Last Updated: August 3, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SULFATRIM-DS


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SULFATRIM-DS

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002524 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With AIDS-Related Lymphoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1993-06-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients with AIDS-related lymphoma.
NCT00002524 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With AIDS-Related Lymphoma Completed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 2 1993-06-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients with AIDS-related lymphoma.
NCT00405704 ↗ Randomized Intervention for Children With Vesicoureteral Reflux (RIVUR) Completed University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Phase 3 2007-05-01 In this 2-year, multisite, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 607 children with vesicoureteral reflux that was diagnosed after a first or second febrile or symptomatic urinary tract infecton, we evaluated the efficacy of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) prophylaxis in preventing recurrences (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes were renal scarring, treatment failure (a composite of recurrences and scarring), and antimicrobial resistance.
NCT00405704 ↗ Randomized Intervention for Children With Vesicoureteral Reflux (RIVUR) Completed National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Phase 3 2007-05-01 In this 2-year, multisite, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 607 children with vesicoureteral reflux that was diagnosed after a first or second febrile or symptomatic urinary tract infecton, we evaluated the efficacy of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) prophylaxis in preventing recurrences (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes were renal scarring, treatment failure (a composite of recurrences and scarring), and antimicrobial resistance.
NCT00791505 ↗ Antibiotic/COPD in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Requiring Mechanical Ventilation Completed University of Monastir Phase 3 2002-07-01 Although the use of antibiotics in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is largely accepted, controversy remains regarding whether the choice of antibiotic has any impact on outcome. Our aim was to compare the effects of the combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin in patients treated for severe COPD exacerbation requiring mechanical ventilation.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SULFATRIM-DS

Condition Name

Condition Name for SULFATRIM-DS
Intervention Trials
Urinary Tract Infections 1
Vesicoureteral Reflux 1
Antibiotics 1
Bladder Carcinoma 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SULFATRIM-DS
Intervention Trials
Urinary Tract Infections 2
Communicable Diseases 1
Gastroesophageal Reflux 1
Carcinoma 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SULFATRIM-DS

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SULFATRIM-DS
Location Trials
United States 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SULFATRIM-DS
Location Trials
New York 2
Texas 2
Oklahoma 1
Ohio 1
North Carolina 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SULFATRIM-DS

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SULFATRIM-DS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SULFATRIM-DS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 3
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SULFATRIM-DS

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SULFATRIM-DS
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 2
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 1
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SULFATRIM-DS
Sponsor Trials
Other 4
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 26, 2026

Sulfatrim-DS clinical trials update, market analysis and revenue projection (timeline, competitors, and exclusivity risks)

Executive summary: Sulfatrim-DS (commonly marketed as a trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole pediatric/oral liquid) is a long-established, off-patent antibacterial product in the U.S. and other major markets. Forecast demand is primarily driven by (1) pediatric infection incidence, (2) competitive pricing across multisource TMP-SMX suspensions, and (3) payer and formulary preference for lower-cost generics. Current R&D risk is low because the active ingredient class is mature and subject to broad generic availability, with clinical trial activity more likely to be limited to bioequivalence, formulation, or safety studies rather than new pivotal efficacy programs.

No clinically meaningful, drug-specific Phase 2/3 trial results, trial identifiers, regulatory exclusivity milestones, or NDA/ANDA-specific Orange Book patent estate details for “SULFATRIM-DS” are provided in the available information. Without verifiable drug-specific trial and regulatory data tied to the exact brand name, a complete and accurate clinical-trials update and projection cannot be produced.


What clinical trials exist for Sulfatrim-DS (TMP-SMX suspension) and what is the latest update?

Featured snippet answer: For mature TMP-SMX products like Sulfatrim-DS, “latest updates” typically come from post-marketing safety monitoring and small studies supporting bioequivalence or formulation changes, not new Phase 3 efficacy trials.

Are there Phase 2/3 efficacy trials tied to the brand name Sulfatrim-DS?

Sulfatrim-DS is a brand of a generic drug class (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) used for susceptible bacterial infections. In practice, brand-specific late-stage trials are uncommon for established antibacterials when multisource generic versions already exist.

What trial types are most likely for TMP-SMX liquid pediatric brands?

  • Bioequivalence studies for oral suspensions
  • Stability and formulation work (shelf-life, palatability, dosing accuracy, viscosity)
  • Pediatric safety studies and pharmacokinetic bridging
  • Labeling updates aligned with guideline changes and resistance patterns

How to interpret “clinical trials” language for mature antibacterials

When clinical trial “updates” are reported for TMP-SMX, they usually map to:

  • ANDA supporting studies rather than sponsor-funded efficacy programs
  • Post-marketing pharmacovigilance analyses rather than trial endpoints
  • Substitution for brand supply disruptions rather than new therapeutic indications

Is Sulfatrim-DS still covered by patents or exclusivity in the US (Orange Book status)?

Featured snippet answer: TMP-SMX products are generally off patent in the U.S.; brand-name liquid suspensions are commonly multisource. A brand-level Orange Book entry can exist only if the product has still-active formulation, method-of-use, or other listed patents.

How Orange Book listings typically map to TMP-SMX

If Orange Book patents are listed for a brand, they usually relate to:

  • Specific formulations or improved manufacturing processes
  • Method-of-use restrictions (less common for old antibacterials)
  • Or listed for brand-specific product improvements that do not block generic TMP-SMX broadly

What matters for launch timing

For market entry and competitive impact, the key question is whether any listed patent blocks:

  • ANDA approval (blocking patents)
  • Or triggers 30-month stay via a Paragraph IV certification Without drug-specific Orange Book data, there is no basis for asserting a current exclusivity or patent-expiration timeline for Sulfatrim-DS.

When do generic versions of Sulfatrim-DS launch and what is the generic entry risk?

Featured snippet answer: Generic entry risk is historically high for established TMP-SMX brands because the active ingredient is widely generic. The remaining risks for entrants tend to be supply chain, labeling differences, and formulation equivalency.

Paragraph IV challenge likelihood

For mature TMP-SMX formulations, Paragraph IV challenges are less common as the base product is already generic, unless:

  • a specific brand product has a still-listed, brand-specific formulation patent
  • or a new strength, concentration, or dosing device triggers a protected improvement

What could still delay generic competition

  • Product-specific manufacturing controls and quality/CMC comparability
  • Pediatric formulation stability constraints (suspension uniformity)
  • Shortages that temporarily lift pricing regardless of patent status

Market analysis for Sulfatrim-DS: demand drivers, pricing power, and competitive landscape

Featured snippet answer: Demand is steady and largely pediatric-driven; pricing is constrained by generic competition. Market share shifts typically track cost and availability rather than therapeutic differentiation.

Commercial drivers

  • Pediatric infection burden (upper/lower respiratory, skin/soft tissue, UTIs when susceptible)
  • Antimicrobial stewardship restrictions by guideline and local resistance
  • Formulary placement for low-cost TMP-SMX suspensions
  • Prescriber habits and pharmacy stocking behavior

Pricing and margin dynamics

For TMP-SMX suspension products, the typical pattern is:

  • high baseline volume but low unit margins
  • frequent price resets as additional generics enter or as wholesalers negotiate rebates
  • margin sensitivity to raw material costs and manufacturing yields

Competitor set (how the category competes)

Competition is primarily among:

  • multisource TMP-SMX oral suspension formulations
  • label-specific pediatric dosing concentration and excipient profiles
  • pharmacy substitution policies (automatic generic substitution where allowed)

Where brand differentiation can still exist

Even in multisource classes, differentiation can occur through:

  • taste masking and dosing accuracy
  • stability and shelf-life that reduce returns
  • reliable supply and contract pricing

Revenue projection for Sulfatrim-DS: base case, downside, and upside scenarios

Featured snippet answer: A credible revenue projection requires brand-level U.S. net sales history, unit volumes, concentration, payer mix, and contract pricing. None of those inputs are present here, so a complete numerical forecast cannot be produced.

What typically drives projection ranges in pediatric TMP-SMX suspensions

  • Pediatric population trends and prescribing rates
  • Market share erosion with each new generic entrant
  • Drug shortages and temporary price spikes
  • Competition from alternative antibiotic classes when guidelines shift

Projection structure used for mature antibiotic suspensions (template)

A forecast model normally breaks revenue into:

  1. Units sold by strength/concentration
  2. Net price after rebates, chargebacks, and wholesaler terms
  3. Market share by product and channel (retail vs institutional)
  4. Competitive actions (new entrants, list price changes, shortage dynamics)

Why a numeric forecast cannot be stated here

No verifiable Sulfatrim-DS brand metrics (net sales, units, market share, pricing, channel mix) or trial/regulatory milestones that would materially change trajectory are available in the provided context.


How does Sulfatrim-DS compare with other TMP-SMX oral suspensions (efficacy, dosing, and compliance)?

Featured snippet answer: Clinically, TMP-SMX effectiveness is driven by susceptibility and dosing adequacy. Oral suspension compliance and accurate measurement are the practical differentiators between brands and generics.

What to compare across products

  • mg/mL concentration and dosing table
  • excipients affecting tolerability (taste, viscosity)
  • shelf-life after opening (when applicable)
  • delivery device (oral syringe compatibility)
  • stability under real-world storage conditions

What manufacturing or formulation patents could affect Sulfatrim-DS availability?

Featured snippet answer: Even where active ingredient patents have lapsed, formulation and CMC controls can limit supply and slow entry for specific suspension formats.

CMC areas that often matter for liquid antibiotics

  • particle size distribution and suspension uniformity
  • moisture uptake and stability of sulfamethoxazole fractions
  • preservative system integrity and microbial limits
  • batching and filling tolerances

What litigation and settlements affect Sulfatrim-DS (patent disputes, supply agreements)?

Featured snippet answer: Litigation can affect supply and entry only if there are still-active brand-specific listed patents or if a later product improvement is protected. No drug-specific litigation or settlement records are provided here.


What is the FDA regulatory status of Sulfatrim-DS (NDA vs ANDA, labeling, and updates)?

Featured snippet answer: TMP-SMX suspensions in this category are typically marketed via ANDAs. Brand-specific labeling changes depend on updates to the approved prescribing information and pediatric dosing guidance.

How regulatory status typically impacts market outcomes

  • label expansions can change prescribing behavior
  • boxed warnings or safety communications can shift utilization patterns
  • formulation changes can affect substitution and contracting

Biosimilar risk and biologic replacement: does it apply to Sulfatrim-DS?

Featured snippet answer: No. Sulfatrim-DS is a small-molecule antibacterial, so biosimilar pathways and biologic replacement risk do not apply.


Key Takeaways

  • Sulfatrim-DS is a mature TMP-SMX antibacterial brand; clinical-development activity is typically limited to supporting studies, not new pivotal programs.
  • Generic competition is structurally the dominant market force; pricing and share depend on cost, availability, and formulary placement.
  • A numeric clinical-trial update and revenue projection require brand-specific trial, Orange Book, and net sales/volume data tied to the exact product; that data is not provided here.
  • Product-level CMC and formulation quality can still influence supply stability and practical patient access.

FAQs

  1. What infections are commonly treated with TMP-SMX pediatric suspensions like Sulfatrim-DS?
  2. How do TMP-SMX resistance patterns affect prescribing rates for oral suspension products?
  3. What formulation factors determine tolerability for TMP-SMX liquid in children?
  4. How does drug shortage history for TMP-SMX influence short-term pricing and prescribing?
  5. Do patent estates for old antibacterials typically block ANDA entry, or are they mainly off-patent by now?

References

  1. FDA Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (Accessed via FDA Orange Book database).
  2. FDA Drug Trials Snapshots and ClinicalTrials.gov. U.S. Food and Drug Administration / National Library of Medicine. (Accessed via respective databases).
  3. FDA Approved Labeling for TMP-SMX products and prescribing information resources. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.