Last Updated: April 30, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TOLTERODINE TARTRATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Tolterodine Tartrate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00143377 ↗ Study to Determine The Effectiveness Of Detrusitol In Patients Diagnosed With OAB Completed Pfizer Phase 4 2004-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Detrusitol (tolterodine tartrate) SR, 4 mg once daily, on patient's perception of the symptoms of overactive bladder and which of these bothersome symptoms are improved with treatment.
NCT00143377 ↗ Study to Determine The Effectiveness Of Detrusitol In Patients Diagnosed With OAB Completed Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. Phase 4 2004-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Detrusitol (tolterodine tartrate) SR, 4 mg once daily, on patient's perception of the symptoms of overactive bladder and which of these bothersome symptoms are improved with treatment.
NCT00293839 ↗ Efficacy and Tolerability of DITROPAN XL (Oxybutynin Chloride) Versus DETROL LA (Tolterodine Tartrate) in Treatment of Overactive Bladder Completed Alza Corporation, DE, USA Phase 3 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of DITROPAN® XL (oxybutynin chloride) Extended-Release Tablets and DETROL® LA (tolterodine tartrate extended-release capsules) in the reduction of urge urinary incontinence episodes during a 12-week treatment period in patients with overactive bladder. The secondary objective is to compare the tolerability of DITROPAN® XL (oxybutynin chloride) and DETROL® LA (tolterodine tartrate) during a 12-week treatment period.
NCT00444925 ↗ Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fesoterodine in Comparison to Tolterodine for Overactive Bladder (OAB) Completed Pfizer Phase 3 2007-04-01 To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fesoterodine in comparison to tolterodine and placebo for overactive bladder
NCT00454740 ↗ Efficacy & Safety Study of VESIcare® (Solifenacin Succinate) in Patients Wishing to Switch From Detrol LA® for Treatment of Overactive Bladder Completed Astellas Pharma Inc Phase 3 2004-06-01 To evaluate the efficacy of 5 and10mg solifenacin succinate in patients with urgency who have OAB syndrome (urgency, with or without urge incontinence, usually with frequency and nocturia) and wish to switch from tolterodine tartrate extended release to solifenacin succinate due to lack of sufficient improvement in urgency episodes
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Tolterodine Tartrate

Condition Name

Condition Name for Tolterodine Tartrate
Intervention Trials
Overactive Bladder 7
Urinary Bladder, Overactive 3
Urinary Incontinence 2
Urge Incontinence 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Tolterodine Tartrate
Intervention Trials
Urinary Bladder, Overactive 12
Urinary Incontinence 4
Enuresis 3
Urinary Incontinence, Urge 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Tolterodine Tartrate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Tolterodine Tartrate
Location Trials
United States 64
South Africa 5
Brazil 5
India 5
Canada 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Tolterodine Tartrate
Location Trials
California 4
Texas 3
Georgia 3
Florida 3
Utah 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Tolterodine Tartrate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Tolterodine Tartrate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 5
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Tolterodine Tartrate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 15
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Tolterodine Tartrate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Tolterodine Tartrate
Sponsor Trials
Pfizer 6
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. 3
Astellas Pharma Inc 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Tolterodine Tartrate
Sponsor Trials
Industry 16
Other 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Tolterodine Tartrate Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 28, 2026

Tolterodine Tartrate: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

What is tolterodine tartrate and where is it used clinically?

Tolterodine tartrate is a muscarinic receptor antagonist used for overactive bladder (OAB) indications. Commercially, the molecule is positioned across oral formulations (including immediate- and extended-release products depending on market) and has a long history of clinical use. The active drug is tolterodine; the tartrate salt form is used for formulation and manufacturing properties.

What does the recent clinical trials landscape show?

No complete, credible, and time-bounded “clinical trials update” covering new interventional studies, phase-by-phase enrollments, or readouts for tolterodine tartrate was available in the source set used for this response. Production of a specific phase status, site-level enrollment totals, or an update timeline would require a qualified trials database pull (for example, ClinicalTrials.gov) for the defined recency window, plus a mapping to salt form and formulation variants.

What is the market for tolterodine tartrate today?

Tolterodine is one of the established oral OAB therapies that competes in the overactive bladder medication class alongside other antimuscarinics and, in many markets, newer treatment classes.

Market positioning (functional):

  • Indication: Overactive bladder (symptom control, typically urgency and frequency; safety and tolerability drive prescribing).
  • Therapy class: Antimuscarinic.
  • Key competitive set: Other antimuscarinic agents (for OAB) and beta-3 agonists depending on local reimbursement and guideline preferences.
  • Adoption dynamics: Long-standing brands and generics increase volume, while newer agents can pressure growth rates in markets with strong uptake of alternative mechanisms.

Commercial reality for older OAB molecules:

  • Pricing pressure and share shifts typically reflect generic entry and payer preferences.
  • Product-level differentiation usually depends on tolerability, dosing convenience, and formulary access rather than new clinical efficacy breakthroughs.

How should a projection be framed for tolterodine tartrate?

A projection requires baseline market sizing, geography splits, growth rates, and a constraint set (patent/generic status, formulary trends, and competitor momentum). Those inputs are not present in the available source set for this response, so a precise CAGR, absolute revenue forecast, or year-by-year shipment projection cannot be stated without fabricating inputs.

What can be stated from a high-level, decision-useful lens:

  • Near-term (typical) trajectory for legacy antimuscarinics: Slow growth or declining share in markets where beta-3 agonists and other new OAB therapies gain formulary adoption.
  • Value chain constraints: Generics and pricing compression generally cap revenue growth for branded salt-form products.
  • Clinical inertia: Long patient and prescriber familiarity can sustain demand, but it rarely drives high growth versus newer mechanisms.

Where are the key regulatory and documentation anchors?

Tolterodine is supported by extensive regulatory history for OAB symptom management. For salt-form documentation, the relevant coverage is typically embedded in the approved product labeling and regulatory dossiers by jurisdiction.

No jurisdiction-specific labeling excerpts or renewal timelines were available in the source set used for this response, so it is not possible to provide a defensible, citation-backed “regulatory status update” by country.


Actionable business takeaways for R&D and investment decisions

What decisions can be made with the available evidence?

  • Treat tolterodine tartrate as a mature OAB asset with market behavior dominated by generic competition, payer formulary dynamics, and tolerability-driven switching rather than new clinical differentiation.
  • If evaluating adjacent R&D or lifecycle extension:
    • Priority should go to formulation differentiation (adherence, side effect minimization), not incremental efficacy claims.
    • Evidence development should assume comparative effectiveness pressure versus newer OAB mechanisms.

What projection approach should you use?

  • Build projections using a country-by-country formulary model tied to:
    • generic penetration,
    • reimbursement tiering,
    • OAB guideline treatment sequencing,
    • competitor market share shifts (new mechanism uptake),
    • and historical price erosion for antimuscarinic class.
  • Use a scenario framework (share-stable vs share-losing) rather than a single-point forecast for revenue.

Key Takeaways

  • Tolterodine tartrate is an established antimuscarinic therapy for overactive bladder and competes in a crowded OAB market where growth is typically constrained by genericization and shifting payer preferences.
  • A precise, time-bounded clinical trials update (phase status, enrollments, and readouts) and a quantified market forecast cannot be produced from the available sourced material in this response.
  • For forward-looking projections, use a formulary and pricing-driven model, not a growth-by-indication model tied to brand-new clinical breakthroughs.

FAQs

1) What is tolterodine tartrate used to treat?

It is used for overactive bladder symptom control, administered as an antimuscarinic agent.

2) Is tolterodine tartrate still actively studied in new clinical trials?

A sourced, time-bounded update of active or recently completed interventional studies is not available in the provided source set for this response.

3) How does tolterodine compare economically to newer OAB therapies?

In most markets, mature antimuscarinics face pricing pressure and share erosion as newer mechanisms gain formulary adoption; the magnitude varies by geography and reimbursement rules.

4) What are the main competitive forces in OAB for tolterodine?

Payer formulary preferences, generic penetration, side-effect profiles that drive switching, and competitor uptake by mechanism and dosing convenience.

5) How should a market forecast be built for tolterodine?

Use a country-level model incorporating generic share, pricing erosion, formulary tier placement, and competitor share movement over time.


References

[1] Clinical Pharmacology [Database]. Tolterodine. Elsevier.
[2] Drugs@FDA. Tolterodine (product and labeling records). U.S. FDA.
[3] European Medicines Agency (EMA). Tolterodine (authorisation and product information records). EMA.
[4] ClinicalTrials.gov. Tolterodine (search results and study records). U.S. National Library of Medicine.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.