Last Updated: September 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TAPAZOLE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for TAPAZOLE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02727738 ↗ Treatment of Graves' Hyperthyroidism With Selenium Plus Methimazole Completed University of Pisa N/A 2014-01-01 Evaluation of the efficacy of the combined treatment (methimazole plus selenium) in the control of hyperthyroidism as compared to methimazole alone in 30 Graves' disease (GD) untreated patients.
NCT05017610 ↗ Inducing a Hypothyroxinemic State in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma or Gliosarcoma Not yet recruiting Emory University Early Phase 1 2021-12-31 This early phase I trial studies the safety and feasibility of inducing a hypothyroxinemic state in patients with glioblastoma or gliosarcoma that has come back (recurrent). This trial aims to see if giving a specific thyroid hormone, such as methimazole and liothyronine, is safe and could benefit cancer treatment.
NCT05607407 ↗ A Phase 2 Study of Methimazole in Patients With Progressive Glioblastoma Not yet recruiting Case Comprehensive Cancer Center Phase 2 2024-01-01 The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of a drug called Methimazole. The investigational drug, Methimazole is not FDA approved for brain tumors, but it is used to treat thyroid illnesses. Different doses of Methimazole will be given to several study participants with glioblastoma. The first several study participants will receive the lowest dose. If the drug does not cause serious side effects, it will be given to other study participants at a higher dose. The doses will continue to increase for every group of study participants until the side effects occur that require the dose to be lowered. The procedures in this study are research blood draws, physical exams, collection of medical history, MRI scans, and study drug administration.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for TAPAZOLE

Condition Name

Condition Name for TAPAZOLE
Intervention Trials
Glioblastoma 1
Glioma 1
Graves' Disease 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for TAPAZOLE
Intervention Trials
Glioblastoma 2
Graves Disease 1
Gliosarcoma 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for TAPAZOLE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for TAPAZOLE
Location Trials
Italy 1
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for TAPAZOLE
Location Trials
Georgia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for TAPAZOLE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for TAPAZOLE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 2 1
N/A 1
Early Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for TAPAZOLE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 2
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for TAPAZOLE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for TAPAZOLE
Sponsor Trials
University of Pisa 1
Emory University 1
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for TAPAZOLE
Sponsor Trials
Other 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 8, 2026

TAPAZOLE (methimazole): Clinical Trials Update and Market Outlook

What is TAPAZOLE and who markets it?

TAPAZOLE is the brand name for methimazole, a thionamide used for the treatment of hyperthyroidism (including Graves’ disease) and other causes of excess thyroid hormone production. It is an established, off-patent small molecule marketed in multiple jurisdictions, typically under both brand and generic forms.


How is the clinical trial pipeline shaping up for methimazole?

Are new clinical trials still enrolling or active?

No current, reliably citable, drug-specific trial activity for methimazole as “TAPAZOLE” can be confirmed from the provided information in this task context. Clinical-trial activity for methimazole (as a substance) generally exists, but translating that into brand-specific conclusions for TAPAZOLE requires verifiable, source-backed trial identifiers tied to methimazole and/or the brand label.

Given the constraint, the only defensible clinical-trial update is structural:

  • Methimazole is widely used standard-of-care for hyperthyroidism.
  • Trial focus in mature markets typically shifts from “new efficacy vs placebo” to comparative effectiveness, dose optimization, formulation, or safety in subpopulations.
  • For a legacy, multi-source molecule, the probability of brand-specific trials is low unless there is a reformulation, new dosing regimen, or novel indication with dedicated sponsorship.

What does the market structure imply for TAPAZOLE?

Is TAPAZOLE a monopoly or a competitive market?

TAPAZOLE is a highly competitive, generics-dominated market category in most regions. Methimazole is a mature API with extensive generic supply chains, which compresses pricing and limits brand share unless the brand retains differentiation through distribution contracts, rebates, payer positioning, or specific patient/physician preference.

Implication for a business case

  • Brand economics depend on managed-care uptake, tender pricing, and inventory/distribution reliability, not on pipeline breakthroughs.
  • Revenue growth usually tracks hyperthyroidism incidence, treatment rates, and share retention, not on clinical differentiation.

What is the clinical and commercial demand driver for methimazole?

Which disease states consume methimazole?

Methimazole demand is driven primarily by:

  • Graves’ disease
  • Toxic multinodular goiter
  • Toxic adenoma
  • Preoperative and bridge therapy in selected hyperthyroid workflows (protocol-dependent by region)

Therapy durability is governed by:

  • Endocrinology practice patterns (medical management vs ablation vs surgery)
  • Label guidance and clinician comfort
  • Safety monitoring capacity and adherence

What safety and monitoring factors affect utilization?

What patient management constraints limit uptake?

Methimazole use is constrained by the need for monitoring and adverse-event management. Key practical friction points include:

  • Risk of agranulocytosis (rare but high-impact), requiring patient education and symptom-triggered evaluation
  • Risk of hepatotoxicity and other less common serious adverse effects
  • Need for regular thyroid function testing

These factors tend to support stable, protocol-driven utilization rather than rapid adoption swings.


Market projection: What base-case trajectory fits a legacy methimazole brand?

How should revenue be projected without a brand-specific pipeline?

For a legacy small molecule brand in a generics-heavy setting, credible market projection generally follows a component model:

  1. Disease incidence and treatment penetration
    Growth follows underlying hyperthyroidism prevalence and the proportion treated medically rather than ablated/surgically.

  2. Competitive share and net pricing
    Generics set the floor for price; brand value is protected mainly by:

    • contracts and formulary status
    • substitution rules
    • wholesaler/channel alignment
    • patient adherence and tolerability perception
  3. Regulatory and supply continuity
    Stable access can outperform peers during generic supply shocks, even without clinical novelty.

Base-case expectation for TAPAZOLE (genericized category):

  • Volume: typically steady to modestly growing with thyroid disease management rates.
  • Price: typically downward or flat relative to generics over time.
  • Revenue: low single-digit growth or flat in mature markets, with variability by geography, formulary pressure, and contract cycles.

Because this task requires hard-data sources and none were provided for region-specific sales or trial status, only the structural projection direction can be stated without inventing numeric forecasts.


What are the key risks to the TAPAZOLE market outlook?

Which factors can pressure demand or pricing?

  • Formulary downgrades and step therapy changes within managed care
  • Generic price erosion and increased substitution rates
  • Practice pattern shifts toward ablation or surgery for certain presentations
  • Safety-related prescribing friction (patient and clinician reluctance if monitoring pathways are weak)

Which factors can support stability?

  • High baseline utilization of methimazole as first-line or bridge therapy
  • Strong payer contracting for the brand
  • Trusted distribution channels that prevent stockouts
  • Stable endocrinology guideline alignment supporting medical management

Competitive positioning: What does TAPAZOLE need to defend share?

How does a brand compete in a generics market?

TAPAZOLE brand defense usually comes from:

  • Formulary access in priority tiers
  • Pharmacy benefit manager negotiations and rebate leverage
  • Channel reliability and order-fill performance
  • Clinical support programs that improve adherence and monitoring compliance

These are commercial execution levers rather than R&D levers.


Key Takeaways

  • TAPAZOLE is methimazole, a legacy thionamide used for hyperthyroidism; the market is structurally generic-competitive.
  • A brand-specific clinical trials update for “TAPAZOLE” cannot be supported with citable evidence in this task context; pipeline expectations for methimazole are typically comparative, safety-focused, or operational rather than brand-defining.
  • In mature markets, credible projections are anchored in volume steadiness plus net-price pressure, yielding flat to low growth outcomes absent a brand-specific differentiation event.
  • Commercial strategy dominates: formulary positioning, contracting, and supply reliability are the primary drivers of share and revenue.

FAQs

1) What is the main indication for TAPAZOLE?

TAPAZOLE (methimazole) is used to treat hyperthyroidism, including Graves’ disease.

2) Is TAPAZOLE protected by patents that drive exclusive market rights?

No. Methimazole is a mature molecule widely available as generic; exclusivity is typically limited.

3) Why do clinical trials matter less for TAPAZOLE than for newer drugs?

For legacy generics, new trials rarely produce brand-level differentiation unless they target new formulations, new regimens, or new indications with sponsor-backed programs.

4) What is the biggest commercial driver for a brand in a generics category?

Formulary access and net pricing under payer and PBM contracting.

5) What is the main clinical constraint on prescribing?

Ongoing safety monitoring and patient education tied to rare serious adverse events and thyroid function testing.


References

[1] FDA. Label information for TAPAZOLE (methimazole) (access details vary by record).
[2] DailyMed. TAPAZOLE (methimazole) label.
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. Methimazole-related trial listings (trial-specific mapping to brand name requires record-level review).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.