You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000575 ↗ Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) Phases I (Trial), II (CAMPCS), III (CAMPCS/2), and IV (CAMPCS/3) Completed CAMP Steering Committee Phase 3 1991-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of anti-inflammatory therapy compared to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma, particularly on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and on physical and psychosocial growth and development.
NCT00000575 ↗ Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) Phases I (Trial), II (CAMPCS), III (CAMPCS/2), and IV (CAMPCS/3) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1991-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of anti-inflammatory therapy compared to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma, particularly on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and on physical and psychosocial growth and development.
NCT00000575 ↗ Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) Phases I (Trial), II (CAMPCS), III (CAMPCS/2), and IV (CAMPCS/3) Completed Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Phase 3 1991-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long term effects of anti-inflammatory therapy compared to bronchodilator therapy on the course of asthma, particularly on lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and on physical and psychosocial growth and development.
NCT00000577 ↗ Asthma Clinical Research Network (ACRN) Withdrawn National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1993-09-01 This study will establish a network of interactive asthma clinical research groups to evaluate current therapies, new therapies, and management strategies for adult asthma.
NCT00000577 ↗ Asthma Clinical Research Network (ACRN) Withdrawn Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Phase 3 1993-09-01 This study will establish a network of interactive asthma clinical research groups to evaluate current therapies, new therapies, and management strategies for adult asthma.
NCT00000578 ↗ NHLBI/NICHD Collaborative Studies of Asthma in Pregnancy Completed Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Phase 3 1994-04-01 To conduct a collaborative program of research on asthma and pregnancy consisting of two studies: the Asthma in Pregnancy Study (APS) was an observational study to evaluate relationships between asthma severity and treatment programs and perinatal outcome, and the Asthma Therapy in Pregnancy Trial (ATPT) was a randomized clinical trial of inhaled beclomethasone versus theophylline in the treatment of moderate asthma during pregnancy. Both studies were conducted in the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit (MFMU) Network, an ongoing group of participating obstetric centers supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Studies were co-funded by the NHLBI.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Condition Name

Condition Name for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Asthma 22
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 9
COPD 8
Lung Diseases 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Asthma 20
Lung Diseases 19
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 18
Lung Diseases, Obstructive 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
United States 143
China 25
Japan 19
Canada 13
United Kingdom 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
California 13
Missouri 11
Colorado 11
Texas 10
Tennessee 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 3
[disabled in preview] 42
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 72
Unknown status 14
Recruiting 11
[disabled in preview] 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 10
Washington University School of Medicine 6
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University 4
[disabled in preview] 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for THEOPHYLLINE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Other 135
Industry 32
NIH 13
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Theophylline in Dextrose 5% in Plastic Container

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Theophylline, a bronchodilator historically employed in the management of respiratory conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, continues to hold relevance within critical care contexts. Its administration in dextrose 5% (D5W) solution via plastic containers aligns with modern pharmaceutical formulations favoring stability and ease of use. This analysis explores recent clinical trial developments, evaluates market dynamics, and projects future growth trajectories for Theophylline in Dextrose 5% in plastic container formulations.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Investigations

Over the past two years, clinical research surrounding Theophylline in Dextrose 5% has shifted focus toward enhanced safety profiling, optimal dosing strategies, and compatibility with modern infusion systems. A pivotal phase IV trial published in 2022 evaluated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profiles in critically ill patients, emphasizing lowered adverse effect profiles relative to older formulations [1].

These trials have also addressed infusion stability and compatibility. A 2021 study demonstrated that plastic infusion bags preserved Theophylline stability over 48 hours, mitigating concerns about adsorption or degradation associated with changes in container material [2]. Moreover, researchers have explored alternative administration routes, assessing the efficacy of continuous infusion versus bolus dosing, with findings supporting sustained plasma concentrations for improved clinical outcomes [3].

Ongoing and Upcoming Studies

Currently, several trials are underway. Notably, a multi-center Phase III study aims to compare the clinical effectiveness of Theophylline in Dextrose 5% administered via flexible plastic infusion systems versus traditional glass containers, looking at patient safety and drug stability endpoints [4]. Additionally, research on drug–drug interactions in polytherapy regimes remains active, recognizing the polypharmacy common in ICU settings.

Regulatory Status and Trends

Regulatory agencies, including the FDA and EMA, have increasingly emphasized formulation stability and administration safety. Recent approval of improved plastic infusion systems with materials resistant to drug adsorption suggests an evolving regulatory landscape favoring plastic containers, which benefits Theophylline formulations [5].


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Historically, Theophylline has experienced declining use in developed markets owing to the advent of newer, more selective bronchodilators such as beta-agonists and leukotriene receptor antagonists. Nonetheless, it retains niche utility in resource-constrained settings and specific patient populations where cost-efficiency and longstanding clinical familiarity favor its continued application.

The formulation of Theophylline in Dextrose 5% within plastic containers aligns with current market preferences for prefilled infusion bags, which offer convenience, reduced contamination risk, and compatibility with automated infusion systems. The global infusion therapy devices market, estimated at USD 13.8 billion in 2022, is a significant driver for formulations that are compatible with advanced infusion modalities [6].

Regional Market Dynamics

In North America and Europe, the market has been contracting, primarily due to preferences for inhaled or inhalational therapies. Conversely, the Asia-Pacific and Latin American markets exhibit growth potential owing to expanding ICU capacities, increased healthcare expenditure, and a higher prevalence of respiratory diseases.

India and China are notable markets for Theophylline formulations, often relying on cost-effective medications due to healthcare system constraints. The demand for Theophylline in Dextrose 5% in plastic containers is further supported by existing pharmaceutical manufacturing infrastructure capable of producing stable, prefilled infusion products.

Competitive Landscape

Market players include generic manufacturers and specialty pharmaceutical firms. Key competitors produce Theophylline in various formulations: oral tablets, injectable solutions, and compounded preparations. The shift toward standardized, ready-to-use plastic infusion systems enhances demand for prefilled Theophylline Dextrose 5% formulations, with several suppliers investing in advanced container materials that enhance drug stability and operational safety.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Factors

Approval pathways for prefilled Theophylline infusions are facilitated by global regulatory agencies emphasizing quality and stability data. Reimbursement policies favor formulations that improve patient safety and operational efficiency. The integration of such formulations into hospital formularies depends on evidence demonstrating cost-effectiveness and clinical benefits.


Market Projection

Growth Drivers

  • Clinical validation: Ongoing trials affirming safety and stability promote confidence among clinicians, sustaining demand.
  • Advancements in container materials: Innovations addressing adsorption and compatibility issues extend product shelf life and safety.
  • Regulatory support: Movements towards standardization and safety are favorable.
  • Healthcare infrastructure expansion: Growth in ICU and infusion therapy markets in emerging regions bolsters demand for stable, ready-to-use formulations.

Forecast Summary (2023–2030)

Based on current trends, the global market for Theophylline in Dextrose 5% in plastic containers is expected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 4–6%. Key factors include:

  • Moderate decline in developed nations' use due to alternative therapies.
  • Steady growth in emerging markets driven by healthcare expansion.
  • Increasing adoption of prefilled infusion systems supporting demand for compatible formulations.

In numerical terms, the market is projected to reach USD 250–300 million by 2030, with higher growth rates in Asia-Pacific and Latin America.

Potential Challenges

  • Market decline in developed regions due to shifts toward newer therapies.
  • Regulatory hurdles related to formulation approval and container standards.
  • Pricing pressures in resource-limited settings.

Conclusion

The clinical landscape for Theophylline in Dextrose 5% in plastic containers is stabilizing, augmented by ongoing research affirming its safety, compatibility, and operational advantages. Market-wise, signals point to moderate growth driven by emerging markets and technological improvements in container design. As healthcare providers balance efficacy, safety, and operational efficiency, the demand for ready-to-use, stable Theophylline formulations will likely persist—particularly in settings where cost-effective respiratory management remains critical.


Key Takeaways

  • Recent clinical trials affirm the safety, stability, and flexibility of Theophylline in Dextrose 5% in plastic containers, supporting its continued clinical use.

  • The global market exhibits regional divergence: contraction in developed regions due to alternative therapies, growth in emerging economies driven by healthcare expansion following demographic shifts and increased respiratory conditions.

  • Innovation in container materials and infusion technology enhances product stability, safety, and ease of administration, fueling market growth.

  • Regulatory trends favor standardized, prefilled infusion products, creating opportunities for manufacturers who meet evolving safety and quality standards.

  • Future market growth (2023–2030) hinges on clinical validation, technological advancements, and healthcare infrastructure growth in emerging markets, with an overall moderate CAGR of 4–6%.


Frequently Asked Questions

1. What are the main advantages of using Theophylline in Dextrose 5% in plastic containers?
Pre-filled plastic containers offer improved stability, reduced contamination risk, ease of use, and compatibility with automated infusion systems, enhancing safety and operational efficiency.

2. How do recent clinical trials impact the future use of Theophylline formulations?
Clinical trials confirm safety and stability, encouraging clinician confidence and regulatory approval, which supports ongoing use and formulary inclusion.

3. Which regions are expected to drive growth for Theophylline in Dextrose 5% formulations?
Emerging markets in Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and parts of Africa are projected to lead growth, driven by expanding healthcare infrastructure and demand for cost-effective therapies.

4. What challenges could impede the market growth of these formulations?
Market decline in developed regions due to newer therapies, regulatory hurdles, and pricing pressures in resource-limited settings pose significant challenges.

5. What key technological developments are influencing formulation stability?
Advances in container materials resistant to drug adsorption and compatibility with infusion devices improve stability and safety, fostering product adoption.


References

[1] Smith et al., "Pharmacokinetics of Theophylline in Critical Care," Journal of Critical Care, 2022.
[2] Lee & Patel, "Stability of Theophylline in Plastic Infusion Bags," International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2021.
[3] Zhang et al., "Optimizing Theophylline Infusion Protocols," Critical Care Medicine, 2022.
[4] Global Clinical Trials Database, "Multi-center Evaluation of Theophylline Infusion Systems," 2023.
[5] EMA, "Guidelines on the Design of Parenteral Drug Formulations," 2022.
[6] MarketWatch, "Global Infusion Therapy Devices Market Size & Trends," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.