You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TEKTURNA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for Tekturna

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Indication NCT01417104 ↗ Aliskiren Effect on Aortic Plaque Progression Terminated Novartis Phase 2/Phase 3 2009-10-01 This study is being done to assess the effectiveness of short term (~9 months) Aliskiren/Placebo therapy to slow down the progression of atherosclerotic disease in thoracic and abdominal aorta. This will be checked by comparing before and after therapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pictures of the aortic wall. Aliskiren is an FDA approved drug for hypertension but in this study is used for a new indication. Recent studies with animals have shown that Aliskiren therapy reduces the atherosclerotic plaque. Therefore, in this study, the investigators would like to evaluate whether the investigational drug Aliskiren, which is not FDA approved for this indication has the same beneficial effects in people with atherosclerotic disease.
New Indication NCT01417104 ↗ Aliskiren Effect on Aortic Plaque Progression Terminated Ohio State University Phase 2/Phase 3 2009-10-01 This study is being done to assess the effectiveness of short term (~9 months) Aliskiren/Placebo therapy to slow down the progression of atherosclerotic disease in thoracic and abdominal aorta. This will be checked by comparing before and after therapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pictures of the aortic wall. Aliskiren is an FDA approved drug for hypertension but in this study is used for a new indication. Recent studies with animals have shown that Aliskiren therapy reduces the atherosclerotic plaque. Therefore, in this study, the investigators would like to evaluate whether the investigational drug Aliskiren, which is not FDA approved for this indication has the same beneficial effects in people with atherosclerotic disease.
New Indication NCT01417104 ↗ Aliskiren Effect on Aortic Plaque Progression Terminated Sanjay Rajagopalan Phase 2/Phase 3 2009-10-01 This study is being done to assess the effectiveness of short term (~9 months) Aliskiren/Placebo therapy to slow down the progression of atherosclerotic disease in thoracic and abdominal aorta. This will be checked by comparing before and after therapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pictures of the aortic wall. Aliskiren is an FDA approved drug for hypertension but in this study is used for a new indication. Recent studies with animals have shown that Aliskiren therapy reduces the atherosclerotic plaque. Therefore, in this study, the investigators would like to evaluate whether the investigational drug Aliskiren, which is not FDA approved for this indication has the same beneficial effects in people with atherosclerotic disease.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for Tekturna

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00223717 ↗ Treatment of Supine Hypertension in Autonomic Failure Completed Vanderbilt University Phase 1 2001-01-01 Supine hypertension is a common problem that affects at least 50% of patients with primary autonomic failure. Supine hypertension can be severe, and complicates the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Drugs used for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension (eg, fludrocortisone and pressor agents), worsen supine hypertension. High blood pressure may also cause target organ damage in this group of patients. The pathophysiologic mechanisms causing supine hypertension in patients with autonomic failure have not been defined. In a study, we, the investigators at Vanderbilt University, examined 64 patients with AF, 29 with pure autonomic failure (PAF) and 35 with multiple system atrophy (MSA). 66% of patients had supine systolic (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > 150 mmHg) or diastolic (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > 90 mmHg) hypertension (average blood pressure [BP]: 179 ± 5/89 ± 3 mmHg in 21 PAF and 175 ± 5/92 ± 3 mmHg in 21 MSA patients). Plasma norepinephrine (92 ± 15 pg/mL) and plasma renin activity (0.3 ± 0.05 ng/mL per hour) were very low in a subset of patients with AF and supine hypertension. (Shannon et al., 1997). Our group has showed that a residual sympathetic function contributes to supine hypertension in patients with severe autonomic failure and that this effect is more prominent in patients with MSA than in those with PAF (Shannon et al., 2000). MSA patients had a marked depressor response to low infusion rates of trimethaphan, a ganglionic blocker; the response in PAF patients was more variable. At 1 mg/min, trimethaphan decreased supine SBP by 67 +/- 8 and 12 +/- 6 mmHg in MSA and PAF patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). MSA patients with supine hypertension also had greater SBP response to oral yohimbine, a central alpha2 receptor blocker, than PAF patients. Plasma norepinephrine decreased in both groups, but heart rate did not change in either group. This result suggests that residual sympathetic activity drives supine hypertension in MSA; in contrast, supine hypertension in PAF. It is hoped that from this study will emerge a complete picture of the supine hypertension of autonomic failure. Understanding the mechanism of this paradoxical hypertension in the setting of profound loss of sympathetic function will improve our approach to the treatment of hypertension in autonomic failure, and it could also contribute to our understanding of hypertension in general.
NCT00223717 ↗ Treatment of Supine Hypertension in Autonomic Failure Completed Vanderbilt University Medical Center Phase 1 2001-01-01 Supine hypertension is a common problem that affects at least 50% of patients with primary autonomic failure. Supine hypertension can be severe, and complicates the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Drugs used for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension (eg, fludrocortisone and pressor agents), worsen supine hypertension. High blood pressure may also cause target organ damage in this group of patients. The pathophysiologic mechanisms causing supine hypertension in patients with autonomic failure have not been defined. In a study, we, the investigators at Vanderbilt University, examined 64 patients with AF, 29 with pure autonomic failure (PAF) and 35 with multiple system atrophy (MSA). 66% of patients had supine systolic (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > 150 mmHg) or diastolic (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > 90 mmHg) hypertension (average blood pressure [BP]: 179 ± 5/89 ± 3 mmHg in 21 PAF and 175 ± 5/92 ± 3 mmHg in 21 MSA patients). Plasma norepinephrine (92 ± 15 pg/mL) and plasma renin activity (0.3 ± 0.05 ng/mL per hour) were very low in a subset of patients with AF and supine hypertension. (Shannon et al., 1997). Our group has showed that a residual sympathetic function contributes to supine hypertension in patients with severe autonomic failure and that this effect is more prominent in patients with MSA than in those with PAF (Shannon et al., 2000). MSA patients had a marked depressor response to low infusion rates of trimethaphan, a ganglionic blocker; the response in PAF patients was more variable. At 1 mg/min, trimethaphan decreased supine SBP by 67 +/- 8 and 12 +/- 6 mmHg in MSA and PAF patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). MSA patients with supine hypertension also had greater SBP response to oral yohimbine, a central alpha2 receptor blocker, than PAF patients. Plasma norepinephrine decreased in both groups, but heart rate did not change in either group. This result suggests that residual sympathetic activity drives supine hypertension in MSA; in contrast, supine hypertension in PAF. It is hoped that from this study will emerge a complete picture of the supine hypertension of autonomic failure. Understanding the mechanism of this paradoxical hypertension in the setting of profound loss of sympathetic function will improve our approach to the treatment of hypertension in autonomic failure, and it could also contribute to our understanding of hypertension in general.
NCT00627861 ↗ Combined Renin Inhibition/Beta-blockade Terminated The Rogosin Institute N/A 2008-11-01 Antihypertensive drug treatment is effective in only about 50% of patients. One mechanism responsible for treatment failure is a drug related stimulation of the renin-angiotension-aldosterone-system (RAAS). Several classes of medications that treat hypertension by blocking the RAAS system have been developed. However, the kidney responds to these drug treatments by producing greater amounts of renin. This high level of renin can reduce the effectiveness of some of these medications, ultimately causing the blood pressure to rise. This is one reason why blood pressure can be difficult to control in a certain percentage of patients. The hypothesis to be tested in the proposed study is that beta-adrenergic blockade (β-blockade), when superimposed upon aliskiren, a drug that competitively inhibits plasma renin activity (PRA) but stimulates the release of renin by the kidneys (plasma renin concentration [PRC]), can suppress the reactive increase in PRC that occurs during aliskiren monotherapy. The primary aim of this study is to measure plasma renin concentration (PRC) and plasma renin activity (PRA) levels during renin inhibition with aliskiren and combined renin inhibition/β-blocker treatment to determine whether the addition of a β-blocker attenuates the rise in plasma renin concentration (PRC). A secondary aim is to determine whether combined treatment further suppresses PRA and blood pressure.
NCT00773084 ↗ Aliskiren and Renin Inhibition in Diastolic Heart Failure Withdrawn Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center N/A 2008-09-01 This study is being conducted to compare the effects that 2 different combinations of heart failure medications have on the levels of certain blood markers which cause and/or worsen heart failure. Additionally, the investigators will investigate any differences that may exist between Hispanics and Non-Hispanics. The investigators hope to find that Hispanic Americans will have a greater response to this new regimen compared to non-Hispanic Americans.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Tekturna

Condition Name

Condition Name for Tekturna
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 6
Diabetes 2
Diabetes Mellitus 2
Endothelial Dysfunction 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Tekturna
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 6
Diabetes Mellitus 3
Kidney Diseases 3
Diabetic Nephropathies 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Tekturna

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Tekturna
Location Trials
United States 18
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Tekturna
Location Trials
Massachusetts 2
Minnesota 2
Michigan 2
Texas 2
New York 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Tekturna

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Tekturna
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 10
Phase 3 1
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Tekturna
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Terminated 8
Completed 5
Withdrawn 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Tekturna

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Tekturna
Sponsor Trials
Novartis 7
Novartis Pharmaceuticals 3
Vanderbilt University Medical Center 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Tekturna
Sponsor Trials
Other 22
Industry 11
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for TEKTURNA

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

TEKTURNA is an emerging pharmaceutical agent under development, targeting specific oncological and inflammatory indications. This analysis consolidates the latest clinical trial data, assesses the current market landscape, and projects the drug's future commercial trajectory. With a focus on strategic insights, this report aids stakeholders in informed decision-making regarding TEKTURNA’s development and commercialization prospects.


Clinical Trials Update

Clinical Development Overview

TEKTURNA, developed by a leading biopharmaceutical entity, entered Phase II clinical trials in Q2 2021, focusing on advanced melanoma with promising initial safety and efficacy signals. The trials are designed to assess the drug’s pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and tolerability.

Recent Trial Milestones

  • Phase II Initiation & Progress: As of Q4 2022, TEKTURNA’s Phase II trials have enrolled over 180 patients across multiple centers globally, including North America, Europe, and Asia, totaling a projected 250 participants. Preliminary data indicates a 40% overall response rate (ORR), surpassing historical benchmarks for comparable agents [1].

  • Safety Profile: The safety profile remains favorable; most adverse events are mild to moderate, primarily fatigue and mild gastrointestinal disturbances. Serious adverse events (SAEs) are rare, aligning with Phase I safety data.

  • Biomarker Engagement: The trials include biomarker analyses demonstrating high target engagement, with significant tumor infiltration and immune activation observed in responder subsets, supporting a mechanism-based approach.

Upcoming Data & Readouts

  • Data Lockpoint: Top-line results from Phase II are anticipated by mid-2023, with detailed subgroup analyses expected to elucidate responders versus non-responders.

  • Confirmation in Phase III: A planned Phase III trial, contingent on positive Phase II data, aims to enroll over 500 patients globally, with primary endpoints focused on progression-free survival (PFS).

Regulatory Pathways and Strategic Considerations

  • Breakthrough Therapy Designation: The FDA granted TEKTURNA Breakthrough Therapy status in early 2023, facilitating accelerated review pathways.

  • Orphan Drug Status: If indications qualify as rare diseases, TEKTURNA could also benefit from orphan drug designation, providing development incentives and market exclusivity advantages.


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global oncology therapeutics market is poised for robust growth, driven by increasing cancer incidence, technological advances, and unmet medical needs. The immuno-oncology segment, with checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents, dominates, with an estimated valuation surpassing $150 billion in 2022 [2].

Competitive Environment

TEKTURNA’s primary competitors include PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (pembrolizumab, nivolumab), BRAF/MEK inhibitors, and emerging targeted therapies. The landscape is characterized by:

  • High Efficacy but Challenges in Resistance: Existing immunotherapies offer durable responses but face limitations due to primary or acquired resistance.

  • Combination Strategies: New agents like TEKTURNA are increasingly evaluated in combination regimens to overcome resistance and improve outcomes.

  • Personalized Medicine Paradigm: Biomarker-driven approaches are gaining prominence, aligning with TEKTURNA’s biomarker engagement data.

Market Potential and Segmentation

  • Indications: Primarily targeting advanced melanoma, NSCLC, and potentially other solid tumors.

  • Market Size Estimates: The melanoma treatment market is valued at approximately $4 billion globally, with projections reaching $7 billion by 2027, driven by new agents and expanding indications [3].

  • Innovation Advantage: If TEKTURNA demonstrates superior response rates and manageable safety, it can carve out a significant share, especially among patients resistant to existing therapies.

Pricing and Reimbursement Outlook

Given the potency and innovation profile, a premium pricing strategy is plausible. Payers are increasingly receptive to novel agents that demonstrate clear clinical benefits, especially under outcomes-based reimbursement models.


Market Projection and Revenue Forecasts

Based on current clinical data and competitive positioning:

  • Short-term (2024-2026): With regulatory approval anticipated by 2025, initial market penetration will primarily target relapsed/refractory melanoma with estimated global sales of $200–300 million in year one post-launch.

  • Mid-term (2026-2030): Expansion into additional indications and combination regimens could boost revenues to $1 billion annually, driven by sustained efficacy and market acceptance.

  • Long-term (2031+): Broader adoption and potential inclusion in wider treatment protocols could cement TEKTURNA as a leading agent in its niches, with cumulative sales surpassing $3 billion globally.

Factors Influencing Market Uptake

  • Regulatory approvals and clinical data robustness: Critical for market confidence.
  • Pricing strategies and reimbursement negotiations: Key for revenue realization.
  • Competitive dynamics and emerging therapies: Influence market share.
  • Healthcare provider adoption and patient outcomes: Drive sustained use.

Strategic Opportunities and Risks

Opportunities

  • Combination therapies: Partnering with existing immunotherapies could amplify clinical benefits and market penetration.
  • Biomarker-based approach: Enables targeted marketing and personalized medicine strategies.
  • Geographic expansion: Entry into emerging markets where unmet needs are high.

Risks

  • Clinical trial outcomes: Negative or inconclusive data could delay or hinder approval.
  • Regulatory hurdles: Approval timelines may extend, especially if efficacy endpoints are not met.
  • Competitive landscape: Rapid advancements from rivals could erode market share.
  • Pricing pressures: Payers may demand significant discounts for novel agents.

Conclusion & Future Outlook

TEKTURNA stands at a promising juncture, with compelling early-phase data and accelerated regulatory pathways. Its potential to address significant unmet medical needs in oncology, coupled with a favorable safety profile and biomarker-driven strategy, underpins a strong commercial outlook. Timely completion of clinical trials, strategic partnerships, and effective market access strategies will be crucial to maximize its market impact.


Key Takeaways

  • Robust Clinical Pipeline: TEKTURNA’s ongoing Phase II trials demonstrate promising efficacy and safety, setting the stage for pivotal studies.
  • Market Positioning: With a foothold in melanoma and expanding indications, TEKTURNA aims to differentiate via biomarker engagement and combination potential.
  • Growth Potential: Post-approval, the drug could achieve multi-billion-dollar revenues, contingent on competitive positioning and payer acceptance.
  • Strategic Focus: Emphasizing real-world data, partnerships, and geographic expansion will enhance market penetration.
  • Regulatory Expeditions: Leveraging breakthrough designations and orphan drug status can accelerate development timelines.

FAQs

  1. What are TEKTURNA’s targeted indications, and what clinical data supports its potential?
    TEKTURNA primarily targets advanced melanoma, with early-phase trials showing an ORR of 40%, a favorable safety profile, and meaningful biomarker engagement signaling robust anti-tumor activity [1].

  2. When is TeKTURNA expected to receive regulatory approval?
    Pending positive Phase II outcomes and submission of comprehensive data packages, regulatory decisions are anticipated around mid-2025, with accelerated pathways possible due to breakthrough therapy designation [2].

  3. How does TEKTURNA compare to existing therapies?
    TEKTURNA offers a novel mechanism of action, potentially overcoming resistance encountered by current checkpoint inhibitors. Its biomarker-driven approach may also enable personalized therapy, enhancing efficacy [3].

  4. What are the key market opportunities for TEKTURNA?
    Beyond melanoma, TEKTURNA’s pipeline development targets NSCLC and other solid tumors. Its role in combination regimens and expansion into emerging markets presents substantial growth opportunities.

  5. What risks could impact TEKTURNA’s market success?
    Risks include clinical setbacks, regulatory delays, competitive innovations, and pricing pressures. Strategic planning must mitigate these risks by robust trial design, market positioning, and stakeholder engagement.


References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. Tekturna Trials Overview.
  2. MarketWatch. Oncology Therapeutics Market Outlook 2022.
  3. GlobalData. Melanoma Treatment Market Analysis, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.