Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR TAMSULOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for TAMSULOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT01726270 ↗ An 8-week, Open-label, Uncontrolled Study of Tamsulosin 0.4mg in Men With Bothersome Urinary Symptoms Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 2 2012-11-01 Multicenter trial conducted in Pharmacy retail centers
OTC NCT02573311 ↗ Actual Use Study of Tamsulosin in Men Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 3 2015-09-23 An actual use study to assess how men who respond to advertisements about urinary symptoms use tamsulosin in a simulated Over the Counter (OTC) setting including following "stop use and ask a doctor if" and "ask a doctor before use" statements and if they take the medication according to the label instructions, also assess any reported adverse events during simulated OTC use.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for TAMSULOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00090103 ↗ Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Trial With Dutasteride And Tamsulosin Combination Treatment Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 3 2003-11-01 This study will investigate the efficacy and safety of treatment with dutasteride and tamsulosin, administered once daily for 4 years, alone and in combination, on the improvement of symptoms and clinical outcome in men with moderate to severe symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). Study visits are every 3 months for up to 4 years (18 clinic visits). Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is done annually.
NCT00147654 ↗ Effect and Safety Of Detrol LA In Men With Overactive Bladder Symptoms With Or Without Bladder Outlet Obstruction Completed Pfizer Phase 4 2004-11-01 The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate the effect of tolterodine ER plus tamsulosin versus placebo on patient perception of overall treatment benefit in men who have frequency and urgency, with or without urinary urge incontinence (UUI), with or without bladder outlet obstruction (BOO).
NCT00147654 ↗ Effect and Safety Of Detrol LA In Men With Overactive Bladder Symptoms With Or Without Bladder Outlet Obstruction Completed Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. Phase 4 2004-11-01 The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate the effect of tolterodine ER plus tamsulosin versus placebo on patient perception of overall treatment benefit in men who have frequency and urgency, with or without urinary urge incontinence (UUI), with or without bladder outlet obstruction (BOO).
NCT00151567 ↗ Evaluation of Tamsulosin in the Treatment of Ureteral Stones Completed Ministry of Health, France Phase 3 2002-02-01 Ureteral stones have an important place in daily urological practice, usually causing acute episodes of ureteral colic by obstructing the urinary tract. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether repeated administration of tamsulosin, a drug routinely used in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms, could lower the delay of elimination of the stone in patients with pelvis ureterolithiasis.
NCT00151567 ↗ Evaluation of Tamsulosin in the Treatment of Ureteral Stones Completed Yamanouchi Phase 3 2002-02-01 Ureteral stones have an important place in daily urological practice, usually causing acute episodes of ureteral colic by obstructing the urinary tract. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether repeated administration of tamsulosin, a drug routinely used in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms, could lower the delay of elimination of the stone in patients with pelvis ureterolithiasis.
NCT00151567 ↗ Evaluation of Tamsulosin in the Treatment of Ureteral Stones Completed Rennes University Hospital Phase 3 2002-02-01 Ureteral stones have an important place in daily urological practice, usually causing acute episodes of ureteral colic by obstructing the urinary tract. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether repeated administration of tamsulosin, a drug routinely used in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms, could lower the delay of elimination of the stone in patients with pelvis ureterolithiasis.
NCT00201630 ↗ Prophylactic Vs. Therapeutic Use of Uroxatrol in Men Undergoing Brachytherapy Unknown status Sanofi Phase 3 2005-09-01 To asess the efficacy of Uroxatrol, an alpha blocker in men undergoing prostate brachytherapy to treat prostate cancer, and whether the use of Uroxatrol in advance of the brachytherapy is better or not than starting it on the day of surgery.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for TAMSULOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for TAMSULOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia 37
Prostatic Hyperplasia 31
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms 20
Urinary Retention 15
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for TAMSULOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Prostatic Hyperplasia 89
Hyperplasia 76
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms 36
Urinary Retention 27
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for TAMSULOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for TAMSULOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
United States 223
Germany 42
Korea, Republic of 33
Italy 29
China 26
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for TAMSULOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
California 13
Texas 11
New York 11
Alabama 10
Ohio 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for TAMSULOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for TAMSULOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 11
PHASE3 9
PHASE2 1
[disabled in preview] 107
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for TAMSULOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 133
RECRUITING 30
Unknown status 28
[disabled in preview] 36
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for TAMSULOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for TAMSULOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 20
Boehringer Ingelheim 20
Astellas Pharma Inc 13
[disabled in preview] 26
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for TAMSULOSIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Other 170
Industry 121
NIH 5
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Tamsulosin Hydrochloride Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Revenue Projection (2026–2036)

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Tamsulosin hydrochloride, an alpha-1A/1D selective antagonist for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), is a mature branded-generic market with long-running oral regimen lifecycles, limited late-stage pipeline depth, and high sensitivity to generic price dynamics. Most development activity concentrates on formulation changes, dose regimens, and lifecycle management rather than new mechanisms of action.

H1: Tamsulosin Hydrochloride Clinical Trials Update and Market Forecast (BPH/LUTS)

What is the current clinical trials landscape for tamsulosin hydrochloride?

Answer (featured snippet): Clinical trials for tamsulosin hydrochloride remain dominated by formulation, pharmacokinetic (PK) comparability, and real-world effectiveness studies in LUTS/BPH, with fewer signal-rich Phase 3 programs than during earlier drug-development eras.

What trial types are most common?

  • Bioequivalence and PK/PD studies: assess modified-release profiles (commonly once-daily), excipient changes, and generic-to-reference comparability.
  • Formulation lifecycle studies: orally disintegrating or alternative release technologies, plus studies aiming at adherence and tolerability optimization.
  • Comparative clinical trials in LUTS/BPH: head-to-head comparisons vs other alpha-blockers and combination arms (often with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors).
  • Peri-procedural outcomes: studies tied to urologic procedures where LUTS/BPH management influences retention, catheterization time, or symptom scores.

Where do trials typically enroll and what endpoints are used?

  • Endpoints: International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual (PVR), incidence of urinary retention, symptom improvement at 4 to 12 weeks for acute response windows, and longer follow-up for persistence.
  • Design patterns: randomized, controlled, parallel-group for comparative studies; crossover and PK-heavy designs for bioequivalence.

Which companies are active in developing new tamsulosin hydrochloride formulations?

Answer (featured snippet): Development activity skews toward generic and specialty manufacturers running formulation and bioequivalence programs rather than independent, mechanism-expanding R&D by original innovators.

Active developer archetypes

  • Generic manufacturers: submit abbreviated regulatory packages supported by bioequivalence and limited bridging clinical datasets.
  • Urology-focused specialty firms: run incremental trials to support differentiated-release or dosing attributes and to defend market share against lower-priced competitors.
  • Contract research organizations (CRO)-led multicenter studies: often conduct comparative LUTS trials across outpatient urology sites.

When does tamsulosin hydrochloride lose exclusivity in key markets?

Answer (featured snippet): For the core molecule, most major jurisdictions have long passed primary composition-of-matter exclusivity. Market entry has largely proceeded through generic approvals and formulation-specific exclusivity (if any), not through end-to-end monopoly windows.

Practical exclusivity reality for tamsulosin

  • Generic penetration: high, with extensive pharmacy availability and multiple manufacturers.
  • Lifecycle protection: when present, typically attaches to specific release profiles, manufacturing processes, or combination-product claims rather than the parent compound broadly.

How many patents cover tamsulosin hydrochloride and which patent families matter?

Answer (featured snippet): Patent protection is primarily relevant at the formulation or method-of-use level. Broad compound exclusivity has largely expired; current protection is typically fragmented across jurisdictions and product form.

What to expect in a modern tamsulosin estate

  • Formulation patents: modified-release mechanisms, excipient matrices, bead or diffusion system structures, and manufacturing parameters.
  • Method-of-use patents: specific dosing schedules, patient subgroups, or procedural/adjunct uses (less common than formulation).
  • Combination product patents: only relevant if a specific marketed combination is under review.

What is the Orange Book status of tamsulosin hydrochloride?

Answer (featured snippet): Tamsulosin hydrochloride is widely represented by multiple ANDA products on the FDA Orange Book, with active listings tied mainly to formulation-specific intellectual property rather than ongoing primary-drug monopolies.

Typical Orange Book composition for mature drugs

  • Reference listed drug (RLD): long-established.
  • ANDA entries: numerous, often with “therapeutic equivalence” designations.
  • Patent coverage: when listed, usually corresponds to formulation, device-like release attributes, or process claims that can be challenged via Paragraph IV.

What generic entry risks exist for tamsulosin hydrochloride?

Answer (featured snippet): Generic entry risk is low from a legal-blocker standpoint for the core molecule in most geographies because the market is already saturated. The remaining risks relate to residual, formulation-specific patent thickets and to product-specific regulatory or labeling constraints.

Main risk channels

  • Formulation IP: a competitor’s product may avoid or inherit certain release-technology claims.
  • Litigation history: a pattern of settlements can indicate a faster path to entry for bioequivalent products once specific patents are cleared.
  • Regulatory labeling: minor labeling differences can affect pharmacy adoption and payer contracting.

What patent litigation affects tamsulosin hydrochloride?

Answer (featured snippet): Litigation exists intermittently across formulation and patent listings, but it is not currently a dominant, high-cost battleground compared with newer BPH or LUTS agents.

Where litigation typically clusters

  • Modified-release formulations
  • Process/manufacturing method patents
  • Secondary-use claims (where asserted)

How does tamsulosin hydrochloride compare with other BPH/LUTS drugs for market dynamics?

Answer (featured snippet): Compared with newer branded BPH therapies, tamsulosin has weaker brand premium leverage and stronger price pressure due to broad generic availability. Its market share is supported by long-standing physician adoption and once-daily convenience.

Competitive set (commercial)

  • Other alpha blockers: silodosin, doxazosin, alfuzosin.
  • Combination pathways: tamsulosin plus dutasteride or finasteride (where applicable by product formulation and labeling).
  • Novel agents and device-adjacent approaches: typically compete within subsegments rather than displacing first-line alpha-blocker use broadly.

What are the commercial drivers behind tamsulosin hydrochloride demand?

Answer (featured snippet): Demand is driven by BPH incidence, chronic symptom persistence, payer formularies favoring low-cost generics, and urology workflow adoption of alpha-blockers as initial medical therapy.

Revenue and volume drivers

  • BPH prevalence and age demographics: growth in older male populations expands prescription addressable base.
  • Adherence: once-daily dosing supports persistence.
  • Seasonality: typically modest, tied to routine urology visits rather than acute disease surges.

What is the market size for tamsulosin hydrochloride and how is it trending?

Answer (featured snippet): The tamsulosin hydrochloride market is large and stable in volume terms, but value growth is constrained by generic price compression.

How value typically behaves for saturated generics

  • Unit volumes: relatively steady to slightly growing with population aging.
  • ASP/revenue: grows slowly or declines, depending on US pricing, payer reimbursement, and competitive entry cycles.

What is the revenue projection for tamsulosin hydrochloride (2026–2036)?

Answer (featured snippet): Revenue is projected to remain mostly flat-to-low growth globally, driven by modest volume expansion and continued ASP erosion.

Projection model structure (what drives the forecast)

  • Volume growth: anchored to demographic BPH prevalence and diagnosis rates.
  • Price/ASP behavior: declines where new generic entrants compress pricing further, stabilizes where supply constraints or multi-year contracts persist.
  • Share shifts: modest shifts among alpha blockers and combination products, with tamsulosin maintaining a large base due to entrenched prescribing.

High-level forecast ranges (directional)

  • 2026–2030: low single-digit global volume growth; mid to low single-digit annual value erosion or near-flat value depending on pricing stabilization.
  • 2031–2036: continuing price pressure, offset by incremental volume growth. Net result trends to flat value growth with episodic dips around entry waves.

Which geographies will matter most for tamsulosin hydrochloride growth?

Answer (featured snippet): Growth tracks with aging male populations and access to outpatient urology care, with the largest absolute revenues historically in the US and Europe and steady incremental gains in parts of Asia.

Geographic patterns to expect

  • US: payer-driven low ASP environment; continued generic supply competition.
  • Europe: national formularies and reimbursement tiers; similar maturity with local price controls.
  • Emerging markets: higher sensitivity to access and tender cycles; potential for incremental volume expansion.

What formulations are most relevant for market share and clinical use?

Answer (featured snippet): Modified-release once-daily capsules and tablet equivalents dominate routine use; newer delivery systems matter mainly where they reduce tolerability issues or improve adherence.

Key product attributes that shape adoption

  • Once-daily convenience
  • Swallowing tolerance and GI tolerability
  • Stable plasma profile reducing peak-related side effects

Does tamsulosin hydrochloride have combination-product momentum?

Answer (featured snippet): Combination adoption exists where combination therapy is guideline-consistent for men with larger prostates and progressive symptoms, but the market impact depends on the specific combination product’s regulatory status and pricing.

Combination pathways that affect demand

  • Alpha blocker + 5-alpha reductase inhibitor: typically for men at higher risk of progression.
  • Fixed-dose vs separate prescriptions: depends on payer preference and patient co-payment.

Key Takeaways

  • Tamsulosin hydrochloride clinical activity remains primarily incremental: formulation, bioequivalence, and comparative LUTS/BPH outcomes rather than new mechanism-defining Phase 3 breakthroughs.
  • The patent landscape is largely stale at the core compound level; present protection is fragmented, usually tied to formulation or process claims for specific products.
  • Market value is constrained by generic price compression, while volume benefits from BPH prevalence and aging demographics.
  • Revenue projections point to flat-to-low single-digit global value growth through 2036, with unit volumes supported by demographic tailwinds and prices trending down or stabilizing after entry waves.

FAQs

1) What endpoints do tamsulosin hydrochloride trials use for BPH/LUTS efficacy?
IPSS, Qmax, PVR, urinary retention incidence, and symptom change over 4–12 week windows for early readouts.

2) Are there any new Phase 3 tamsulosin hydrochloride programs that could change standard of care?
Current activity is mainly formulation and comparative clinical work; mechanism-changing Phase 3 pipelines are not a dominant feature of the current landscape.

3) What is the main competitive threat to tamsulosin hydrochloride in LUTS/BPH?
Price competition from multiple generic entries and share competition from other alpha blockers and combination regimens.

4) Does tamsulosin hydrochloride have device-like delivery innovations impacting dosing?
Most differentiation remains oral modified-release and formulation engineering, not fundamentally new delivery devices.

5) How do payer formularies typically impact tamsulosin hydrochloride revenue?
Formulary preference for low-cost equivalents constrains value growth even when prescription volume holds up.

References

  1. FDA Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (Orange Book). U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Public assessment reports and product information for tamsulosin-containing medicines.
  3. ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for “tamsulosin hydrochloride” and “BPH/LUTS” clinical studies.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.