Last Updated: July 28, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SODIUM ACETATE ANHYDROUS


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Sodium Acetate Anhydrous

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00283387 ↗ Efficacy of Betaine for Reduction of Urine Oxalate in Patients With Type 1 Primary Hyperoxaluria Completed National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Phase 2 2007-02-01 The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of betaine in reducing urine oxalate excretion of Type 1 Primary Hyperoxaluria (PHI) patients. Hypothesis: Betaine will effectively reduce urine oxalate excretion in Primary Hyperoxaluria Type I patients.
NCT00283387 ↗ Efficacy of Betaine for Reduction of Urine Oxalate in Patients With Type 1 Primary Hyperoxaluria Completed Orphan Europe Phase 2 2007-02-01 The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of betaine in reducing urine oxalate excretion of Type 1 Primary Hyperoxaluria (PHI) patients. Hypothesis: Betaine will effectively reduce urine oxalate excretion in Primary Hyperoxaluria Type I patients.
NCT00283387 ↗ Efficacy of Betaine for Reduction of Urine Oxalate in Patients With Type 1 Primary Hyperoxaluria Completed Mayo Clinic Phase 2 2007-02-01 The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of betaine in reducing urine oxalate excretion of Type 1 Primary Hyperoxaluria (PHI) patients. Hypothesis: Betaine will effectively reduce urine oxalate excretion in Primary Hyperoxaluria Type I patients.
NCT00302289 ↗ B181: Stimulation of Thermogenesis by Bio-Active Food Ingredients Completed Science, Toxicology & Technology, San Francisco, California Phase 1 2000-01-01 The primary aim was to measure the effect of green tea extract, tyrosine and caffeine on energy expenditure, appetite ratings and spontaneous energy intake together with recording of side effects in healthy normal weight subjects.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Sodium Acetate Anhydrous

Condition Name

Condition Name for Sodium Acetate Anhydrous
Intervention Trials
Healthy 4
Pachyonychia Congenita 2
Glioblastoma Multiforme 1
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Sodium Acetate Anhydrous
Intervention Trials
Rhinitis 2
Pachyonychia Congenita 2
Nails, Malformed 2
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Sodium Acetate Anhydrous

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Sodium Acetate Anhydrous
Location Trials
United States 38
Spain 4
Canada 3
United Kingdom 2
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Sodium Acetate Anhydrous
Location Trials
California 7
Minnesota 5
Utah 3
Pennsylvania 3
Texas 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Sodium Acetate Anhydrous

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Sodium Acetate Anhydrous
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 2
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Sodium Acetate Anhydrous
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 18
Not yet recruiting 5
Recruiting 5
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Sodium Acetate Anhydrous

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Sodium Acetate Anhydrous
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 4
Palvella Therapeutics, Inc. 3
Mayo Clinic 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Sodium Acetate Anhydrous
Sponsor Trials
Other 25
Industry 19
NIH 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 11, 2026

Sodium Acetate Anhydrous: Clinical-Stage Signals, Market Reality, and Forecast Fit

What is Sodium Acetate Anhydrous in the clinical pipeline?

“Sodium acetate anhydrous” is a salt form of sodium acetate used as an excipient and treatment component in multiple settings (notably IV fluids, correction of metabolic disturbances, and peri-procedural supportive care). In practice, it is not typically developed as a proprietary, patent-limited “new drug” with a dedicated global phase program. Clinical activity for sodium acetate products tends to cluster around:

  • Formulation and use as a component of therapy (e.g., IV fluids containing acetate, acid-base management).
  • Comparative supportive-care protocols (hospital pathways rather than drug-development programs).
  • Use as an ingredient in parenteral solutions, not as a standalone investigational active with a modern phase-trial lifecycle and clear global NDA/MAA endpoints.

This structure drives a predictable market pattern: sodium acetate anhydrous behaves more like a commodity input or generic-supportive-care product class than a blockbuster drug candidate.

What does the clinical-trials signal look like?

A clinically meaningful “update” for a drug requires trial registration linkage to a specific investigational product (distinct sponsor, IND/CTA, and protocol details). For sodium acetate anhydrous, the trial landscape is typically fragmented across:

  • Different brands/products (manufacturers and solution formats).
  • Different indications (supportive care, acid-base balance, perioperative protocols).
  • Different routes (generally parenteral use as part of fluids rather than a proprietary drug).

Because these trials are frequently protocol-level and ingredient-level, the dataset does not map cleanly into a single “clinical trials update” narrative with a single sponsor, phase progression, and registrational readout.

What is the market for sodium acetate anhydrous?

The market for sodium acetate anhydrous is dominated by:

  • Industrial and chemical use (buffering, chemical feedstock).
  • Pharmaceutical and medical supply where it is used in formulations and supportive-care products.

For healthcare-facing commercial purposes, sodium acetate anhydrous is usually procured under:

  • Bulk chemical supply contracts
  • Pharmaceutical-grade specifications for compounding and manufacturing
  • Supply agreements tied to finished parenteral or hospital products (rather than direct patient-facing prescription brands)

This means the “market analysis and projection” for the ingredient is driven more by:

  • Demand for parenteral fluids and acid-base protocols
  • Hospital purchasing cycles and tendering
  • Cost of feedstocks and manufacturing capacity
  • Regulatory quality requirements for pharmaceutical-grade material

How is it projected commercially?

For an ingredient like sodium acetate anhydrous, projections are built on volume and unit economics, not on pipeline value transfer.

A practical projection framework for investors and R&D planners typically uses:

  • Healthcare utilization assumptions (how often acetate-containing supportive care is used)
  • Penetration into formulations (share of acetate-buffered parenteral solutions)
  • Manufacturing capacity and pricing (commodity chemical dynamics)
  • Regulatory and quality-cost pass-through (compliance and batch-release cost)

However, producing a credible numeric forecast (market size, CAGR, and segment shares) requires a specific source dataset (e.g., a named market report or granular healthcare volume series). No such market-size and CAGR figures are provided in the available context.

Where does sodium acetate anhydrous create value in product development?

Value is more likely to appear in:

  • Manufacturing scale and cost leadership for pharmaceutical-grade supply.
  • Quality and compliance reliability (batch-to-batch consistency, impurity profile control).
  • Formulation work that reduces risk and improves stability or compatibility in IV solutions.
  • Supply-chain resilience (secondary suppliers, risk diversification, reduced lead times).

These are execution advantages, not clinical-development defensibility.


Decision Lens: Is there a treatable “drug” investment thesis here?

Is sodium acetate anhydrous a patentable drug thesis?

Sodium acetate anhydrous generally does not function as a patent-driven therapeutic platform in the way that modern NME biologics or small-molecule candidates do. The commercial logic aligns with:

  • Generic ingredient procurement
  • Regulatory-grade manufacturing
  • Supportive-care protocol demand

Any “clinical-stage” thesis is usually secondary to supply and formulation.

What kind of “clinical update” is actionable for this ingredient?

The most actionable update type for sodium acetate anhydrous is not phase readouts. It is:

  • Changes in hospital protocols favoring acetate-containing fluids
  • Procurement tender shifts between suppliers
  • New compounding or manufacturing monograph requirements affecting purity specs
  • Safety signals that affect usage frequency (rare for a commodity salt, but possible in formulation-specific contexts)

A sponsor-driven clinical pipeline update is less likely to exist as a single coherent asset.


Market and Forecast: What can be concluded from available information

What numbers can be stated without a named source dataset?

No defensible market size, CAGR, or segment forecasts can be stated without a cited numeric dataset tied to “sodium acetate anhydrous” (or a clearly defined related market such as “sodium acetate market” with a healthcare segment). Under strict correctness rules, numeric projections would require those source citations.

What does the competitive landscape likely look like?

Even without numeric shares, the competitive pattern for sodium acetate anhydrous is:

  • Commodity chemical manufacturers competing on price and volume
  • Pharmaceutical-grade suppliers competing on specification compliance and batch release quality
  • Finished-solution manufacturers where sodium acetate content affects their formulation economics

This creates a market where defensibility is operational.


Key Takeaways

  • Sodium acetate anhydrous is typically a supportive-care ingredient or manufacturing component, not a unified proprietary clinical asset with a single phase pipeline.
  • Clinical-trial activity for the ingredient often appears as protocol-level or formulation-level studies rather than registrational “drug development” programs.
  • Market value is driven more by volume, specifications, compliance, and supply economics than by blockbuster-style clinical success.
  • A numeric market projection requires a cited market dataset; without that, the only rigorous conclusions are structural (supply-driven competition and operational value drivers).

FAQs

1) Is sodium acetate anhydrous in active Phase 3 or registrational trials as a standalone drug?

The ingredient generally does not behave like a standalone registrational candidate; clinical use is usually tied to supportive-care protocols and formulations.

2) What typically drives demand for sodium acetate anhydrous in healthcare?

Demand tracks hospital and manufacturing usage of acetate-containing parenteral fluids and acid-base supportive care protocols.

3) What is the main economic lever for suppliers?

Unit cost and supply reliability for pharmaceutical-grade material, including impurity control and batch-release consistency.

4) Where can R&D teams create differentiation?

Process improvements for purity/specification compliance, improved formulation compatibility, and stability-focused development tied to finished parenteral products.

5) Does patent strategy apply as it would for a novel small molecule?

Not in the same way. The asset class behaves closer to a commodity ingredient than a proprietary therapeutic platform.


References

[1] (No sources cited because none were provided in the prompt and no verifiable numeric or clinical trial datasets are included.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.