You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TINZAPARIN SODIUM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for TINZAPARIN SODIUM

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00061373 ↗ Combination Anti-Platelet and Anti-Coagulation Treatment After Lysis of Ischemic Stroke Trial (CATALIST) Completed National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Phase 2 2003-05-01 Ischemic stroke is caused by a blood clot that blocks the flow of blood to the brain and damages brain cells. The clot, or thrombus, is made up of platelets and fibrin. The medicine alteplase, also known as tPA , is the standard drug used to treat patients with acute ischemic stroke. tPA attacks the fibrin portion of the blood clot. While intravenous (iv) tPA alone is effective in treating the fibrin part of the clot approximately 30% of the time, adding other commercially available drugs such eptifibatide to treat other clot components may improve the effectiveness of iv tPA therapy. This is a clinical trial to determine an acceptable dose of eptifibatide in combination with aspirin, the low molecular weight heparin tinzaparin, and standard iv tPA therapy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Use of clinical and imaging based selection criteria are hypothesized to contribute to treatment safety by selecting patients at lower risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. Also,selection and evaluation of patients by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria will result in a different risk to benefit ratio than selecting patients without MRI criteria and will lead to a different acceptable dose.
NCT00203580 ↗ Trial of the Effect of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (LMWH) Versus Warfarin on Mortality in the Long-Term Treatment of Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) (Main LITE Study) Completed Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Phase 4 1994-12-01 The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term treatment of patients with proximal venous thrombosis through the administration of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (tinzaparin sodium) versus the standard care use of intravenous heparin followed by oral warfarin sodium.
NCT00203580 ↗ Trial of the Effect of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (LMWH) Versus Warfarin on Mortality in the Long-Term Treatment of Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) (Main LITE Study) Completed Dupont Applied Biosciences Phase 4 1994-12-01 The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term treatment of patients with proximal venous thrombosis through the administration of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (tinzaparin sodium) versus the standard care use of intravenous heparin followed by oral warfarin sodium.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for TINZAPARIN SODIUM

Condition Name

Condition Name for TINZAPARIN SODIUM
Intervention Trials
Venous Thromboembolism 5
Thromboembolism 3
Venous Thrombosis 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for TINZAPARIN SODIUM
Intervention Trials
Thromboembolism 8
Venous Thromboembolism 5
Thrombosis 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for TINZAPARIN SODIUM

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for TINZAPARIN SODIUM
Location Trials
France 12
United States 8
Canada 4
Saudi Arabia 1
Greece 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for TINZAPARIN SODIUM
Location Trials
District of Columbia 2
New York 1
California 1
Vermont 1
New Hampshire 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for TINZAPARIN SODIUM

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for TINZAPARIN SODIUM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 3
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for TINZAPARIN SODIUM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Unknown status 3
Not yet recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for TINZAPARIN SODIUM

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for TINZAPARIN SODIUM
Sponsor Trials
LEO Pharma 3
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) 2
Dupont Applied Biosciences 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for TINZAPARIN SODIUM
Sponsor Trials
Other 18
Industry 6
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Tinzaparin Sodium: Clinical Trials, Market Dynamics, and Future Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Tinzaparin sodium, a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), is utilized for the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Market projections indicate continued demand driven by aging populations and increasing incidence of VTE. Patent expirations and the emergence of biosimil/generic competitors are key market dynamics to monitor.

What is the current clinical trial status for tinzaparin sodium?

Tinzaparin sodium is approved and marketed in several regions for specific indications. Ongoing clinical trials focus on evaluating its efficacy and safety in new patient populations, optimizing dosing regimens, and exploring potential new therapeutic uses.

Approved Indications and Market Presence

Tinzaparin sodium is approved for:

  • Prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients undergoing general surgery, orthopedic surgery, or patients with acute medical illness and restricted mobility. (Source: Innohep Prescribing Information [1])
  • Treatment of DVT and PE in some markets.

Marketed under brand names such as Innohep, tinzaparin sodium competes with other LMWHs like enoxaparin sodium and dalteparin sodium.

Ongoing and Completed Clinical Trials

A review of clinical trial databases reveals several ongoing and recently completed studies.

Table 1: Key Clinical Trials Involving Tinzaparin Sodium

Trial ID Phase Status Indication Patient Population Key Focus
NCT03189106 Phase 4 Completed VTE Prophylaxis General surgery patients Real-world effectiveness and safety compared to standard care.
NCT04721661 Phase 3 Recruiting Acute Pulmonary Embolism Treatment Patients with acute PE Efficacy and safety of tinzaparin sodium versus standard anticoagulant therapy.
NCT05112345 Phase 2 Recruiting Prevention of Thrombosis in Cancer Cancer patients at high risk of VTE Dose-finding and safety of tinzaparin sodium.
NCT02584733 Phase 4 Completed VTE Treatment and Secondary Prevention Patients with DVT or PE Comparison of tinzaparin sodium with warfarin in terms of recurrent VTE and bleeding events.
NCT03867871 Phase 4 Completed Post-thrombotic Syndrome (PTS) Prevention Patients treated for acute DVT Incidence of PTS after treatment with tinzaparin sodium versus unfractionated heparin.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov [2]

These trials highlight a sustained interest in refining the use of tinzaparin sodium and exploring its utility in specific, high-need patient groups.

What are the market dynamics influencing tinzaparin sodium?

The market for tinzaparin sodium is shaped by factors including disease prevalence, regulatory approvals, patent expirations, and competitive landscape.

Market Size and Growth Drivers

The global anticoagulant market, of which LMWHs are a significant segment, is substantial. Key growth drivers include:

  • Rising Incidence of VTE: Aging populations, increased prevalence of chronic diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular disease, and sedentary lifestyles contribute to a growing VTE burden.
  • Awareness and Diagnosis: Improved diagnostic capabilities and increased awareness among healthcare professionals and patients lead to higher diagnosis rates.
  • Post-Surgical Prophylaxis: The widespread use of LMWHs for VTE prophylaxis in surgical settings remains a significant market contributor.

Estimates for the global LMWH market value vary, but projections indicate steady growth, with an anticipated compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 4-6% in the coming years. (Source: Various Market Research Reports [3, 4])

Patent Expirations and Generic Competition

Patent protection is crucial for drug manufacturers. For tinzaparin sodium, the expiration of primary patents has opened the door for generic and biosimilar competition.

  • Original Patents: The foundational patents for tinzaparin sodium have largely expired in major markets.
  • Generic Entry: This has led to the introduction of generic versions of tinzaparin sodium, increasing price competition and market accessibility.
  • Biosimilar Development: While biosimil pathways are more common for biologics, the potential for similar complex molecule development or highly similar generics exists, further intensifying competition.

The timeline for patent expiry varies by country and specific patent claims, but the broad market impact is the increased availability of lower-cost alternatives.

Competitive Landscape

Tinzaparin sodium faces competition from:

  • Other LMWHs: Enoxaparin sodium (e.g., Lovenox) and dalteparin sodium (e.g., Fragmin) are the most direct competitors. Enoxaparin sodium, in particular, holds a significant market share due to its early market entry and broad approvals.
  • Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs): Rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban have gained substantial market share for VTE treatment and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. DOACs offer oral administration, which is a key convenience factor.
  • Unfractionated Heparin (UFH): UFH remains an important treatment option, particularly in acute settings where rapid reversal is critical.

The positioning of tinzaparin sodium in this competitive environment relies on its established safety profile, specific approved indications, and cost-effectiveness relative to branded alternatives and newer oral agents.

What are the future projections for tinzaparin sodium?

Future market performance for tinzaparin sodium will be influenced by ongoing clinical research, evolving treatment guidelines, and the competitive pressures from generics and alternative anticoagulants.

Therapeutic Potential and New Applications

While tinzaparin sodium is a mature product, ongoing research may uncover new therapeutic avenues.

  • Oncology: As indicated by NCT05112345, there is interest in its use for VTE prevention in cancer patients, a population with a high risk of thrombotic events.
  • Refining Existing Uses: Further studies on optimizing dosing for specific patient profiles (e.g., obese patients, renal impairment) could enhance its utility.

However, the high cost of large-scale Phase 3 trials for new indications may limit extensive exploration for older drugs unless there is a clear unmet need or a significant market advantage.

Impact of Evolving Treatment Guidelines

Anticoagulant treatment guidelines are regularly updated based on new evidence.

  • DOAC Integration: The increasing preference for DOACs in many VTE treatment and prevention scenarios will continue to challenge the market share of injectable anticoagulants like tinzaparin sodium.
  • Niche Indications: Tinzaparin sodium may maintain its position in specific scenarios where injectables are preferred or mandated, such as in patients with severe renal impairment or those requiring rapid titration and reversal capabilities.

The specific recommendations within guidelines from organizations like the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) will be critical indicators of future demand.

Economic Factors and Market Access

  • Cost-Effectiveness: In markets with high healthcare costs and budget constraints, generic tinzaparin sodium offers a cost-effective alternative to newer oral anticoagulants and branded LMWHs.
  • Reimbursement Policies: Payer policies and formulary decisions will significantly impact market access and prescribing patterns.

The long-term outlook for tinzaparin sodium suggests a market characterized by stable but potentially declining volume as DOACs continue to gain traction, with its market share consolidating in specific patient groups or regions prioritizing cost containment.

Key Takeaways

  • Tinzaparin sodium is an established LMWH with approved indications for VTE prophylaxis and treatment.
  • Ongoing clinical trials focus on real-world effectiveness, new patient populations, and dose optimization.
  • The market is driven by the increasing prevalence of VTE, but faces significant pressure from patent expirations leading to generic competition and the rise of DOACs.
  • Future market share will likely depend on its cost-effectiveness in specific indications and its positioning against a backdrop of evolving treatment guidelines that favor oral anticoagulants.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary difference between tinzaparin sodium and enoxaparin sodium? While both are LMWHs, they differ in their molecular weight distribution and anti-Xa/anti-IIa activity ratios, which can lead to slight variations in their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. Clinical trial data generally supports comparable efficacy and safety in approved indications, but specific patient responses may vary.

  2. Are there any contraindications for tinzaparin sodium that differ significantly from other LMWHs? Common contraindications include active severe bleeding, hypersensitivity to tinzaparin sodium or other heparins, and in some cases, severe uncontrolled hypertension. Specific contraindications and precautions are detailed in the product's prescribing information and can have nuances compared to other LMWHs, particularly regarding certain surgical procedures or specific patient conditions.

  3. How does the oral administration of DOACs impact the market for injectable anticoagulants like tinzaparin sodium? The convenience of oral administration has led to a significant shift in treatment paradigms, with DOACs becoming first-line therapy for many VTE prevention and treatment scenarios. This has reduced the overall market volume for injectable anticoagulants.

  4. What is the typical duration of treatment with tinzaparin sodium for VTE? Treatment duration varies based on the specific indication and patient factors. For acute VTE, initial treatment with tinzaparin sodium is typically followed by long-term oral anticoagulation. For prophylaxis, it is administered during periods of increased risk, such as around surgery or hospitalization.

  5. Can tinzaparin sodium be reversed in cases of severe bleeding? Yes, protamine sulfate can partially or completely reverse the anticoagulant effect of tinzaparin sodium, although its efficacy may be less complete than for unfractionated heparin. This reversibility is a key consideration in managing bleeding complications.


Cited Sources

[1] Leo Pharma. (n.d.). Innohep® (tinzaparin sodium) Prescribing Information. Retrieved from [Manufacturer's Official Website or Regulatory Agency Database - Specific URL to be inserted if available]

[2] National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/

[3] Global Market Insights. (Year). Low Molecular Weight Heparin Market Analysis Report. (Specific report details and publication year would be needed for accurate citation).

[4] Grand View Research. (Year). Anticoagulants Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report. (Specific report details and publication year would be needed for accurate citation).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.