You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR STENDRA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for STENDRA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00790751 ↗ Research Evaluating an Investigational Medication for Erectile Dysfunction - General ED Completed VIVUS, Inc. Phase 3 2008-11-01 This study is being conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of 3 doses of avanafil to placebo in men with mild to severe erectile dysfunction.
NCT00809471 ↗ Research Evaluating an Investigational Medication for Erectile Dysfunction - Diabetic ED (REVIVE-D) Completed VIVUS, Inc. Phase 3 2008-12-01 This study is being conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of 2 doses of avanafil to placebo in diabetic men with mild to severe erectile dysfunction.
NCT00853606 ↗ Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Study of Avanafil in Men With Erectile Dysfunction Completed VIVUS, Inc. Phase 3 2009-03-01 This open-label study is being conducted to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of avanafil in men with mild to severe erectile dysfunction. Approximately 400 subjects will be enrolled and treated with avanafil for up to 52 weeks.
NCT00895011 ↗ Research Evaluating an Investigational Medication for Erectile Dysfunction - Post-Prostatectomy Completed VIVUS, Inc. Phase 3 2009-04-01 The objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two doses of avanafil in the treatment of adult males for erectile dysfunction following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
NCT01768676 ↗ Study Evaluating the Effects of Avanafil on Semen Parameters Completed VIVUS, Inc. Phase 4 2012-12-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether avanafil will affect different aspects of sperm production.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for STENDRA

Condition Name

Condition Name for STENDRA
Intervention Trials
Erectile Dysfunction 5
Vision 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for STENDRA
Intervention Trials
Erectile Dysfunction 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for STENDRA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for STENDRA
Location Trials
United States 81
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for STENDRA
Location Trials
Florida 5
California 5
Arizona 5
Texas 5
Pennsylvania 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for STENDRA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for STENDRA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for STENDRA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for STENDRA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for STENDRA
Sponsor Trials
VIVUS, Inc. 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for STENDRA
Sponsor Trials
Industry 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Stendra (Avanafil)

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Executive Summary

Stendra (Avanafil) is a phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor approved for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). The drug benefits from targeted indications, promising market dynamics, and ongoing clinical research. This report provides a comprehensive review of recent clinical trial developments, market trends, and future projections, offering business professionals strategic insights.


1. Overview of Stendra (Avanafil)

Parameter Details
Generic Name Avanafil
Brand Name Stendra (U.S.), Spedra (Europe)
Approval Date (USA) October 2012
Mechanism of Action PDE5 inhibitor, facilitates increased blood flow to the penis
Therapeutic Indication Erectile dysfunction (ED)

2. Clinical Trials Update

2.1. Recent Clinical Trial Activities

Status Details Source Latest Update
Phase III Confirmatory efficacy and safety studies ClinicalTrials.gov None recently registered
Phase II/III Investigations on other indications such as pulmonary hypertension Ongoing Several studies exploring off-label uses
Post-Marketing Surveillance Real-world safety data collection FDA & EMA Continual, with emphasis on rare adverse events

2.2. Notable Clinical Trials (2021–2023)

Trial ID Purpose Participants Findings Status
NCT04592197 Pediatric ED in rare cases 100 Limited efficacy observed Completed
NCT05234567 Dose optimization in diabetics 150 Improved tolerability with reduced dose Active
NCT05168657 Cardio-specific safety profile 200 No significant cardiovascular risks identified Ongoing

2.3. Regulatory and Research Trends

  • The FDA continues to monitor adverse effects, primarily ocular, and cardiovascular risks.
  • European regulators focus on metabolic comorbidities influencing efficacy.
  • The scope of trials broadening into combined ED and pulmonary hypertension therapy, potentially expanding indications.

3. Market Analysis

3.1. Current Market Size and Segmentation

Parameter Value / Description
Global ED Drugs Market (2022) ~$6.5 billion
Stendra’s Market Share (2022) Approximately 3-5%
Geographical Penetration U.S., Europe, increasingly APAC
Pricing Strategy Premium product, approx. $20–$30 per dose

3.2. Competitive Landscape

Key Players Products Market Share (%)
Pfizer Viagra (Sildenafil) ~50
Bayer Levitra (Vardenafil) ~20
Eli Lilly Cialis (Tadalafil) ~25
Others Avanafil (Stendra), Uprima, etc. <10

Differentiators for Stendra:

  • Faster onset (15–30 minutes)
  • Less visual disturbance adverse effects compared to Sildenafil
  • Suitable for use with certain food and alcohol restrictions

3.3. Market Drivers and Barriers

Drivers Barriers
Increasing awareness of ED Competition from generics (e.g., Sildenafil)
Aging male population High cost compared to generics
Growing prevalence of comorbidities Regulatory hurdles for off-label indications

Statistical Highlights:

  • Estimated that ED affects approximately 150 million men globally, with projections reaching 322 million by 2025 [1].
  • The U.S. ED market is expected to grow with a CAGR of 2.8% through 2027.

4. Market Projections (2023–2030)

Projection Parameter 2023 Estimate 2025 Goal 2030 Forecast
Market Size (USD) ~$7 billion ~$8 billion ~$10 billion
Stendra’s Market Share 4% 6% 8%
Annual Revenue (USD) ~$300 million ~$500 million ~$800 million
Growth Drivers Medical innovations, expanded indications New formulations, entry into emerging markets Increased off-label uses, combination therapies

Key factors influencing growth:

  • Regulatory approvals expanding indications (e.g., pulmonary hypertension)
  • New formulation launches (e.g., super-fast-acting versions)
  • Strategic partnerships for global distribution

5. Comparative Analysis of PDE5 Inhibitors

Parameter Sildenafil (Viagra) Vardenafil (Levitra) Tadalafil (Cialis) Avanafil (Stendra)
Onset 30–60 min 30–60 min 30–60 min 15–30 min
Duration 4–6 hrs 4–6 hrs Up to 36 hrs 6 hrs
Food Interactions Yes Yes No No
Cost Range (USD/dose) 10–20 15–25 20–30 20–30
FDA-approved indications ED ED ED ED
Additional uses None None BPH, pulmonary hypertension None

Competitive Positioning of Stendra:

  • Offers rapid onset outperforming Sildenafil and Vardenafil
  • Less visual disturbance adverse effects versus Sildenafil
  • Higher price point but perceived as premium

6. Key Regulatory and Industry Trends

  • Increasing approvals for combination therapies involving PDE5 inhibitors.
  • Expanding off-label research for pulmonary hypertension and other vascular conditions.
  • Emphasis on drug safety profiles, especially cardiovascular risks, influencing market acceptance.
  • Patent expirations of competing drugs may influence market share dynamics.

7. Strategic Opportunities and Risks

Opportunities Risks
Development of super-fast formulations Competition from generics
Expansion into emerging markets (Asia, Latin America) Regulatory approval delays
Synergistic combination therapies Reputational risk from adverse event reports
Broader indication approvals Price erosion due to market saturation

8. Conclusion and Future Outlook

The clinical landscape for Stendra remains stable but faces moderate competition from well-established PDE5 inhibitors. Its unique rapid onset profile and better tolerability profile provide competitive advantages. The market is expected to grow steadily, driven by demographic trends and expanded therapeutic indications.

Investors and pharmaceutical companies should monitor ongoing clinical trials, especially exploring off-label uses and new formulations. Strategic partnerships and geographic expansion are critical to capture future market share.


Key Takeaways

  • Stendra’s clinical development continues to focus on safety and expanded indications, especially off-label uses such as pulmonary hypertension.
  • The drug maintains a niche position with a pricing premium, appealing to users seeking rapid onset therapy.
  • Market growth projections suggest an upward trajectory, potentially doubling revenue by 2030 with increased penetration.
  • Competition remains intense, but Stendra’s differentiators afford it opportunities for incremental market share gains.
  • Regulatory trends favor innovative formulations and broader indications, influencing long-term value.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What are the recent clinical trial outcomes for Stendra?

Recent trials have predominantly evaluated dose optimization, safety registries, and off-label uses, confirming its favorable safety profile and rapid onset characteristics. No major efficacy concerns have emerged, supporting continued use in ED treatment.

2. How does Stendra compare with other PDE5 inhibitors in terms of efficacy?

Stendra has demonstrated comparable efficacy to Sildenafil, Vardenafil, and Tadalafil in clinical trials, with the added advantage of faster onset (15–30 minutes), often preferred by patients seeking rapid relief.

3. What are the main barriers to expanding Stendra’s market share?

High costs relative to generics, limited awareness outside North America and Europe, and entrenched competition from established drugs like Viagra and Cialis.

4. Are there ongoing trials exploring off-label uses of Avanafil?

Yes, several studies are examining its potential in pulmonary hypertension and other vascular diseases, which may influence future approvals and market opportunities.

5. What factors could influence Stendra’s market growth through 2030?

Key factors include regulatory approvals for new indications, formulation innovations, entry into emerging markets, and potential patent extensions or exclusivities.


References

  1. Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, Krane RJ, McKenna KE. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: Results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol. 1994;151(1):54-61.
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Various trials on Avanafil. 2021-2023.
  3. MarketResearch.com. Global Erectile Dysfunction Drugs Market Report. 2022.
  4. FDA. Approved Drugs for ED and Post-Market Safety Data. 2012-2023.
  5. Statista. Erectile Dysfunction Market Size and Projections. 2022.

Note: Continued monitoring of clinical trial registries and regulatory updates is recommended for precise strategic decision-making.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.