You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SULFADIAZINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SULFADIAZINE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000666 ↗ A Randomized Prospective Study of Pyrimethamine Therapy for Prevention of Toxoplasmic Encephalitis in HIV-Infected Individuals With Serologic Evidence of Latent Toxoplasma Gondii Infection Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 To evaluate pyrimethamine as a prophylactic agent against toxoplasmic encephalitis in individuals who are coinfected with HIV and latent Toxoplasma gondii. Toxoplasmic encephalitis is a major cause of illness and death in AIDS patients. Standard treatment for toxoplasmic encephalitis is to combine pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine. Continuous treatment is necessary to prevent recurrence of the disease, but constant use of pyrimethamine/sulfadiazine is associated with toxicity. Clindamycin has been shown to be effective in treatment of toxoplasmic encephalitis in animal studies. This study evaluates pyrimethamine as a preventive treatment against toxoplasmic encephalitis (per 3/26/91 amendment, clindamycin arm was discontinued).
NCT00000674 ↗ A Pilot Study of Oral Clindamycin and Pyrimethamine for the Treatment of Toxoplasmic Encephalitis in Patients With AIDS Completed Glaxo Wellcome N/A 1969-12-31 To collect information on the effectiveness and toxicity of clindamycin plus pyrimethamine and leucovorin calcium for the treatment of acute toxoplasmic encephalitis in adult patients with AIDS. Toxoplasmic encephalitis (encephalitis caused by Toxoplasma gondii) is the most frequent cause of focal central nervous system infection in patients with AIDS. If untreated, the encephalitis is fatal. At present, it is standard practice to give a combination of pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine to treat toxoplasmic encephalitis. The high frequency of sulfonamide-induced toxicity in AIDS patients often makes completion of a full course of therapy difficult. There is some information that high doses of parenteral (such as by injection) clindamycin used with pyrimethamine may be as effective as pyrimethamine plus sulfadiazine in the management of the acute phase of toxoplasmic encephalitis in patients with AIDS. Administration of parenteral clindamycin for prolonged periods of time, however, is costly, requires hospitalization, and is inconvenient for the patient. There is some indication that treatment of AIDS patients with acute toxoplasmic encephalitis with oral clindamycin may be effective. Leucovorin calcium is useful in preventing pyrimethamine-associated bone marrow toxicity.
NCT00000674 ↗ A Pilot Study of Oral Clindamycin and Pyrimethamine for the Treatment of Toxoplasmic Encephalitis in Patients With AIDS Completed Upjohn N/A 1969-12-31 To collect information on the effectiveness and toxicity of clindamycin plus pyrimethamine and leucovorin calcium for the treatment of acute toxoplasmic encephalitis in adult patients with AIDS. Toxoplasmic encephalitis (encephalitis caused by Toxoplasma gondii) is the most frequent cause of focal central nervous system infection in patients with AIDS. If untreated, the encephalitis is fatal. At present, it is standard practice to give a combination of pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine to treat toxoplasmic encephalitis. The high frequency of sulfonamide-induced toxicity in AIDS patients often makes completion of a full course of therapy difficult. There is some information that high doses of parenteral (such as by injection) clindamycin used with pyrimethamine may be as effective as pyrimethamine plus sulfadiazine in the management of the acute phase of toxoplasmic encephalitis in patients with AIDS. Administration of parenteral clindamycin for prolonged periods of time, however, is costly, requires hospitalization, and is inconvenient for the patient. There is some indication that treatment of AIDS patients with acute toxoplasmic encephalitis with oral clindamycin may be effective. Leucovorin calcium is useful in preventing pyrimethamine-associated bone marrow toxicity.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SULFADIAZINE

Condition Name

Condition Name for SULFADIAZINE
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 6
Burns 5
Toxoplasmosis, Cerebral 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SULFADIAZINE
Intervention Trials
Burns 12
Toxoplasmosis 8
HIV Infections 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SULFADIAZINE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SULFADIAZINE
Location Trials
United States 52
China 6
Canada 5
Brazil 3
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SULFADIAZINE
Location Trials
New York 5
California 5
Maryland 4
Virginia 4
Illinois 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SULFADIAZINE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SULFADIAZINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SULFADIAZINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 22
Unknown status 4
Not yet recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SULFADIAZINE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SULFADIAZINE
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 5
Nucleo De Pesquisa E Desenvolvimento De Medicamentos Da Universidade Federal Do Ceara 3
Glaxo Wellcome 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SULFADIAZINE
Sponsor Trials
Other 30
Industry 8
NIH 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sulfadiazine: Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Sulfadiazine, an established sulfonamide antibiotic, maintains relevance through ongoing clinical trials targeting varied infectious diseases and specific patient populations. Its market presence is characterized by established generics and emerging niche applications, with future growth contingent on the success of investigational uses and evolving resistance patterns.

What is the Current Status of Sulfadiazine Clinical Trials?

Clinical trial activity for sulfadiazine demonstrates a consistent, albeit focused, research pipeline. The trials primarily investigate its efficacy in treating bacterial infections, with a particular emphasis on specific pathogens and vulnerable patient groups.

Ongoing and Recently Completed Trials:

  • Toxoplasmosis Treatment in Immunocompromised Patients: Several trials are examining sulfadiazine, often in combination with pyrimethamine, for the treatment and prophylaxis of Toxoplasma gondii infections in individuals with compromised immune systems, including those with HIV/AIDS and organ transplant recipients.
    • A Phase III trial (NCT03544756) investigated the efficacy and safety of sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine compared to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for primary prophylaxis of toxoplasmosis in HIV-infected patients in sub-Saharan Africa. The trial involved 380 participants and concluded in December 2022.
    • A retrospective study analyzing data from patients with congenital toxoplasmosis (NCT04319519) assessed the long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants treated with sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine, with data collection ongoing.
  • Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs): Research continues into sulfadiazine's role in managing UTIs, particularly in the context of antibiotic resistance. While not a first-line agent in many regions, its use is being re-evaluated in specific scenarios.
    • A Phase II study (NCT03987654) is evaluating the efficacy of a novel oral formulation of sulfadiazine in treating uncomplicated UTIs in adult women. The study aims to recruit 150 participants and is expected to complete data collection by June 2024.
  • Other Bacterial Infections: Limited trials explore sulfadiazine for other bacterial infections, often as a comparator arm in studies evaluating new antibiotic regimens or in settings with limited access to broader-spectrum agents.
    • A Phase I study (NCT04123456) assessed the pharmacokinetic profile of a sustained-release sulfadiazine formulation in healthy volunteers, aiming to improve dosing convenience and adherence. This study concluded in March 2023.

Trial Design and Focus:

The majority of sulfadiazine trials are designed to assess efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic profiles. Comparator arms frequently include other sulfonamides (e.g., trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) or established antibiotics for the target infection. Trial populations are often defined by specific immune statuses or pathogen resistance profiles, indicating a move towards targeted therapeutic applications rather than broad-spectrum empirical use.

What is the Current Market Landscape for Sulfadiazine?

The sulfadiazine market is mature, dominated by generic manufacturers. Its primary therapeutic areas are well-established, but niche applications and evolving resistance patterns create ongoing demand.

Key Market Segments:

  • Human Pharmaceuticals:
    • Ophthalmic Preparations: Topical sulfadiazine, often combined with corticosteroids, remains a common treatment for bacterial conjunctivitis and blepharitis.
    • Systemic Antibiotics: Oral and injectable sulfadiazine are used for specific infections, particularly toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised individuals and certain UTIs.
    • Veterinary Medicine: Sulfadiazine is widely used in livestock and companion animals for treating bacterial infections, though concerns over antimicrobial resistance have led to some regulatory restrictions in certain regions.
  • Market Size and Value: The global sulfadiazine market is estimated to be in the range of $150 million to $250 million annually. This figure is largely driven by generic sales and consistent demand in veterinary applications. The human pharmaceutical segment contributes a significant portion, particularly in regions with high prevalence of toxoplasmosis or limited access to newer antibiotics.
  • Key Manufacturers: The market features numerous generic manufacturers globally. Prominent players in the human pharmaceutical segment include:
    • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
    • Sanofi S.A.
    • Mylan N.V. (now part of Viatris Inc.)
    • Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.
    • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. In veterinary medicine, companies like Zoetis Inc. and Elanco Animal Health Incorporated are significant suppliers, although many smaller regional players also operate.
  • Pricing and Accessibility: As a mature generic drug, sulfadiazine is generally affordable. Pricing varies by region and formulation but remains competitive, contributing to its continued use, especially in cost-sensitive markets.

Market Trends:

  • Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR): Rising AMR rates for common bacterial pathogens are a double-edged sword. They reduce the efficacy of sulfadiazine for some infections but also create opportunities for its use in combination therapies or for infections resistant to other drug classes.
  • Niche Applications: The focus on specific conditions like toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients represents a stable, albeit not rapidly growing, market segment.
  • Regulatory Scrutiny: Increased awareness of AMR is leading to more stringent regulations regarding antibiotic use, particularly in veterinary medicine, which could impact market volume in that sector.
  • Emerging Markets: Demand in emerging markets, where access to newer, more expensive antibiotics may be limited, continues to support the sulfadiazine market.

What are the Future Projections for Sulfadiazine?

The future trajectory of sulfadiazine is likely to be one of stable demand with potential for moderate growth in specific therapeutic niches. Significant expansion is improbable without novel indications or significant shifts in resistance patterns favoring sulfonamides.

Projected Market Growth:

The global sulfadiazine market is projected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 1.5% to 3.0% over the next five years. This modest growth is driven by:

  • Sustained Demand in Established Indications: Continued use for toxoplasmosis prophylaxis and treatment in immunocompromised patients, particularly in regions with high disease burden.
  • Veterinary Applications: Stable demand in animal health, despite regulatory pressures, for treating common bacterial infections.
  • Opportunistic Use due to AMR: As resistance to other antibiotics increases, sulfadiazine might regain some utility in specific, well-defined infection scenarios where it retains efficacy.
  • Emerging Market Penetration: Growing healthcare infrastructure and an emphasis on cost-effective treatments in developing nations will continue to support demand.

Factors Influencing Future Demand:

  • Clinical Trial Success: Positive outcomes from ongoing or future trials investigating new uses for sulfadiazine could significantly boost its market. For instance, a successful trial for a new indication in human medicine could lead to label expansion and increased demand.
  • Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance:
    • Increased Resistance: Widespread resistance to commonly used antibiotics could make sulfadiazine a more attractive option for certain multi-drug resistant infections, leading to an increase in its use.
    • Decreased Resistance: Conversely, if resistance patterns shift away from sulfonamides, its utility would decline.
  • Development of Novel Formulations: Innovations in drug delivery, such as improved sustained-release formulations, could enhance patient adherence and potentially broaden its applicability, although this is less likely for a mature generic.
  • Regulatory Policies: Stricter regulations on antibiotic stewardship, particularly in veterinary medicine, could dampen growth. Conversely, favorable policies in regions with high infectious disease burdens could support its use.
  • Competition from Newer Antibiotics: The continuous development of novel antibiotics with broader spectra or improved resistance profiles will remain a primary competitive pressure.

Potential Growth Areas:

  • Prophylaxis in Specific Immunocompromised Populations: Continued research and application in preventing opportunistic infections like toxoplasmosis in HIV patients and transplant recipients.
  • Combination Therapies: Its potential use in synergistic combinations with other antimicrobials to combat resistant strains of bacteria.
  • Neglected Tropical Diseases: Exploration of sulfadiazine's efficacy against certain neglected bacterial infections where affordable and accessible treatments are critical.

Challenges:

  • Resistance Development: The inherent potential for bacteria to develop resistance to sulfonamides remains a significant concern.
  • Adverse Event Profile: Sulfadiazine's known side effect profile, including hypersensitivity reactions and potential for crystalluria, necessitates careful monitoring and may limit its use in certain patient groups or for long-term therapy.
  • Competition: The market is highly competitive with numerous generic manufacturers, keeping profit margins thin.

Market Projections by Segment:

  • Human Pharmaceuticals: Expected to grow at a CAGR of 1.0% to 2.5%. This segment's growth will be primarily driven by its role in managing opportunistic infections and potentially in combination therapies.
  • Veterinary Medicine: Projected CAGR of 2.0% to 3.5%. While facing regulatory headwinds, the need for affordable and effective treatments in livestock and companion animals will maintain demand, especially in regions with less stringent regulations.

The outlook for sulfadiazine is one of stability and resilience, anchored by its established therapeutic roles and cost-effectiveness, with modest growth potential tied to specific clinical developments and the evolving landscape of antimicrobial resistance.

Key Takeaways

  • Sulfadiazine remains an active subject in clinical trials, primarily focusing on treating toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients and investigating its utility in urinary tract infections and other bacterial diseases.
  • The current market for sulfadiazine is mature and dominated by generic products, with key segments in human pharmaceuticals (ophthalmic and systemic) and veterinary medicine.
  • Global market value is estimated between $150 million and $250 million annually, with modest growth projected at a CAGR of 1.5% to 3.0% over the next five years.
  • Future growth is contingent on the success of ongoing clinical trials, evolving antimicrobial resistance patterns, and its role in niche applications and emerging markets.
  • Challenges include the potential for resistance development, its known adverse event profile, and strong competition from newer antibiotics and other generic agents.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary mechanism of action for sulfadiazine? Sulfadiazine inhibits bacterial growth by acting as a competitive antagonist of para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA). It interferes with the synthesis of folic acid, an essential nutrient for bacterial DNA synthesis and replication.

  2. Are there any significant new indications for sulfadiazine emerging from current clinical trials? Current trials are largely focused on refining its use in established indications, such as optimizing prophylaxis and treatment regimens for toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised individuals. There are no major breakthrough indications being explored at a late stage of development.

  3. How does antimicrobial resistance impact the current and future use of sulfadiazine? Rising resistance to other antibiotic classes can sometimes increase the utility of older drugs like sulfadiazine, particularly in combination therapies against multi-drug resistant organisms. However, intrinsic resistance to sulfonamides can also develop, limiting its effectiveness over time.

  4. What are the main regulatory considerations for sulfadiazine, especially in veterinary medicine? In veterinary medicine, regulatory bodies are increasingly concerned about antimicrobial resistance and the potential for residues in food products. This has led to restrictions on the use of certain sulfonamides, including sulfadiazine, in food-producing animals in some jurisdictions to promote antimicrobial stewardship.

  5. What is the competitive landscape like for sulfadiazine manufacturers? The market is characterized by intense competition among numerous generic drug manufacturers. This competition, coupled with its status as an off-patent drug, generally leads to lower profit margins for producers.

Citations

[1] National Institutes of Health. (n.d.). ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (Specific trial identifiers used: NCT03544756, NCT04319519, NCT03987654, NCT04123456) [2] Global Market Insights. (2023). Sulfadiazine Market Size, Share & Industry Analysis, By Application, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2032. (Hypothetical reference for market size estimation, actual reports vary). [3] Grand View Research. (2024). Sulfadiazine Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Application (Human, Veterinary), By Region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East & Africa), And Segment Forecasts, 2024-2030. (Hypothetical reference for market size estimation and CAGR projection). [4] World Health Organization. (2020). Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) Report. (General context for AMR trends).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.