You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 15, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TRISENOX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for Trisenox

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Dosage NCT00225992 ↗ Phase II Research Study of Arsenic Trioxide (Trisenox) in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Terminated Oncology Specialties, Alabama Phase 2 2004-02-01 In this phase II study besides evaluating for safety, the primary efficacy parameter is to evaluate the incidence of patients who have had a response to Trisenox by evidence of increased blood counts (red, white, or platelets) and/or by decrease or transfusion dependency. The secondary efficacy parameter is the assessment of the tolerability of the new dosing schedule. Arsenic trioxide will be administered intravenously over 1 to 2 hours with a loading dose of 0.30mg/kg for days 1-5 of the first week and then twice weekly for 27 weeks for a total of 28 weeks.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for Trisenox

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00003934 ↗ Tretinoin, Cytarabine, and Daunorubicin Hydrochloride With or Without Arsenic Trioxide Followed by Tretinoin With or Without Mercaptopurine and Methotrexate in Treating Patients With Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1999-06-01 This randomized phase III trial is studying tretinoin and combination chemotherapy to see how well they work compared to tretinoin, combination chemotherapy, and arsenic trioxide in treating patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia that has not been treated previously. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as daunorubicin, cytarabine, mercaptopurine, methotrexate, and arsenic trioxide, work in different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Tretinoin may help leukemia cells develop into normal white blood cells. It is not yet known which regimen is more effective for acute promyelocytic leukemia.
NCT00005786 ↗ Arsenic Trioxide in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoma or Leukemia Terminated National Cancer Institute (NCI) N/A 2001-01-01 Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of arsenic trioxide in treating patients who have relapsed or refractory lymphoma or leukemia. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die
NCT00006092 ↗ Arsenic Trioxide for Induction Therapy of Adult Patients With Leukemia Terminated National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2000-08-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of arsenic trioxide in treating patients who have recurrent or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia or chronic myelogenous leukemia.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Trisenox

Condition Name

Condition Name for Trisenox
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 4
Multiple Myeloma 3
Lung Cancer 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Trisenox
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 14
Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute 7
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Trisenox

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Trisenox
Location Trials
United States 124
Canada 11
Australia 5
New Zealand 2
Puerto Rico 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Trisenox
Location Trials
Texas 10
California 9
New York 7
Illinois 6
Ohio 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Trisenox

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Trisenox
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 3
Phase 2 19
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Trisenox
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 18
Terminated 11
Active, not recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Trisenox

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Trisenox
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 16
Cephalon 7
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Trisenox
Sponsor Trials
Other 37
NIH 17
Industry 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Trisenox (Arsenic Trioxide)

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Trisenox, the brand name for arsenic trioxide, is an FDA-approved chemotherapeutic agent primarily indicated for the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Since its initial approval, Trisenox has cemented its role within the oncology pharmacopeia, especially in cases resistant to or relapsed from first-line treatments. This article provides a comprehensive overview of recent clinical trials, evaluates current market dynamics, and projects future market trajectory for Trisenox, considering therapeutic landscape shifts, regulatory insights, and emerging scientific evidence.


Clinical Trials Update

Current Therapeutic Indications and Evolving Applications

While arsenic trioxide’s primary FDA indication remains APL, recent clinical investigations explore its potential in other hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Notably, ongoing trials aim to understand its broader anti-cancer properties and combinatorial efficacy.

Key Recent Clinical Trials

  • Combination Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory APL: Multiple Phase II/III studies have demonstrated that combining arsenic trioxide with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) significantly increases remission rates. The landmark study published in Blood (2018) reported that this combination achieves complete remission in over 90% of relapsed patients, often allowing chemotherapy-free regimens [1].

  • Use in Solid Tumors: Early-phase trials are evaluating arsenic trioxide’s utility in neuroblastoma, glioblastoma, and pancreatic cancers. These studies, such as NCT04309103 (neuroblastoma), are in preliminary phases, with some showing modest anti-tumor activity but requiring validation in larger cohorts [2].

  • Novel Delivery Systems: Recent trials involve nanoparticle-based arsenic delivery (e.g., NCT04530517), aiming to improve bioavailability, minimize toxicity, and expand its therapeutic window.

Safety and Toxicity Profile

Recent clinical data reaffirm arsenic trioxide’s toxicity profile, emphasizing risks like QT prolongation, differentiation syndrome, and hepatotoxicity. Advances in monitoring protocols and dose adjustments have improved safety outcomes relative to earlier applications.

Regulatory and Clinical Practice Trends

While arsenic trioxide's FDA approvals remain limited, updates in clinical guidelines from entities such as NCCN have incorporated arsenic trioxide as a frontline option for APL, especially for relapsed or high-risk patients, signaling a consolidation of its therapeutic role [3].


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The Trisenox market is predominantly driven by its FDA-approved indication for APL. Global sales are concentrated in North America, Europe, and select Asian markets, with the United States accounting for approximately 70% of total revenues, owing to the high prevalence of APL and established clinical practice guidelines [4].

Market Drivers

  • Increasing Incidence of APL: Although APL accounts for only about 10-15% of adult AML cases, its rising recognition and earlier diagnosis contribute to steady demand.

  • Advances in Combination Regimens: The proven efficacy of arsenic trioxide with ATRA enhances treatment options, fostering continued utilization and favorable reimbursement policies.

  • Emerging Label Expansion Opportunities: Ongoing clinical trials exploring arsenic trioxide’s utility in other malignancies hint at future market expansion prospects.

Market Challenges

  • Toxicity and Monitoring Requirements: The risk of cardiotoxicity necessitates specialized care and monitoring, potentially limiting widespread use.

  • Competition from Novel Agents: The evolving landscape of targeted and immunotherapies, such as FLT3 inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, may overshadow arsenic trioxide’s market share in AML or other hematologic malignancies.

  • Limited Formulation Diversity: Currently, Trisenox is available primarily as an injectable, restricting versatile administration options.

Competitive Landscape

Despite few direct competitors, the market features alternative AML treatments, including gemtuzumab ozogamicin and frontline chemotherapy. The advent of oral agents like Venetoclax presents evolving competition, though arsenic trioxide maintains a niche due to its distinctive mechanism and proven efficacy in APL.


Market Projection and Future Outlook

Forecast Overview (2023-2030)

The global arsenic trioxide market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 4-6%, reaching roughly USD 500-600 million by 2030, driven by several factors:

  • Expansion into New Indications: Positive preliminary data for solid tumors and other hematologic malignancies could catalyze orphan drug designations and accelerated approvals, broadening market horizon.

  • Increased Use in Maintenance Therapy: Research suggesting benefits of arsenic trioxide in consolidation and maintenance therapy for APL could foster extended product utilization.

  • Regulatory Approvals and Label Expansion: Pending trial outcomes, regulatory agencies may authorize label extensions, bolstering sales.

Impact of Scientific and Regulatory Developments

Advent of newer formulations (e.g., liposomal arsenic), strong clinical evidence for combination regimens, and supportive healthcare policies bolster growth prospects. Conversely, regulatory hurdles concerning toxicity management remain an impediment.

Potential Market Entry of Generics

Patent expirations, coupled with generic manufacturing capabilities, might lead to price reductions, enhancing accessibility but compressing profit margins for brand-name arsenic trioxide.


Conclusion

Trisenox’s role remains firmly rooted in the treatment of APL, with a consistent clinical evidence base supporting its efficacy and safety. In tandem, emerging research explores broader oncology applications, promising future growth avenues. Market dynamics are favorable but require navigational agility amid competition, toxicity management, and evolving therapeutic standards. Strategic investments in formulation innovation, expanded clinical indications, and real-world safety protocols are crucial to maximize its market potential.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical validation outstanding: Recent studies affirm arsenic trioxide's combination efficacy with ATRA in relapsed APL, with potential in solid tumors under investigation.
  • Market stability with growth opportunity: Despite competition, high efficacy and updated guidelines sustain demand; expansion into new indications could significantly increase market size.
  • Toxicity management remains critical: Effective monitoring and safety protocols are essential to mitigate adverse effects and expand use.
  • Future prospects hinge on research and regulatory support: Trial successes and label expansions could propel the market beyond current limitations.
  • Formulation innovation as a growth driver: Development of novel delivery systems may enhance tolerability and broaden application spectrum.

FAQs

Q1: What are the primary therapeutic uses of Trisenox today?
A: Trisenox is primarily used in treating acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), particularly in relapsed or resistant cases, as per FDA approval.

Q2: Are there ongoing clinical trials exploring arsenic trioxide in other cancers?
A: Yes, multiple early-phase trials investigate arsenic trioxide's potential efficacy in neuroblastoma, glioblastoma, and pancreatic cancers, aiming to expand its oncology application.

Q3: What are the main safety concerns associated with arsenic trioxide?
A: Significant risks include QT prolongation, cardiotoxicity, differentiation syndrome, and hepatotoxicity, necessitating rigorous patient monitoring.

Q4: How might market growth for Trisenox change in the coming decade?
A: Market projections suggest moderate growth (4-6% CAGR), driven by label extensions, new formulations, and potential new indications, especially in orphan diseases.

Q5: What challenges might hinder Trisenox market expansion?
A: Challenges include toxicity management, competition from targeted therapies and immunotherapies, and clinical trial outcomes that do not meet regulatory expectations.


References

[1] Lo-Coco, F., et al. (2018). "Arsenic trioxide and ATRA in the treatment of relapsed APL." Blood.

[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. (2022). "NCT04309103: Study of Arsenic Trioxide in Treating Patients With Neuroblastoma." Retrieved from clinicaltrials.gov.

[3] National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). (2023). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

[4] MarketWatch. (2022). "Arsenic Trioxide Market Size and Forecast."

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.