Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TEMOVATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for TEMOVATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00297011 ↗ Valacyclovir+Temovate Gel for the Treatment of Herpes Labialis Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 2 2004-09-01 A randomized study comparing the combination of valacyclovir and temovate gel (clobetasol gel) versus placebo for the treatment of recurrent herpes labialis (cold sores).
NCT00297011 ↗ Valacyclovir+Temovate Gel for the Treatment of Herpes Labialis Completed University of Utah Phase 2 2004-09-01 A randomized study comparing the combination of valacyclovir and temovate gel (clobetasol gel) versus placebo for the treatment of recurrent herpes labialis (cold sores).
NCT00470392 ↗ Mechanistically-based Optimization of UV Radiation Therapy in Psoriasis Terminated University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center N/A 2007-05-01 The purpose of this study is 1) to determine whether Imiquimod or Steroid pretreatment modifies UVB laser light response resulting in increased cell death compared to UVB laser light alone; 2) to determine if pretreatment of psoriatic lesions with Imiquimod or Steroid prior to UVB laser light exposure selectively effects various T cell functions; 3) to determine clinical results from the Imiquimod/Steroid/UVB laser light and correlate those changes with immuno-histochemical changes in the skin; and 4) to determine if single high dose lesion limited UVB laser light intervention combined with Imiquimod or Steroid influences T cell changes
NCT00470392 ↗ Mechanistically-based Optimization of UV Radiation Therapy in Psoriasis Terminated VA Office of Research and Development N/A 2007-05-01 The purpose of this study is 1) to determine whether Imiquimod or Steroid pretreatment modifies UVB laser light response resulting in increased cell death compared to UVB laser light alone; 2) to determine if pretreatment of psoriatic lesions with Imiquimod or Steroid prior to UVB laser light exposure selectively effects various T cell functions; 3) to determine clinical results from the Imiquimod/Steroid/UVB laser light and correlate those changes with immuno-histochemical changes in the skin; and 4) to determine if single high dose lesion limited UVB laser light intervention combined with Imiquimod or Steroid influences T cell changes
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for TEMOVATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for TEMOVATE
Intervention Trials
Herpes Labialis 1
Psoriasis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for TEMOVATE
Intervention Trials
Psoriasis 1
Herpes Labialis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for TEMOVATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for TEMOVATE
Location Trials
United States 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for TEMOVATE
Location Trials
Ohio 1
Utah 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for TEMOVATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for TEMOVATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 2 1
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for TEMOVATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for TEMOVATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for TEMOVATE
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 1
University of Utah 1
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for TEMOVATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
Industry 1
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 6, 2026

TEMOVATE (clobetasol propionate): clinical trials update and market outlook

What is TEMOVATE and what is its patent and regulatory footprint?

TEMOVATE is a brand name for clobetasol propionate, a high-potency topical corticosteroid. In the US, TEMOVATE products are commonly marketed as creams/ointments/solutions under FDA-approved labeling for dermatoses that respond to corticosteroids.

Regulatory status (US):

  • Clobetasol propionate topical products have been on market for many years; TEMOVATE is not a new chemical entity.
  • Clinical-trial activity for clobetasol products is now largely bioequivalence, formulation, or comparative/bridging work rather than first-in-class efficacy programs.

Patent reality (practical market implication):

  • For an older active ingredient like clobetasol propionate, the active-molecule core patents have long since expired in major jurisdictions.
  • Brand differentiation typically rests on formulations, device/vehicle, and labeling rather than new active-substance exclusivity.

What is the clinical trials update for clobetasol propionate (TEMOVATE brand)?

No active, globally relevant late-stage clinical program exists for TEMOVATE as a branded program in the way investors track for new molecular entities. The clinical landscape for clobetasol propionate is dominated by:

  1. Generic and “authorized brand” formulation studies
  • Bioequivalence and vehicle performance studies.
  • Local tolerability and absorption comparisons across different topical formulations.
  1. Special-population or real-world evidence (limited to observational work)
  • Studies that support appropriate use, steroid-sparing regimens, or adherence in routine dermatology.

Because the question requests a “clinical trials update” for TEMOVATE specifically (brand), a brand-level trial register update requires a brand-specific trial taxonomy (trial identifiers tied to “TEMOVATE” rather than to “clobetasol propionate”). Without that mapping, a full, accurate brand-level update cannot be produced.

What do the late-stage and high-evidence trial signals look like?

For clobetasol propionate, the efficacy and safety evidence base is established and primarily anchored to:

  • Long-standing dermatology RCTs across inflammatory dermatoses.
  • Post-marketing safety monitoring for topical steroid class risks (skin atrophy, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal suppression risk with improper use, glaucoma risk with peri-ocular exposure, etc.).

As a result, the signal now is not “late-stage pipeline progress” but rather:

  • Ongoing competitive pressure from generics.
  • Periodic lifecycle improvements (vehicle variants) and label-maintenance actions.

How big is the TEMOVATE market, and what matters for forecasting?

TEMOVATE’s commercial performance tracks the broader topical corticosteroid market, segmented by:

  • Potency tier (ultra-high potency vs medium vs mild)
  • Indication (psoriasis, eczema/dermatitis, lichen planus, and other corticosteroid-responsive dermatoses)
  • Vehicle (cream, ointment, solution, spray where applicable)
  • Channel (retail, mail order, dermatology clinics)

Key demand drivers

  • Chronic inflammatory dermatoses with episodic flares.
  • Physician familiarity with clobetasol as a rescue therapy.
  • Availability of multiple strengths and vehicles.

Key headwinds

  • Price erosion from generic substitution.
  • Persistent clinical caution and stewardship (ultra-potent steroid overuse drives switching to lower-potency regimens and shorter courses).

Forecast mechanics (what a defensible model must include for clobetasol brands) A market projection for TEMOVATE must model:

  • Volume trend driven by dermatology incidence and treatment patterns.
  • Price trend driven by generic erosion and payer formulary pressure.
  • Mix shift by vehicle (cream vs ointment vs solution) if spend shifts faster than volume.

Where is growth likely to come from in the next 3 to 5 years?

For TEMOVATE-like brands in ultra-high potency topical steroids, growth is usually not “pipeline-driven.” It is driven by one of the following:

  • Mix improvements within clobetasol portfolios (vehicle optimization, adherence-friendly presentations).
  • Repositioned contracting (inclusion in formularies or step-therapy exemptions for defined severity).
  • Brand retention strategies (patient- and prescriber-facing education, stewardship-aligned protocols).

Against that, the base case is typically:

  • Continued generic penetration.
  • Flat to modest value growth unless a premium vehicle or payer access improves.

Market projection: base, downside, upside framework

A complete projection requires current numeric market size and share data for TEMOVATE (units and value) and for comparable clobetasol propionate branded and generic segments. Without those numbers, any specific year-by-year forecast would be speculative.

Given the constraint to produce only complete and accurate responses, no quantitative TEMOVATE-specific forecast (US or global) is presented here.

Competitive landscape: what replaces TEMOVATE in practice?

TEMOVATE faces competition from:

  • Generic clobetasol propionate across major strengths and vehicles.
  • Other ultra-high potency topical corticosteroids in the class.
  • In some conditions, non-steroid alternatives (topical calcineurin inhibitors, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, vitamin D analogs, retinoids), depending on indication and guideline preferences.

In pricing terms, the economics usually compress around:

  • A higher share of generic volume.
  • Brand narrowing to higher co-pay tiers, specific payer agreements, and prescriber preference for certain vehicles.

Key commercial risks and diligence targets

For business and investment diligence, the decision-relevant items are:

  • Formulary status (preferred vs non-preferred tier changes).
  • Net price vs list price driven by rebates and pharmacy benefit manager contracting.
  • Vehicle-specific share (cream vs ointment vs solution).
  • Utilization management (step edits, prior auth, or course limits for ultra-potent steroids).

Key Takeaways

  • TEMOVATE is clobetasol propionate, an established ultra-high potency topical corticosteroid with a mature clinical evidence base.
  • Clinical trial activity for the active ingredient is now mainly formulation/bioequivalence and lifecycle work rather than late-stage brand-shaping innovation.
  • A rigorous TEMOVATE market projection requires brand-level market share, units, and net price data; a numerical forecast is not provided here because a complete, accurate basis cannot be established from the available information.
  • The commercial path is largely governed by generic penetration, formulary access, net pricing, and vehicle mix, not by new clinical efficacy differentiation.

FAQs

  1. Is TEMOVATE a new drug with ongoing phase 3 trials?
    No. TEMOVATE is an established clobetasol propionate brand; current activity is typically lifecycle and formulation related.

  2. What is the main reason TEMOVATE faces margin pressure?
    Generic clobetasol propionate availability drives price erosion and channel substitution.

  3. What drives prescription decisions for TEMOVATE in dermatology?
    Potency for acute flares, vehicle preference (cream vs ointment vs solution), and physician experience within guideline and stewardship frameworks.

  4. What are the most important non-efficacy risks to monitor?
    Topical steroid class safety issues tied to inappropriate duration, site, and patient factors.

  5. Where can a branded clobetasol strategy still win?
    Through net price retention via contracting, vehicle-level differentiation, and payer access for defined patient segments.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug product labeling for clobetasol propionate topical corticosteroids (TEMOVATE brand and generic clobetasol propionate products). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.