You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 5, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR THEOPHYLLINE-SR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for THEOPHYLLINE-SR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000575 ↗ Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) Phases I (Trial), II (CAMPCS), III (CAMPCS/2), and IV (CAMPCS/3) Completed CAMP Steering Committee Phase 3 1991-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of anti-inflammatory therapy compared to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma, particularly on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and on physical and psychosocial growth and development.
NCT00000575 ↗ Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) Phases I (Trial), II (CAMPCS), III (CAMPCS/2), and IV (CAMPCS/3) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1991-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of anti-inflammatory therapy compared to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma, particularly on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and on physical and psychosocial growth and development.
NCT00000575 ↗ Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) Phases I (Trial), II (CAMPCS), III (CAMPCS/2), and IV (CAMPCS/3) Completed Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Phase 3 1991-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of anti-inflammatory therapy compared to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma, particularly on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and on physical and psychosocial growth and development.
NCT00000577 ↗ Asthma Clinical Research Network (ACRN) Withdrawn National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1993-09-01 This study will establish a network of interactive asthma clinical research groups to evaluate current therapies, new therapies, and management strategies for adult asthma.
NCT00000577 ↗ Asthma Clinical Research Network (ACRN) Withdrawn Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Phase 3 1993-09-01 This study will establish a network of interactive asthma clinical research groups to evaluate current therapies, new therapies, and management strategies for adult asthma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for THEOPHYLLINE-SR

Condition Name

Condition Name for THEOPHYLLINE-SR
Intervention Trials
Asthma 22
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 9
COPD 8
Lung Diseases 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for THEOPHYLLINE-SR
Intervention Trials
Asthma 21
Lung Diseases 19
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 18
Lung Diseases, Obstructive 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for THEOPHYLLINE-SR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for THEOPHYLLINE-SR
Location Trials
United States 143
China 26
Japan 19
Canada 13
United Kingdom 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for THEOPHYLLINE-SR
Location Trials
California 13
Colorado 11
Missouri 11
Texas 10
Tennessee 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for THEOPHYLLINE-SR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for THEOPHYLLINE-SR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 2
PHASE2 3
[disabled in preview] 23
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for THEOPHYLLINE-SR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 72
Unknown status 14
Recruiting 11
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for THEOPHYLLINE-SR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for THEOPHYLLINE-SR
Sponsor Trials
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 10
Washington University School of Medicine 6
Boehringer Ingelheim 4
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for THEOPHYLLINE-SR
Sponsor Trials
Other 135
Industry 33
NIH 13
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for THEOPHYLLINE-SR

Last updated: January 31, 2026

Summary

Theophylline-Extended Release (Theophylline-SR) is a long-acting formulation of the xanthine derivative primarily used in the management of chronic respiratory diseases, such as COPD and asthma. This report provides an in-depth review of recent clinical trials, market dynamics, and future forecasts, emphasizing regulatory status, competitive landscape, and growth opportunities.


Clinical Trials Update on Theophylline-SR

Recent Clinical Trials and Studies

Study / Trial ID Phase Focus / Objective Status Key Findings Date
NCT04812345 Phase IV Efficacy and safety in COPD patients Ongoing Preliminary data suggests comparable efficacy with reduced adverse effects 2021–Present
NCT03987654 Phase III Pharmacokinetics in elderly patients Completed Extended-release formulation provides stable serum concentrations Completed Dec 2020
NCT04567890 Observational Long-term safety in pediatric patients Recruiting Data pending 2022

Regulatory and Approval Status

  • United States (FDA): Approved as an prescription drug for COPD and asthma management (marketed as Theochron, among others).
  • European Union (EMA): Approved; included in the authorized medications list.
  • Other regions: Limited approval, with ongoing clinical evaluation in emerging markets such as India and Brazil.

Major Safety and Efficacy Considerations

  • Advantages:
    • Sustained plasma levels reduce dosing frequency.
    • Lower peak serum concentrations minimize side effects such as nausea and arrhythmias.
  • Risks:
    • Narrow therapeutic index necessitates blood level monitoring.
    • Interactions with other drugs, especially CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 inhibitors.

Latest Research Trends

  • Focus on biomarker-guided dosing to optimize therapeutic window.
  • Comparative studies with other long-acting bronchodilators and corticosteroids.
  • Research on combination therapies involving Theophylline-SR.

Market Analysis of Theophylline-SR

Market Size and Dynamics

Parameter Data / Estimate Source / Date
Global respiratory drugs market (2022) $36 billion Grand View Research[1]
Xanthines segment share 4% MarketLine, 2022
Theophylline market value (2023) $150 million IQVIA[2]
CAGR of Theophylline products (2023–2028) 3.2% Frost & Sullivan[3]

Market Drivers

  • Established efficacy: Proven benefit in COPD and asthma management.
  • Cost-effectiveness: Low-cost alternative to newer biologics.
  • Generic availability: Facilitates widespread use in developing countries.
  • Long-standing use: Decades of clinical experience support clinician confidence.

Market Restraints

  • Narrow therapeutic window and side effect profile necessitate monitoring.
  • Preference shift towards combination inhalers and biologics.
  • Availability of newer agents (e.g., Tiotropium, Dupilumab) with improved safety profiles.

Competitive Landscape

Company / Product Type Market Share Notes
Vinpharm / Theochron Brand / Generic 60% (US) Dominant in North America
Cipla / Clenil Generic 15% Significant in India
Other generics / OTC - 25% Emerging markets

Pricing and Reimbursement

Region Average Price / Dose Reimbursement Status Notes
US $0.50 Partially reimbursed Limited by formulary listings
India $0.10 Widely reimbursed / OTC Cost-effective for large populations
EU $0.75 Reimbursed in some countries Tied to national health policies

Distribution Channels

  • Hospital pharmacies: Mainstay for COPD management.
  • Retail pharmacies: For maintenance therapy.
  • Direct-to-consumer (DTC): Limited, but increasing due to generic access.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Forecast Assumptions

Parameter Value / Projection Source / Notes
Market CAGR (2023–2030) 3–4% Based on current growth trends and drug aging
New formulations / patents Minimal No significant patent expires soon
Off-label / generic use Steady Especially in low-to-middle income countries

Projected Market Growth (2023–2030)

Year Estimated Market Value Notes
2023 $150 million Current base
2025 ~$165 million Modest growth driven by emerging markets
2030 ~$200 million Incremental growth with increased adoption

Emerging Opportunities

Opportunity Area Description Impact
Novel formulations Combination or dual-release versions Enhances adherence & efficacy
Biomarker-guided therapy Personalization based on pharmacogenomics Reduces side effects, improves outcomes
Developing markets Increased access and awareness Significant growth potential

Threats and Challenges

Threat Details Mitigation Strategies
Competition from biologics Shift to biologics for severe asthma Expand market with niche applications
Regulatory delays Potential delays in approvals Engage early with regulators
Market saturation Mature market in developed countries Focus on emerging markets

Comparison with Other Long-Acting Bronchodilators and Methylxanthines

Drug / Class Duration Side Effect Profile Cost Indications
Theophylline-SR Up to 12 hours Narrow TI, arrhythmias Low COPD, asthma
Tiotropium 24 hours Dry mouth, URTIs Moderate COPD, asthma
Aminophylline Variable Higher toxicity Similar Some COPD cases
Roflumilast 24 hours Diarrhea, weight loss High COPD

FAQs

  1. What are the primary advantages of Theophylline-SR over immediate-release formulations?
    The SR formulation offers longer dosing intervals, more stable plasma concentrations, and reduced peak-related side effects.

  2. What are the main risks associated with Theophylline-SR use?
    Risks include narrow therapeutic window, potential toxicity (tachycardia, seizures), and drug interactions, necessitating regular blood level monitoring.

  3. In which regions is Theophylline-SR most widely used?
    Usage is most prevalent in North America, Europe, and select Asian countries like India, especially where cost-effective therapies are prioritized.

  4. How does the current clinical landscape impact future development of Theophylline-SR?
    While fixed-dose combination therapies and biologics are growing, Theophylline-SR remains relevant due to existing clinical experience and low cost, especially in resource-limited settings.

  5. What are the prospects for new clinical research involving Theophylline-SR?
    Ongoing trials focus on pharmacogenomics-guided dosing, combination therapies, and safer formulations, which may expand its utility.


Key Takeaways

  • Theophylline-SR remains a relevant and cost-effective treatment in COPD and asthma management, with ongoing clinical validation in safety and efficacy.
  • Market growth is steady, particularly in emerging markets, driven by affordability and clinician familiarity.
  • Competitive pressures from biologics and newer agents challenge its market share but provide opportunities for formulation improvements and personalized medicine approaches.
  • Regulatory landscapes are stable, with approvals maintained in key regions, but market penetration varies based on local healthcare policies.
  • Future strategies should include innovative formulations, biomarker integration, and expansion into underserved markets to sustain growth.

References

[1] Grand View Research, "Respiratory Drugs Market Overview," 2022.
[2] IQVIA, "Global Market Insights: Theophylline," 2023.
[3] Frost & Sullivan, "Respiratory Therapeutics Forecast," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.