Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TRIMETHOBENZAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for TRIMETHOBENZAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00489255 ↗ Safety/Efficacy of Tigan® to Control Nausea/Vomiting Experienced During Apokyn® Initiation and Treatment Completed INC Research Limited Phase 4 2007-05-01 The purposes of the study are to determine: i. To assess the efficacy of Tigan® (trimethobenzamide) in preventing nausea and vomiting when initiating therapy with Apokyn® (apomorphine) ii. To determine the optimal duration for continuation of Tigan® following initiation of Apokyn® therapy iii. To assess the safety of Tigan® in combination with Apokyn® iv. To characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of apomorphine in subjects treated concomitantly with and without Tigan®
NCT00489255 ↗ Safety/Efficacy of Tigan® to Control Nausea/Vomiting Experienced During Apokyn® Initiation and Treatment Completed Ipsen Phase 4 2007-05-01 The purposes of the study are to determine: i. To assess the efficacy of Tigan® (trimethobenzamide) in preventing nausea and vomiting when initiating therapy with Apokyn® (apomorphine) ii. To determine the optimal duration for continuation of Tigan® following initiation of Apokyn® therapy iii. To assess the safety of Tigan® in combination with Apokyn® iv. To characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of apomorphine in subjects treated concomitantly with and without Tigan®
NCT01770145 ↗ Apokyn for Motor IMProvement of Morning AKinesia Trial (AM IMPAKT) Completed Cape Cod Clinical Research Inc. Phase 4 2012-12-01 This study is designed to assess the effect of APOKYN treatment in rapid and reliable improvement of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) subjects suffering from delayed or unreliable onset of levodopa (L-dopa) action.
NCT01770145 ↗ Apokyn for Motor IMProvement of Morning AKinesia Trial (AM IMPAKT) Completed ClinData Services, Inc. Phase 4 2012-12-01 This study is designed to assess the effect of APOKYN treatment in rapid and reliable improvement of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) subjects suffering from delayed or unreliable onset of levodopa (L-dopa) action.
NCT01770145 ↗ Apokyn for Motor IMProvement of Morning AKinesia Trial (AM IMPAKT) Completed US WorldMeds LLC Phase 4 2012-12-01 This study is designed to assess the effect of APOKYN treatment in rapid and reliable improvement of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) subjects suffering from delayed or unreliable onset of levodopa (L-dopa) action.
NCT02262767 ↗ A Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of PF-06649751 Co-administered With Trimethobenzamide Hydrochloride in Healthy Subjects Completed Pfizer Phase 1 2014-11-01 This study will test the hypothesis that PF-06649751 with continuous co-administration of trimethobenzamide hydrochloride (TMB) with will be safe and well tolerated. Single doses of PF-06649751 will be tested in this study, starting at a low dose and escalating to a dose projected to be under the current limits for drug concentration.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for TRIMETHOBENZAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for TRIMETHOBENZAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Parkinson's Disease 2
Healthy 1
Hypomobility 1
Motor Symptoms 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for TRIMETHOBENZAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Parkinson Disease 2
Gastroparesis 1
Vomiting 1
Nausea 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for TRIMETHOBENZAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for TRIMETHOBENZAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
United States 23
Belgium 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for TRIMETHOBENZAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
Texas 2
Ohio 2
New York 2
Michigan 2
Illinois 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for TRIMETHOBENZAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for TRIMETHOBENZAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 2 1
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for TRIMETHOBENZAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 3
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for TRIMETHOBENZAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for TRIMETHOBENZAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
US WorldMeds LLC 1
Pfizer 1
Kyowa Kirin 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for TRIMETHOBENZAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 6
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trimethobenzamide Hydrochloride: Clinical Trials, Market Dynamics, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Trimethobenzamide hydrochloride (TMB) is an antiemetic agent used to treat nausea and vomiting. Its patent exclusivity has expired, leading to a generic market. While no novel clinical trials are currently prominent for TMB itself, its use in specific patient populations and formulations continues to be a subject of research, primarily in palliative care and oncology settings. The market for antiemetics is mature and competitive, with TMB holding a niche position.

What is the Current Status of Trimethobenzamide Hydrochloride Clinical Trials?

There are no late-stage (Phase III or IV) clinical trials specifically for novel indications or formulations of trimethobenzamide hydrochloride that are actively recruiting or nearing completion as of the latest available data. Research interest has shifted towards newer antiemetic classes with broader efficacy and different mechanisms of action, particularly for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

However, smaller, investigator-initiated studies or observational research may explore its utility in specific contexts. For instance, studies in palliative care settings might investigate its role in managing nausea and vomiting in terminally ill patients where side effect profiles of newer agents are a concern.

Investigational Areas and Past Research

Past research and ongoing discussions in medical literature suggest potential areas of interest, though these do not always translate to large-scale clinical trials:

  • Palliative Care: Studies have examined the effectiveness and tolerability of TMB in managing nausea and vomiting in patients with advanced cancer or other life-limiting illnesses. The focus is often on symptom control and quality of life when other agents are contraindicated or less effective.
  • Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders: Historically, TMB's mechanism of action, which involves blocking dopamine receptors in the chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ) and potentially affecting gut motility, has led to its consideration in certain GI motility-related symptoms. However, other agents are now preferred for these indications.
  • Formulation Optimization: While no major advancements are currently in the pipeline, there is always potential for exploring new delivery systems or combination therapies to improve efficacy or reduce side effects, though this is more speculative for an older drug.

Comparison with Newer Antiemetics

The landscape of antiemetics has evolved significantly. Newer agents like 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (e.g., ondansetron, granisetron) and NK-1 receptor antagonists (e.g., aprepitant) offer superior efficacy, particularly for CINV, and are now standard of care.

Drug Class Primary Mechanism Typical Indications Key Advantages over TMB
Trimethobenzamide HCl Dopamine receptor antagonism (CTZ) Nausea, Vomiting Cost (generic)
5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists Serotonin receptor blockade CINV, PONV, Radiation-induced Nausea/Vomiting Higher efficacy for CINV, broader spectrum of action, better tolerability in some cases
NK-1 Receptor Antagonists Substance P/NK-1 receptor antagonism Highly emetogenic CINV, delayed CINV Synergistic effects with 5-HT3 antagonists, effective for delayed nausea
Corticosteroids (e.g., Dexamethasone) Anti-inflammatory, antiemetic effects Adjunct for CINV, PONV Synergistic antiemetic effects

CINV: Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting; PONV: Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; CTZ: Chemoreceptor Trigger Zone.

What is the Market Analysis and Projection for Trimethobenzamide Hydrochloride?

Trimethobenzamide hydrochloride operates within the broader antiemetic market, which is mature and highly competitive. As a generic drug with expired patents, its market share is primarily driven by cost-effectiveness and established clinical practice, particularly in specific, lower-acuity indications or in regions where cost is a significant factor.

Market Size and Growth Drivers

The global antiemetics market is substantial, projected to grow due to factors including the increasing incidence of cancer, advancements in chemotherapy regimens (which often induce nausea and vomiting), a growing elderly population prone to various conditions causing nausea, and a rise in surgical procedures.

  • Global Antiemetics Market: Estimated to be in the range of USD 4.5 billion to USD 5.5 billion in recent years, with projections for continued steady growth.
  • Key Drivers:
    • Increasing cancer diagnoses and more aggressive chemotherapy regimens.
    • Rising prevalence of gastrointestinal disorders.
    • Growth in surgical procedures and the associated risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
    • Demand for improved symptom management and patient quality of life.
    • Development of combination therapies.

Trimethobenzamide Hydrochloride's Market Position

TMB's market position is characterized by:

  • Generic Status: Its primary advantage is its low cost compared to branded and newer generic antiemetics.
  • Niche Indications: It is typically used for less severe or specific types of nausea and vomiting where newer agents may be considered overkill or economically prohibitive. It is often a second or third-line option.
  • Geographic Variations: Its usage may be more prominent in healthcare systems with strict cost controls or in developing economies.
  • Competition: Faces intense competition from a wide array of established and emerging antiemetic drugs across different classes.

Pricing and Reimbursement

Pricing is a critical factor for TMB. As a generic, its price is significantly lower than branded or even newer generic antiemetics. Reimbursement policies can vary by country and healthcare provider, but generally, cost-effectiveness is a major consideration, favoring older, generic agents for routine indications.

Future Market Outlook for TMB

The future market for trimethobenzamide hydrochloride is expected to remain stable but largely stagnant in terms of growth.

  • Limited Innovation: The lack of ongoing significant clinical development for TMB means it is unlikely to capture new market segments or indications.
  • Evolving Standard of Care: The increasing adoption of newer, more effective antiemetics for CINV and PONV will continue to relegate TMB to more specific or cost-driven applications.
  • Potential Decline in Certain Markets: In developed markets with high healthcare spending and a focus on optimal patient outcomes, TMB's market share may gradually decrease as newer agents become more accessible and preferred.
  • Sustained Role in Specific Niches: It is likely to retain a role in palliative care, elderly populations, and in cost-sensitive markets where its affordability remains a key attribute.

What is the Patent and Intellectual Property Landscape for Trimethobenzamide Hydrochloride?

Trimethobenzamide hydrochloride is a well-established drug with a long history. Its original composition of matter patents have long since expired, leading to a fully genericized market. There are no active patents covering the molecule itself or its primary uses.

Patent Expiration and Generic Entry

  • Original Patents: The foundational patents covering trimethobenzamide hydrochloride were filed in the mid-20th century. These patents have expired decades ago.
  • Generic Market Dominance: The expiration of these patents allowed for the widespread introduction of generic versions by multiple manufacturers. This has led to significant price competition and made TMB an affordable treatment option.
  • No New Patents on Core Technology: The drug's mechanism of action and basic formulation are in the public domain.

Potential for New Intellectual Property

While patents on the core drug are non-existent, intellectual property could theoretically be sought in the following limited areas, though none appear to be significantly active or commercially pursued for TMB:

  • Novel Formulations: Development of new drug delivery systems (e.g., extended-release formulations, transdermal patches) or specific pharmaceutical compositions that offer a demonstrable improvement in efficacy, safety, or patient compliance could be patentable. However, the investment required to develop and patent such improvements for an older, low-cost generic drug is often not commercially viable.
  • New Indications: Discovering and developing TMB for an entirely new therapeutic indication would require significant clinical trials. If successful, a patent could be sought for the use of TMB in that specific new indication. However, the extensive data on existing antiemetics makes this a challenging and costly endeavor, especially given TMB's established profile.
  • Combination Therapies: Patents might be obtainable for specific synergistic combinations of TMB with other active pharmaceutical ingredients, provided the combination demonstrates unexpected efficacy or safety benefits. This is more common with newer drug development rather than for older generics.

Current IP Status Summary

  • Composition of Matter Patents: Expired.
  • Method of Use Patents (Primary Indications): Expired.
  • Formulation Patents: Any existing formulation patents are likely expired or nearing expiration. The market is dominated by generic manufacturers using standard formulations.
  • Regulatory Exclusivity: No new regulatory exclusivities (e.g., orphan drug exclusivity, new chemical entity exclusivity) are applicable to trimethobenzamide hydrochloride.

The lack of active patents means that any company can manufacture and market generic trimethobenzamide hydrochloride, provided they meet regulatory requirements (e.g., FDA approval for Abbreviated New Drug Applications in the U.S.). This competitive environment is characterized by price-driven decisions.

Key Takeaways

Trimethobenzamide hydrochloride (TMB) is an established antiemetic with expired patent exclusivity, operating within a competitive generic market. Current clinical trial activity for TMB itself is minimal, with research focus shifted to newer antiemetic classes. Its market position is defined by cost-effectiveness, serving niche indications and palliative care. The intellectual property landscape is characterized by expired composition of matter and method of use patents, leaving the market open to generic competition.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Are there any ongoing Phase III clinical trials for trimethobenzamide hydrochloride? No significant Phase III clinical trials for novel indications or advanced formulations of trimethobenzamide hydrochloride are currently active or nearing completion.

  2. What is the primary mechanism of action for trimethobenzamide hydrochloride? Trimethobenzamide hydrochloride acts as a dopamine receptor antagonist, primarily targeting the chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ) in the brain.

  3. What factors contribute to the continued use of trimethobenzamide hydrochloride despite newer antiemetics? Its affordability as a generic drug and its established efficacy for certain types of nausea and vomiting, particularly in cost-sensitive markets or palliative care, contribute to its sustained use.

  4. Can new patents be obtained for trimethobenzamide hydrochloride? While patents on the core molecule and its primary uses have expired, new patents could theoretically be sought for novel formulations, specific combination therapies, or entirely new, clinically validated indications, though commercial viability for such efforts is limited.

  5. How does trimethobenzamide hydrochloride compare in efficacy to modern antiemetics used for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)? Modern antiemetics, such as 5-HT3 receptor antagonists and NK-1 receptor antagonists, generally offer superior efficacy and broader coverage for CINV compared to trimethobenzamide hydrochloride.

Citations

[1] Global Antiemetics Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report. (n.d.). Grand View Research. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/antiemetics-market [2] Various pharmaceutical company product information and drug databases (e.g., FDA Orange Book, EMA Summary of Product Characteristics). (Accessed continuously). [3] ClinicalTrials.gov database. (Accessed continuously). [4] Pharmaceutical patent databases (e.g., USPTO, EPO). (Accessed continuously).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.