tied to product manufacturing, labeling maintenance, or smaller observational work.

Why clinical-trials updates are limited for barium sulfate contrast agents

Barium sulfate contrast products typically:

  • have long-established use and standardized imaging protocols,
  • face development cycles focused on equivalence/CMC, not de novo clinical benefit.

What does “latest update” usually mean for VARIBAR-type products?

For legacy contrast agents, the most actionable “updates” generally include:

  • FDA labeling revisions,
  • manufacturing site or formulation changes (CMC),
  • quality/inspection outcomes impacting supply,
  • any documented shortages and resolution timelines.

Clinical outcome endpoints in imaging contrast products

When studies exist, endpoints tend to be:

  • image quality scoring by radiologists,
  • contrast retention/flow consistency,
  • tolerability and adverse event characterization.

What is the Orange Book status of VARIBAR, and what patents protect it?

Featured snippet answer: Patent and exclusivity coverage for legacy oral barium sulfate imaging agents is usually reflected through FDA’s Orange Book for approved drug products. Without a specific Orange Book listing captured here, patent-count and expiration cannot be stated accurately.

How to evaluate VARIBAR exclusivity and patent barriers

For contrast agents, generic entry is typically easier than for complex drug substances because barriers are often:

  • formulation-specific (particle size, suspension stability, viscosity targets),
  • manufacturing controls and specifications,
  • labeling requirements.

What to expect in the Orange Book listing

If present, Orange Book items typically include:

  • composition of matter (less common for commodity actives),
  • formulation/process patents (more common for stability and suspension behavior),
  • method-of-use patents (often weak in practice for standardized imaging use).

When does VARIBAR lose exclusivity, and what is the generic entry risk?

Featured snippet answer: For legacy contrast agents, exclusivity risk is generally driven by whether any listed patents or unexpired exclusivities remain. Without exact Orange Book data and patent numbers, a precise “loss date” cannot be produced.

Typical generic risk profile for barium sulfate oral suspensions

Generic entry risk is elevated when:

  • the active ingredient is commodity-like (barium sulfate),
  • patents are limited to formulation/process details that can be designed around,
  • no method-of-use patents materially constrain labeling.

Settlement dynamics: what matters if ANDA litigations occurred

Where patent challenges exist, the business-critical variables are:

  • whether the brand asserts formulation/process patents in litigation,
  • whether “skinny labeling” is used for imaging indications,
  • whether a court settlement sets an agreed launch date.

How strong is the patent estate for VARIBAR, and how many patents cover it?

Featured snippet answer: A quantified patent estate strength review requires the specific Orange Book listing and the exact patent families attached to VARIBAR’s approved product code.

What “strength” means for a legacy contrast agent

For VARIBAR-like products, practical strength often depends on:

  • whether patents are “generic-proof” formulation claims,
  • whether manufacturing design-around is feasible,
  • whether courts treat process/formulation patents as easy-to-avoid.

Which patent categories typically matter

  • Formulation stability and suspension uniformity patents
  • Particle size distribution and sedimentation control
  • Manufacturing process steps tied to critical quality attributes

What formulations and packaging are protected for VARIBAR?

Featured snippet answer: Formulation and packaging protection (if any) usually centers on suspension characteristics and manufacturing controls rather than on novel delivery technology.

Dosage, concentration, and suspension-performance variables

Protected parameters in similar barium sulfate products often include:

  • concentration,
  • viscosity range,
  • particle size distribution,
  • resuspendability after shaking,
  • sedimentation behavior over shelf-life.

What generic challengers typically target

  • Bioequivalence is not the same as for systemic drugs, but quality and performance specs matter.
  • Competitors aim to meet labeled specs without infringing formulation claims.

Which companies manufacture VARIBAR, and what is the competitive landscape?

Featured snippet answer: The competitive set for VARIBAR is typically other FDA-approved barium sulfate oral suspensions and radiology contrast suppliers, including authorized generics.

Competitive pressure drivers

  • hospital tendering and group purchasing organization (GPO) contracts,
  • distributor availability and lead time,
  • unit price and line-item contracting.

Switching dynamics

For radiology contrast agents:

  • switching is fast if the product meets facility protocol and stock availability,
  • delayed if there are supply interruptions or labeling differences.

How does VARIBAR perform financially: market size, pricing, and revenue projection?

Featured snippet answer: VARIBAR’s revenue profile is constrained by a niche use pattern and by generic substitution across barium sulfate contrast categories; market growth correlates with imaging volume rather than with new clinical adoption.

Market analysis framework for VARIBAR

Revenue projection usually decomposes into:

  1. procedure volume proxy (GI imaging demand),
  2. contrast agent penetration by modality,
  3. share of supply and purchasing contracts,
  4. net price trends after generic pressure,
  5. supply continuity and shortage effects.

Market-sizing approach that fits legacy contrast drugs

  • Use billed GI imaging volume proxies (radiology utilization)
  • Apply contrast agent utilization rates (oral barium sulfate use frequency)
  • Apply brand-to-generic substitution rates (tender and formulary driven)
  • Apply price curve reflecting generic erosion if competitors launch

Pricing expectations under generic substitution

For mature imaging contrast categories:

  • brand pricing tends to compress as authorized generics and private label products enter,
  • distributor rebates and hospital contracting materially impact realized net price.

What is the base-case projection for VARIBAR over the next 5 years?

Featured snippet answer: The base-case trajectory is typically flat-to-declining unit economics unless supply disruptions or shortages create temporary price lift, with longer-term pressure from generic options.

5-year projection structure (business-ready)

  • Units: driven by GI imaging volumes and facility protocol adherence
  • Net revenue: units times realized net price after rebates and contract concessions
  • Cost and margin: manufacturing compliance, inspection risk, and raw material costs for barium sulfate

Scenario logic to use internally

  • Base case: modest net price decline, stable or slightly declining volume
  • Upside: shortage-driven temporary volume capture and price stabilization
  • Downside: additional generic entrants, contract readjustments, or supply normalization

What regulatory events could impact VARIBAR supply and labeling?

Featured snippet answer: For contrast agents, the most material regulatory events are manufacturing inspections, labeling revisions tied to safety monitoring, and any FDA actions affecting distribution continuity.

Manufacturing and quality risk categories

  • cGMP inspection outcomes
  • changes in manufacturing site or process requiring comparability data
  • out-of-spec events that trigger recalls or temporary production pauses

Labeling changes that can shift demand

  • updates to contraindications or warnings
  • modifications to preparation instructions affecting workflow
  • safety statement changes influencing ordering habits

Key Takeaways

  • VARIBAR is a legacy barium sulfate oral contrast agent where “clinical trial updates” are not dominated by late-stage efficacy studies.
  • The commercial outlook is governed by imaging utilization, contracting, and generic substitution more than by patent-driven innovation.
  • A precise exclusivity timeline, patent-count, and “when generics can launch” requires the exact Orange Book listing and associated patent family data for the specific VARIBAR product code and dosage form, which are not provided in the prompt.

FAQs

  1. How do hospitals decide between VARIBAR and alternative barium sulfate oral suspensions?
  2. What labeling or preparation differences most affect radiology ordering of oral barium contrast?
  3. What supply disruptions are most likely to impact VARIBAR availability, and how do they affect short-term pricing?
  4. How do ANDA/abbreviated approvals typically address formulation equivalence for oral barium sulfate products?
  5. What market indicators best predict VARIBAR demand over the next 12 to 24 months?

References

No sources were provided or cited in the request.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.