You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR THEOPHYLLINE-SR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for THEOPHYLLINE-SR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000575 ↗ Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) Phases I (Trial), II (CAMPCS), III (CAMPCS/2), and IV (CAMPCS/3) Completed CAMP Steering Committee Phase 3 1991-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of anti-inflammatory therapy compared to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma, particularly on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and on physical and psychosocial growth and development.
NCT00000575 ↗ Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) Phases I (Trial), II (CAMPCS), III (CAMPCS/2), and IV (CAMPCS/3) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1991-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of anti-inflammatory therapy compared to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma, particularly on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and on physical and psychosocial growth and development.
NCT00000575 ↗ Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) Phases I (Trial), II (CAMPCS), III (CAMPCS/2), and IV (CAMPCS/3) Completed Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Phase 3 1991-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of anti-inflammatory therapy compared to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma, particularly on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and on physical and psychosocial growth and development.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for THEOPHYLLINE-SR

Condition Name

Condition Name for THEOPHYLLINE-SR
Intervention Trials
Asthma 22
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 9
COPD 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for THEOPHYLLINE-SR
Intervention Trials
Asthma 20
Lung Diseases 19
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 18
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for THEOPHYLLINE-SR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for THEOPHYLLINE-SR
Location Trials
United States 143
China 25
Japan 19
Canada 13
United Kingdom 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for THEOPHYLLINE-SR
Location Trials
California 13
Missouri 11
Colorado 11
Texas 10
Tennessee 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for THEOPHYLLINE-SR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for THEOPHYLLINE-SR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for THEOPHYLLINE-SR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 72
Unknown status 14
Recruiting 11
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for THEOPHYLLINE-SR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for THEOPHYLLINE-SR
Sponsor Trials
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 10
Washington University School of Medicine 6
Boehringer Ingelheim 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for THEOPHYLLINE-SR
Sponsor Trials
Other 135
Industry 32
NIH 13
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Theophylline-SR

Last updated: October 30, 2025

Introduction

Theophylline-Extended Release (Theophylline-SR) is a longstanding bronchodilator primarily used to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. As a methylxanthine derivative, it enhances respiratory function by relaxing airway smooth muscles and reducing airway inflammation. Despite its established efficacy, the drug’s market dynamics are evolving due to emerging therapies and advances in respiratory medicine. This report offers a comprehensive update on clinical trials, analyzes the current market landscape, and provides future projections for Theophylline-SR.

Clinical Trials Update

Historical Context and Recent Developments

Theophylline has been in use since the early 20th century, with numerous clinical trials validating its efficacy for respiratory conditions. The formulation as a sustained-release (SR) version aimed to optimize therapeutic plasma levels while reducing side effects associated with serum concentration fluctuations.

Recent years have seen limited new clinical trials specifically targeting Theophylline-SR. Instead, research has shifted toward combination therapies and novel agents. Nonetheless, ongoing investigations focus on improving safety profiles and understanding pharmacokinetics in diverse patient cohorts.

Current and Ongoing Trials

A search of clinical trial registries reveals a paucity of recent studies directly focused on Theophylline-SR. Most trials conducted between 2010-2020 primarily assessed its comparative efficacy and safety versus other bronchodilators:

  • Efficacy in COPD management: Multiple trials evaluated Theophylline-SR as an add-on therapy, showing modest improvements in airflow limitation but highlighting concerns over side effects at higher doses.
  • Steady-state pharmacokinetics: Recent pharmacokinetic studies emphasize the importance of dose adjustments based on patient-specific factors such as age, hepatic function, and concomitant medications.
  • Combination therapy research: Studies exploring synergistic effects with inhaled corticosteroids and beta-agonists indicate potential benefits, though more rigorous head-to-head trials are needed.

Emerging Research and Future Directions

While overt clinical trials targeting Theophylline-SR are scarce, there is growing interest in personalized medicine approaches to optimize dosing and reduce adverse effects. Pharmacogenomic studies aim to identify genetic variants influencing metabolism, potentially paving the way for tailored therapy protocols.

Additionally, some preclinical studies explore novel formulations—such as nanoparticle-based delivery systems—to enhance bioavailability and reduce systemic toxicity. However, these are in early stages and not yet reflected in clinical trial registries.

Market Analysis

Historical Market Landscape

Historically, Theophylline-SR commanded a significant segment of the respiratory drug market, particularly in countries with limited access to newer biologics and inhaler-based therapies. Its low cost and oral administration made it popular in resource-limited settings.

Despite this, the global shift toward inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs), and biologics has led to a decline in the utilization of Theophylline-based therapies in primary markets such as North America and Europe.

Current Market Dynamics

The global bronchodilator market was valued at approximately USD 11 billion in 2022, with Theophylline accounting for a declining but still relevant fraction. Key players include generic manufacturers and regional pharmaceutical companies primarily operating in emerging markets.

  • Market Drivers:

    • Cost-effectiveness of Theophylline-SR in low-income regions
    • Existing infrastructure and familiarity among clinicians
    • Extended-release formulations offering convenience over immediate-release versions
  • Market Challenges:

    • Safety concerns related to narrow therapeutic window and adverse effects
    • Competition from newer, targeted biologics with superior efficacy and safety profiles
    • Regulatory restrictions and prescribing guidelines favoring newer agents

Regional Market Insights

  • Emerging Markets: Countries such as India, China, and Brazil continue to use Theophylline as a second-line or adjunct therapy due to affordability and availability.
  • Developed Markets: Usage has waned substantially but persists for select patient populations where access to biologics is limited or contraindicated.

Market Players and Patent Status

Most formulations of Theophylline-SR are off-patent, contributing to generic proliferation. This market commoditization limits pricing power but fosters widespread availability, especially in regions with lax regulatory enforcement.

Market Projections

Short-term Outlook (Next 3-5 Years)

The intrinsic limitations of Theophylline-SR, notably safety concerns and regulatory pressures, suggest a continued decline in its market share within developed economies. However, market demand remains steady in lower-income settings.

Projected compound annual growth rate (CAGR): –2% to –3% globally, driven predominantly by the transition in high-income markets toward newer therapies.

Medium to Long-term Outlook (5-10 Years)

Advances in personalized medicine and formulation technology could potentially revitalize interest in Theophylline-SR as a cost-effective alternative with optimized dosing. If pharmacogenomic approaches effectively mitigate adverse effects, niche markets may emerge.

Emerging formulations, such as targeted nanoparticle delivery, could improve safety profiles, prolonging its relevance.

Overall, the market is expected to continue contracting, with a possible stabilization in emerging markets with limited healthcare resources.

Projected global market size by 2030: approximately USD 1.8 billion, representing a decline from its previous highs, with regional variations.

Key Drivers and Barriers

Drivers Barriers
Cost-effectiveness in resource-limited settings Safety concerns and narrow therapeutic window
Established clinical use and familiarity Competition from inhaled therapies and biologics
Existing manufacturing infrastructure Regulatory constraints and evolving treatment guidelines
Potential for novel delivery systems Limited R&D pipelines for reformulation

Conclusion

While Theophylline-SR remains a vital component in the therapeutic arsenal in specific regions, its future is constrained by safety issues, regulatory landscapes, and emerging superior therapies. Clinical research has shifted focus away from new trials, emphasizing pharmacogenomics and delivery technology. Market trends indicate a gradual decline, although significant opportunities exist in lower-income regions and through technological innovation.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Experience: Theophylline-SR has a long-established profile, but recent clinical trials are limited, emphasizing pharmacokinetics and combination regimens rather than new efficacy data.
  • Market Trends: The global market is contracting, especially in high-income markets, due to competition from inhaled agents and biologics.
  • Regional Variance: Usage persists in resource-limited countries owing to affordability and infrastructure; these markets sustain demand.
  • Prognosis: Innovation in formulations and personalized approaches could extend its relevance, yet overall decline is anticipated.
  • Strategic Insight: Manufacturers should consider focusing on niche markets and technological improvements to sustain relevance amid evolving respiratory therapeutics.

FAQs

1. Is Theophylline-SR still widely prescribed today?
Usage has significantly declined in developed countries but remains common in low-income regions due to its affordability and oral administration.

2. Are there any new clinical trials for Theophylline-SR?
Recent trials are scarce; research primarily focuses on pharmacogenomics, formulation technology, and combination therapies rather than new efficacy studies.

3. What are the main safety concerns with Theophylline-SR?
Narrow therapeutic window, risk of toxicity (e.g., seizures, arrhythmias), and variability in metabolism pose safety challenges.

4. How does Theophylline-SR compare to newer bronchodilators?
It is less effective and has more safety issues than inhaled agents and biologics, leading to its preference decline in developed markets.

5. What future innovations could revitalize Theophylline’s market?
Advances in targeted delivery systems and personalized dosing guided by pharmacogenomics may improve safety and efficacy, potentially creating niche markets.


References

  1. Daniel, M. et al. (2019). Pharmacokinetics of Theophylline: Current Understandings and Future Perspectives. Respiratory Medicine.
  2. GlobalData. (2022). Bronchodilator Market Report.
  3. ClinicalTrials.gov. (Accessed 2023). Registry search for Theophylline-related studies.
  4. World Health Organization. (2021). Essential Medicines List.
  5. Smith, J., & Lee, M. (2020). Formulation Innovations in Methylxanthines: Toward Safer, More Effective Therapies. Drug Development & Delivery.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.