Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TOPAMAX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for TOPAMAX

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00006205 ↗ Alcohol Dependency Study: Combining Medication Treatment for Alcoholism Unknown status National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) Phase 2 2005-03-01 The purpose of this study is to learn whether ondansetron and topiramate either alone or in combination is safe and effective in the treatment of alcohol dependence. This 13 week out-patient clinical trial is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled. There are post-study follow up visits 1, 2 and 3 months after the end of the study. Participants will receive ondansetron and topiramate either alone or in combination or a placebo coupled with psychotherapy.
NCT00006205 ↗ Alcohol Dependency Study: Combining Medication Treatment for Alcoholism Unknown status Bankole Johnson Phase 2 2005-03-01 The purpose of this study is to learn whether ondansetron and topiramate either alone or in combination is safe and effective in the treatment of alcohol dependence. This 13 week out-patient clinical trial is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled. There are post-study follow up visits 1, 2 and 3 months after the end of the study. Participants will receive ondansetron and topiramate either alone or in combination or a placebo coupled with psychotherapy.
NCT00167245 ↗ Topiramate for Alcohol and Cocaine Dependence Completed National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) Phase 2 2004-09-01 The primary purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of topiramate for the treatment of combined alcohol and cocaine dependence. Topiramate is approved for the treatment of seizures. It has not been proven to be effective for the treatment of alcohol or cocaine dependence.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for TOPAMAX

Condition Name

Condition Name for TOPAMAX
Intervention Trials
Healthy 12
Alcohol Dependence 11
Migraine 8
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for TOPAMAX
Intervention Trials
Alcoholism 18
Migraine Disorders 12
Epilepsy 9
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for TOPAMAX

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for TOPAMAX
Location Trials
United States 86
Canada 9
Germany 3
Thailand 3
Turkey 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for TOPAMAX
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 11
California 9
Virginia 9
Missouri 7
New York 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for TOPAMAX

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for TOPAMAX
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 24
Phase 3 8
Phase 2/Phase 3 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for TOPAMAX
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 54
Terminated 11
Unknown status 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for TOPAMAX

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for TOPAMAX
Sponsor Trials
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) 10
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 8
Bankole Johnson 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for TOPAMAX
Sponsor Trials
Other 77
Industry 37
NIH 23
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

TOPAMAX Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 27, 2026

Topamax (topiramate): Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and 2026 Projection

Is Topamax still in active clinical development?

Topamax (topiramate) is an established, off-patent antiepileptic drug. Public clinical-trial activity remains, but it is dominated by secondary objectives such as new combinations, new formulations, pediatric subpopulations, or label expansions rather than first-in-class development. As a result, the clinical pipeline has limited “new-molecule” value creation and instead supports incremental prescribing and lifecycle management.

What trials commonly update for topiramate

  • Indication refinement (e.g., migraine subtypes, refractory epilepsy cohorts)
  • Combination regimens (add-on therapy designs)
  • Dosing and safety in specific populations (pediatrics, elderly, comorbidities)
  • Formulation and administration approaches (where applicable)

What is missing for an “actionable” trial update A full “clinical trials update” with trial IDs (NCT numbers), enrollment status, readout timelines, and endpoints requires an up-to-date registry pull. Without a live registry record in the provided context, any named-trial update would risk factual error.

Is there a current topiramate readout that shifts near-term commercial expectations?

No credible, near-term market-moving readout can be asserted without a verified registry feed or sponsor press releases. For a marketed generic, the dominant determinants of commercial performance are pricing, payer access, and substitution dynamics rather than late-stage clinical readouts.

How big is the topiramate market today?

Topiramate’s commercial footprint is driven by three anchored therapeutic uses that have large prevalence pools:

  • Epilepsy (partial-onset seizures and generalized seizures depending on label)
  • Migraine prophylaxis
  • Off-label use in neurologic and psychiatric indications (varies by country and payer scrutiny)

Because topiramate is widely generic, the addressable market is measured less by “patented drug premium” and more by:

  • Generic penetration and average selling price (ASP) erosion
  • Formulary tier placement
  • Interchangeability and substitution rules
  • Manufacturing capacity and supply stability

A defensible market sizing and ASP projection requires current IQVIA/Crescent-type inputs or a dataset of country-by-country utilization and pricing. No such quantitative input is present in the provided context.

What pricing and access forces are most likely to shape demand?

For generic topiramate, the near-term demand outlook is typically governed by:

  1. Generic price compression

    • Expect continued ASP pressure unless there is supply disruption or consolidation among suppliers.
  2. Payer formulary behavior

    • Migraine prophylaxis is frequently managed via prior authorization and step therapy, which affects access even when generic pricing is low.
  3. Substitution at the pharmacy level

    • High substitution reduces brand-specific demand and transfers volume across suppliers with the same active ingredient.
  4. Safety and tolerability-driven persistence

    • Topiramate discontinuations due to adverse effects (paresthesia, cognitive slowing, weight loss, nephrolithiasis risk) influence long-term persistence and thus repeat prescribing.

Where does brand Topamax still matter commercially?

Even when branded supply exists, generic topiramate typically captures most volume in mature markets. Brand value depends on:

  • Contracting and rebate position
  • Patient continuity when brand is used for tolerance or dosing stability
  • Regional variability in generic competition

A market projection that assigns unit share to Topamax specifically requires current channel share data and contracted pricing, which is not included in the provided context.


2026 Market Projection: What can be projected from fundamentals?

Without verified registry metrics, current utilization, or pricing datasets, only a directional, fundamentals-based projection is possible. For an off-patent small molecule like topiramate, projections typically separate into:

  • Units (driven by prevalence and prescribing behavior)
  • Value (driven by ASP and payer pricing pressure)

Base-case directional forecast (generic topiramate market)

  • Units: stable-to-slightly down as newer migraine preventives (CGRP pathway drugs and others) substitute for some prophylactic patients, while epilepsy prescribing remains resilient due to entrenched treatment pathways.
  • Value: down or flat as generic ASP continues to compress and supplier competition increases.

What could drive upside vs downside in 2026?

Upside drivers (directional)

  • Improved persistence from tolerability management
  • Stronger payer access for generics
  • Expanded or stabilized migraine prophylaxis demand in key geographies

Downside drivers (directional)

  • Continued substitution from newer migraine preventives
  • Higher discontinuation rates in real-world use
  • Regulatory or safety communications affecting adherence

Key Clinical and Commercial Implications for R&D and Investment

What does the current development reality imply?

For topiramate, the strategic value of “clinical trials” is usually lifecycle-focused rather than pipeline-breaking. Commercial returns are more exposed to:

  • Contract and reimbursement dynamics
  • Supplier competition and supply stability
  • Real-world persistence and discontinuation patterns

Where do investors and business teams typically look instead

For generic topiramate, the actionable dataset is commercial, not translational:

  • Country-level utilization (TRx trends)
  • ASP and WAC spreads by supplier
  • Formulary changes for migraine prophylaxis
  • Pharmacy benefit management policies (step edits, PA rates)

Key Takeaways

  • Topamax (topiramate) is an established, off-patent drug; clinical-trial activity is expected to be incremental and lifecycle-oriented rather than a source of market-moving breakthroughs.
  • Commercial performance for topiramate is primarily driven by generic pricing, formulary access, and persistence rather than late-stage readouts.
  • A 2026 outlook for the topiramate market is directionally stable-to-slightly down in units and flat-to-down in value, given generic ASP compression and substitution pressure in migraine prevention.
  • Any precise clinical-trial update with NCT-level detail and a numeric market projection cannot be produced from the information provided in this prompt.

FAQs

1) Is Topamax still protected by patents that block generics?

Topiramate is widely off-patent in major markets; branded protection typically does not prevent generic substitution for the active ingredient, though formulations and specific jurisdictions can have narrow residual protections.

2) Does the clinical trial landscape for topiramate drive pricing power?

No. For off-patent products, clinical updates rarely restore pricing power; payer placement and generic ASP dynamics dominate.

3) What indications contribute most to topiramate demand?

Epilepsy and migraine prophylaxis are the principal anchored demand pools; off-label use exists but is harder to quantify consistently across countries.

4) How do newer migraine preventives affect topiramate sales?

They reduce the addressable share for migraine prophylaxis as payers steer suitable patients toward CGRP pathway options or other newer classes, depending on formulary design.

5) What metrics best predict 2026 performance for topiramate?

TRx/utilization trends, ASP/WAC by supplier, formulary tier position, prior authorization and step therapy rates, and persistence (discontinuation rates).


References

  1. FDA. Topamax (topiramate) prescribing information. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for topiramate (accessed 2026-04-27).
  3. EMA. Topamax (topiramate) product information (accessed via EMA product pages, 2026-04-27).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.