Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TOFACITINIB CITRATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for TOFACITINIB CITRATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02197455 ↗ Tofacitnib for the Treatment of Alopecia Areata and Variants Completed Yale University Phase 2 2014-07-01 The purpose of this study is to investigate the ability of tofacitinib citrate, a Janus kinase inhibitor, to generate hair regrowth in patients with moderate to severe alopecia areata and its variants.
NCT02312882 ↗ Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Alopecia Areata and Its Variants Completed Stanford University N/A 2014-12-01 The purpose of this study is to investigate the ability of tofacitinib citrate, a Janus kinase inhibitor, to generate hair regrowth in patients with moderate to severe alopecia areata and its variants.
NCT03002649 ↗ Study of Tofacitinib in Refractory Dermatomyositis Completed Pfizer Phase 1 2017-01-01 The purpose of this study is to obtain preliminary data regarding the safety and efficacy of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, tofacitinib, in adults with active, treatment-refractory dermatomyositis.
NCT03002649 ↗ Study of Tofacitinib in Refractory Dermatomyositis Completed Johns Hopkins University Phase 1 2017-01-01 The purpose of this study is to obtain preliminary data regarding the safety and efficacy of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, tofacitinib, in adults with active, treatment-refractory dermatomyositis.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for TOFACITINIB CITRATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for TOFACITINIB CITRATE
Intervention Trials
Alopecia Totalis 2
Alopecia Universalis 2
Alopecia Areata 2
Healthy Volunteers 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for TOFACITINIB CITRATE
Intervention Trials
Alopecia Areata 4
Alopecia 3
Dermatitis 1
Amyloidosis, Primary Cutaneous 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for TOFACITINIB CITRATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for TOFACITINIB CITRATE
Location Trials
United States 4
Pakistan 2
Canada 1
Korea, Republic of 1
China 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for TOFACITINIB CITRATE
Location Trials
California 1
Connecticut 1
Michigan 1
Maryland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for TOFACITINIB CITRATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for TOFACITINIB CITRATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 1
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for TOFACITINIB CITRATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
Not yet recruiting 4
Recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for TOFACITINIB CITRATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for TOFACITINIB CITRATE
Sponsor Trials
Yale University 1
China-Japan Friendship Hospital 1
Stanford University 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for TOFACITINIB CITRATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 9
Industry 5
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Tofacitinib Citrate Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Exclusivity-Driven Generic/Biosimilar Projections (2026)

Last updated: July 27, 2026

How many clinical trials for tofacitinib citrate are ongoing, completed, or recruiting in 2026?

Tofacitinib (tofacitinib citrate is the marketed salt form) is a JAK inhibitor used across rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ulcerative colitis (UC), and Crohn’s disease (CD). By 2026, most late-stage programs focus on label expansion, head-to-head safety/efficacy questions, durability in real-world populations, and risk-management endpoints that support ongoing regulatory review and pharmacovigilance.

Clinical-trial visibility by program type (what companies typically run in a mature JAK franchise)

  • Label-supportive outcomes: durability (maintenance), flare rate, steroid-sparing, and long-term safety registries.
  • Special populations: elderly, baseline cardiovascular or malignancy risk, infection history.
  • Comparative strategy: positioning versus TNF inhibitors and other JAK inhibitors in net clinical benefit.
  • Formulation/dosing: adherence and exposure-response work is typically fewer at maturity, but real-world pharmacokinetic substudies remain common.

What to look for in 2026 trial updates for tofacitinib

  • Longer-term safety data with hard adjudicated endpoints (major adverse cardiovascular events, malignancy, serious infection, venous thromboembolism).
  • Study-level stratifications that map to current regulatory cautions on JAK inhibitors.
  • Initiatives tied to background risk mitigation (dose selection and treatment sequencing guidance).

Operational implication for R&D The trial pipeline for tofacitinib in 2026 is not defined by first-in-class phase 1 breakthroughs. It is defined by safety evidence refresh, comparative value arguments, and label maintenance in major geographies.

What is the current market size and revenue trajectory for tofacitinib citrate worldwide?

Tofacitinib is a cornerstone product in the JAK inhibitor category, with revenue driven by:

  • Chronic, long-duration use in RA, UC, and PsA
  • Switching dynamics from biologics after inadequate response
  • Retention due to oral administration and clinical outcomes
  • Constrained growth tied to safety label risk management and payer prior authorization

Market drivers and drag factors

Drivers

  • Oral convenience and broad efficacy across inflammatory phenotypes.
  • Existing prescriber familiarity and entrenched formulary positions.
  • Switching from TNF inhibitors and other biologics after non-response.

Drags

  • JAK-class safety signals that can reduce initiation rate and slow line-of-therapy adoption.
  • Tight payer controls for higher-risk cohorts.
  • Competition from newer JAK inhibitors and IL-23/IL-17 pathways in IBD and PsA.

2026 projection logic (high-level)

Market growth in tofacitinib is typically constrained by:

  • Share shift to newer agents in PsA and CD/UC.
  • Increased utilization management for JAKs.
  • Generic entry timelines for tofacitinib products in individual markets.

Projection range (structural view, not point-estimate)

  • Base case: flat-to-low growth through 2026/early 2027 as volume rises modestly but average patient mix shifts toward more controlled use.
  • Bear case: sharper adoption slowdown due to risk-based restrictions and intensified competition.
  • Bull case: maintained retention plus incremental label utility in UC/CD leads to modest share gains, offsetting competition.

(If a quantified forecast is required for investment use, it must be tied to specific assumptions on geography, pricing, and regulatory restrictions; those assumptions require primary-market inputs not present in this prompt.)

How does tofacitinib citrate compare with other JAK inhibitors on efficacy, safety, and positioning?

Tofacitinib competes in the JAK class where efficacy is often comparable across immune-mediated inflammation, but safety signals and monitoring requirements influence prescribing behavior.

Positioning comparison framework

  • Efficacy: clinical response rates and durability across RA and IBD endpoints.
  • Safety: class effects, infection risk, thromboembolic signals, and malignancy warnings.
  • Convenience: oral dosing schedules and adherence.
  • Regulatory constraints: label language and risk mitigation programs.

Practical commercial result Even when efficacy is retained, safety warnings can reduce new starts, increasing the share of demand that comes from switch patients rather than line-of-therapy expansion.

What patents protect tofacitinib citrate and what is the strength of the patent estate?

A full “patent estate strength” view depends on the jurisdictional Orange Book and corresponding national filings (and on whether the relevant product is branded tofacitinib or a specific formulation or dosing regimen). This prompt does not supply the underlying Orange Book listing(s), publication numbers, or jurisdiction-specific filing set required for an exact patent map.

High-level patent estate categories for small-molecule chronic drugs

  • Composition-of-matter: active ingredient and specific salt forms.
  • Formulation: tablets, coatings, release profiles, excipient systems.
  • Method of use: indications (RA, PsA, UC, CD) and patient subgroups.
  • Manufacturing: polymorphs, crystallization conditions, particle size, and process controls.

Actionable takeaway For business decisions, tofacitinib’s freedom-to-operate risk is usually driven less by the original core compound patents alone and more by downstream formulation and method-of-use claims that persist after core expiry, plus jurisdiction-specific secondary patents.

When does tofacitinib citrate lose exclusivity in the US, and what drives generic launch timing?

Generic timing is driven by:

  • Orange Book patent expiries for the reference listed drug
  • Exclusivity periods (if applicable) beyond patents
  • Paragraph IV litigation timelines and settlements
  • Regulatory readiness: product formulation bioequivalence and labeling changes

This prompt does not include the Orange Book patent numbers, expiration dates, or exclusivity codes for the specific RLD listing, so a dated exclusivity calendar cannot be produced.

What is the Orange Book status of tofacitinib citrate (listed patents, expiration dates, and exclusivity)?

An Orange Book status requires:

  • Reference product name(s)
  • Listed patents with expiration dates
  • Patent types (drug substance, drug product, method of use)
  • Exclusivity codes and expiration
  • Any relevant pediatric exclusivity

Those listing details are not included here. Without them, a correct Orange Book table cannot be generated.

What generic entry risks exist for tofacitinib citrate under Paragraph IV?

Paragraph IV risk depends on:

  • Whether ANDAs can be submitted to challenge one or more listed patents
  • Whether a carve-out or labeling change is required to avoid infringement
  • Whether the branded holder has an active suit that can trigger 180-day exclusivity for challengers

This requires Orange Book listed patents and the litigation record. No patent numbers, ANDA identifiers, or suit details are provided in the prompt.

What patent litigation affects tofacitinib citrate and how does it shape settlements?

Litigation impact depends on:

  • Suit filings (brand vs ANDA filers), court and docket
  • Alleged infringed patents
  • Claim construction outcomes and injunction status
  • Settlements that shift launch dates or create “design-around” labels

A litigation calendar requires case dockets or at least patent numbers and party names. The prompt provides none.

How do EU and UK regulatory exclusivity timelines compare with US for tofacitinib citrate?

EU and UK exclusivity and patent timing depend on:

  • SPC (Supplementary Protection Certificate) status and base patent expiry
  • Market exclusivity under EU frameworks
  • National patent enforcement
  • Generic market authorization and labeling steps

No jurisdiction-specific SPC numbers or national filings are provided here, preventing a correct side-by-side timeline.

What formulations are protected for tofacitinib citrate (immediate release vs other dosing forms)?

To produce a defensible formulation protection map, the relevant:

  • Orange Book drug product patents
  • Formulation patent publications
  • Jurisdiction-specific claim coverage for tablet strengths and release profiles are required.

This prompt does not include those patent identifiers, so a reliable formulation list cannot be compiled.

What biosimilar risk applies to tofacitinib citrate?

Tofacitinib is a small molecule, not a biologic, so it is not subject to “biosimilar” pathways. Competition risk comes from:

  • Generics (ANDAs)
  • Authorized generics
  • Switch and payer strategies
  • Formulation alternatives

Competitive landscape: which companies sell tofacitinib citrate and what is their market share exposure?

A market-share projection requires:

  • Reference product market data by country
  • Generic penetration rates by molecule and strength
  • Payer/HTA decisions

None is provided here, so a company-by-company share exposure forecast cannot be generated accurately.

Revenue exposure under generic entry: what happens to tofacitinib citrate pricing and volume?

When generics enter a high-use chronic therapy:

  • Branded pricing typically declines toward parity with generics through rebate and formulary pressure.
  • Volume may remain but revenue per prescription compresses.
  • Switching accelerates in commercially insured populations with flexible pharmacy networks.
  • Hospital and specialty centers may retain preferred agents for subsets, slowing full erosion.

A defensible revenue exposure model requires the:

  • Specific generic launch timing by geography
  • Number of ANDAs launched (and whether “first filer” 180-day exclusivity applies)
  • Litigation settlement outcomes None of which are in the prompt.

Key Takeaways

  • Tofacitinib’s 2026 clinical-trial activity is predominantly label maintenance, long-term safety, and patient stratification rather than first-in-class efficacy discovery.
  • Market growth is structurally constrained by JAK-class safety label effects and payer utilization controls, with competition pressure from other JAK and biologic pathways.
  • Accurate exclusivity, Orange Book status, patent-expiration calendars, and generic entry risk require the underlying listed patents and litigation docket details; those data are not present in this prompt, so a dated freedom-to-operate and launch scenario cannot be produced.

FAQs

  1. How do JAK inhibitor risk-management label changes affect tofacitinib initiation vs continuation?
  2. What endpoints in UC and RA trials most influence post-approval labeling updates for tofacitinib?
  3. How do generic substitution rules and pharmacy benefit design accelerate tofacitinib revenue erosion after ANDA approval?
  4. What are the main regulatory hurdles for generic tofacitinib tablets (bioequivalence, labeling, manufacturing controls)?
  5. How does competition from newer JAK inhibitors and IL-23 pathway therapies change tofacitinib line-of-therapy placement in 2026?

References

  1. FDA Orange Book. Drug Products and Approved Drug Products With Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. US FDA. (Cited for Orange Book methodology only; specific listing not provided in prompt).
  2. EMA. Product information and EPAR documents for tofacitinib (method varies by geography). European Medicines Agency.
  3. MHRA/UK. Public assessment documents for tofacitinib products and SPC/UK exclusivity status. UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.
  4. ClinicalTrials.gov. Tofacitinib citrate search results (trial statuses and listing methodology). US National Library of Medicine.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.