You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00036634 ↗ A Dose Escalation Study of Tenofovir Alafenamide in Treatment-Naive Patients Completed Gilead Sciences Phase 1/Phase 2 2002-03-01 This study evaluated two doses of tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF).
NCT01497899 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of E/C/F/TAF (Genvoya®) Versus E/C/F/TDF (Stribild®) in HIV-1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults Completed Gilead Sciences Phase 2 2011-12-28 The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (Genvoya®; E/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) versus elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Stribild®; E/C/F/TDF) FDC in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral treatment-naive adults.
NCT01565850 ↗ D/C/F/TAF Versus COBI-boosted DRV Plus FTC/TDF in HIV-1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment Naive Adults Completed Gilead Sciences Phase 2 2012-04-01 This study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet versus darunavir (DRV)+cobicistat (COBI)+emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral treatment-naive adults as determined by the achievement of HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 24.
NCT01780506 ↗ Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of E/C/F/TAF (Genvoya®) Versus E/C/F/TDF (Stribild®) in HIV-1 Positive, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults Completed Gilead Sciences Phase 3 2012-12-26 The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) versus elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF) FDC in HIV-1 positive, antiretroviral treatment-naive adults.
NCT01797445 ↗ Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of E/C/F/TAF Versus E/C/F/TDF in HIV-1 Positive, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults Completed Gilead Sciences Phase 3 2013-03-12 The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) versus elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF) in HIV-1 positive, antiretroviral treatment-naive adults.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE
Intervention Trials
Hiv 14
Chronic Hepatitis b 13
HIV Infections 10
HIV-1 Infection 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE
Intervention Trials
Hepatitis B 32
Hepatitis 26
HIV Infections 21
Hepatitis B, Chronic 21
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE
Location Trials
United States 373
China 83
Canada 54
United Kingdom 23
France 23
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE
Location Trials
California 26
Florida 21
Texas 19
New York 19
Michigan 18
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 2
PHASE2 3
[disabled in preview] 23
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 32
Recruiting 28
Not yet recruiting 14
[disabled in preview] 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE
Sponsor Trials
Gilead Sciences 35
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University 5
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 4
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 94
Industry 49
NIH 5
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate

Last updated: October 30, 2025

Introduction

Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) represents a pivotal advancement in antiviral therapeutics, primarily addressing chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HIV infections. As a prodrug of tenofovir, TAF delivers the active metabolite more efficiently with a favorable safety profile, leading to increased adoption within pharmaceutical pipelines and markets. This report provides a comprehensive update on ongoing clinical trials, evaluates current market dynamics, and projects future growth trajectories for TAF-based therapies.

Clinical Trials Update

Current Clinical Development Landscape

TAF, marketed under brand names such as Vemlidy (Hepatitis B), and marketed or in development as part of HIV treatment regimens (e.g., Genvoya, Odefsey), continues to be evaluated through numerous clinical trials.

Hepatitis B Virus (HBV):
Multiple Phase III trials assess the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Vemlidy. Recent data underscores its non-inferiority to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) with a reduced impact on renal function and bone mineral density [1]. The FDA approval of Vemlidy in 2018 cemented TAF as a standard of care for HBV.

HIV:
Various Phase II and III trials investigate TAF-based regimens like Biktarvy (bictegravir/emtricitabine/TAF) and Descovy (emtricitabine/TAF). Trials focus on optimizing dosing, resistance profiles, and long-term safety. Notably, the GEMINI trials demonstrated non-inferior efficacy of Biktarvy compared to standard regimens, with a better renal safety profile [2].

Emerging Indications and Formulations:
There is ongoing research into TAF’s utility against hepatitis C and as part of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) strategies. A recent Phase II trial explores TAF-based vaginal rings for HIV PrEP, emphasizing its potential as a versatile antiviral agent [3].

Upcoming Initiatives and Data Expected

Future releases include long-term safety outcomes, real-world effectiveness studies, and comparative analyses between TAF and TDF across patient populations. Key upcoming milestones include the 2023-2024 data releases from pivotal Phase III studies, which may influence label extensions and broader indication approvals, especially in low-income regions.

Market Analysis

Current Market Size

The global antiviral drug market surpassed USD 32 billion in 2022, driven by HIV and HBV therapeutics [4]. TAF's share within this space is substantial due to its favorable profile over older tenofovir formulations.

Hepatitis B: The HBV treatment market is valued at approximately USD 3.2 billion, with Vemlidy capturing a significant segment post-approval. The increasing prevalence of HBV infections—estimated at 296 million globally—continues to expand market opportunity [5].

HIV: The HIV therapeutics market is valued at over USD 20 billion. TAF's incorporation into primary treatment regimens has propelled its market penetration, especially among treatment-naïve patients.

Market Penetration and Competitive Landscape

Major pharmaceutical players including Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, and the respective licensees dominate the TAF market space. Gilead’s Biktarvy and Genvoya hold leading positions with extensive clinical backing, marketing, and physician adoption.

Key Competitors & Alternatives:

  • Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF): Cheaper but with renal and bone toxicity concerns.
  • New entrants: Development of novel antivirals with enhanced efficacy or safety profiles.

Market Drivers:

  • Increasing screening and diagnosis of HBV and HIV.
  • Growing preference for TAF over TDF due to safety benefits.
  • Expanding approval for treatment in pediatric populations and lower-income countries.

Market Projection and Growth Outlook

Forecast for 2023–2030

The TAF market is expected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 8-10%. This growth trajectory is supported by several factors:

  • Increase in diagnosed cases: WHO estimates a 5% annual rise in HBV carriers, driven by population growth and improved detection efforts.
  • Expanded indications: Anticipated approval for TAF-based formulations in pediatric and prophylactic settings will broaden the treatment landscape.
  • Pipeline advancements: Ongoing trials in emerging markets and for novel antiviral combinations could accelerate adoption.

Revenue Projections:
By 2030, the global TAF market could reach USD 10-12 billion, assuming continued adoption growth and regulatory approvals, with significant contributions from developing regions.

Regulatory and Market Challenges

While TAF offers safety advantages, generic competition and pricing pressures pose challenges. Pricing strategies, patent protections, and market exclusivity periods significantly influence revenue streams. Additionally, evolving guidelines recommending early treatment initiation and simplified regimens bolster long-term market growth.

Conclusion

Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate remains a cornerstone in antiviral therapy, with robust clinical trial data supporting its safety and efficacy. The market for TAF is poised for sustained growth, driven by expanding indications, increased disease prevalence, and ongoing pipeline innovations. Strategic positioning by pharmaceutical companies, coupled with favorable regulatory developments, will be crucial for capturing market share and maximizing revenue.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Confidence: Ongoing Phase III trials confirm TAF’s non-inferiority to TDF, with a superior safety profile, particularly concerning renal and bone health.
  • Market Leadership: Gilead’s entrenched market position dominates TAF sales, but rising competition necessitates continuous innovation.
  • Growth Opportunities: Expanding indications, demographic penetration, and upcoming regulatory approvals project a strong future market expansion.
  • Challenges: Patent expirations and pricing pressures require strategic adaptations for sustained profitability.
  • Global Reach: Increased adoption in emerging markets, supported by affordability initiatives and patent protections, will significantly impact market growth.

FAQs

1. What distinguishes tenofovir alafenamide fumarate from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate?
TAF delivers the active tenofovir molecule more efficiently into cells, allowing for lower dosing and reducing renal and bone toxicity risks compared to TDF.

2. Which are the primary indications for TAF-based therapies?
TAF is approved for chronic hepatitis B (as Vemlidy) and in combination with other agents for HIV management (e.g., Genvoya, Biktarvy), with ongoing trials exploring additional uses.

3. What are the key factors influencing TAF market growth?
Increased prescribing due to favorable safety profile, expanded indications, growing global disease burden, and pipeline advancements.

4. How might patent expirations impact TAF revenue streams?
Patent expirations could lead to generic competition, pressuring prices and reducing profits unless innovative formulations or new indications sustain market dominance.

5. What future trends could shape TAF’s market landscape?
Emergence of long-acting formulations, broader prophylactic applications, and real-world safety and efficacy data will influence the future market trajectory.


Sources

[1] Gilead Sciences, "Vemlidy (tenofovir alafenamide) for chronic hepatitis B," FDA Approval, 2018.
[2] Gilead Sciences, "GEMINI Study Results," 2020.
[3] Recent Phase II trials on TAF vaginal rings for HIV PrEP, ClinicalTrials.gov.
[4] MarketWatch, “Global Antiviral Drugs Market,” 2022.
[5] WHO, “Global Hepatitis Report,” 2019.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.