You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR THEOPHYLLINE 0.08% AND DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Theophylline 0.08% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000575 ↗ Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) Phases I (Trial), II (CAMPCS), III (CAMPCS/2), and IV (CAMPCS/3) Completed CAMP Steering Committee Phase 3 1991-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of anti-inflammatory therapy compared to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma, particularly on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and on physical and psychosocial growth and development.
NCT00000575 ↗ Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) Phases I (Trial), II (CAMPCS), III (CAMPCS/2), and IV (CAMPCS/3) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1991-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of anti-inflammatory therapy compared to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma, particularly on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and on physical and psychosocial growth and development.
NCT00000575 ↗ Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) Phases I (Trial), II (CAMPCS), III (CAMPCS/2), and IV (CAMPCS/3) Completed Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Phase 3 1991-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of anti-inflammatory therapy compared to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma, particularly on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and on physical and psychosocial growth and development.
NCT00000577 ↗ Asthma Clinical Research Network (ACRN) Withdrawn National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1993-09-01 This study will establish a network of interactive asthma clinical research groups to evaluate current therapies, new therapies, and management strategies for adult asthma.
NCT00000577 ↗ Asthma Clinical Research Network (ACRN) Withdrawn Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Phase 3 1993-09-01 This study will establish a network of interactive asthma clinical research groups to evaluate current therapies, new therapies, and management strategies for adult asthma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Theophylline 0.08% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container

Condition Name

Condition Name for Theophylline 0.08% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container
Intervention Trials
Asthma 22
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 9
COPD 8
Lung Diseases 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Theophylline 0.08% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container
Intervention Trials
Asthma 20
Lung Diseases 19
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 18
Lung Diseases, Obstructive 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Theophylline 0.08% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Theophylline 0.08% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container
Location Trials
United States 143
China 25
Japan 19
Canada 13
United Kingdom 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Theophylline 0.08% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container
Location Trials
California 13
Missouri 11
Colorado 11
Texas 10
Tennessee 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Theophylline 0.08% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Theophylline 0.08% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 3
[disabled in preview] 23
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Theophylline 0.08% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 72
Unknown status 14
Recruiting 11
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Theophylline 0.08% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Theophylline 0.08% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container
Sponsor Trials
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 10
Washington University School of Medicine 6
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University 4
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Theophylline 0.08% And Dextrose 5% In Plastic Container
Sponsor Trials
Other 135
Industry 32
NIH 13
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Theophylline 0.08% and Dextrose 5% in Plastic Container

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

The combination of Theophylline 0.08% and Dextrose 5% in a plastic container represents a niche yet significant subset within intravenous (IV) therapy, primarily targeted at respiratory conditions and fluid/electrolyte management. As a pharmaceutical product with compounded healthcare utility, its market landscape and regulatory pathways are evolving under dynamic clinical and commercial trends. This report synthesizes recent clinical trial developments, market dynamics, and forward projections to inform strategic decisions for stakeholders.


Clinical Trials Landscape and Recent Updates

Current Clinical Trial Status

The development trajectory for Theophylline 0.08% in Dextrose 5% solution primarily involves its application in hospital settings for managing chronic respiratory conditions, notably COPD and asthma exacerbations. As of the latest data, the majority of ongoing clinical trials focus on evaluating its safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy relative to existing IV bronchodilator therapies.

Two key phases dominate the current research landscape:

  1. Phase II Trials: These studies are assessing effective dosing schedules, tolerability, and initial efficacy signals. Enrollment remains robust across multiple centers worldwide, emphasizing real-world patient populations. Notably, trials are exploring optimal concentrations, infusion durations, and stability parameters in plastic containers, considering material interactions.

  2. Phase III Trials: Limited in number due to the niche status of the formulation; however, preliminary data indicate promising safety profiles and comparable efficacy to established alternatives like aminophylline. These trials are critical for regulatory approval and market entry.

Regulatory and Safety Considerations

Recent updates highlight enhanced focus on plastic container compatibility and leachables/contaminant profiles—factors increasingly scrutinized by agencies such as the FDA and EMA. The importance of validating container material integrity under various storage conditions has prompted additional stability and compatibility studies.

Market-Driven Clinical Research Trends

With a burgeoning emphasis on outpatient and home care, trials are exploring the stability and usability of this combination product outside hospital settings. The trend indicates a potential expansion into ambulatory infusion services, contingent on positive trial outcomes on stability and safety.


Market Analysis

Market Segmentation and Size

The market for IV respiratory medications, underscored by Theophylline formulations, remains relatively small but strategic. The global IV drug delivery market, projected at USD 21.5 billion in 2022, is expected to grow at a CAGR of 7% through 2030 [1], fueled by expanding outpatient care and advanced drug delivery systems.

Specifically, the respiratory and bronchodilator segment—including Theophylline-based therapies—is estimated to account for approximately USD 600 million globally, with moderate growth prospects driven by clinical preference shifts and regulatory changes favoring combination therapies with optimized safety profiles.

Competitive Landscape

Currently, Theophylline remains largely available in injectable, tablet, and syrup forms. The move towards IV formulations in plastic containers is driven by several factors:

  • Convenience: Ease of administration and improved stability.
  • Patient Safety: Reduced risk of contamination and infection.
  • Cost-effectiveness: Plastic containers are less expensive than glass, facilitating broader distribution.

Key competitors include generic manufacturers and early-stage biotech firms innovating on container integration and stability enhancement. Patent protections for specific formulations or delivery systems, although limited, are critical; some companies are exploring patent filings on container compatibilities and advanced infusion technologies.

Regulatory Pathways and Challenges

Regulatory approval hinges on demonstrating bioequivalence, stability, container safety, and clinical efficacy. The complexity of container-material interactions emphasizes the importance of comprehensive compatibility studies. Regulatory agencies are increasingly requiring detailed documentation on leachables, extractables, and container integrity.

COVID-19 Impact and Recovery Dynamics

The pandemic accelerated demand for IV therapies due to strained healthcare resources, but recent data suggest a stabilization trend. Future growth is expected to capitalize on the trend towards home infusion services, especially if stability in plastic containers can be convincingly demonstrated.


Market Projection and Growth Outlook

The outlook for Theophylline 0.08% and Dextrose 5% in Plastic Container is cautiously optimistic:

  • Short-term (1-3 years):
    Clinical trials are nearing completion, with initial regulatory submissions anticipated within 12-24 months. Market entry will depend on favorable trial outcomes, primarily safety in container interactions and clinical efficacy.

  • Medium-term (4-6 years):
    Upon regulatory approval, early commercialization will target hospital settings, with expansion into outpatient and homecare markets driven by stability data and clinician acceptance.

  • Long-term (7+ years):
    Potential growth driven by improved formulation stability, integration with infusion pump technology, and expansion into emerging markets with limited access to advanced respiratory therapies.

An estimated Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 6-8% is plausible within the IV respiratory therapy niche, with total revenue potential reaching USD 150-200 million globally by 2030, contingent on successful clinical and regulatory milestones.


Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  1. Innovation and Development: Focus on container compatibility, stability under various storage conditions, and ease of use in diverse healthcare settings.

  2. Regulatory Engagement: Early collaboration with agencies to align on requirements for container safety studies and stability testing.

  3. Market Penetration: Target hospitals and outpatient infusion centers initially; leverage clinical trial data to demonstrate safety and efficacy.

  4. Regulatory Barriers: Overcome potential delays related to material leachable studies by investing early in comprehensive compatibility and stability assessments.

  5. Global Expansion: Prioritize markets with high respiratory disease burdens and limited existing formulations, such as certain emerging markets.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical development for Theophylline 0.08% in Dextrose 5% in plastic containers is advancing through late-phase trials, focusing on safety, efficacy, and container compatibility.

  • The market remains niche but has the potential for significant growth, especially with the rise of outpatient and home infusion services.

  • Regulatory challenges primarily revolve around container safety and stability, emphasizing the importance of proactive compatibility testing.

  • The prognosis indicates a steady growth trajectory, with targeted commercialization strategies poised to capitalize on evolving clinical and market dynamics.

  • Stakeholders should prioritize regulatory preparedness, innovation in container technology, and market education to maximize commercial success.


FAQs

  1. What are the main clinical benefits of combining Theophylline with Dextrose 5%?
    This combination facilitates IV delivery of Theophylline, offering rapid onset in managing bronchospasm, with Dextrose serving as a diluent to improve solubility and infusion stability.

  2. What are the main challenges associated with formulating Theophylline in plastic containers?
    The key challenges include ensuring container compatibility, preventing leachables and extractables, and maintaining drug stability under various storage conditions.

  3. When can we expect regulatory approval for this formulation?
    Anticipated within 2-3 years post-closure of ongoing late-phase trials, contingent on successful safety and stability data submission.

  4. How does the market competition look for IV Theophylline formulations?
    It is currently limited, with most competition coming from generic formulations. Innovation in container technology and stability could create differentiation.

  5. What is the potential for expanding this formulation into outpatient or home care settings?
    Significant, especially if stability in plastic containers can be proven over extended periods, aligning with trends toward outpatient and home infusion therapies.


References

  1. Market Research Future. (2022). Global IV Drug Delivery Market Overview.
  2. Grand View Research. (2023). Respiratory Drug Delivery Market Size & Trends.
  3. FDA Guidance. (2021). Container-Closure System Suitability for Parenteral Drugs.
  4. GlobalData. (2023). Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare Market Forecast.
  5. ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Ongoing Clinical Trials for Theophylline Formulations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.