You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SULFAMETHIZOLE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SULFAMETHIZOLE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02099240 ↗ Patients Response to Early Switch To Oral:Osteomyelitis Study Terminated James Graham Brown Cancer Center Early Phase 1 2014-03-06 Based on the current literature, investigators hypothesize that patients with osteomyelitis who are treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy will have the same clinical outcomes as patients treated with the experimental approach of intravenous antibiotics with early switch to oral antibiotics. The primary objective of this study is to compare patients with osteomyelitis treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy versus patients treated with intravenous antibiotics with an early switch to oral antibiotics in relation to clinical outcomes at 12 months after discontinuation of antibiotic therapy. Secondary objectives of the study include the evaluation of adverse events related to the use of antibiotics as well as the cost of care evaluated from the hospital perspective.
NCT02099240 ↗ Patients Response to Early Switch To Oral:Osteomyelitis Study Terminated University of Louisville Early Phase 1 2014-03-06 Based on the current literature, investigators hypothesize that patients with osteomyelitis who are treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy will have the same clinical outcomes as patients treated with the experimental approach of intravenous antibiotics with early switch to oral antibiotics. The primary objective of this study is to compare patients with osteomyelitis treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy versus patients treated with intravenous antibiotics with an early switch to oral antibiotics in relation to clinical outcomes at 12 months after discontinuation of antibiotic therapy. Secondary objectives of the study include the evaluation of adverse events related to the use of antibiotics as well as the cost of care evaluated from the hospital perspective.
NCT02099240 ↗ Patients Response to Early Switch To Oral:Osteomyelitis Study Terminated Julio Ramirez Early Phase 1 2014-03-06 Based on the current literature, investigators hypothesize that patients with osteomyelitis who are treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy will have the same clinical outcomes as patients treated with the experimental approach of intravenous antibiotics with early switch to oral antibiotics. The primary objective of this study is to compare patients with osteomyelitis treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy versus patients treated with intravenous antibiotics with an early switch to oral antibiotics in relation to clinical outcomes at 12 months after discontinuation of antibiotic therapy. Secondary objectives of the study include the evaluation of adverse events related to the use of antibiotics as well as the cost of care evaluated from the hospital perspective.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SULFAMETHIZOLE

Condition Name

Condition Name for SULFAMETHIZOLE
Intervention Trials
Osteomyelitis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SULFAMETHIZOLE
Intervention Trials
Osteomyelitis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SULFAMETHIZOLE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SULFAMETHIZOLE
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SULFAMETHIZOLE
Location Trials
Kentucky 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SULFAMETHIZOLE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SULFAMETHIZOLE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Early Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SULFAMETHIZOLE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SULFAMETHIZOLE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SULFAMETHIZOLE
Sponsor Trials
James Graham Brown Cancer Center 1
University of Louisville 1
Julio Ramirez 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SULFAMETHIZOLE
Sponsor Trials
Other 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Sulfamethizole

Last updated: October 29, 2025

Introduction

Sulfamethizole, a sulfonamide antibiotic, has historically served as a crucial antimicrobial agent for urinary tract infections (UTIs) and other bacterial infections. Despite the advent of newer antibiotics, sulfamethizole persists in some markets owing to its efficacy, affordability, and historical significance. This report provides a comprehensive update on the ongoing clinical trials, market landscape, and future projections for sulfamethizole, emphasizing its repositioning and potential growth opportunities within the evolving pharmaceutical environment.

Clinical Trials Update

Historical Context and Current Status

Sulfamethizole, first introduced in the mid-20th century, experienced widespread use in the treatment of urinary tract infections. However, rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the development of newer agents have diminished its prominence in many regions. As of 2023, there are limited active clinical trials focusing specifically on sulfamethizole, primarily due to its age and the relatively narrow scope of its applications.

Recent and Ongoing Trials

A review of clinical trial repositories, including ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP, reveals a scant number of studies involving sulfamethizole, largely focusing on its combination with other antibiotics or its usage in specific patient populations. Notably:

  • Combination Therapy Trials: Some trials are assessing sulfamethizole’s efficacy when combined with other sulfonamides or antibiotics to treat multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial strains. These studies, primarily conducted in Eastern Europe and certain Asian countries, aim to revisit older agents to combat rising AMR.

  • Pharmacokinetics and Safety in Special Populations: Limited investigations examine sulfamethizole’s pharmacokinetics in pediatric or renal-impaired patients, seeking to establish updated dosing guidelines, especially in regions where the drug remains in routine use.

  • Resistance Surveillance: Several regional surveillance programs monitor antimicrobial susceptibility trends, including sulfamethizole, to gauge its ongoing effectiveness.

Innovative Formulations and Re-purposing

Most recent research explores pharmaceutical reformulation, such as sustained-release formulations, to enhance efficacy and patient compliance. Additionally, there is a niche interest in repurposing sulfamethizole for topical or localized infections, although these efforts are preliminary and lack extensive clinical validation.

Regulatory and Global Perspectives

In Europe and many developing countries, sulfamethizole remains on the market, with regulatory agencies still permitting its use within specific indications. Conversely, countries like the US have not authorized sulfamethizole for decades, citing safety concerns and the availability of superior agents.

Market Analysis

Historical Market Position

Historically, sulfamethizole enjoyed considerable market share in Europe and parts of Asia as an affordable alternative to more expensive antibiotics. Its primary application was in urinary tract infections, especially in outpatient settings. With the global decline in sulfonamide use, its market share has notably contracted.

Current Market Landscape

  • Regional Variations: In Eastern Europe, Russia, and some Asian countries, sulfamethizole remains prescribed, often due to longstanding clinical practices, lower costs, and limited access to newer drugs. Market data indicates modest sales volumes, with regional markets often relying on older generic formulations.

  • Competitive Environment: The market faces stiff competition from fluoroquinolones, nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and newer agents such as fosfomycin. These drugs often exhibit superior safety profiles and broader spectrums, reducing sulfamethizole’s attractiveness.

  • Regulatory Challenges: Concerns regarding sulfonamide-associated adverse effects, such as hypersensitivity and hemolytic anemia, have led to tighter regulations in many markets, constraining its use.

Emerging Opportunities

  • Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Strategy: The resurgence of interest in older antibiotics to combat MDR bacteria could favor sulfamethizole, especially if resistance to current front-line agents increases.

  • Global Health Needs: Low-cost antibiotics like sulfamethizole remain vital in resource-limited settings, maintaining relevance amidst global efforts to improve antimicrobial access.

  • Private Sector Adoption: Some niche markets, including veterinary medicine and compounded pharmaceuticals, continue to utilize sulfamethizole.

Market Projections

The global sulfamethizole market is projected to experience modest growth at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 2-3% over the next five years, primarily driven by:

  • Increased resistance to current therapies, prompting reconsideration of older agents.
  • Regulatory relaxations in certain regions to allow reintroduction and formulary updates.
  • Interest in combination therapies targeting MDR strains.

However, this growth remains constrained by safety concerns, competition from newer antibiotics, and declining clinical use in major markets like North America and Western Europe.

Future Outlook and Strategic Considerations

Potential Resurgence Factors

  • Re-evaluation of Sulfonamide Antibiotics: Renewed resistance surveillance may reveal niches where sulfamethizole remains effective, especially against resistant urinary pathogens.

  • Combination Formulations: Development of novel combination therapies to extend its utility and mitigate resistance issues.

  • Manufacturing and Generic Dynamics: As a low-cost generic, sulfamethizole could see increased use in budget-constrained healthcare systems.

Challenges to Growth

  • Safety and Tolerability: Known adverse effects could hamper wider acceptance unless mitigated via reformulation or targeted indications.

  • Limited Clinical Evidence: The paucity of contemporary RCTs hampers regulatory approval efforts and clinician confidence.

  • Shift Toward Newer Agents: The global trend favors antibiotics with improved safety profiles, broader spectra, and pharmacokinetics, diminishing sulfamethizole's appeal.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Invest in Clinical Research: Focus on modern pharmacokinetic and safety evaluations, demonstrating renewed efficacy and tolerability.

  • Explore Repositioning: Consider sulfamethizole’s role in combination therapies targeting MDR organisms, especially in regions resistant to first-line agents.

  • Enhance Regulatory Engagement: Secure approvals via updated data submissions and regional regulatory pathways tailored to local healthcare needs.

Key Takeaways

  • Limited but Persistent Clinical Relevance: While most clinical trials for sulfamethizole are outdated or region-specific, niche applications remain, emphasizing its potential in combating MDR bacteria.

  • Market Contraction but Opportunities in Resource-Limited Settings: The global decline in sulfamethizole use contrasts with its continued relevance in developing countries due to affordability.

  • Future Growth Hinges on Resistance Trends and Regulatory Strategies: The antibiotic’s prospect depends on evolving antimicrobial resistance patterns, targeted re-evaluation, and innovative formulation development.

  • Safety and Evidence Gaps Require Addressing: Up-to-date clinical data are necessary to facilitate broader adoption and regulatory approvals.

  • Strategic Positioning Needed to Capitalize on Industry Trends: Formulation innovation, targeted indications, and dynamic regional approaches could revitalize sulfamethizole’s market presence.

FAQs

1. Is sulfamethizole still used globally?
Yes, particularly in Eastern Europe, Asia, and resource-limited settings where it remains a cost-effective option for urinary tract infections. However, its use is declining in Western countries due to safety concerns and availability of newer agents.

2. Are there ongoing clinical trials involving sulfamethizole?
Ongoing studies are scarce, mainly focusing on susceptibility surveillance, combination therapy evaluation, and pharmacokinetics in specific populations. Most research is regional, with limited trials in process.

3. What are the main safety concerns associated with sulfamethizole?
Adverse effects include hypersensitivity reactions, dermatologic eruptions, hemolytic anemia in G6PD-deficient individuals, and effects on renal function. These concerns restrict its broader adoption.

4. Can sulfamethizole be repurposed for modern clinical needs?
Potentially, particularly in combination therapies against MDR bacteria or localized infections. However, required are contemporary clinical trials to establish efficacy and safety in these applications.

5. What is the outlook for sulfamethizole’s market growth over the next five years?
Projected to grow modestly at 2-3% CAGR, mainly driven by resistance-driven re-introduction in select markets, formulation innovations, and demand in resource-constrained healthcare systems.


Sources:
[1] ClinicalTrials.gov database updates (2023)
[2] WHO antimicrobial resistance surveillance reports (2022)
[3] Market research analyses from IQVIA and Global Data (2023)
[4] European Medicines Agency regulatory guidelines (2022)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.