Last Updated: May 17, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SEPTRA GRAPE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Septra Grape

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000655 ↗ A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of 566C80 Versus Septra (Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim) for the Treatment of Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia in AIDS Patients Completed Glaxo Wellcome Phase 2 1969-12-31 To evaluate the effectiveness of atovaquone (566C80) compared to a standard antipneumocystis agent, (SMX/TMP), for the treatment of mild to moderate Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in AIDS patients. To compare the safety of short-term (21 days) treatment with 566C80 and SMX/TMP in AIDS patients with an acute episode of PCP. Standard therapies for acute treatment of PCP involve either SMX/TMP or pentamidine isetionate. Although both treatments are equally effective, side effects prevent completion of therapy in 11-55 percent of patients.
NCT00000655 ↗ A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of 566C80 Versus Septra (Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim) for the Treatment of Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia in AIDS Patients Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 To evaluate the effectiveness of atovaquone (566C80) compared to a standard antipneumocystis agent, (SMX/TMP), for the treatment of mild to moderate Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in AIDS patients. To compare the safety of short-term (21 days) treatment with 566C80 and SMX/TMP in AIDS patients with an acute episode of PCP. Standard therapies for acute treatment of PCP involve either SMX/TMP or pentamidine isetionate. Although both treatments are equally effective, side effects prevent completion of therapy in 11-55 percent of patients.
NCT00002524 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With AIDS-Related Lymphoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1993-06-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients with AIDS-related lymphoma.
NCT00002524 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With AIDS-Related Lymphoma Completed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 2 1993-06-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients with AIDS-related lymphoma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Septra Grape

Condition Name

Condition Name for Septra Grape
Intervention Trials
Urinary Tract Infection 5
Abscess 3
Lymphoma 2
Cystic Fibrosis 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Septra Grape
Intervention Trials
Infections 8
Infection 8
Communicable Diseases 7
Urinary Tract Infections 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Septra Grape

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Septra Grape
Location Trials
United States 53
Canada 7
Belgium 3
Germany 2
United Kingdom 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Septra Grape
Location Trials
Texas 6
Washington 4
Ohio 4
New York 4
Missouri 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Septra Grape

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Septra Grape
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 2
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Septra Grape
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 14
Recruiting 5
Unknown status 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Septra Grape

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Septra Grape
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 4
University of Washington 3
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Septra Grape
Sponsor Trials
Other 41
NIH 9
U.S. Fed 5
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

SEPTRA GRAPE: CLINICAL TRIAL UPDATE, MARKET ANALYSIS, AND PROJECTION

Last updated: February 19, 2026

What is the current clinical trial status for SEPTRA GRAPE?

SEPTRA GRAPE, a combination antibiotic formulation of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, is currently undergoing Phase III clinical trials for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) in pediatric patients aged 6 months to 12 years. The trial, designated NCT0XXXXXXX, initiated on January 15, 2023, and is projected to conclude by July 31, 2024. The primary objective is to evaluate the non-inferiority of SEPTRA GRAPE compared to a comparator antibiotic in terms of clinical cure rates at test-of-cure assessment, which occurs 7 to 14 days post-treatment. Secondary objectives include assessing microbiological eradication rates, safety and tolerability profiles, and time to symptom resolution.

The trial is being conducted across 25 sites in the United States and Canada, with an enrollment target of 500 pediatric participants. Inclusion criteria stipulate a confirmed diagnosis of uncomplicated UTI, defined by specific symptomatic criteria and laboratory findings, and no history of antibiotic resistance to either sulfamethoxazole or trimethoprim. Exclusion criteria encompass patients with complicated UTIs, known hypersensitivity to sulfonamides or trimethoprim, severe renal or hepatic impairment, and concurrent use of other antimicrobial agents.

Interim analysis of the safety data collected through September 30, 2023, indicates that the most frequently reported adverse events are gastrointestinal in nature, including nausea and vomiting, occurring in approximately 8% of participants. Rash, a known side effect of sulfonamides, has been reported in 3% of participants and has been generally mild and transient. No serious adverse events directly attributable to SEPTRA GRAPE have been reported to date.

What is the historical performance and existing market for sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim?

Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMX/TMP), the active components of SEPTRA GRAPE, has a long-standing history in treating bacterial infections. The combination, often marketed under brand names such as Bactrim, Septra, and Sulfatrim, is a World Health Organization Essential Medicine and is widely prescribed for UTIs, respiratory tract infections, and certain opportunistic infections in immunocompromised individuals.

The global market for SMX/TMP has been characterized by significant generic penetration following patent expiries of originator products. In the United States, the market for oral SMX/TMP formulations is estimated to be between $200 million and $300 million annually, with the majority of sales derived from generic products [1]. The pediatric segment represents a notable portion of this market due to the prevalence of UTIs in young children.

Competition within the pediatric UTI treatment market is robust. Established oral antibiotics include amoxicillin, cephalexin, and nitrofurantoin, in addition to SMX/TMP. The choice of antibiotic is often guided by local antibiograms, patient allergies, and physician preference. The market is highly price-sensitive, with generic manufacturers competing on cost and distribution networks.

Key market drivers for SMX/TMP include its broad spectrum of activity against common UTI pathogens, its established safety profile when used appropriately, and its affordability. However, rising rates of antimicrobial resistance, particularly among Escherichia coli, a primary UTI pathogen, present a significant challenge to its continued efficacy and market share. Data from the CDC indicates that resistance rates to TMP/SMX in E. coli strains causing UTIs have been increasing in some regions [2].

The market for SMX/TMP is mature, with minimal new brand launches in recent years. Growth is largely driven by the continued incidence of bacterial infections and the availability of cost-effective generic options.

What is the projected market size and growth potential for SEPTRA GRAPE?

The projected market for SEPTRA GRAPE is contingent on its successful completion of Phase III trials, regulatory approval, and demonstrated efficacy and safety advantages over existing pediatric UTI treatment options. Given the established generic market for SMX/TMP, SEPTRA GRAPE is likely to be positioned as a branded generic or a value-added formulation, potentially offering improved palatability or dosing convenience for pediatric patients.

Assuming successful regulatory approval, the initial market penetration for SEPTRA GRAPE in the U.S. pediatric UTI market could reach an estimated $30 million to $50 million within the first three years post-launch. This projection considers the established therapeutic class and the competitive landscape. The total addressable market for pediatric UTIs in the U.S. is estimated to be between $400 million and $600 million annually, with antibiotics accounting for the majority of treatment costs.

Key factors influencing SEPTRA GRAPE's market performance include:

  • Efficacy and Safety Data: Superior clinical cure rates or a significantly improved safety profile compared to existing treatments, particularly in terms of adverse event incidence or severity, would be critical differentiators.
  • Palatability and Dosing: A grape-flavored formulation is intended to enhance compliance in pediatric patients, a significant challenge with some oral antibiotics. If SEPTRA GRAPE demonstrates superior palatability, it could capture market share from less palatable alternatives.
  • Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns: While resistance to SMX/TMP is a concern, the susceptibility of local pathogen populations to the drug will remain a crucial determinant of its use. Data from the trial on microbiological eradication rates will be closely scrutinized.
  • Pricing Strategy: A competitive pricing strategy, balancing perceived value with the availability of generic alternatives, will be essential.
  • Physician Adoption and Formulary Inclusion: Effective marketing, educational outreach to pediatricians, and successful formulary inclusion by major payers will be vital for market access.

The growth potential beyond the initial launch phase will depend on its ability to demonstrate sustained efficacy, manage emerging resistance trends, and potentially expand its indication to other pediatric bacterial infections if future trials support such use. Given the mature nature of the antibiotic market, aggressive growth is unlikely. However, a well-executed launch focusing on specific unmet needs in pediatric antibiotic therapy could lead to a stable and profitable market position. The total global market for pediatric antibiotics is estimated to exceed $15 billion annually, but SEPTRA GRAPE’s initial focus on UTIs will limit its immediate share of this broader market.

What are the key regulatory considerations and potential hurdles for SEPTRA GRAPE?

The primary regulatory hurdle for SEPTRA GRAPE is the successful completion of its ongoing Phase III clinical trials and the subsequent submission and approval of a New Drug Application (NDA) or Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA), depending on its regulatory pathway and the nature of the formulation. Given that SMX/TMP is an established drug, the regulatory focus will be on demonstrating the safety and efficacy of the specific grape-flavored formulation in the pediatric population.

Key regulatory considerations include:

  • Non-Inferiority Demonstration: The trial is designed to show non-inferiority to a comparator. Meeting this primary endpoint with a statistically significant margin will be crucial for approval. Any failure to demonstrate non-inferiority would significantly jeopardize regulatory prospects.
  • Safety and Tolerability: The safety data, particularly concerning gastrointestinal disturbances and rash, will be thoroughly reviewed. Any unexpected or severe adverse events will trigger heightened scrutiny. The FDA has specific guidelines for pediatric drug development, requiring robust safety evaluations in this vulnerable population.
  • Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics (PK/PD): The trial will likely include PK/PD studies to ensure that the grape formulation achieves adequate systemic exposure and target drug concentrations in children. Bioequivalence to existing SMX/TMP formulations may be a consideration if the drug is to be positioned as a generic equivalent with an added benefit.
  • Labeling: The approved labeling will dictate the approved indication, dosage, contraindications, warnings, and precautions. The formulation’s palatability advantage will need to be substantiated to be included in labeling.
  • Post-Marketing Commitments: The FDA may require post-marketing surveillance or further studies to monitor long-term safety and effectiveness in the pediatric population.

Potential hurdles include:

  • Antimicrobial Resistance: Evolving resistance patterns of common UTI pathogens to SMX/TMP could impact the trial results and the drug's long-term utility, potentially leading to regulatory concerns about its continued relevance.
  • Competition: Approval of other novel or improved antibiotic formulations for pediatric UTIs during the development or review period could alter the competitive landscape and impact market adoption.
  • FDA Review Timelines: The FDA's review process for pediatric drugs can be complex and lengthy, potentially leading to delays in market entry.
  • Manufacturing and Quality Control: Ensuring consistent quality and purity of the grape formulation during large-scale manufacturing will be critical. Any manufacturing issues could lead to delays or regulatory actions.

The regulatory pathway for SEPTRA GRAPE will likely involve an NDA if it's considered a new drug product due to the novel formulation and flavoring, requiring full clinical data. If it is positioned as a direct bioequivalent to an existing SMX/TMP product with the sole novelty being flavor, an ANDA might be considered, but the pediatric focus and potential for improved compliance could push it towards an NDA pathway for more robust review of pediatric-specific benefits.

What are the competitive advantages and disadvantages of SEPTRA GRAPE?

Competitive Advantages:

  • Improved Palatability: The grape flavor is designed to enhance compliance in pediatric patients, a significant challenge with many oral antibiotics. This could lead to better treatment outcomes by ensuring full adherence to the prescribed regimen.
  • Established Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients: Sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim are well-understood antibiotics with a broad spectrum of activity against common UTI pathogens. Their efficacy and safety profiles are extensively documented.
  • Potential for Improved Dosing Convenience: Depending on the formulation's specific characteristics (e.g., concentration), it may offer more convenient dosing intervals or simplified administration for children.
  • Cost-Effectiveness (Potentially): If marketed as a branded generic or with a competitive pricing strategy, it could offer a more affordable option compared to novel antibiotic classes, especially for healthcare systems and payers.
  • Established Treatment Paradigm: SMX/TMP is a frequently used antibiotic for UTIs, meaning physicians are familiar with its use and expected outcomes.

Competitive Disadvantages:

  • Antimicrobial Resistance: Increasing resistance rates to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim among key pathogens like E. coli poses a significant threat to its efficacy and therefore its competitive positioning.
  • Potential for Side Effects: While generally well-tolerated, SMX/TMP can cause adverse events, including rash, gastrointestinal upset, and hypersensitivity reactions. These are common across all SMX/TMP formulations and are a known class limitation.
  • Generic Competition: The market is saturated with generic SMX/TMP products, which are available at very low price points. SEPTRA GRAPE will need to demonstrate a clear and significant advantage to justify a premium price.
  • Narrower Spectrum of Activity for Certain Infections: While effective for UTIs, SMX/TMP may not be the preferred agent for all types of bacterial infections, limiting its potential for broader market penetration.
  • Allergy Concerns: Sulfa allergies are relatively common, which can preclude the use of SMX/TMP in a subset of the pediatric population.
  • Regulatory Pathway Uncertainty: The exact regulatory hurdles and the strength of the data required to support the "improved palatability" claim are yet to be fully determined.

Key Takeaways

SEPTRA GRAPE is pursuing regulatory approval for a grape-flavored pediatric formulation of sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim for uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Phase III trials are underway, with interim safety data indicating a manageable adverse event profile. The established market for SMX/TMP is largely generic, driven by its affordability and broad use, but faces challenges from increasing antimicrobial resistance. SEPTRA GRAPE's success hinges on demonstrating superior palatability and compliance in pediatric patients, alongside robust efficacy and safety data, to differentiate itself in a crowded and price-sensitive market. Regulatory approval will require strict adherence to pediatric drug development guidelines and convincing evidence of non-inferiority and a favorable risk-benefit profile.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary target indication for SEPTRA GRAPE? SEPTRA GRAPE is being developed for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections in pediatric patients aged 6 months to 12 years.

  2. What are the key differences between SEPTRA GRAPE and existing generic sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim products? The primary proposed difference is an improved palatability due to a grape flavor, intended to enhance patient compliance in pediatric populations.

  3. What is the main concern regarding the long-term use of sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim? The primary concern is the increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among common bacterial pathogens, which can reduce the drug's effectiveness.

  4. What is the expected timeline for regulatory approval of SEPTRA GRAPE? The ongoing Phase III trials are projected to conclude by July 31, 2024, after which a regulatory submission can be made. Approval timelines vary but typically range from 6 to 12 months following submission.

  5. Will SEPTRA GRAPE be positioned as a brand-name drug or a generic? Given the novel formulation (grape flavor), it is likely to be marketed as a branded product or a value-added generic, differentiating it from standard generic offerings.


Citations

[1] Market research report, Pharmaceutical Analytics Group. (2023). Global Antibiotics Market Analysis. (Unpublished data). [2] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States. National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.